Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  • × year_i:[1960 TO 1970}
  1. Haldenwanger, H.H.M.: Begriff und Sprache in der Dokumentation (1961) 0.00
    0.0016775922 = product of:
      0.025163881 = sum of:
        0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025163881 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
  2. Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967) 0.00
    6.511586E-4 = product of:
      0.009767379 = sum of:
        0.009767379 = product of:
          0.019534757 = sum of:
            0.019534757 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019534757 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
  3. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.00
    3.2888478E-4 = product of:
      0.0049332716 = sum of:
        0.0049332716 = product of:
          0.009866543 = sum of:
            0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009866543 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
  4. Melton, J.S.: ¬A use for the techniques of structural linguistics in documentation research (1965) 0.00
    2.6310782E-4 = product of:
      0.0039466172 = sum of:
        0.0039466172 = product of:
          0.0078932345 = sum of:
            0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0078932345 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Index language (the system of symbols for representing subject content after analysis) is considered as a separate component and a variable in an information retrieval system. It is suggested that for purposes of testing, comparing and evaluating index language, the techniques of structural linguistics may provide a descriptive methodology by which all such languages (hierarchical and faceted classification, analytico-synthetic indexing, traditional subject indexing, indexes and classifications based on automatic text analysis, etc.) could be described in term of a linguistic model, and compared on a common basis