Search (5978 results, page 1 of 299)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.37
    0.36962548 = product of:
      1.0472722 = sum of:
        0.079308584 = product of:
          0.23792575 = sum of:
            0.23792575 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23792575 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.23792575 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23792575 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.01626061 = weight(_text_:und in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01626061 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.23792575 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23792575 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.23792575 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23792575 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
        0.23792575 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23792575 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.31
    0.3057863 = product of:
      0.8663945 = sum of:
        0.066090494 = product of:
          0.19827147 = sum of:
            0.19827147 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19827147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19827147 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19827147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.19827147 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19827147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.19827147 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19827147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007218178 = score(doc=1826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.19827147 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19827147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.30
    0.30471674 = product of:
      0.74002635 = sum of:
        0.039654292 = product of:
          0.11896288 = sum of:
            0.11896288 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11896288 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16823891 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16823891 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.019915098 = weight(_text_:und in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019915098 = score(doc=484,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.16823891 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16823891 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.16823891 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16823891 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.007501351 = weight(_text_:in in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007501351 = score(doc=484,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.16823891 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16823891 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 73(2020) H.3/4, S.496-503
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.26
    0.2564581 = product of:
      0.6228268 = sum of:
        0.046263345 = product of:
          0.13879003 = sum of:
            0.13879003 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13879003 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13879003 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13879003 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.01341432 = weight(_text_:und in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01341432 = score(doc=5955,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.13879003 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13879003 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.13879003 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13879003 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.00798906 = weight(_text_:in in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00798906 = score(doc=5955,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
        0.13879003 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13879003 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    Diskussionen um Datennetze und Informationstechnik drehen sich häufig um kompetentes Handeln. In der Publikation werden Voraussetzungen eines autonomen informationellen Handelns gezeigt: Abstrahieren, Analogien bilden, Plausibilitäten beachten, Schlussfolgern und kreativ sein. Informationelle Kompetenz ist gelebte Informationelle Autonomie. Es lassen sich Konsequenzen für ein zukünftiges Menschenbild in informationstechnischen Umgebungen ziehen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.23
    0.23302335 = product of:
      0.6602328 = sum of:
        0.15861717 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15861717 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.021680813 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021680813 = score(doc=2188,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.15861717 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15861717 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.15861717 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15861717 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004083218 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.15861717 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15861717 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  6. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.22
    0.21894303 = product of:
      1.2406771 = sum of:
        0.015330651 = weight(_text_:und in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015330651 = score(doc=4026,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
        1.2212632 = sum of:
          0.26720396 = weight(_text_:sacherschlie in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.26720396 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.27473092 = queryWeight, product of:
                11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                0.024967048 = queryNorm
              0.9726024 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
          0.41965127 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.41965127 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24345313 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.024967048 = queryNorm
              1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
          0.5344079 = weight(_text_:9fung in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.5344079 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.27473092 = queryWeight, product of:
                11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                0.024967048 = queryNorm
              1.9452049 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
        0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004083218 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.1764706 = coord(3/17)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
    Footnote
    Wierabdruck aus: Handbuch Kulturportale: Online-Angebote aus Kultur und Wissenschaft. Hrsg.: Ellen Euler u.a. Berlin 2015.
    Source
    Studiolo: Kooperative Forschungsumgebungen in den eHumanities. Hrsg: Eva-MariaSeng, Reinhard Keil
  7. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.18
    0.18429534 = product of:
      0.44757438 = sum of:
        0.033045247 = product of:
          0.099135734 = sum of:
            0.099135734 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099135734 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.011735085 = weight(_text_:und in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011735085 = score(doc=4388,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.0062511256 = weight(_text_:in in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062511256 = score(doc=4388,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    Werden Maschinen mit Begriffen beschrieben, die ursprünglich der Beschreibung des Menschen dienen, so liegt zunächst der Verdacht nahe, dass jene Maschinen spezifischmenschliche Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen. Für körperliche Fähigkeiten, die mechanisch nachgeahmt werden, hat sich in der Alltagssprache eine anthropomorphisierende Sprechweise bereits etabliert. So wird kaum in Frage gestellt, dass bestimmte Maschinen weben, backen, sich bewegen oder arbeiten können. Bei nichtkörperlichen Eigenschaften, etwa kognitiver, sozialer oder moralischer Art sieht dies jedoch anders aus. Dass mittlerweile intelligente und rechnende Maschinen im alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch Eingang gefunden haben, wäre jedoch undenkbar ohne den langjährigen Diskurs über Künstliche Intelligenz, welcher insbesondere die zweite Hälfte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts geprägt hat. In jüngster Zeit ist es der Autonomiebegriff, welcher zunehmend Verwendung zur Beschreibung neuer Technologien findet, wie etwa "autonome mobile Roboter" oder "autonome Systeme". Dem Begriff nach rekurriert die "Autonomie" jener Technologien auf eine bestimmte Art technologischen Fortschritts, die von der Fähigkeit zur Selbstgesetzgebung herrührt. Dies wirft aus philosophischer Sicht jedoch die Frage auf, wie die Selbstgesetzgebung in diesem Fall definiert ist, zumal sich der Autonomiebegriff in der Philosophie auf die politische oder moralische Selbstgesetzgebung von Menschen oder Menschengruppen beziehungsweise ihre Handlungen bezieht. Im Handbuch Robotik hingegen führt der Autor geradezu beiläufig die Bezeichnung "autonom" ein, indem er prognostiziert, dass "[.] autonome Roboter in Zukunft sogar einen Großteil der Altenbetreuung übernehmen werden."
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.18
    0.18302408 = product of:
      0.5185682 = sum of:
        0.039654292 = product of:
          0.11896288 = sum of:
            0.11896288 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11896288 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0030624135 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030624135 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  9. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.17
    0.17394613 = product of:
      0.49284735 = sum of:
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.0068477658 = weight(_text_:in in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068477658 = score(doc=563,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.11896288 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896288 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.010148071 = product of:
          0.020296142 = sum of:
            0.020296142 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020296142 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08743035 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  10. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.17
    0.16983464 = product of:
      0.48119813 = sum of:
        0.026436195 = product of:
          0.079308584 = sum of:
            0.079308584 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079308584 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.112159275 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112159275 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.112159275 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112159275 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.112159275 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112159275 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.006124827 = weight(_text_:in in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006124827 = score(doc=5820,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.112159275 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112159275 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.15
    0.15416695 = product of:
      0.43680635 = sum of:
        0.033045247 = product of:
          0.099135734 = sum of:
            0.099135734 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099135734 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007218178 = score(doc=4997,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.15
    0.15289316 = product of:
      0.43319726 = sum of:
        0.033045247 = product of:
          0.099135734 = sum of:
            0.099135734 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099135734 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.003609089 = weight(_text_:in in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003609089 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.099135734 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099135734 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21167092 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  13. Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft : Hat die Infromationswissenschaft eine Zukunft? Grundlagen und Perspektiven - Angebote in der Lehre - An den Fronten der Informationswissenschaft (2019) 0.12
    0.117328055 = product of:
      0.28493956 = sum of:
        0.08979413 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08979413 = score(doc=5239,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.63036615 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.026240448 = weight(_text_:und in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026240448 = score(doc=5239,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.47420087 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.019379541 = product of:
          0.038759083 = sum of:
            0.038759083 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038759083 = score(doc=5239,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08396459 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08396459 = score(doc=5239,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.7465564 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.038759083 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038759083 = score(doc=5239,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.007218178 = weight(_text_:in in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007218178 = score(doc=5239,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
        0.019583572 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 5239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019583572 = score(doc=5239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 5239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5239)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    Befindet sich die Informationswissenschaft in der Krise? Die Krise der Informationswissenschaft ist durch institutionelle Schließungen, mangelhaften Zusammenhalt und geringe Sichtbarkeit in Politik und Öffentlichkeit gekennzeichnet. Führende Informationswissenschaftler diskutieren, ob die Informationswissenschaft ein neues Paradigma braucht. Sie stellen sich der Frage, wie sie ihre Lehre an neue Herausforderungen in der Praxis, beispielsweise die neue Flut an Fehl- und Falschinformationen, anpassen und die Studierenden im Verbund beispielsweise mit wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken noch besser an anspruchsvolle Recherchen und Quellenkritik heranführen sollten. Die Forschung der Informationswissenschaft umfasst ein heterogenes Themenspektrum und kommt zu wichtigen Ergebnissen, z.B. in den Bereichen Smart Cities und Smart Countries, Semantic Web, Information Behavior, Big Data und Forschungsinfrastruktur. Diese und andere Gebiete werden unsere Zukunft bis weit in unseren Alltag hinein bestimmen. Wie wir diese Herausforderungen bewältigen, dafür eröffnet die Informationswissenschaft neue und notwendige Perspektiven.
    BK
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
    Classification
    06.00 (Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines)
    06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Lewandowski, D.: Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem: Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen. In: Open Password. Nr. 664 vom 19.11.2019 [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=822&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]. Vgl. auch den Bericht über die Berliner Tagung von Stefan Hauff-Hartwig in: Bibliotheksdienst 54(2020) H.1, S.27- .
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Informationsgesellschaft / Informationseinrichtung / Zukunft
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Informationsgesellschaft / Informationseinrichtung / Zukunft
  14. Brügger, N.: ¬The archived Web : doing history in the digital age (2018) 0.08
    0.08236581 = product of:
      0.20003125 = sum of:
        0.050795227 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050795227 = score(doc=5679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.033731487 = weight(_text_:buch in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033731487 = score(doc=5679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.01714019 = weight(_text_:und in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01714019 = score(doc=5679,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.3097467 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.015503633 = product of:
          0.031007266 = sum of:
            0.031007266 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031007266 = score(doc=5679,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.044781115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044781115 = score(doc=5679,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.031007266 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031007266 = score(doc=5679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.0070723416 = weight(_text_:in in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070723416 = score(doc=5679,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    An original methodological framework for approaching the archived web, both as a source and as an object of study in its own right. As life continues to move online, the web becomes increasingly important as a source for understanding the past. But historians have yet to formulate a methodology for approaching the archived web as a source of study. How should the history of the present be written? In this book, Niels Brügger offers an original methodological framework for approaching the web of the past, both as a source and as an object of study in its own right. While many studies of the web focus solely on its use and users, Brügger approaches the archived web as a semiotic, textual system in order to offer the first book-length treatment of its scholarly use. While the various forms of the archived web can challenge researchers' interactions with it, they also present a range of possibilities for interpretation. The Archived Web identifies characteristics of the online web that are significant now for scholars, investigates how the online web became the archived web, and explores how the particular digitality of the archived web can affect a historian's research process. Brügger offers suggestions for how to translate traditional historiographic methods for the study of the archived web, focusing on provenance, creating an overview of the archived material, evaluating versions, and citing the material. The Archived Web lays the foundations for doing web history in the digital age, offering important and timely guidance for today's media scholars and tomorrow's historians.
    BK
    15.03 Theorie und Methoden der Geschichtswissenschaft
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    NB 2800 - Geschichte / Geschichte als Wissenschaft und Unterrichtsfach / Einführung in die Geschichtswissenschaft und das Studium der Geschichte / Arbeitstechniken für Historiker
    AN 95400 - Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Speicherung von Informationen
    15.03 Theorie und Methoden der Geschichtswissenschaft
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Content
    "How will the history of the present be written? As life continues to move online, the web becomes ever more important for an understanding of the past. This book offers an original theoretical framework for approaching the web of the past, both as a source and as an object of study in its own right"
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 71(2020) no.3, S.374-376 (M.S. Weber)
    RVK
    NB 2800 - Geschichte / Geschichte als Wissenschaft und Unterrichtsfach / Einführung in die Geschichtswissenschaft und das Studium der Geschichte / Arbeitstechniken für Historiker
    AN 95400 - Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Speicherung von Informationen
  15. Arafat, S.; Ashoori, E.: Search foundations : toward a science of technology-mediated experience (2018) 0.08
    0.08234665 = product of:
      0.19998471 = sum of:
        0.0718353 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0718353 = score(doc=158,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.033731487 = weight(_text_:buch in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033731487 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.010840407 = weight(_text_:und in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010840407 = score(doc=158,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.015503633 = product of:
          0.031007266 = sum of:
            0.031007266 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031007266 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03166503 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03166503 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.28154406 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.031007266 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031007266 = score(doc=158,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.0054015904 = weight(_text_:in in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054015904 = score(doc=158,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    This book contributes to discussions within Information Retrieval and Science (IR&S) by improving our conceptual understanding of the relationship between humans and technology. A call to redirect the intellectual focus of information retrieval and science (IR&S) toward the phenomenon of technology-mediated experience. In this book, Sachi Arafat and Elham Ashoori issue a call to reorient the intellectual focus of information retrieval and science (IR&S) away from search and related processes toward the more general phenomenon of technology-mediated experience. Technology-mediated experience accounts for an increasing proportion of human lived experience; the phenomenon of mediation gets at the heart of the human-machine relationship. Framing IR&S more broadly in this way generalizes its problems and perspectives, dovetailing them with those shared across disciplines dealing with socio-technical phenomena. This reorientation of IR&S requires imagining it as a new kind of science: a science of technology-mediated experience (STME). Arafat and Ashoori not only offer detailed analysis of the foundational concepts underlying IR&S and other technical disciplines but also boldly call for a radical, systematic appropriation of the sciences and humanities to create a better understanding of the human-technology relationship. Arafat and Ashoori discuss the notion of progress in IR&S and consider ideas of progress from the history and philosophy of science. They argue that progress in IR&S requires explicit linking between technical and nontechnical aspects of discourse. They develop a network of basic questions and present a discursive framework for addressing these questions. With this book, Arafat and Ashoori provide both a manifesto for the reimagining of their field and the foundations on which a reframed IR&S would rest.
    Classification
    AN 96000: Allgemeines / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Content
    The embedding of the foundational in the adhoc -- Notions of progress in information retrieval -- From growth to progress I : methodology for understanding progress -- From growth to progress II : the network of discourse -- Basic questions characterising foundations discourse -- Enduring nature of foundations -- Foundations as the way to the authoritative against the authoritarian : a conclusion
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 72(2021) no.3, S.377-383. (Marcia J. Bates)
    RSWK
    Informationsverhalten / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft
    RVK
    AN 96000: Allgemeines / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Subject
    Informationsverhalten / Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft
  16. ¬Das Ende der Bibliothek? : vom Wert der Materialität im virtuellen Zeitalter ; Tagungsband Gotha, April 2010. (2011) 0.08
    0.07874924 = product of:
      0.19124815 = sum of:
        0.050795227 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050795227 = score(doc=584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.033731487 = weight(_text_:buch in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033731487 = score(doc=584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.01434051 = weight(_text_:und in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01434051 = score(doc=584,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.25915268 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.018987997 = product of:
          0.037975993 = sum of:
            0.037975993 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037975993 = score(doc=584,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.34121946 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037975993 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037975993 = score(doc=584,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.34121946 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.004083218 = weight(_text_:in in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004083218 = score(doc=584,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
        0.031333715 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031333715 = score(doc=584,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.33305797 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.4117647 = coord(7/17)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Band versammelt die Beiträge einer Tagung, die im April 2010 in der Forschungsbibliothek Gotha stattgefunden hat. Ziel der Veranstaltung war es, nach dem zukünftigen Wert zu fragen, den Bibliotheken und Archive im Zeitalter der Virtualisierung behalten werden. Diesen immer weiter fortschreitenden Prozess treiben nicht nur diese Institutionen selbst, sondern auch mächtige Quasimonopole wie Google voran, ohne dass über die Implikationen hinreichend reflektiert würde. Zu fragen ist, ob zu den Folgen, die die Virtualisierung für Bibliotheken und Archive haben wird, auch ihre Selbstabschaffung als an Orten fassbare Einrichtungen gehört. Es ist aber auch damit zu rechnen, dass das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten und Denken seine Struktur verändern wird. Vor diesem Hintergrund unternimmt dieser Band eine Würdigung des Analogen und seines fortbestehenden Wertes im Zeitalter der Entmaterialisierung.
    BK
    06.30 / Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.30 / Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    Content
    Aus dem Inhalt: G. Siebeck: Die Vielfalt der Bibliotheken und die Produktion der Verlage - C. Heibach: Über das Problem des Vergessens im digitalen Zeitalter - U. Jochum: Die Selbstabschaffung der Bibliotheken - M. Knoche: Original oder digital? Die Rekonstruktion des verbrannten Buchbestandes in Weimar - B. Fischer: Von der "Handschrift" zum Digitalisat. Kehrseiten der Wissensgesellschaft - A. Schlechter: Archäologisches Objekt, Exemplar, Ensemble. Was bleibt vom alten Buch? - R. Reuß: Das Buch und seine Typographie in Zeiten der Hypnose.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 59(2012) H.3/4, S.222-224 (S. Köppl)
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie - Sonderbände ; 105
  17. Gierke, B.; Mangei, J.; Merz, D.; Simon, S.: Fachinformationsdienst Buch-, Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft : ein Werkstattbericht (2019) 0.07
    0.06981058 = product of:
      0.23735596 = sum of:
        0.06746297 = weight(_text_:buch in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06746297 = score(doc=5108,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5811713 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
        0.026553465 = weight(_text_:und in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026553465 = score(doc=5108,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.47985753 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
        0.021925448 = product of:
          0.043850895 = sum of:
            0.043850895 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043850895 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.077563174 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077563174 = score(doc=5108,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.68963933 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
        0.043850895 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043850895 = score(doc=5108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 5108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5108)
      0.29411766 = coord(5/17)
    
    Abstract
    Nach einem kurzen Rückblick auf die Vorgeschichte des Fachinformationsdienstes Buch-, Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (FID BBI) sowie einer Skizze zum Stand der Fachinformationsdienste im Allgemeinen bietet der vorliegende Bericht aus der Werkstatt des FID BBI vor allem Aussagen zu den Erwerbungskriterien des Dienstes und Informationen zu dem kürzlich freigeschalteten Portal. Die Angaben sollen dem Austausch mit der bibliothekarischen und fachlichen Community dienen und schließen daher auch offene Fragen und noch unerreichte Meilensteine ein.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
  18. Handbuch Bibliothek : Geschichte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven (2012) 0.07
    0.06654087 = product of:
      0.18853246 = sum of:
        0.08979413 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08979413 = score(doc=1080,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14244758 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.63036615 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.016595917 = weight(_text_:und in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016595917 = score(doc=1080,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.29991096 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.019379541 = product of:
          0.038759083 = sum of:
            0.038759083 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038759083 = score(doc=1080,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038759083 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038759083 = score(doc=1080,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.34825563 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.004420214 = weight(_text_:in in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004420214 = score(doc=1080,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.019583572 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019583572 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.20816123 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    Welche Rolle spielt die Bibliothek in Zeiten der Digitalisierung? Seit jeher unverzichtbare Quellen der Forschung, übernehmen Bibliotheken heute vielfältige neue Aufgaben. Beispielsweise sind sie an der Entstehung von Semantic-Web-Strukturen und an der digitalen Langzeitarchivierung beteiligt. Das Handbuch bietet einen fundierten Einblick in Geschichte, Theorie und gegenwärtige Praxis der Institution Bibliothek. Alle Aspekte des Informations- und Wissensmanagements bis hin zu Repositorien und Open Access werden dargestellt.
    BK
    06.30 Bibliothekswesen Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    06.40 Bibliotheksarten IuD-Einrichtungen: Allgemeines
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Classification
    06.30 Bibliothekswesen Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines
    06.40 Bibliotheksarten IuD-Einrichtungen: Allgemeines
    06.01 Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    Footnote
    Rez. in: iwp 64(2013) H.4, S.228-232 (C. Cazan)
  19. Jezior, T.: Adaption und Integration von Suchmaschinentechnologie in mor(!)dernen OPACs (2013) 0.06
    0.06403906 = product of:
      0.181444 = sum of:
        0.010840407 = weight(_text_:und in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010840407 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
        0.021925448 = product of:
          0.043850895 = sum of:
            0.043850895 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043850895 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.044781115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044781115 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11246919 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
        0.043850895 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043850895 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
        0.0057745427 = weight(_text_:in in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057745427 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
        0.05427159 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05427159 = score(doc=2222,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.57687336 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken werden heutzutage durch Universalsuchmaschinen wie Google bedroht. Ein Grund hierfür ist, dass Bibliotheken auf Rechercheinstrumente setzen die, die heutigen Erwartungen ihrer Nutzer nicht mehr erfüllen können. Wollen Bibliotheken auch zukünftig eine tragende Rolle spielen, müssen sie die Techniken in ihrer Produkte integrieren, die Suchmaschinen zu ihrem Erfolg im Web verholfen haben.
    Footnote
    Diplomarbeit im Studiengang Bibliothekswesen
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln / Institut für Informationswissenschaft
  20. Oehlmann, D.: Lizenzen oder Texte, Nutzung oder Hosting? : Können Bibliotheken ihren Auftrag in Zeiten elektronischer Texte weiterhin ausreichend erfüllen? (2012) 0.06
    0.064033024 = product of:
      0.1814269 = sum of:
        0.041740585 = weight(_text_:buch in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041740585 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11608105 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.028456066 = weight(_text_:und in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028456066 = score(doc=579,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.055336144 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.019184766 = product of:
          0.038369533 = sum of:
            0.038369533 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038369533 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024967048 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038369533 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038369533 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11129492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.006188299 = weight(_text_:in in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006188299 = score(doc=579,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.033961542 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.047487643 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047487643 = score(doc=579,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09407886 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024967048 = queryNorm
            0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.3529412 = coord(6/17)
    
    Abstract
    Mit dem Paradigmenwechsel, der für Bibliotheken durch die verstärkte Nutzung elektronischer Medien eingesetzt hat, verlieren sie zunehmend die Möglichkeit, ihrer Aufgabe nachzukommen, das kulturelle und wissenschaftliche Erbe zu archivieren und ihren Nutzern zur Verfügung zu stellen. Im Mittelpunkt des Sammelns steht in Zukunft der Text jeglicher Form anstelle des Mediums Buch. Das bedingt neue Wege der Erwerbung, der Bewahrung und des Umgangs mit Texten. Die Voraussetzungen dafür, dass jede Bibliothek, die einen Sammel- und Archivauftrag erfüllt, elektronische Texte speichern und auf zeitgemäße Weise in ihrem Katalog nachweisen kann, sind jedoch noch nicht gegeben. Das Schaffen dieser rechtlichen, technischen und organisatorischen Voraussetzungen ist unbedingt notwendig, damit Bibliotheken weiterhin effektiv Wissenschaft und Forschung unterstützen und befördern können.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 59(2012) H.5, S.231-235

Languages

Types

  • a 5168
  • el 700
  • m 463
  • s 121
  • x 94
  • r 34
  • n 13
  • b 8
  • i 5
  • p 3
  • ag 2
  • v 2
  • ms 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications