Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Coyle, K."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.00
    0.0010469672 = product of:
      0.015704507 = sum of:
        0.015704507 = product of:
          0.031409014 = sum of:
            0.031409014 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031409014 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  2. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.00
    6.5435446E-4 = product of:
      0.009815317 = sum of:
        0.009815317 = product of:
          0.019630633 = sum of:
            0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019630633 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58
  3. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.00
    2.3255666E-4 = product of:
      0.0034883497 = sum of:
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
  4. Coyle, K.: Simplicity in data models (2015) 0.00
    1.9733087E-4 = product of:
      0.002959963 = sum of:
        0.002959963 = product of:
          0.005919926 = sum of:
            0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 2025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005919926 = score(doc=2025,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2025, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2025)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.30-33

Types

Classifications