Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.32
    0.3240703 = product of:
      0.6076318 = sum of:
        0.10317227 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10317227 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.068513416 = weight(_text_:buch in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068513416 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.015569357 = weight(_text_:und in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015569357 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.044533674 = product of:
          0.08906735 = sum of:
            0.08906735 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08906735 = score(doc=1515,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06431614 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06431614 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.08906735 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08906735 = score(doc=1515,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.2147378 = weight(_text_:bibliotheksbenutzung in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2147378 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23852277 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.9002822 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
        0.0077217915 = product of:
          0.015443583 = sum of:
            0.015443583 = weight(_text_:information in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015443583 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    
    BK
    06.60 / Bibliotheksbenutzung
    Classification
    AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
    06.60 / Bibliotheksbenutzung
    COMPASS
    Information science / Statistical mathematics
    LCSH
    Information science / Statistical methods
    RVK
    AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
    Subject
    Information science / Statistical mathematics
    Information science / Statistical methods
  2. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
  3. Egghe, L.: Empirical and combinatorial study of country occurrences in multi-authored papers (2006) 0.00
    0.001101904 = product of:
      0.008264279 = sum of:
        0.0062909704 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062909704 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0019733086 = product of:
          0.0039466172 = sum of:
            0.0039466172 = weight(_text_:information in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039466172 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.427-432
  4. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : the second special issue (2006) 0.00
    3.9466174E-4 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 7119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=7119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1405-1407
  5. Egghe, L.: Expansion of the field of informetrics : origins and consequences (2005) 0.00
    3.9466174E-4 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 1910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=1910,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1910, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1910)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1311-1316
  6. Egghe, L.: Special features of the author - publication relationship and a new explanation of Lotka's law based on convolution theory (1994) 0.00
    3.9466174E-4 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.6, S.422-427
  7. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.00
    3.9466174E-4 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
  8. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00
    3.9466174E-4 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997) 0.00
    3.7209064E-4 = product of:
      0.0055813594 = sum of:
        0.0055813594 = product of:
          0.011162719 = sum of:
            0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011162719 = score(doc=647,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Asserts that duality is an important topic in informetrics, especially in connection with the classical informetric laws. Yet this concept is less studied in information retrieval. It deals with the unification or symmetry between queries and documents, search formulation versus indexing, and relevant versus retrieved documents. Elaborates these ideas and highlights the connection with the hypergeometric distribution
  10. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.00
    3.2888478E-4 = product of:
      0.0049332716 = sum of:
        0.0049332716 = product of:
          0.009866543 = sum of:
            0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009866543 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
  11. Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008) 0.00
    3.255793E-4 = product of:
      0.0048836893 = sum of:
        0.0048836893 = product of:
          0.009767379 = sum of:
            0.009767379 = weight(_text_:information in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009767379 = score(doc=1881,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In a previous article, we introduced a general transformation on sources and one on items in an arbitrary information production process (IPP). In this article, we investigate the influence of these transformations on the h-index and on the g-index. General formulae that describe this influence are presented. These are applied to the case that the size-frequency function is Lotkaian (i.e., is a decreasing power function). We further show that the h-index of the transformed IPP belongs to the interval bounded by the two transformations of the h-index of the original IPP, and we also show that this property is not true for the g-index.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.8, S.1304-1312
  12. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.00
    2.79068E-4 = product of:
      0.0041860198 = sum of:
        0.0041860198 = product of:
          0.0083720395 = sum of:
            0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0083720395 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.145-157
  13. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00
    2.79068E-4 = product of:
      0.0041860198 = sum of:
        0.0041860198 = product of:
          0.0083720395 = sum of:
            0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0083720395 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  14. Egghe, L.: On the law of Zipf-Mandelbrot for multi-word phrases (1999) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=3058,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.3, S.233-241
  15. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
  16. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
  17. Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.452-454
  18. Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
  19. Egghe, L.: Type/Token-Taken informetrics (2003) 0.00
    2.3255666E-4 = product of:
      0.0034883497 = sum of:
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=1608,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Type/Token-Taken informetrics is a new part of informetrics that studies the use of items rather than the items itself. Here, items are the objects that are produced by the sources (e.g., journals producing articles, authors producing papers, etc.). In linguistics a source is also called a type (e.g., a word), and an item a token (e.g., the use of words in texts). In informetrics, types that occur often, for example, in a database will also be requested often, for example, in information retrieval. The relative use of these occurrences will be higher than their relative occurrences itself; hence, the name Type/ Token-Taken informetrics. This article studies the frequency distribution of Type/Token-Taken informetrics, starting from the one of Type/Token informetrics (i.e., source-item relationships). We are also studying the average number my* of item uses in Type/Token-Taken informetrics and compare this with the classical average number my in Type/Token informetrics. We show that my* >= my always, and that my* is an increasing function of my. A method is presented to actually calculate my* from my, and a given a, which is the exponent in Lotka's frequency distribution of Type/Token informetrics. We leave open the problem of developing non-Lotkaian Type/TokenTaken informetrics.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.603-610
  20. Egghe, L.: ¬The power of power laws and an interpretation of Lotkaian informetric systems as self-similar fractals (2005) 0.00
    2.3255666E-4 = product of:
      0.0034883497 = sum of:
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 3466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=3466,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3466, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3466)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Power laws as defined in 1926 by A. Lotka are increasing in importance because they have been found valid in varied social networks including the Internet. In this article some unique properties of power laws are proven. They are shown to characterize functions with the scalefree property (also called seif-similarity property) as weIl as functions with the product property. Power laws have other desirable properties that are not shared by exponential laws, as we indicate in this paper. Specifically, Naranan (1970) proves the validity of Lotka's law based on the exponential growth of articles in journals and of the number of journals. His argument is reproduced here and a discrete-time argument is also given, yielding the same law as that of Lotka. This argument makes it possible to interpret the information production process as a seif-similar fractal and show the relation between Lotka's exponent and the (seif-similar) fractal dimension of the system. Lotkaian informetric systems are seif-similar fractals, a fact revealed by Mandelbrot (1977) in relation to nature, but is also true for random texts, which exemplify a very special type of informetric system.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.7, S.669-675