Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011117952 = product of:
  0.08338463 = sum of:
    0.01906849 = weight(_text_:und in 5982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01906849 = score(doc=5982,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 5982, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5982)
    0.06431614 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06431614 = score(doc=5982,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 5982, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5982)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)

Abstract

Im Rahmen der vorliegenden Magisterarbeit wurde ein virtuelles Bibliotheksregal für die Informationswissenschaft entwickelt. Es ermöglicht den BenutzerInnen den Browsing-Zugang zum informationswissenschaftlichen Literaturbestand der Universitätsbibliothek Hildesheim über drei verschiedene hierarchische Ordnungssystematiken. Die BenutzerInnen können eine Systematik auswählen, nach der sich der Bestand entsprechend anordnet. Die vorliegende Arbeit beschreibt die einzelnen Schritte der Realisierung des virtuellen Bibliotheksregals sowie seine anschließende Evaluierung durch einen Benutzertest, der mit Studierenden der Universität Hildesheim durchgeführt wurde.

Content

[Magisterarbeit im Studiengang Internationales Informationsmanagement am Fachbereich Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften der Universität Hildesheim]

Imprint

Hildesheim] : Fachbereich Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften

0.0016775922 = product of:
  0.025163881 = sum of:
    0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025163881 = score(doc=2491,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag werden nach einem kurzen historischen Abriss der OPAC-Entwicklung die Prinzipien und Möglichkeiten zur Gestaltung von Interaktionsvorgängen zur inhaltlichen Suche diskutiert. Es wird dabei ein Plädoyer abgegeben, die OPACs nicht allein als Findeinstrumente für bibliografische Daten sondern auch als Systeme zur Wissenserkundung zu begreifen und die Interaktionsvorgänge darauf abzustimmen

Source

Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 57(2004) H.1, S.70-80

0.0014528375 = product of:
  0.02179256 = sum of:
    0.02179256 = weight(_text_:und in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02179256 = score(doc=2195,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

In diesem Beitrag werden nach einem kurzen historischen Abriss der OPAC-Entwicklung die Prinzipien und Möglichkeiten zur Gestaltung von Interaktionsvorgängen zur inhaltlichen Suche diskutiert. Es wird dabei ein Plädoyer abgegeben, die OPACs nicht allein als Findeinstrumente für bibliografische Daten sondern auch als Systeme zur Wissenserkundung zu begreifen und die Interaktionsvorgänge darauf abzustimmen

4.9332716E-4 = product of:
  0.007399907 = sum of:
    0.007399907 = product of:
      0.014799814 = sum of:
        0.014799814 = weight(_text_:information in 2197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014799814 = score(doc=2197,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2909321 = fieldWeight in 2197, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

We investigate facets of online health information that are preferred, easy-to-use and useful in accessing online consumer health information from a user's perspective. In this study, the existing classification structure of 20 top ranked consumer health information websites in South Korea were analyzed, and nine facets that are used in organizing health information in those websites were identified. Based on the identified facets, an online survey, which asked participants' preferences for as well as perceived ease-of-use and usefulness of each facet in accessing online health information, was conducted. The analysis of the survey results showed that among the nine facets, the "diseases & conditions" and "body part" facets were most preferred, and perceived as easy-to-use and useful in accessing online health information. In contrast, "age," "gender," and "alternative medicine" facets were perceived as relatively less preferred, easy-to-use and useful. This research study has direct implications for organization and design of health information websites in that it suggests facets to include and avoid in organizing and providing access points to online health information.

3.9466174E-4 = product of:
  0.005919926 = sum of:
    0.005919926 = product of:
      0.011839852 = sum of:
        0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 2229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011839852 = score(doc=2229,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2229, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2229)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

Modern fact databses contain abundant data classified through several classifications. Typically, users msut consult these classifications in separate manuals or files, thus making their effective use difficult. Contemporary database systems do little support deductive use of classifications. In this study we show how deductive data management techniques can be applied to the utilization of data value classifications. Computation of transitive class relationships is of primary importance here. We define a representation of classifications which supports transitive computation and present an operation-oriented deductive query language tailored for classification-based deductive information retrieval. The operations of this language are on the same abstraction level as relational algebra operations and can be integrated with these to form a powerful and flexible query language for deductive information retrieval. We define the integration of these operations and demonstrate the usefulness of the language in terms of several sample queries

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.10, S.557-578

2.79068E-4 = product of:
  0.0041860198 = sum of:
    0.0041860198 = product of:
      0.0083720395 = sum of:
        0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0083720395 = score(doc=1251,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.948-963

1.9733087E-4 = product of:
  0.002959963 = sum of:
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)

Source

Information world review. 1996, no.120, S.47-48