-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.32
0.3240703 = product of:
0.6076318 = sum of:
0.10317227 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10317227 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.068513416 = weight(_text_:buch in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068513416 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.015569357 = weight(_text_:und in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015569357 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.044533674 = product of:
0.08906735 = sum of:
0.08906735 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08906735 = score(doc=1515,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06431614 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06431614 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.08906735 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08906735 = score(doc=1515,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.2147378 = weight(_text_:bibliotheksbenutzung in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2147378 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23852277 = queryWeight, product of:
8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.9002822 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.0077217915 = product of:
0.015443583 = sum of:
0.015443583 = weight(_text_:information in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015443583 = score(doc=1515,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3035872 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
- BK
- 06.60 / Bibliotheksbenutzung
- Classification
- AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
06.60 / Bibliotheksbenutzung
- COMPASS
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
- LCSH
- Information science / Statistical methods
- RVK
- AN 70400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksverwaltung / Bibliotheksanalyse, -statistik
- Subject
- Information science / Statistical mathematics
Information science / Statistical methods
-
Cano, V.: Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain (1999)
0.05
0.045051496 = product of:
0.1689431 = sum of:
0.031809766 = product of:
0.06361953 = sum of:
0.06361953 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06361953 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.064969115 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064969115 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
0.06361953 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06361953 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
0.008544678 = product of:
0.017089356 = sum of:
0.017089356 = weight(_text_:information in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017089356 = score(doc=3770,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews 17 years of research in Library and Information Science in Spain. The total production of 2 major Spanish periodical publications were analyzed from 1977-1994 according to productivity variables and thematic content
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.8, S.675-680
-
Bensman, S.J.: Probability distributions in library and information science : a historical and practitioner viewpoint (2000)
0.04
0.036323193 = product of:
0.13621196 = sum of:
0.025447812 = product of:
0.050895624 = sum of:
0.050895624 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050895624 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05197529 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05197529 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
0.050895624 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050895624 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
0.0078932345 = product of:
0.015786469 = sum of:
0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015786469 = score(doc=4859,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- This paper has a dual character dictated by its twofold purpose. First, it is a speculative historiographic essay containing an attempt to fix the present posotion of library and information science within the context of the probabilisitc revolution that has been encompassing all of science. Second, it comprises a guide to practitioners engaged in statistical research in library and information science
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.9, S.816-833
-
Cronin, B.: Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science (2001)
0.04
0.03570669 = product of:
0.13390009 = sum of:
0.025447812 = product of:
0.050895624 = sum of:
0.050895624 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050895624 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05197529 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05197529 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.050895624 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050895624 = score(doc=4488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.0055813594 = product of:
0.011162719 = sum of:
0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011162719 = score(doc=4488,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Data were gathered on acknowledgements in five leading information science journals for the years 1991-1999. The results were compared with data from two earlier studies of the same journals. Analysis of the aggregate data (1971-1999) confirms the general impression that acknowledgement has become an institutionalised element of the scholarly communication process, reflecting the growing cognitive and structural complexity of contemporary research.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.03
0.031731267 = product of:
0.11899225 = sum of:
0.015904883 = product of:
0.031809766 = sum of:
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032484557 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.038793035 = sum of:
0.01103113 = weight(_text_:information in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01103113 = score(doc=2734,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.027761906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027761906 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.434-442
-
Mahapatra, G.: Indian library and information science journals : a bibliometric analysis of the rate of citations and their characteristics (1993)
0.03
0.031536046 = product of:
0.11826017 = sum of:
0.022266837 = product of:
0.044533674 = sum of:
0.044533674 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044533674 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04547838 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04547838 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.348393 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.044533674 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044533674 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.005981274 = product of:
0.011962548 = sum of:
0.011962548 = weight(_text_:information in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011962548 = score(doc=112,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- A bibliometric analysis of 1,456 articles appearing in Indian Library and Information Science journals between 1975 and 1985 revealed that the average rate of citations per article in the field was quite low. Books and journals were identified as the major categories of documents referred to in these articles and both were positively related. It is concluded that the increase in journal citations and rate of citations between 1975 and 1985 indicates that Indian Library and Information Science journals are now publishing a higher number of research-oriented articles in comparison with earlier years.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.03
0.031068213 = product of:
0.116505794 = sum of:
0.015904883 = product of:
0.031809766 = sum of:
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032484557 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.036306582 = sum of:
0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008544678 = score(doc=2808,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.027761906 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027761906 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Internet based electronic resources are growing dramatically but there have been no empirical studies evaluating the impact of e-sources, as a whole, on formal scholarly communication. reports results of an investigation into how much e-sources have been used in formal scholarly communication, using a case study in the area of Library and Information Science (LIS) during the period 1994 to 1996. 4 citation based indicators were used in the study of the impact measurement. Concludes that, compared with the impact of print sources, the impact of e-sources on formal scholarly communication in LIS is small, as measured by e-sources cited, and does not increase significantly by year even though there is observable growth of these impact across the years. It is found that periodical format is related to the rate of citing e-sources, articles are more likely to cite e-sources than are print priodical articles. However, once authors cite electronic resource, there is no significant difference in the number of references per article by periodical format or by year. Suggests that, at this stage, citing e-sources may depend on authors rather than the periodical format in which authors choose to publish
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.4, S.241-254
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.03
0.029562928 = product of:
0.11086097 = sum of:
0.015904883 = product of:
0.031809766 = sum of:
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032484557 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.030661764 = sum of:
0.01103113 = weight(_text_:information in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01103113 = score(doc=998,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019630633 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
-
Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009)
0.03
0.028899875 = product of:
0.10837452 = sum of:
0.015904883 = product of:
0.031809766 = sum of:
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032484557 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.028175311 = sum of:
0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008544678 = score(doc=2745,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019630633 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:54:59
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.581-594
-
Tedd, L.A.: Use of library and information science journals by Master's students in their dissertations : experiences at the University of Wales Aberystwyth (2006)
0.03
0.027428728 = product of:
0.102857724 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=4895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
0.0066186786 = product of:
0.013237357 = sum of:
0.013237357 = weight(_text_:information in 4895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013237357 = score(doc=4895,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 4895, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4895)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to report on research undertaken into the use made of library and information science (LIS) journals in dissertations written by students undertaking the Master's course in Information and Library Studies at the University of Wales Aberystwyth. Design/methodology/approach - Analysis of the citations of 100 (post 2000) dissertations submitted gives an indication of the range of material used in dissertations. In addition, responses to questionnaires from students provide information about how relevant papers are found from LIS journals. Findings - Journals with a practical bias were cited more than research-oriented journals. Lists of the most "popular" journal titles are included. Originality/value - The research provides a "snapshot" of the use made of LIS journals by Master's students in their dissertations.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft: UK library and information school: Aberystwyth
-
González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008)
0.03
0.027428728 = product of:
0.102857724 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.0066186786 = product of:
0.013237357 = sum of:
0.013237357 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013237357 = score(doc=1347,freq=10.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- The main fields of research in Library Science and Documentation are identified by quantifying the frequency of appearance and the analysis of co-occurrence of the descriptors assigned to 11,273 indexed works in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database for the 2004-2005 period. The analysis made has enabled three major core research areas to be identified: World Wide Web, Libraries and Education. There are a further 12 areas of research with specific development, one connected with the library sphere and another 11 connected with the World Wide Web and Internet: Networks, Computer Security, Information technologies, Electronic Resources, Electronic Publications, Bibliometrics, Electronic Commerce, Computer applications, Medicine, Searches and Online Information retrieval.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.1, S.150-154
-
Nkereuwem, E.E.: Accrediting knowledge : the ranking of library and information science journals (1997)
0.03
0.027242394 = product of:
0.10215897 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.005919926 = product of:
0.011839852 = sum of:
0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839852 = score(doc=786,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Describes how a representative sample of librarians was surveyed to carry out a comparative evaluation of selected journals in library and information science. Respondents were asked to rate each journal on a scale from poor to outstanding (0-10), in terms of their visibility and the quality of articles they publish. Such evaluation should assist librarians in journal selection and in determining the quality of journals to which they send their research papers for publication. Reports the findings of the survey which discovered that some journals such as Library Waves, Assistant Librarian and Library Journal get low ratings because of low visibility and irregular publication. Others such as African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science and Journal of Information Science are rated highly because of familiarity and accessibility. Argues that the results of the study should help librarians determine the quality of journals and will subsequently enhance their utilization and subscription.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
-
Janssens, F.; Leta, J.; Glänzel, W.; Moor, B. de: Towards mapping library and information science (2006)
0.03
0.027242394 = product of:
0.10215897 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.005919926 = product of:
0.011839852 = sum of:
0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839852 = score(doc=992,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- In an earlier study by the authors, full-text analysis and traditional bibliometric methods were combined to map research papers published in the journal Scientometrics. The main objective was to develop appropriate techniques of full-text analysis and to improve the efficiency of the individual methods in the mapping of science. The number of papers was, however, rather limited. In the present study, we extend the quantitative linguistic part of the previous studies to a set of five journals representing the field of Library and Information Science (LIS). Almost 1000 articles and notes published in the period 2002-2004 have been selected for this exercise. The optimum solution for clustering LIS is found for six clusters. The combination of different mapping techniques, applied to the full text of scientific publications, results in a characteristic tripod pattern. Besides two clusters in bibliometrics, one cluster in information retrieval and one containing general issues, webometrics and patent studies are identified as small but emerging clusters within LIS. The study is concluded with the analysis of cluster representations by the selected journals.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1614-1642
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Pratt , J.A.; Hauser, K.: Using field cocitation analysis to assess reciprocal and shared impact of LIS/MIS fields (2008)
0.03
0.027242394 = product of:
0.10215897 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.005919926 = product of:
0.011839852 = sum of:
0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839852 = score(doc=1959,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- This study utilized bibliometric tools to analyze the relationship between two separate, but related, fields: Library and Information Science (LIS) and Management Information Systems (MIS). The top-ranked 48 journals in each field were used as the unit of analysis. Using these journals, field cocitation was introduced as a method for evaluating the relationships between the two fields. The three-phased study evaluated (a) the knowledge imported/exported between LIS and MIS, (b) the body of knowledge influenced by both fields, and (c) the overlap in fields as demonstrated by multidimensional scaling. Data collection and analysis were performed using DIALOG and SPSS programs. The primary findings from this study indicate that (a) the MIS impact on LIS is greater than the reverse, (b) there is a growing trend for shared impact between the two disciplines, and (c) the area of overlap between the two fields is predominately those journals focusing on technology systems and digital information. Additionally, this study validated field cocitation as a method by which to evaluate relationships between fields.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1441-1453
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016)
0.03
0.027242394 = product of:
0.10215897 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.005919926 = product of:
0.011839852 = sum of:
0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011839852 = score(doc=2779,freq=8.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web of Science subject categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.707-714
-
Zhao, R.; Wu, S.: ¬The network pattern of journal knowledge transfer in library and information science in China (2014)
0.03
0.027030895 = product of:
0.10136585 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.0051268064 = product of:
0.010253613 = sum of:
0.010253613 = weight(_text_:information in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010253613 = score(doc=1392,freq=6.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Using the library and information science journals 2003-2012 in Nanjing University's Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index as data sources, the paper reveals the citation structure implied in these journals by applying social network analysis. Results show that, first, journal knowledge transfer activity in library and information science is frequent, and both the level of knowledge and discipline integration as well as the knowledge gap influenced knowledge transfer activity. According to the out-degree and in-degree, journals can be divided into three kinds. Second, based on professional bias and citation frequency, the knowledge transfer network can be divided into four blocks. With the change of discipline capacity and knowledge gap among journals, the "core-periphery" structure of the knowledge transfer network is getting weaker. Finally, regions of the knowledge transfer network evolved from a "weak-weak" subgroup to a "strong-weak" subgroup or a "weak-strong" subgroup, and then move to a "strong-strong" subgroup.
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
-
Ni, C.; Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.; Ding, Y.: Journal impact and proximity : an assessment using bibliographic features (2013)
0.03
0.026780019 = product of:
0.100425065 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.0041860198 = product of:
0.0083720395 = sum of:
0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0083720395 = score(doc=686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- Journals in the Information Science & Library Science category of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared using both bibliometric and bibliographic features. Data collected covered journal impact factor (JIF), number of issues per year, number of authors per article, longevity, editorial board membership, frequency of publication, number of databases indexing the journal, number of aggregators providing full-text access, country of publication, JCR categories, Dewey decimal classification, and journal statement of scope. Three features significantly correlated with JIF: number of editorial board members and number of JCR categories in which a journal is listed correlated positively; journal longevity correlated negatively with JIF. Coword analysis of journal descriptions provided a proximity clustering of journals, which differed considerably from the clusters based on editorial board membership. Finally, a multiple linear regression model was built to predict the JIF based on all the collected bibliographic features.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.802-817
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.03
0.026780019 = product of:
0.100425065 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.0041860198 = product of:
0.0083720395 = sum of:
0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0083720395 = score(doc=2495,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- In theory, articles can attract readers on the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations, so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers of, and citations to, 4 general library and information science (LIS) journals. For this discipline, it takes about 7 years for articles to attract as many Scopus citations as Mendeley readers, and after this the Spearman correlation between readers and citers is stable at about 0.6 for all years. This suggests that Mendeley readership counts may be useful impact indicators for both newer and older articles. The lack of dates for individual Mendeley article readers and an unknown bias toward more recent articles mean that readership data should be normalized individually by year, however, before making any comparisons between articles published in different years.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.191-199
-
Chang, Y.-W.: Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research (2016)
0.03
0.026780019 = product of:
0.100425065 = sum of:
0.01908586 = product of:
0.03817172 = sum of:
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038981467 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03817172 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.0041860198 = product of:
0.0083720395 = sum of:
0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0083720395 = score(doc=2973,freq=4.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.4, S.658-669
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011)
0.02
0.023126753 = product of:
0.08672532 = sum of:
0.015904883 = product of:
0.031809766 = sum of:
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032484557 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031809766 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.0065261046 = product of:
0.013052209 = sum of:
0.013052209 = weight(_text_:information in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013052209 = score(doc=4143,freq=14.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.256578 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
- Abstract
- This work identifies changes in dominant topics in library and information science (LIS) over time, by analyzing the 3,121 doctoral dissertations completed between 1930 and 2009 at North American Library and Information Science programs. The authors utilize latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify latent topics diachronically and to identify representative dissertations of those topics. The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930-1969) to the present (2000-2009). However, some themes occurred in multiple periods, representing core areas of the field: library history occurred in the first two periods; citation analysis in the second and third periods; and information-seeking behavior in the fourth and last period. Two topics occurred in three of the five periods: information retrieval and information use. One of the notable changes in the topics was the diminishing use of the word library (and related terms). This has implications for the provision of doctoral education in LIS. This work is compared to other earlier analyses and provides validation for the use of LDA in topic analysis of a discipline.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.185-204
