Search (53 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.04
    0.03510284 = product of:
      0.13163565 = sum of:
        0.01908586 = product of:
          0.03817172 = sum of:
            0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038981467 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
        0.03539661 = sum of:
          0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011839852 = score(doc=351,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
          0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023556758 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
    Theme
    Information
  2. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff (2020) 0.03
    0.025533566 = product of:
      0.12766783 = sum of:
        0.01906849 = weight(_text_:und in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01906849 = score(doc=326,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
        0.10169275 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10169275 = score(doc=326,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.77903044 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
        0.00690658 = product of:
          0.01381316 = sum of:
            0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01381316 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaft, eine Disziplin ohne Theorie, ohne Bezugsrahmen und ohne Klärung ihres Grundbegriffes. Zahlreiche FachvertreterInnen der Informationswissenschaft bereiten erst recht das Feld für Hate Speech und Fake News vor - mit ihrem ungeklärten (Un)begriff der "Information", - mit ihrer Forderung nach "Informationskompetenz", ein Terrain, das eigentlich der Bibliothekswissenschaft zusteht, - mit ihrer Theorielosigkeit, - mit ihrer unkritischen Ablehnung einer ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung sowie - mit ihrem ungeklärten Domänenverständnis.
    Content
    Fortsetzung als: Wie man mit Information umgehen sollte - Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  3. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : Wie man mit "Information" umgehen sollte: Das Beispiel der Medienforschung (2020) 0.02
    0.022657705 = product of:
      0.11328852 = sum of:
        0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018872911 = score(doc=5911,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
        0.087165214 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087165214 = score(doc=5911,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.66774035 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
        0.007250399 = product of:
          0.014500798 = sum of:
            0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014500798 = score(doc=5911,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Information als "Wissen in Aktion" zu definieren, scheint der Informationswissenschaft zu reichen. Und das in einer Welt, wie das Fachportal woxiwon (https://synonyme.woxikon.de/synonyme/information.php) ausweist, bei über 460 Synonyma für den Begriff "Information", die in fast dreißig Gruppen geclustert sind. Cluster 1: "Aufmerksamkeit" mit den Dimensionen der Nutzererwartungen "Aktualität", "Werbung", "Schlagzeilen" sowie "Provokation durch Fake & Klatsch". Cluster 2: "Verbundenheit" Cluster 3: "Gemeinsamkeit" Cluster 4: "Intellektuelle Leistung"
    Content
    Fortsetzung von: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch: die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.759 vom 25. Mai 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ]. Weitere Fortsetzung als: Informationskompetenz in den Bibliotheken und in der Informationswissenschaft - Das Verlangen nach einer verständlichen Wissenschaftssprache. In: Open Password. 2020, Nr.784 vom 09. Juli 2020. Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzExNiwiM2Y4YjgwNDBiM2QxIiwwLDAsMTA2LDFd.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  4. Buschman, J.: ¬The public sphere without democracy : some recent work in LIS (2020) 0.02
    0.022316683 = product of:
      0.08368756 = sum of:
        0.015904883 = product of:
          0.031809766 = sum of:
            0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031809766 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
        0.0034883497 = product of:
          0.0069766995 = sum of:
            0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0069766995 = score(doc=5838,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze and re-direct recent schematic and empirical scholarship on Habermas' theory of the public sphere in library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a critical analysis of the relevant literature in light of Habermas' origination and use/purpose of the public sphere concept. Findings The authors examined here produced a schematic operationalization of the public sphere that thinned the concept, but in turn, that schematization has produced insight into the civil society functions and communications of libraries, both within and without. For this work to be meaningful, the considerations and contexts of democratic society must be reinserted. Research limitations/implications Further explorations of the relationship between the public sphere and civil society as they are manifested around and in libraries is called for. Additionally, Weigand's approach to producing data/evidence on the public sphere and libraries should be furthered. Practical implications Understanding the role and function of libraries in democratic societies is essential for libraries to play a productive democratic role in those societies and thus, in guiding them. Social implications This paper helps to situate the bewildering circumstances of libraries who face both popular support and broad political-social questioning of their role and place. Originality/value This paper arguably interjects a more sophisticated and nuanced theoretical picture of the public sphere than prior precis presented in the LIS literature have undertaken. It also engages a unique set of empirical-theoretical students from another perspective in order to deepen and shift that research discourse.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  5. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : das Verlangen nach einer verständlichen Wissenschaftssprache (2020) 0.02
    0.02203597 = product of:
      0.11017985 = sum of:
        0.024966514 = weight(_text_:und in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024966514 = score(doc=5684,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
        0.077962935 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077962935 = score(doc=5684,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
        0.007250399 = product of:
          0.014500798 = sum of:
            0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 5684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014500798 = score(doc=5684,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5684, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Informationskompetenz in den Bibliotheken und in der Informationswissenschaft. Es ist erschreckend, dass im Zeitalter der vieldiskutierten "Desinformationen" und "Fake News" im Medienbereich der einzige Beitrag der Informationswissenschaft in der Betonung einer irgendwie ausgestalteten "Informationskompetenz", manchmal ergänzt um eine ebenso imaginäre "Medienkompetenz" besteht. Man möchte sich gern zum verbindlichen Entscheider darüber erklären, was wahre und falsche Information, was Hate Speech und Fakten sind. Der Türöffner dafür soll das bibliothekarisch besetzte Feld der "Informationskompetenz" sein, dass man nunmehr für den Gesamtbereich der "Information" besetzen möchte. Die ursprüngliche Beschränkung der bibliothekarischen Domäne der Informationskompetenz auf eine berufsrelevante Vermittlung von InformationsSUCHkompetenz wird dafür geopfert. Der Ursprung des Begriffes "Informationskompetenz" liegt im Bibliotheksbereich und sollte dort beheimatet bleiben.
    Content
    Fortsetzung von: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch: Wie man mit "Information" umgehen sollte: Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  6. Schüller-Zwierlein, A.: ¬Die Fragilität des Zugangs : eine Kritik der Informationsgesellschaft (2021) 0.02
    0.017222486 = product of:
      0.08611243 = sum of:
        0.055367198 = weight(_text_:buch in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055367198 = score(doc=5716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
        0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025163881 = score(doc=5716,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
        0.0055813594 = product of:
          0.011162719 = sum of:
            0.011162719 = weight(_text_:information in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011162719 = score(doc=5716,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Wir haben uns in der Informationsgesellschaft gemütlich eingerichtet: Information steht allenthalben auf Abruf bereit. Gleichzeitig kann man ein Wiederaufkommen von Populismus und Radikalismus, von Gewalt und enthemmter Kommunikation beobachten. Das Buch widmet sich der Frage, ob in der Vorstellung einer Informationsgesellschaft selbst und in den damit verbundenen Praktiken ein Strickfehler verborgen ist, der Populismus und Radikalismus befördert.
    Theme
    Information
  7. Kuhlen, R.; Semar, W.: Information - ein Konstrukt mit Folgen (2023) 0.01
    0.014036858 = product of:
      0.07018429 = sum of:
        0.015569357 = weight(_text_:und in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015569357 = score(doc=775,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
        0.04547838 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04547838 = score(doc=775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
        0.009136546 = product of:
          0.018273093 = sum of:
            0.018273093 = weight(_text_:information in 775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018273093 = score(doc=775,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 775, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=775)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Abstract
    Im Anschluss an die einführenden, auf Information bezogenen Kapitel in der 5. und 6. Ausgabe der Grundlagen (Kuhlen 2004; Kuhlen 2013) soll das pragmatische Verständnis von Information hier weiter theoretisch abgesichert werden.1 Um es auf den Punkt zu bringen: Information wird nicht über einen (wie auch immer begründeten) Wahrheitsbegriff bestimmt. Was Information ist, was also Nutzer oder Nutzerinnen in Situationen informationeller Unsicherheit oder Unterbestimmtheit tatsächlich aus der auf sie einstürmenden oder ihnen zur Verfügung gestellten Informationsangebote verwenden, was also zu Information wird, entscheiden letztlich sie - wobei das sicherlich nicht immer autonome Entscheidungen sind, dafür sind die darauf wirkenden externen Kontextfaktoren zu groß.
    Source
    Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft. Hrsg.: Rainer Kuhlen, Dirk Lewandowski, Wolfgang Semar und Christa Womser-Hacker. 7., völlig neu gefasste Ausg
    Theme
    Information
  8. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.01
    0.009890327 = product of:
      0.07417745 = sum of:
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
        0.041692894 = sum of:
          0.02206226 = weight(_text_:information in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02206226 = score(doc=5839,freq=40.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                  40.0 = termFreq=40.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019630633 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose In The Invisible Substrate of Information Science, a landmark article about the discipline of information science, Marcia J. Bates wrote that ".we are always looking for the red thread of information in the social texture of people's lives" (1999a, p. 1048). To sharpen our understanding of information science and to elaborate Bates' idea, the work at hand answers the question: Just what does the red thread of information entail? Design/methodology/approach Through a close reading of Bates' oeuvre and by applying concepts from the reference literature of information science, nine composite entities that qualify as the red thread of information are identified, elaborated, and related to existing concepts in the information science literature. In the spirit of a scientist-poet (White, 1999), several playful metaphors related to the color red are employed. Findings Bates' red thread of information entails: terms, genres, literatures, classification systems, scholarly communication, information retrieval, information experience, information institutions, and information policy. This same constellation of phenomena can be found in resonant visions of information science, namely, domain analysis (Hjørland, 2002), ethnography of infrastructure (Star, 1999), and social epistemology (Shera, 1968). Research limitations/implications With the vital vermilion filament in clear view, newcomers can more easily engage the material, conceptual, and social machinery of information science, and specialists are reminded of what constitutes information science as a whole. Future researchers and scientist-poets may wish to supplement the nine composite entities with additional, emergent information phenomena. Originality/value Though the explication of information science that follows is relatively orthodox and time-bound, the paper offers an imaginative, accessible, yet technically precise way of understanding the field.
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  9. Hapke, T.: Zu einer ganzheitlichen Informationskompetenz gehört eine kritische Wissenschaftskompetenz : Informationskompetenz und Demokratie (2020) 0.00
    0.0041692443 = product of:
      0.03126933 = sum of:
        0.028309368 = weight(_text_:und in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028309368 = score(doc=5685,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.4407773 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
        0.002959963 = product of:
          0.005919926 = sum of:
            0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005919926 = score(doc=5685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    1. Was ist Informationskompetenz? Was macht Informationskompetenz im Kern aus? Wie weit greift sie, wo endet sie? Inwiefern spielt Informationskompetenz mit weiteren Kompetenzen zusammen? 2. Wie soll man Informationskompetenz vermitteln? Wie soll Informationskompetenz am besten vermittelt werden? Wie werden Menschen am besten zu informationskompetentem Verhalten motiviert und geführt? 3. Welches sind die zentralen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung? Wie entwickelt sich Informationskompetenz? Welche Bereiche werden künftig wichtiger? 4. Weitere Aspekte des Themas - Welche? Warum sind diese wichtig? Was folgert daraus?
    Footnote
    Leicht veränderte Fassung eines Beitrages, der für das Projekt "Informationskompetenz und Demokratie" erstellt wurde (Daphné Çetta, Joachim Griesbaum, Thomas Mandl, Elke Montanari). Die ursprüngliche Fassung ist enthalten in: Çetta, D., Griesbaum, J., Mandl, T., Montanari, E. (Hg). (2019). Positionspapiere: Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Projekt: Zukunftsdiskurse: Informationskompetenz und Demokratie (IDE): Bürger, Suchverfahren und Analyse-Algorithmen in der politischen Meinungsbildung, Universität Hildesheim, http://informationskompetenz.blog.uni-hildesheim.de/files/2019/10/Projekt_Informationskompetenz_und_DemokratieKompilation_aller_Positionspapiere.pdf. Die Fragen, die den Beitrag strukturieren und entsprechend hervorgehoben werden, wurden von den Hildesheimer Forschern gestellt.
    Theme
    Information
  10. Fugmann, R.: What is information? : an information veteran looks back (2022) 0.00
    0.0040882356 = product of:
      0.061323527 = sum of:
        0.061323527 = sum of:
          0.02206226 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02206226 = score(doc=1085,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.039261267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039261267 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2022-1-3/what-is-information-an-information-veteran-looks-back-jahrgang-49-2022-heft-1?page=1.
    Date
    18. 8.2022 19:22:57
    Theme
    Information
  11. Seth, A.K.: Unsere inneren Universen (2020) 0.00
    0.0034318906 = product of:
      0.025739178 = sum of:
        0.02179256 = weight(_text_:und in 5662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02179256 = score(doc=5662,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 5662, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5662)
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 5662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=5662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Fortlaufend stellt unser Gehirn Vermutungen über die Welt da draußen an und gleicht Sinneseindrücke ab. Damit konstruiert es die Realität, die wir wahrnehmen, als eine Art kontrollierte Halluzination.
    Footnote
    Vgl. die Diskussion um die Farbwahrnehmung eines Kleides: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/gesellschaft/panorama/dressgate-im-februar-2015-weiss-und-gold-oder-blau-und-schwarz-welche-farbe-hat-das-kleid/11435330.html.
    Theme
    Information
  12. Koch, C.: Was ist Bewusstsein? (2020) 0.00
    0.0032751875 = product of:
      0.04912781 = sum of:
        0.04912781 = sum of:
          0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.009866543 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
          0.039261267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039261267 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2020 22:15:11
    Theme
    Information
  13. Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023) 0.00
    0.0027422844 = product of:
      0.041134264 = sum of:
        0.041134264 = sum of:
          0.021503631 = weight(_text_:information in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021503631 = score(doc=950,freq=38.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.42271453 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                  38.0 = termFreq=38.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
          0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019630633 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
    Date
    22. 4.2023 19:27:56
    Theme
    Information
  14. Yang, F.; Zhang, X.: Focal fields in literature on the information divide : the USA, China, UK and India (2020) 0.00
    0.002348734 = product of:
      0.03523101 = sum of:
        0.03523101 = sum of:
          0.015600375 = weight(_text_:information in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015600375 = score(doc=5835,freq=20.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                  20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019630633 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify key countries and their focal research fields on the information divide. Design/methodology/approach Literature was retrieved to identify key countries and their primary focus. The literature research method was adopted to identify aspects of the primary focus in each key country. Findings The key countries with literature on the information divide are the USA, China, the UK and India. The problem of health is prominent in the USA, and solutions include providing information, distinguishing users' profiles and improving eHealth literacy. Economic and political factors led to the urban-rural information divide in China, and policy is the most powerful solution. Under the influence of humanism, research on the information divide in the UK focuses on all age groups, and solutions differ according to age. Deep-rooted patriarchal concepts and traditional marriage customs make the gender information divide prominent in India, and increasing women's information consciousness is a feasible way to reduce this divide. Originality/value This paper is an extensive review study on the information divide, which clarifies the key countries and their focal fields in research on this topic. More important, the paper innovatively analyzes and summarizes existing literature from a country perspective.
    Date
    13. 2.2020 18:22:13
    Theme
    Information
  15. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Li, A.: ¬A hierarchical typology of scholarly information units : based on a deduction-verification study (2020) 0.00
    0.0020659794 = product of:
      0.03098969 = sum of:
        0.03098969 = sum of:
          0.015285183 = weight(_text_:information in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015285183 = score(doc=5655,freq=30.0), product of:
              0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.3004734 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                  30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.015704507 = weight(_text_:22 in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015704507 = score(doc=5655,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.028978055 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to lay a theoretical foundation for identifying operational information units for library and information professional activities in the context of scholarly communication. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a deduction-verification approach to formulate a typology of units for scholarly information. It first deduces possible units from an existing conceptualization of information, which defines information as the combined product of data and meaning, and then tests the usefulness of these units via two empirical investigations, one with a group of scholarly papers and the other with a sample of scholarly information users. Findings The results show that, on defining an information unit as a piece of information that is complete in both data and meaning, to such an extent that it remains meaningful to its target audience when retrieved and displayed independently in a database, it is then possible to formulate a hierarchical typology of units for scholarly information. The typology proposed in this study consists of three levels, which in turn, consists of 1, 5 and 44 units, respectively. Research limitations/implications The result of this study has theoretical implications on both the philosophical and conceptual levels: on the philosophical level, it hinges on, and reinforces the objective view of information; on the conceptual level, it challenges the conceptualization of work by IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Library Reference Model but endorses that by Library of Congress's BIBFRAME 2.0 model. Practical implications It calls for reconsideration of existing operational units in a variety of library and information activities. Originality/value The study strengthens the conceptual foundation of operational information units and brings to light the primacy of "one work" as an information unit and the possibility for it to be supplemented by smaller units.
    Date
    14. 1.2020 11:15:22
    Theme
    Information
  16. Hjoerland, B.: Information (2023) 0.00
    7.975032E-4 = product of:
      0.011962548 = sum of:
        0.011962548 = product of:
          0.023925096 = sum of:
            0.023925096 = weight(_text_:information in 1118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023925096 = score(doc=1118,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.47031528 = fieldWeight in 1118, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1118)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a brief history of the term "information" and its different meanings, which are both important and difficult because the different meanings of the term imply whole theories of knowledge. The article further considers the relation between "information" and the concepts "matter and energy", "data", "sign and meaning", "knowledge" and "communication". It presents and analyses the influence of information in information studies and knowledge organization and contains a presentation and critical analysis of some compound terms such as "information need", "information overload" and "information retrieval", which illuminate the use of the term information in information studies. An appendix provides a chronological list of definitions of information.
    Theme
    Information
  17. Huvila, I.: Making and taking information (2022) 0.00
    7.893235E-4 = product of:
      0.011839852 = sum of:
        0.011839852 = product of:
          0.023679703 = sum of:
            0.023679703 = weight(_text_:information in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023679703 = score(doc=527,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.46549138 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Information behavior theory covers different aspects of the totality of information-related human behavior rather unevenly. The transitions or trading zones between different types of information activities have remained perhaps especially under-theorized. This article interrogates and expands a conceptual apparatus of information making and information taking as a pair of substantial concepts for explaining, in part, the mobility of information in terms of doing that unfolds as a process of becoming rather than of being, and in part, what is happening when information comes into being and when something is taken up for use as information. Besides providing an apparatus to describe the nexus of information provision and acquisition, a closer consideration of the parallel doings opens opportunities to enrich the inquiry of the conditions and practice of information seeking, appropriation, discovery, and retrieval as modes taking, and learning and information use as its posterities.
    Series
    JASIS&Tspecial issue on information behavior and information practices theory
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.4, S.528-541
    Theme
    Information
  18. Ma, Y.: Understanding information : adding a non-individualistic lens (2021) 0.00
    6.9767E-4 = product of:
      0.010465049 = sum of:
        0.010465049 = product of:
          0.020930098 = sum of:
            0.020930098 = weight(_text_:information in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020930098 = score(doc=382,freq=36.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.41144013 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                    36.0 = termFreq=36.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    The individualistic lens refers to the understanding of problematic information as something that is clearly identifiable, with objective criteria of measurement. This article argues for adding a non-individualistic lens for understanding information. The necessity for adding a non-individualistic lens grows from that the existing individualistic lens appears inadequate to make sense of information phenomenon, in particular when it comes to understanding problematic information. Non-individualistic is proposed as a complementary perspective, which needs to be further developed conceptually. To begin such development, this article directs information professionals' attention to the promising concept of information ecology. More specifically, this article pulls resources from philosophy of information (Floridi's infosphere) and information ethics (Capurro's Angeletics) to illustrate existing conceptualizations of information ecology. Information ecology appears to align with this sociotechnical view that information researchers have started to develop in the most recent years, though arguably information ecology may have an even broader scope. Lastly, this article also points out that the conceptualization of information ecology needs to be aware of, and cautious of the philosophical assumption that is relied on for understanding information.
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1295-1305
    Theme
    Information
  19. Tang, R.; Mehra, B.; Du, J.T.; Zhao, Y.C.: Paradigm shift in the field of information (2021) 0.00
    6.5776956E-4 = product of:
      0.009866543 = sum of:
        0.009866543 = product of:
          0.019733086 = sum of:
            0.019733086 = weight(_text_:information in 5902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019733086 = score(doc=5902,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 5902, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1217-1222
    Theme
    Information
  20. Graminius, C.: Fast-food information, information quality and information gap : a temporal exploration of the notion of information in science communication on climate change (2022) 0.00
    6.5776956E-4 = product of:
      0.009866543 = sum of:
        0.009866543 = product of:
          0.019733086 = sum of:
            0.019733086 = weight(_text_:information in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019733086 = score(doc=684,freq=32.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
                  5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                    32.0 = termFreq=32.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss the concept of information in relation to temporality within the context of climate change communication. Furthermore, the paper aims to highlight the empirical richness of information as a concept by analysing its use in context. Design/methodology/approach The discussion is based on 14 semi-structured interviews with initiators and collaborators of 6 open letters on climate change published in 2018-2019. By taking three specific notions the interviewees introduced-fast food information, information quality and information gap-as the analytical point of departure, the study aims for a contextual understanding of information grounded in temporal sensitivity. Findings The paper finds that information in the context of open letters is informed by different, and at times contradicting, temporalities and timescapes which align with various material, institutional and discursive practices. Based on this finding, the paper argues that notions of information are intrinsically linked to the act of communicating, and they should be viewed as co-constituting each other. Originality/value The paper contributes with an empirically informed discussion regarding the concept of information as it is used in a specific context. It illustrates how "information" is far from being understood in a singular fashion, but is made up of multifaceted and at times contradictory understandings. Ultimately, they correspond to why and how one communicates climate change information.
    Theme
    Information

Languages

  • e 41
  • d 12

Types

  • a 49
  • el 5
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • More… Less…