Search (924 results, page 1 of 47)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.20 
    0.19944096 = product of:
  0.59832287 = sum of:
    0.046024837 = product of:
      0.1380745 = sum of:
        0.1380745 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gierke, B.: ¬Der Fachinformationsdienst Buch-, Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft : eine Kurzvorstellung (2020) 0.08 
    0.08383029 = product of:
  0.20957573 = sum of:
    0.058725778 = weight(_text_:buch in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058725778 = score(doc=5709,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.0231145 = weight(_text_:und in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0231145 = score(doc=5709,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06751789 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06751789 = score(doc=5709,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5172295 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(6/15)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des DFG Förderprogramms Fachinformationsdienste (FID) nahm der FID Buch- Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, eine Kooperation der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und der Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, im Oktober 2017 seine Arbeit auf. Ziel ist, die Spitzenversorgung mit Literatur für Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler dieser und angrenzenden Disziplinen sicher zu stellen. Dazu hat der FID BBI ein Discovery Tool entwickelt. Grundlage dafür ist die Open-Source-Software VuFind. Eine Herausforderung für den FID BBI ist die Auswertung unterschiedlichster Datenquellen, weil die Themengebiete des FID BBI sehr weit gefächert sind. Das Portal bietet einen schnellen Rechercheeinstieg. Es ist aber auch möglich komplexere Suchanfragen zu stellen. Der Kontakt zu der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft, die der FID BBI bedient, hat große Priorität, um die Ziele, die von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gesetzt wurden, zu erfüllen. Ein erster Kontakt kann über das Nachweisportal hergestellt werden: https://katalog.fid-bbi.de.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.1, S.43-48
  3. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.04 
    0.03510284 = product of:
  0.13163565 = sum of:
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038981467 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.03539661 = sum of:
      0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011839852 = score(doc=351,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023556758 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
    Theme
    Information
  4. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03 
    0.029562928 = product of:
  0.11086097 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.030661764 = sum of:
      0.01103113 = weight(_text_:information in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01103113 = score(doc=998,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
  5. Ockenfeld, M.: Informationswissenschaft - Bandbreite und Ausrichtungen in der DACH-Region (2020) 0.03 
    0.02861138 = product of:
  0.1430569 = sum of:
    0.029840691 = weight(_text_:und in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029840691 = score(doc=5833,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
    0.11025624 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11025624 = score(doc=5833,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.84463215 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=5833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Auf Initiative von Vivian Petras (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) als Gastgeberin und Dirk Lewandowski (Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg) veranstaltete der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft am 3. Februar 2020 einen Workshop in den Räumen des Instituts für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (IBI) in Berlin. Anliegen dieses und gleichartiger künftig geplanter Treffen ist es, Standorte informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre zu vernetzen und sich besser kennen zu lernen. Angesichts zahlreicher Emeritierungen und Neuberufungen an den Hochschulen sowie dem Generationenwechsel in außeruniversitären Einrichtungen der Forschungsinfrastruktur ist dies, wie die Beteiligung von etwa 60 Personen bewies, eine von vielen begrüßte Initiative. Der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft (HI) versteht sich nicht - wie der Name suggerieren könnte - als Professorenbund, erklärte Lewandowski bei der Einführung, sondern als Zusammenschluss aller, die in Wissenschaft und Forschung in der Informationswissenschaft tätig sind. Zu diesem ersten Workshop waren insgesamt sieben Vorträge - aus der KIBA, zwei Universitäten, zwei Hochschulen sowie zwei außeruniversitären Einrichtungen - eingeladen.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Footnote
    Bericht über einen Workshop des Hochschulverbandes Informationswissenschaft am 3. Februar 2020 in den Räumen des Instituts für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (IBI) in Berlin.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.133-138
  6. Santos Green, L.; Johnston, M.P.: ¬A contextualization of editorial misconduct in the library and information science academic information ecosystem (2022) 0.03 
    0.027597187 = product of:
  0.10348944 = sum of:
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038981467 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.007250399 = product of:
      0.014500798 = sum of:
        0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014500798 = score(doc=612,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In the last decade, one of the most effective tools applied in combating the erosion of public trust in academic research has been an increased level of transparency in the peer review and editorial process. Publicly available publication ethics guidelines and policies are vital in creating a transparent process that prevents unethical research, publication misconduct, manipulation of the communication of research to practitioners, and the erosion of public trust. This study investigated how these unethical practices, specifically those coded as editorial misconduct, bring the authenticity and integrity of the library and information science academic research digital record into question. Employing a multi-layered approach, including key informant interviews, researchers determined the frequency and the content of ethical publishing policies and procedures in library and information science journals; exploring the ways the lack of, or nonadherence to these policies and procedures impacted library and information science researchers in instances of editorial misconduct.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.913-928
  7. Heisig, P.: Informationswissenschaft für Wissensmanager : Was Wissensmanager von der informationswissenschaftlichen Forschung lernen können (2021) 0.03 
    0.02759406 = product of:
  0.1379703 = sum of:
    0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025163881 = score(doc=223,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
    0.073504165 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073504165 = score(doc=223,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
    0.03930225 = sum of:
      0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0078932345 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
      0.031409014 = weight(_text_:22 in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031409014 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaften und das Wissensmanagement weisen zahlreiche Gemeinsamkeiten auf und Anknüpfungspunkte für gemeinsamen Forschungen. Praktiker des Wissensmanagements sollten die Forschungsergebnisse der Schwesterdisziplin eingehender studieren, um für Ihre Organisationspraxis relevante Ergebnisse berücksichtigen zu können. Es ist zu wünschen, dass durch einen gemeinsamen Forschungsdialog potenzielle Synergien für Forschung und Praxis zukünftig erschlossen werden.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:38:21
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.1, S.10-18
  8. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 1: Das Dilemma mit der inkompetenten Informationskompetenz. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021). (2021) 0.03 
    0.026178187 = product of:
  0.13089094 = sum of:
    0.033027593 = weight(_text_:und in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033027593 = score(doc=345,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
    0.09095676 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09095676 = score(doc=345,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.696786 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
    0.00690658 = product of:
      0.01381316 = sum of:
        0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01381316 = score(doc=345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Auf der im März 2021 abgehaltenen (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März -10.März 2021) wurde nochmals nachdrücklich auf die domänenspezifische, fast mit Alleinstellungsanspruch versehene "Informationskompetenz" (Information Literacy) der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft hingewiesen. Erneut wurden "Zukunftsdiskurse" zu "Informationskompetenz und Demokratie" angekündigt und "Positionspapiere" zur Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung präsentiert (D. Cetta, J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl, E. Montanari: Positionspapiere. Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Hildesheim 2019).
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  9. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.03 
    0.025812719 = product of:
  0.12906359 = sum of:
    0.0136203505 = weight(_text_:und in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0136203505 = score(doc=330,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.08594606 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08594606 = score(doc=330,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.6584009 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.029497176 = sum of:
      0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009866543 = score(doc=330,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  10. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff (2020) 0.03 
    0.025533566 = product of:
  0.12766783 = sum of:
    0.01906849 = weight(_text_:und in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01906849 = score(doc=326,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.10169275 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10169275 = score(doc=326,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.77903044 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.00690658 = product of:
      0.01381316 = sum of:
        0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01381316 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaft, eine Disziplin ohne Theorie, ohne Bezugsrahmen und ohne Klärung ihres Grundbegriffes. Zahlreiche FachvertreterInnen der Informationswissenschaft bereiten erst recht das Feld für Hate Speech und Fake News vor - mit ihrem ungeklärten (Un)begriff der "Information", - mit ihrer Forderung nach "Informationskompetenz", ein Terrain, das eigentlich der Bibliothekswissenschaft zusteht, - mit ihrer Theorielosigkeit, - mit ihrer unkritischen Ablehnung einer ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung sowie - mit ihrem ungeklärten Domänenverständnis.
    Content
    Fortsetzung als: Wie man mit Information umgehen sollte - Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  11. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 4: "Informationskompetenz" messbar machen. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021) (2021) 0.03 
    0.025395835 = product of:
  0.12697917 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=428,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
    0.09095676 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09095676 = score(doc=428,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.696786 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
    0.0048836893 = product of:
      0.009767379 = sum of:
        0.009767379 = weight(_text_:information in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009767379 = score(doc=428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Im abschließenden Teil 4 dieser Reihe zur Kritik des "Informationskompetenz"-Ansatzes der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft und dessen Eignung für die Aufdeckung und "Bekämpfung" von Desinformationen bzw. Fake News (Open Password - noch einzufügen) werden ausgewählte Forschungsergebnisse vorgestellt. Diese entstammen der Studie "Quelle: Internet? - Digitale Nachrichten- und Informationskompetenzen der deutschen Bevölkerung im Test". Träger der Studie ist die Berliner Stiftung "Neue Verantwortung", ein Forschungs-"Think Tank für die Gesellschaft im technologischen Wandel" (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation/quelle-internet-digitale-nachrichten-und-informationskompetenzen-der-deutschen).
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  12. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 3: Wie erst spezifisches Fachwissen zu Medien- und Informationskompetenz führen kann. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021) (2021) 0.02 
    0.023491388 = product of:
  0.117456935 = sum of:
    0.03530798 = weight(_text_:und in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03530798 = score(doc=406,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.54974586 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
    0.077962935 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077962935 = score(doc=406,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
    0.0041860198 = product of:
      0.0083720395 = sum of:
        0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0083720395 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    In dieser Reihe wird die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft und ihr Umgang mit der "Informationskompetenz" kritisiert und die Verwertbarkeit ihrer Beiträge für die Aufdeckung und "Bekämpfung" von Desinformationen und Fake News infrage gestellt (Open Password - nachzutragen). Alternativ dazu wurde in Teil 2 das Forschungsdesign zu einer ersten, nationalen empirischen Untersuchung zum Thema: "Digitale Nachrichten- und Informationskompetenzen der deutschen Bevölkerung im Test" der Stiftung "Neue Verantwortung", einem Berliner Forschungs-"Think Tank für die Gesellschaft im technologischen Wandel" (März 2021), vorgestellt (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation/quelle-internet-digitale-nachrichten- und-informationskompetenzen-der-deutschen). In Teil 3 werden die Inhalte und Testverfahren der Berliner Studie interpretiert und bewertet. In Teil 4 werden ausgewählte Ergebnisse der Studie vorgestellt, die in eine Bestandsaufnahme zum Stand der operativen "Informationskompetenz"-Forschung allgemein und in den Nachbarwissenschaften münden sollte.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  13. Vakkari, P.; Chang, Y.-W.; Järvelin, K.: Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science : leading to fragmentation? (2022) 0.02 
    0.022997657 = product of:
  0.08624121 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.006041999 = product of:
      0.012083998 = sum of:
        0.012083998 = weight(_text_:information in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012083998 = score(doc=767,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    The study analyses contributions to Library and Information Science (LIS) by researchers representing various disciplines. How are such contributions associated with the choice of research topics and methodology? The study employs a quantitative content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 2015. Each article is seen as a contribution to LIS by the authors' disciplines, which are inferred from their affiliations. The unit of analysis is the article-discipline pair. Of the contribution instances, the share of LIS is one third. Computer Science contributes one fifth and Business and Economics one sixth. The latter disciplines dominate the contributions in information retrieval, information seeking, and scientific communication indicating strong influences in LIS. Correspondence analysis reveals three clusters of research, one focusing on traditional LIS with contributions from LIS and Humanities and survey-type research; another on information retrieval with contributions from Computer Science and experimental research; and the third on scientific communication with contributions from Natural Sciences and Medicine and citation analytic research. The strong differentiation of scholarly contributions in LIS hints to the fragmentation of LIS as a discipline.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.12, S.1706-1722
  14. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : Wie man mit "Information" umgehen sollte: Das Beispiel der Medienforschung (2020) 0.02 
    0.022657705 = product of:
  0.11328852 = sum of:
    0.018872911 = weight(_text_:und in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018872911 = score(doc=5911,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
    0.087165214 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087165214 = score(doc=5911,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.66774035 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
    0.007250399 = product of:
      0.014500798 = sum of:
        0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 5911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014500798 = score(doc=5911,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 5911, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Information als "Wissen in Aktion" zu definieren, scheint der Informationswissenschaft zu reichen. Und das in einer Welt, wie das Fachportal woxiwon (https://synonyme.woxikon.de/synonyme/information.php) ausweist, bei über 460 Synonyma für den Begriff "Information", die in fast dreißig Gruppen geclustert sind. Cluster 1: "Aufmerksamkeit" mit den Dimensionen der Nutzererwartungen "Aktualität", "Werbung", "Schlagzeilen" sowie "Provokation durch Fake & Klatsch". Cluster 2: "Verbundenheit" Cluster 3: "Gemeinsamkeit" Cluster 4: "Intellektuelle Leistung"
    Content
    Fortsetzung von: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch: die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.759 vom 25. Mai 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ]. Weitere Fortsetzung als: Informationskompetenz in den Bibliotheken und in der Informationswissenschaft - Das Verlangen nach einer verständlichen Wissenschaftssprache. In: Open Password. 2020, Nr.784 vom 09. Juli 2020. Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzExNiwiM2Y4YjgwNDBiM2QxIiwwLDAsMTA2LDFd.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  15. Peset, F.; Garzón-Farinós, F.; González, L.M.; García-Massó, X.; Ferrer-Sapena, A.; Toca-Herrera, J.L.; Sánchez-Pérez, E.A.: Survival analysis of author keywords : an application to the library and information sciences area (2020) 0.02 
    0.022525748 = product of:
  0.08447155 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=5774,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
    0.004272339 = product of:
      0.008544678 = sum of:
        0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 5774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008544678 = score(doc=5774,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5774, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Our purpose is to adapt a statistical method for the analysis of discrete numerical series to the keywords appearing in scientific articles of a given area. As an example, we apply our methodological approach to the study of the keywords in the Library and Information Sciences (LIS) area. Our objective is to detect the new author keywords that appear in a fixed knowledge area in the period of 1 year in order to quantify the probabilities of survival for 10 years as a function of the impact of the journals where they appeared. Many of the new keywords appearing in the LIS field are ephemeral. Actually, more than half are never used again. In general, the terms most commonly used in the LIS area come from other areas. The average survival time of these keywords is approximately 3 years, being slightly higher in the case of words that were published in journals classified in the second quartile of the area. We believe that measuring the appearance and disappearance of terms will allow understanding some relevant aspects of the evolution of a discipline, providing in this way a new bibliometric approach.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.4, S.462-473
  16. Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022) 0.02 
    0.022525748 = product of:
  0.08447155 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
    0.004272339 = product of:
      0.008544678 = sum of:
        0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008544678 = score(doc=949,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from 1965 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a quantitative intellectual content analysis of articles published in 30+ scholarly LIS journals, following the design by Tuomaala et al. (2014). In the content analysis, we classify articles along eight dimensions covering topical content and methodology. Findings The topical findings indicate that the earlier strong LIS emphasis on L&I services has declined notably, while scientific and professional communication has become the most popular topic. Information storage and retrieval has given up its earlier strong position towards the end of the years analyzed. Individuals are increasingly the units of observation. End-user's and developer's viewpoints have strengthened at the cost of intermediaries' viewpoint. LIS research is methodologically increasingly scattered since survey, scientometric methods, experiment, case studies and qualitative studies have all gained in popularity. Consequently, LIS may have become more versatile in the analysis of its research objects during the years analyzed. Originality/value Among quantitative intellectual content analyses of LIS research, the study is unique in its scope: length of analysis period (50 years), width (8 dimensions covering topical content and methodology) and depth (the annual batch of 30+ scholarly journals).
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
  17. Rauch, W.: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist (2021) 0.02 
    0.022352805 = product of:
  0.11176402 = sum of:
    0.017793551 = weight(_text_:und in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017793551 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.09002385 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09002385 = score(doc=420,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.68963933 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
    0.0039466172 = product of:
      0.0078932345 = sum of:
        0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0078932345 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Zur Eröffnung der ISI2021, dem 16. Internationalen Symposium für Informationswissenschaft, hat Prof. Dr. WolfRauch, Emeritus der Universität Graz, einen Festvortrag gehalten, dessen Manuskript wir hier mit seinem Einverständ-nis zum Nachlesen abdrucken. Wie freuen uns, ebenso wieder Autor, über Reaktionen in Form von Kommentaren oder Leserbriefen und auf eine lebendige fruchtbare Diskussion.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.4, S.169-176
  18. Buschman, J.: ¬The public sphere without democracy : some recent work in LIS (2020) 0.02 
    0.022316683 = product of:
  0.08368756 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=5838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
    0.0034883497 = product of:
      0.0069766995 = sum of:
        0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 5838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069766995 = score(doc=5838,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5838, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze and re-direct recent schematic and empirical scholarship on Habermas' theory of the public sphere in library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a critical analysis of the relevant literature in light of Habermas' origination and use/purpose of the public sphere concept. Findings The authors examined here produced a schematic operationalization of the public sphere that thinned the concept, but in turn, that schematization has produced insight into the civil society functions and communications of libraries, both within and without. For this work to be meaningful, the considerations and contexts of democratic society must be reinserted. Research limitations/implications Further explorations of the relationship between the public sphere and civil society as they are manifested around and in libraries is called for. Additionally, Weigand's approach to producing data/evidence on the public sphere and libraries should be furthered. Practical implications Understanding the role and function of libraries in democratic societies is essential for libraries to play a productive democratic role in those societies and thus, in guiding them. Social implications This paper helps to situate the bewildering circumstances of libraries who face both popular support and broad political-social questioning of their role and place. Originality/value This paper arguably interjects a more sophisticated and nuanced theoretical picture of the public sphere than prior precis presented in the LIS literature have undertaken. It also engages a unique set of empirical-theoretical students from another perspective in order to deepen and shift that research discourse.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  19. Zhang, L.: ¬The knowledge organization education within and beyond the master of library and information science (2023) 0.02 
    0.022316683 = product of:
  0.08368756 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=1127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=1127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=1127,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
    0.0034883497 = product of:
      0.0069766995 = sum of:
        0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069766995 = score(doc=1127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    By analyzing 63 English-speaking institutions that offer ALA-accredited master's programs in library and information studies, this research aims to explore the education for knowl­edge organization (KO) at different levels and across fields. This research examines the KO courses that are the required courses and elective courses in the MLIS programs, that are offered in other master's programs and graduate certificate programs, that are adapted to the undergraduate degree and certificate programs, and that are particularly developed for programs other than MLIS. The findings indicate that the great majority of MLIS programs still have a focus on or a significant component of knowl­edge organization as their required course and include the knowl­edge organization elective courses, particularly library cataloging and classification, on their curriculum. However, there is a variety of the offerings of KO related courses across the programs in an institution or in the same program across the institutions. It shows a promising trend that the traditional and new KO courses play an important role in many other programs, at different levels and across fields. With the conventional, adapted, or innovative content, these courses demonstrate that the principles and skills of knowl­edge organization are applicable to a wide variety of settings, can be integrated with other disciplinary knowl­edge and emerging technologies, and meet the needs of different career pathways and groups of learners.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
  20. Jörs, B.: Wider eine Überschätzung der gegenwärtigen Leistungen der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft : Keine fehlende Fundierung? Doch mit gesellschaftlicher Relevanz ausgestattet? (2020) 0.02 
    0.022208255 = product of:
  0.11104127 = sum of:
    0.011120969 = weight(_text_:und in 5564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011120969 = score(doc=5564,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 5564, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5564)
    0.09745367 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09745367 = score(doc=5564,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.7465564 = fieldWeight in 5564, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5564)
    0.0024666358 = product of:
      0.0049332716 = sum of:
        0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 5564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049332716 = score(doc=5564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    In einem aktuellen Beitrag von Open Password (#664, 19. November ) zu einer Veranstaltung des Berliner Arbeitskreises Information unter dem Titel "Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft. Hat die Informationswissenschaft eine Zukunft?" nimmt der Herausgeber des gleichnamigen Buches, Dr. Willi Bredemeier, die Rolle eines Berichterstatters ein. Vorgestellt werden die Inhalte eines Vortrages des Hamburger HAW-Referenten, Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski, zum Thema: "Warum die Frage nach der Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft falsch gestellt ist". Dem Bericht darüber in Open Password wurde der Titel "Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem. Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen" gegeben.
    Content
    Erwiderung auf: Lewandowski, D.: Die Informationswissenschaft hat ein strukturelles, kein inhaltliches Problem: Ein Sechs-Punkte-Programm, um aus dem Status eines kleinen Faches herauszukommen. In: Open Password. Nr. 664 vom 19.11.2019, [https://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=822&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]. Zweiter Teil als: Doch einen angemessenen Praxisbezug und einen ausreichenden gesellschaftlichen Nutzen? In: Open Password. Nr. 701 vom 06. Februar 2020 [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzIwLDAsNjI2NCwiMTIxdHVlYm51bnMwa2tnZ2Nnd3dnNDgwdzg4MGs0c2MiLDE5LDBd]. Vgl. auch die vorangegangenen Beiträge von Lewandoski und Jörs.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft: Hat die Informationswissenschaft eine Zukunft?

Authors

Languages

  • e 612
  • d 307
  • pt 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 166
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications