Search (174 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.36
    0.35984245 = product of:
      0.67470455 = sum of:
        0.15317109 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15317109 = score(doc=348,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.9264452 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.083050795 = weight(_text_:buch in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083050795 = score(doc=348,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026690327 = score(doc=348,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.03817172 = product of:
          0.07634344 = sum of:
            0.07634344 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07634344 = score(doc=348,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.11025624 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11025624 = score(doc=348,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.84463215 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.07634344 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07634344 = score(doc=348,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.18406098 = weight(_text_:bibliotheksbenutzung in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18406098 = score(doc=348,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23852277 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.77167046 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
        0.002959963 = product of:
          0.005919926 = sum of:
            0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005919926 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.53333336 = coord(8/15)
    
    BK
    06.60 Bibliotheksbenutzung
    Classification
    AN 95100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Referieren, Klassifizieren, Indexieren
    AN 96100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationsvermittlung, Informationsplanung / Herstellung von Bibliographien und Informationsdiensten
    AK 39900 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Hilfsmittel zur wissenschaftlichen Arbeit
    06.60 Bibliotheksbenutzung
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, PA : Institute for Scientific Information
    RVK
    AN 95100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Referieren, Klassifizieren, Indexieren
    AN 96100 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationsvermittlung, Informationsplanung / Herstellung von Bibliographien und Informationsdiensten
    AK 39900 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Hilfsmittel zur wissenschaftlichen Arbeit
  2. Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007) 0.02
    0.022525748 = product of:
      0.08447155 = sum of:
        0.015904883 = product of:
          0.031809766 = sum of:
            0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809766 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
        0.004272339 = product of:
          0.008544678 = sum of:
            0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008544678 = score(doc=329,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.947-957
  3. Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003) 0.02
    0.022316683 = product of:
      0.08368756 = sum of:
        0.015904883 = product of:
          0.031809766 = sum of:
            0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809766 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=5176,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.14, S.1313-1324
  4. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01
    0.011717109 = product of:
      0.058585543 = sum of:
        0.03915052 = weight(_text_:buch in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03915052 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.016644342 = weight(_text_:und in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016644342 = score(doc=3585,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.25915268 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
        0.0027906797 = product of:
          0.0055813594 = sum of:
            0.0055813594 = weight(_text_:information in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0055813594 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
    LCSH
    Information science / Statistical methods
    Subject
    Information science / Statistical methods
  5. White, H.D.; McCain, K.W.: Visualizing a discipline : an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995 (1998) 0.01
    0.007841472 = product of:
      0.05881103 = sum of:
        0.05197529 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05197529 = score(doc=5020,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
        0.006835742 = product of:
          0.013671484 = sum of:
            0.013671484 = weight(_text_:information in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013671484 = score(doc=5020,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an extensive domain analysis of information science in terms of its authors. Names of those most frequently cited in 12 key journals from 1972 through 1995 were retrieved from Social SciSearch via Dialog. The top 120 were submitted to author co-citation analyzes, yielding automatic classifications relevant to histories of the field
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.4, S.327-355
  6. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.01
    0.0076742205 = product of:
      0.05755665 = sum of:
        0.05197529 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05197529 = score(doc=1263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
        0.0055813594 = product of:
          0.011162719 = sum of:
            0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011162719 = score(doc=1263,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    The accrual of symbolic capital is an important aspect of academic life. Successful capital formation is commonly signified by the trappings of scholarly distinction or acknowledged status as a public intellectual. We consider and compare three potential indices of symbolic capital: citation counts, Web hits, and media mentions. Our Eindings, which are domain specific, suggest that public intellectuals are notable by their absence within the information studies community.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1267-1270
  7. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.0052403 = product of:
      0.0786045 = sum of:
        0.0786045 = sum of:
          0.015786469 = weight(_text_:information in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015786469 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.06281803 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06281803 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  8. Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000) 0.00
    0.00466016 = product of:
      0.034951195 = sum of:
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.7, S.635-645
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00
    0.004359357 = product of:
      0.065390356 = sum of:
        0.065390356 = sum of:
          0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009866543 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.055523813 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055523813 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2
  10. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Author motivation for not citing influences : a methodological note (1988) 0.00
    0.0033057118 = product of:
      0.024792837 = sum of:
        0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018872911 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Footnote
    Stellungnahme zu: Brooks, T.A.: Private acts and private objects: an investigation of citer motivations und Brooks, T.A.: Evidence of complex citer motivation
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.432-433
  11. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00
    0.0026156146 = product of:
      0.039234217 = sum of:
        0.039234217 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.03331429 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03331429 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
  12. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00
    0.0026146274 = product of:
      0.03921941 = sum of:
        0.03921941 = sum of:
          0.015662652 = weight(_text_:information in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015662652 = score(doc=201,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
  13. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00
    0.0024833512 = product of:
      0.037250265 = sum of:
        0.037250265 = sum of:
          0.009767379 = weight(_text_:information in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009767379 = score(doc=6920,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.027482886 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027482886 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
  14. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00
    0.0022926312 = product of:
      0.034389466 = sum of:
        0.034389466 = sum of:
          0.00690658 = weight(_text_:information in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00690658 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.027482886 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027482886 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
  15. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.00
    0.0020939345 = product of:
      0.031409014 = sum of:
        0.031409014 = product of:
          0.06281803 = sum of:
            0.06281803 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06281803 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  16. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
  17. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
  18. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
  19. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
  20. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.00
    0.0019651123 = product of:
      0.029476684 = sum of:
        0.029476684 = sum of:
          0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005919926 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833

Years

Types

  • a 168
  • el 5
  • m 5
  • s 2
  • More… Less…