-
Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : ein neuer Studienschwerpunkt für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Forschungseinrichtungen (2020)
0.00
0.003116655 = product of:
0.023374911 = sum of:
0.017793551 = weight(_text_:und in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017793551 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.0055813594 = product of:
0.011162719 = sum of:
0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011162719 = score(doc=5858,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.255-261
-
Rügenhagen, M.; Beck, T.S.; Sartorius, E.J.: Information integrity in the era of Fake News : an experiment using library guidelines to judge information integrity (2020)
0.00
0.0025890246 = product of:
0.019417683 = sum of:
0.012581941 = weight(_text_:und in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012581941 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.006835742 = product of:
0.013671484 = sum of:
0.013671484 = weight(_text_:information in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013671484 = score(doc=113,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Abstract
- In this article we report on an experiment that tested how useful library-based guidelines are for measuring the integrity of information in the era of fake news. We found that the usefulness of these guidelines depends on at least three factors: weighting indicators (criteria), clear instructions, and context-specificity.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 44(2020) H.1, S.34-53
-
Beck, T.S.: Image manipulation in scholarly publications : are there ways to an automated solution? (2022)
0.00
2.3255666E-4 = product of:
0.0034883497 = sum of:
0.0034883497 = product of:
0.0069766995 = sum of:
0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069766995 = score(doc=680,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Purpose This paper provides an introduction to research in the field of image forensics and asks whether advances in the field of algorithm development and digital forensics will facilitate the examination of images in the scientific publication process in the near future. Design/methodology/approach This study looks at the status quo of image analysis in the peer review process and evaluates selected articles from the field of Digital Image and Signal Processing that have addressed the discovery of copy-move, cut-paste and erase-fill manipulations. Findings The article focuses on forensic research and shows that, despite numerous efforts, there is still no applicable tool for the automated detection of image manipulation. Nonetheless, the status quo for examining images in scientific publications remains visual inspection and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future. This study summarizes aspects that make automated detection of image manipulation difficult from a forensic research perspective. Research limitations/implications Results of this study underscore the need for a conceptual reconsideration of the problems involving image manipulation with a view toward the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in conjunction with library and information science (LIS) expertise on information integrity. Practical implications This study not only identifies a number of conceptual challenges but also suggests areas of action that the scientific community can address in the future. Originality/value Image manipulation is often discussed in isolation as a technical challenge. This study takes a more holistic view of the topic and demonstrates the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach.
