-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0052403 = product of:
0.0786045 = sum of:
0.0786045 = sum of:
0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015786469 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.06281803 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06281803 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013)
0.00
0.0019651123 = product of:
0.029476684 = sum of:
0.029476684 = sum of:
0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005919926 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023556758 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:21:09
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.437-447
-
Nicolaisen, J.; Frandsen, T.F.: Bibliometric evolution : is the journal of the association for information science and technology transforming into a specialty Journal? (2015)
0.00
4.604387E-4 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = product of:
0.01381316 = sum of:
0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 1821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01381316 = score(doc=1821,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1821, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1821)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Applying a recently developed method for measuring the level of specialization over time for a selection of library and information science (LIS)-core journals seems to reveal that Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is slowly transforming into a specialty journal. The transformation seems to originate from a growing interest in bibliometric topics. This is evident from a longitudinal study (1990-2012) of the bibliometric coupling strength between Scientometrics and other LIS-core journals (including JASIST). The cause of this gradual transformation is discussed, and possible explanations are analyzed.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.1082-1085
-
Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Bradford's law of scattering : ambiguities in the concept of "subject" (2005)
0.00
3.2888478E-4 = product of:
0.0049332716 = sum of:
0.0049332716 = product of:
0.009866543 = sum of:
0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009866543 = score(doc=157,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Bradfordrsquos law of scattering is said to be about subject scattering in information sources. However, in spite of a corpus of writings about the meaning of the word ldquosubjectrdquo and equivalent terms such as ldquoaboutnessrdquo or ldquotopicalityrdquo, the meaning of ldquosubjectrdquo has never been explicitly addressed in relation to Bradfordrsquos law. This paper introduces a distinction between Lexical scattering, Semantic scattering, and Subject scattering. Neither Bradford himself nor any follower has explicitly considered the differences between these three and the implications for the practical applications of Bradfordrsquos law. Traditionally, Bradfordrsquos law has been seen as a neutral and objective tool for the selection of the most central information sources in a field. However, it is hard to find actual reports that describe how Bradfordrsquos law has been applied in practical library and information services. Theoretical as well as historical evidence suggest that the selection of journals based on Bradford-distributions tend to favorite dominant theories and views while suppressing views other than the mainstream at a given time.
- Source
- Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Intradisciplinary differences in database coverage and the consequences for bibliometric research (2008)
0.00
2.3021935E-4 = product of:
0.00345329 = sum of:
0.00345329 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 4391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00690658 = score(doc=4391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.10, S.1570-1581
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Effects of academic experience and prestige on researchers' citing behavior (2012)
0.00
2.3021935E-4 = product of:
0.00345329 = sum of:
0.00345329 = product of:
0.00690658 = sum of:
0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00690658 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.64-71
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Praise the bridge that carries you over : testing the flattery citation hypothesis (2011)
0.00
1.9733087E-4 = product of:
0.002959963 = sum of:
0.002959963 = product of:
0.005919926 = sum of:
0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005919926 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.807-818
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Citation behavior : a large-scale test of the persuasion by name-dropping hypothesis (2017)
0.00
1.9733087E-4 = product of:
0.002959963 = sum of:
0.002959963 = product of:
0.005919926 = sum of:
0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005919926 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.5, S.1278-1284
