-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.00
0.0010469672 = product of:
0.015704507 = sum of:
0.015704507 = product of:
0.031409014 = sum of:
0.031409014 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031409014 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Diodato, V.; Gandt, G.: Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing : report of an exploratory study (1991)
0.00
2.3021935E-4 = product of:
0.00345329 = sum of:
0.00345329 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00690658 = score(doc=1114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.341-350
-
Diodato, V.: User preferences for features in back of the book indexes (1994)
0.00
2.3021935E-4 = product of:
0.00345329 = sum of:
0.00345329 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 7762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00690658 = score(doc=7762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.529-536
