Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"White, R.W."
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. White, R.W.: Interactions with search systems (2016) 0.00
    0.0017839039 = product of:
      0.013379279 = sum of:
        0.007863713 = weight(_text_:und in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007863713 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
        0.005515565 = product of:
          0.01103113 = sum of:
            0.01103113 = weight(_text_:information in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01103113 = score(doc=3612,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Information seeking is a fundamental human activity. In the modern world, it is frequently conducted through interactions with search systems. The retrieval and comprehension of information returned by these systems is a key part of decision making and action in a broad range of settings. Advances in data availability coupled with new interaction paradigms, and mobile and cloud computing capabilities, have created a broad range of new opportunities for information access and use. In this comprehensive book for professionals, researchers, and students involved in search system design and evaluation, search expert Ryen White discusses how search systems can capitalize on new capabilities and how next-generation systems must support higher order search activities such as task completion, learning, and decision making. He outlines the implications of these changes for the evolution of search evaluation, as well as challenges that extend beyond search systems in areas such as privacy and societal benefit.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Lewandowski, D.: Wie "Next Generation Search Systems" die Suche auf eine neue Ebene heben und die Informationswelt verändern. In: http://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=254&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045..
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
  2. White, R.W.; Jose, J.M.; Ruthven, I.: Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access (2005) 0.00
    3.2888478E-4 = product of:
      0.0049332716 = sum of:
        0.0049332716 = product of:
          0.009866543 = sum of:
            0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 3881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009866543 = score(doc=3881,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3881, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Web searchers typically fall to view search results beyond the first page nor fully examine those results presented to them. In this article we describe an approach that encourages a deeper examination of the contents of the document set retrieved in response to a searcher's query. The approach shifts the focus of perusal and interaction away from potentially uninformative document surrogates (such as titles, sentence fragments, and URLs) to actual document content, and uses this content to drive the information seeking process. Current search interfaces assume searchers examine results document-by-document. In contrast our approach extracts, ranks, and presents the contents of the top-ranked document set. We use query-relevant topranking sentences extracted from the top documents at retrieval time as fine-grained representations of topranked document content and, when combined in a ranked list, an overview of these documents. The interaction of the searcher provides implicit evidence that is used to reorder the sentences where appropriate. We evaluate our approach in three separate user studies, each applying these sentences in a different way. The findings of these studies show that top-ranking sentences can facilitate effective information access.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1113-1125
  3. White, R.W.; Jose, J.M.; Ruthven, I.: ¬A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching (2003) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=1081,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.689-706