Search (26 results, page 2 of 2)

0.0012581941 = product of:
  0.018872911 = sum of:
    0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 2) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018872911 = score(doc=2,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Vor einigen Monaten weilte ich bei einem ehemaligen Schwergewicht unserer Branche. Das Schwergewicht ist ein solches geblieben, aber über die Existenz der Informationsbranche mache ich mir seit 2009 öffentlich Gedanken, und seitdem ist die Lage nicht besser geworden. Wir überlegten gemeinsam, ob auch die Zeit für publizistische Kampagnen in der Informationsbranche vorbei sei. Immerhin hätte ich in den letzten Wochen mehrere Male kritisch zur Datenschutzgrundverordnung (DSGVO) Stellung genommen, merkte ich an. Mein Gegenüber brach in Gelächter aus. "Aber Herr Bredemeier", sagte er. "Da laufen Sie nur offene Türen ein. Wir sind doch alle Ihrer Meinung." Heute habe ich immer noch niemanden getroffen, der sich für die DSGVO und gegen meine Grundthese ausgesprochen hätte. Diese lautete: Die Datenschutzgrundverordnung verringert die Aktivitäten der bundesrepublikanischen Zivilgesellschaft und schadet ihr. Noch traf ich jemanden, der einen persönlichen Nutzen aus der Existenz der DSGVO gezogen hätte. Kann es sein, dass sich der abstrakt behauptete Nutzen für den Bürger nirgendwo in einem konkreten wahrgenommenen Nutzen niederschlägt?

0.0010484952 = product of:
  0.015727427 = sum of:
    0.015727427 = weight(_text_:und in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015727427 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Der einzige Anbieter, der über Möglichkeiten verfügt, die gesamt Online-Branche zu übernehmen, ist Bertelsmann. Will Bertelsmann das? Im Augenblick nicht. Aber wenn sich entsprechende Entwicklungen auf den internationalen Märkten ergeben, wohl doch. Ein 'Microsoft der Content-Branche' wäre eine Herausforderung für die deutsche und internationale Politik

0.0010484952 = product of:
  0.015727427 = sum of:
    0.015727427 = weight(_text_:und in 4442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015727427 = score(doc=4442,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 4442, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4442)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Besprechungsaufsatz zu: Wolf Dieter Enkelmann und Daniel Kratz (Hrsg.), Denken handelt - Philosophie für Manager. Metropolis Verlag 2017. (Reihe Wirtschaftsphilosophie; Band 6).

3.987516E-4 = product of:
  0.005981274 = sum of:
    0.005981274 = product of:
      0.011962548 = sum of:
        0.011962548 = weight(_text_:information in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011962548 = score(doc=480,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Reports results of the 1994 Member States Study (MSSTUDY) of the supply of and markets for electronic information services (EIS) in the 17 countries of the European Union, based on the methodological approach developed by the DGD. The surveys were conducted in each country by anational institute using the DGD methodology. 2 differnt approaches were followed: a market approach, measuring expenditures for EISs for professional purposes in the 17 countries; and a supplier approach, measuring the worldwide revenues of suppliers of EISs for professional purposes from the 17 countries. Results from the MSSTUDY are gathered from the supply and demand sides of these markets and aggregated to a European picture

Source

Journal of information science. 23(1997) no.3, S.249-259

3.7209064E-4 = product of:
  0.0055813594 = sum of:
    0.0055813594 = product of:
      0.011162719 = sum of:
        0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011162719 = score(doc=432,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Discusses the INFO2000 programme for the promotion of multimedia products on the EU. Argues that there is a need for a European Information Policy which entails cooperation between the public and private sector at the European level to meet new challenges and opportunities, particularly in the consumer sphere. The foundation of a pan-European consciousness will also become essential for protecting Europe's cultural heritage, particularly that of smaller countries

Source

Information world review. 1996, no.117, S.25

2.3021935E-4 = product of:
  0.00345329 = sum of:
    0.00345329 = product of:
      0.00690658 = sum of:
        0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 6952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00690658 = score(doc=6952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 6952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Source

Information world review. 1996, no.119, S.42