-
Schulz, H.: Zur Charakterisierung der BBK/A (1988)
0.02
0.02035825 = product of:
0.15268686 = sum of:
0.050895624 = product of:
0.10179125 = sum of:
0.10179125 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 90) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10179125 = score(doc=90,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 90, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=90)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.10179125 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 90) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10179125 = score(doc=90,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 90, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=90)
0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
- Source
- Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 102(1988), S.26-30
-
Göbel, C.: Neuere Entwicklungen international verbreiteter Klassifikationen : Diskussion und Stand bei UDC, DDC und LCC (1989)
0.00
0.0023724737 = product of:
0.035587102 = sum of:
0.035587102 = weight(_text_:und in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035587102 = score(doc=1161,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
-
Engbarth, M.: ¬Die Library of Congress Classification : Geschichte, Struktur, Verbreitung und Auswirkungen auf deutsche Bibliotheksklassifikationen (1980)
0.00
0.0016775922 = product of:
0.025163881 = sum of:
0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025163881 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
-
Wimmer, F.: ¬Die internationale Dezimalklassifikation : Betrachtungen zu ihrer Entstehungsgeschichte und Aktualität (1985)
0.00
0.0014678931 = product of:
0.022018395 = sum of:
0.022018395 = weight(_text_:und in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022018395 = score(doc=1167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
-
Traiser, W.: Anwendung der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation in Nationalbibliographien (1988)
0.00
0.0012712327 = product of:
0.01906849 = sum of:
0.01906849 = weight(_text_:und in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01906849 = score(doc=749,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Footnote
- Im Jahr 1977 hatte die Unesco in Paris eine Empfehlung für die Gliederung von Nationalbibliographien beschlossen [vgl. International Congress on National Bibliographies, Paris, 10.-15.9.1977, Final report. Paris: Unesco 1978. S.12, Recommendation 12 und International cataloguing 6(1977) S.43] und 2 Jahre später hinzugefügt, daß hierzu verwendet werden sollen entweder die DDC, die UDC/DK, die LCC und die Unesco-Classification. Die vorliegende Untersuchung beschränkt sich auf die europäischen Nationalbibliographien, von denen seit 1986 insgesamt 11 die DK verwenden ...
-
Meink, P.: ¬Das Gestern und das Morgen mit einer DK von Heute : eine Klassifikation hält Schritt (1988)
0.00
0.0010484952 = product of:
0.015727427 = sum of:
0.015727427 = weight(_text_:und in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015727427 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985)
0.00
1.3155391E-4 = product of:
0.0019733086 = sum of:
0.0019733086 = product of:
0.0039466172 = sum of:
0.0039466172 = weight(_text_:information in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039466172 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.028978055 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
