Search (1060 results, page 1 of 53)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.24 
    0.2406652 = product of:
  0.5157111 = sum of:
    0.03835403 = product of:
      0.11506209 = sum of:
        0.11506209 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11506209 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11506209 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11506209 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.0136203505 = weight(_text_:und in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0136203505 = score(doc=1000,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11506209 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11506209 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11506209 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11506209 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11506209 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11506209 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.0034883497 = product of:
      0.0069766995 = sum of:
        0.0069766995 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069766995 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Abstract
    Vorgestellt wird die Konstruktion eines thematisch geordneten Thesaurus auf Basis der Sachschlagwörter der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) unter Nutzung der darin enthaltenen DDC-Notationen. Oberste Ordnungsebene dieses Thesaurus werden die DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Konstruktion des Thesaurus erfolgt regelbasiert unter der Nutzung von Linked Data Prinzipien in einem SPARQL Prozessor. Der Thesaurus dient der automatisierten Gewinnung von Metadaten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen mittels eines computerlinguistischen Extraktors. Hierzu werden digitale Volltexte verarbeitet. Dieser ermittelt die gefundenen Schlagwörter über Vergleich der Zeichenfolgen Benennungen im Thesaurus, ordnet die Treffer nach Relevanz im Text und gibt die zugeordne-ten Sachgruppen rangordnend zurück. Die grundlegende Annahme dabei ist, dass die gesuchte Sachgruppe unter den oberen Rängen zurückgegeben wird. In einem dreistufigen Verfahren wird die Leistungsfähigkeit des Verfahrens validiert. Hierzu wird zunächst anhand von Metadaten und Erkenntnissen einer Kurzautopsie ein Goldstandard aus Dokumenten erstellt, die im Online-Katalog der DNB abrufbar sind. Die Dokumente vertei-len sich über 14 der Sachgruppen mit einer Losgröße von jeweils 50 Dokumenten. Sämtliche Dokumente werden mit dem Extraktor erschlossen und die Ergebnisse der Kategorisierung do-kumentiert. Schließlich wird die sich daraus ergebende Retrievalleistung sowohl für eine harte (binäre) Kategorisierung als auch eine rangordnende Rückgabe der Sachgruppen beurteilt.
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
    Imprint
    Wien / Library and Information Studies : Universität
  2. Rösch, H.: Informationsethik und Bibliotheksethik : Grundlagen und Praxis (2021) 0.20 
    0.20420222 = product of:
  0.43757617 = sum of:
    0.12506367 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12506367 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.7564393 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.083050795 = weight(_text_:buch in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083050795 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.034023624 = weight(_text_:und in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034023624 = score(doc=222,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5297484 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.03817172 = product of:
      0.07634344 = sum of:
        0.07634344 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07634344 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.077962935 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077962935 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.07634344 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07634344 = score(doc=222,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=222)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Abstract
    Neben den theoretischen und allgemeinen Grundlagen von Informationsethik und Bibliotheksethik wird das Spektrum ethischer Konflikte und Dilemmata an Beispielen aus der Praxis des Berufsfelds Bibliothek und Information konkret erläutert. Dabei wird deutlich, dass wissenschaftlich fundierte Aussagen der Informationsethik und der Bibliotheksethik grundlegend für die wertbezogene Standardisierung bibliothekarischer Arbeit und äußerst hilfreich für ethisch abgesicherte Entscheidungen im Berufsalltag sind.
    Classification
    AN 65100: Begriff, Wesen der Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    AN 92650: Darstellungen zu mehreren Gebieten / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    RVK
    AN 65100: Begriff, Wesen der Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    AN 92650: Darstellungen zu mehreren Gebieten / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 68
  3. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.20 
    0.19944096 = product of:
  0.59832287 = sum of:
    0.046024837 = product of:
      0.1380745 = sum of:
        0.1380745 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.1380745 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1380745 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24567628 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.33333334 = coord(5/15)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  4. Gierke, B.: ¬Der Fachinformationsdienst Buch-, Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft : eine Kurzvorstellung (2020) 0.08 
    0.08383029 = product of:
  0.20957573 = sum of:
    0.058725778 = weight(_text_:buch in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058725778 = score(doc=5709,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.0231145 = weight(_text_:und in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0231145 = score(doc=5709,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06751789 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06751789 = score(doc=5709,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5172295 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=5709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5709)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(6/15)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des DFG Förderprogramms Fachinformationsdienste (FID) nahm der FID Buch- Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, eine Kooperation der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel und der Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, im Oktober 2017 seine Arbeit auf. Ziel ist, die Spitzenversorgung mit Literatur für Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler dieser und angrenzenden Disziplinen sicher zu stellen. Dazu hat der FID BBI ein Discovery Tool entwickelt. Grundlage dafür ist die Open-Source-Software VuFind. Eine Herausforderung für den FID BBI ist die Auswertung unterschiedlichster Datenquellen, weil die Themengebiete des FID BBI sehr weit gefächert sind. Das Portal bietet einen schnellen Rechercheeinstieg. Es ist aber auch möglich komplexere Suchanfragen zu stellen. Der Kontakt zu der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft, die der FID BBI bedient, hat große Priorität, um die Ziele, die von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft gesetzt wurden, zu erfüllen. Ein erster Kontakt kann über das Nachweisportal hergestellt werden: https://katalog.fid-bbi.de.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.1, S.43-48
  5. Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021) 0.07 
    0.07018502 = product of:
  0.15039647 = sum of:
    0.044216685 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044216685 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2674417 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.029362889 = weight(_text_:buch in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029362889 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.21793923 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.0066725817 = weight(_text_:und in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066725817 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.10389221 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.013495741 = product of:
      0.026991483 = sum of:
        0.026991483 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026991483 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.20895338 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.02756406 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02756406 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.21115804 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.026991483 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026991483 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.20895338 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.0020930099 = product of:
      0.0041860198 = sum of:
        0.0041860198 = weight(_text_:information in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041860198 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.08228803 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.46666667 = coord(7/15)
    Abstract
    The range of metadata needed to run a digital library and preserve its collections in the long term is much more extensive and complicated than anything in its traditional counterpart. It includes the same 'descriptive' information which guides users to the resources they require but must supplement this with comprehensive 'administrative' metadata: this encompasses technical details of the files that make up its collections, the documentation of complex intellectual property rights and the extensive set needed to support its preservation in the long-term. To accommodate all of this requires the use of multiple metadata standards, all of which have to be brought together into a single integrated whole.
    Classification
    AN 73700: Digitale Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Introduction, Aims and Definitions -- 1.1 Origins -- 1.2 From information science to libraries -- 1.3 The central place of metadata -- 1.4 The book in outline -- 2 Metadata Basics -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Three types of metadata -- 2.2.1 Descriptive metadata -- 2.2.2 Administrative metadata -- 2.2.3 Structural metadata -- 2.3 The core components of metadata -- 2.3.1 Syntax -- 2.3.2 Semantics -- 2.3.3 Content rules -- 2.4 Metadata standards -- 2.5 Conclusion -- 3 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Basic Principles -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Principle 1: Support all stages of the digital curation lifecycle -- 3.3 Principle 2: Support the long-term preservation of the digital object -- 3.4 Principle 3: Ensure interoperability -- 3.5 Principle 4: Control metadata content wherever possible -- 3.6 Principle 5: Ensure software independence -- 3.7 Principle 6: Impose a logical system of identifiers -- 3.8 Principle 7: Use standards whenever possible -- 3.9 Principle 8: Ensure the integrity of the metadata itself -- 3.10 Summary: the basic principles of a metadata strategy -- 4 Planning a Metadata Strategy: Applying the Basic Principles -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Initial steps: standards as a foundation -- 4.2.1 'Off-the shelf' standards -- 4.2.2 Mapping out an architecture and serialising it into a standard -- 4.2.3 Devising a local metadata scheme -- 4.2.4 How standards support the basic principles -- 4.3 Identifiers: everything in its place -- 5 XML: The Syntactical Foundation of Metadata -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 What XML looks like -- 5.3 XML schemas -- 5.4 Namespaces -- 5.5 Creating and editing XML -- 5.6 Transforming XML -- 5.7 Why use XML? -- 6 METS: The Metadata Package -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Why use METS?.
    RVK
    AN 73700: Digitale Bibliothek / Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft
  6. Sühl-Strohmenger, W.: Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken als Orte des Schreibens : Infrastrukturen, Ressourcen, Services (2021) 0.04 
    0.0422723 = product of:
  0.2113615 = sum of:
    0.0231145 = weight(_text_:und in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0231145 = score(doc=457,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
    0.18406098 = weight(_text_:bibliotheksbenutzung in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18406098 = score(doc=457,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23852277 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.77167046 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
    0.0041860198 = product of:
      0.0083720395 = sum of:
        0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0083720395 = score(doc=457,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 457, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    In dem Lehrbuch wird der enge Zusammenhang zwischen dem wissenschaftlichen Schreiben in der Hochschulbibliothek sowie der Schlüsselqualifikation Informationskompetenz systematisch sowie konkret anhand von verschiedenen Schreibszenarien aufgezeigt. Für die erfolgreiche Anfertigung einer studentischen Hausarbeit, einer Abschlussarbeit (Bachelor, Master) oder einer Dissertation bedarf es eines fundierten Wissens beim Umgang mit wissenschaftsrelevanter Information und des Beherrschens dazu notwendiger Fähigkeiten und Fertigkeiten bei der Recherche, der Auswahl, der Bewertung und der Verarbeitung von Information. Das Konzept des forschenden Lernens, wie es an den Hochschulen verfolgt wird, spielt dabei ebenso eine Rolle wie die Schwellenkonzepte der Informationskompetenz, die den dynamischen Zusammenhang der Informationspraxis mit dem Forschungsprozess in den Disziplinen betonen. Die Ressourcen und Dienstleistungen, die die Hochschulbibliothek zur Förderung und Unterstützung des wissenschaftlichen Schreibens zu Verfügung stellen, werden einbezogen.
    BK
    06.60 Bibliotheksbenutzung
    Classification
    06.60 Bibliotheksbenutzung
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; Band 69
  7. Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021) 0.04 
    0.03510284 = product of:
  0.13163565 = sum of:
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038981467 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
    0.03539661 = sum of:
      0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011839852 = score(doc=351,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
      0.023556758 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023556758 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Date
    18. 9.2021 13:22:27
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Special issue: Paradigm shift in the field of information
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
    Theme
    Information
  8. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.03 
    0.029562928 = product of:
  0.11086097 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.030661764 = sum of:
      0.01103113 = weight(_text_:information in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.01103113 = score(doc=998,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
  9. Ockenfeld, M.: Informationswissenschaft - Bandbreite und Ausrichtungen in der DACH-Region (2020) 0.03 
    0.02861138 = product of:
  0.1430569 = sum of:
    0.029840691 = weight(_text_:und in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029840691 = score(doc=5833,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
    0.11025624 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11025624 = score(doc=5833,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.84463215 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 5833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=5833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Auf Initiative von Vivian Petras (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) als Gastgeberin und Dirk Lewandowski (Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg) veranstaltete der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft am 3. Februar 2020 einen Workshop in den Räumen des Instituts für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (IBI) in Berlin. Anliegen dieses und gleichartiger künftig geplanter Treffen ist es, Standorte informationswissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre zu vernetzen und sich besser kennen zu lernen. Angesichts zahlreicher Emeritierungen und Neuberufungen an den Hochschulen sowie dem Generationenwechsel in außeruniversitären Einrichtungen der Forschungsinfrastruktur ist dies, wie die Beteiligung von etwa 60 Personen bewies, eine von vielen begrüßte Initiative. Der Hochschulverband Informationswissenschaft (HI) versteht sich nicht - wie der Name suggerieren könnte - als Professorenbund, erklärte Lewandowski bei der Einführung, sondern als Zusammenschluss aller, die in Wissenschaft und Forschung in der Informationswissenschaft tätig sind. Zu diesem ersten Workshop waren insgesamt sieben Vorträge - aus der KIBA, zwei Universitäten, zwei Hochschulen sowie zwei außeruniversitären Einrichtungen - eingeladen.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Footnote
    Bericht über einen Workshop des Hochschulverbandes Informationswissenschaft am 3. Februar 2020 in den Räumen des Instituts für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft (IBI) in Berlin.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 71(2020) H.2/3, S.133-138
  10. Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022) 0.03 
    0.027838692 = product of:
  0.13919346 = sum of:
    0.08337579 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08337579 = score(doc=752,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
    0.027683599 = weight(_text_:buch in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027683599 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
    0.028134076 = weight(_text_:und in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028134076 = score(doc=752,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Digitalisierung hat unsere Privatsphäre ausgehöhlt, die Öffentlichkeit in antagonistische Teilöffentlichkeiten zerlegt, Hemmschwellen gesenkt und die Grenze zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge aufgeweicht. Wolfgang Huber beschreibt klar und pointiert diese technische und soziale Entwicklung. Er zeigt, wie sich konsensfähige ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz finden lassen und umgesetzt werden können - von der Gesetzgebung, von digitalen Anbietern und von allen Nutzern. Die Haltungen zur Digitalisierung schwanken zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse: Die einen erwarten die Schaffung eines neuen Menschen, der sich selbst zum Gott macht. Andere befürchten den Verlust von Freiheit und Menschenwürde. Wolfgang Huber wirft demgegenüber einen realistischen Blick auf den technischen Umbruch. Das beginnt bei der Sprache: Sind die "sozialen Medien" wirklich sozial? Fährt ein mit digitaler Intelligenz ausgestattetes Auto "autonom" oder nicht eher automatisiert? Sind Algorithmen, die durch Mustererkennung lernen, deshalb "intelligent"? Eine überbordende Sprache lässt uns allzu oft vergessen, dass noch so leistungsstarke Rechner nur Maschinen sind, die von Menschen entwickelt und bedient werden. Notfalls muss man ihnen den Stecker ziehen. Das wunderbar anschaulich geschriebene Buch macht auf der Höhe der aktuellen ethischen Diskussionen bewusst, dass wir uns der Digitalisierung nicht ausliefern dürfen, sondern sie selbstbestimmt und verantwortlich gestalten können. 80. Geburtstag von Wolfgang Huber am 12.8.2022 Ein Heilmittel gegen allzu euphorische und apokalyptische Erwartungen an die Digitalisierung Wie wir unsere Haltung zur Digitalisierung ändern können, um uns nicht der Technik auszuliefern.
    Classification
    MS 4850: Industrie (allgemeines) und Technik (Automatisierung), Technologie (Allgemeines)
    Content
    Vorwort -- 1. Das digitale Zeitalter -- Zeitenwende -- Die Vorherrschaft des Buchdrucks geht zu Ende -- Wann beginnt das digitale Zeitalter? -- 2. Zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse -- Digitalisierung. Einfach. Machen -- Euphorie -- Apokalypse -- Verantwortungsethik -- Der Mensch als Subjekt der Ethik -- Verantwortung als Prinzip -- 3. Digitalisierter Alltag in einer globalisierten Welt -- Vom World Wide Web zum Internet der Dinge -- Mobiles Internet und digitale Bildung -- Digitale Plattformen und ihre Strategien -- Big Data und informationelle Selbstbestimmung -- 4. Grenzüberschreitungen -- Die Erosion des Privaten -- Die Deformation des Öffentlichen -- Die Senkung von Hemmschwellen -- Das Verschwinden der Wirklichkeit -- Die Wahrheit in der Infosphäre -- 5. Die Zukunft der Arbeit -- Industrielle Revolutionen -- Arbeit 4.0 -- Ethik 4.0 -- 6. Digitale Intelligenz -- Können Computer dichten? -- Stärker als der Mensch? -- Maschinelles Lernen -- Ein bleibender Unterschied -- Ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz -- Medizin als Beispiel -- 7. Die Würde des Menschen im digitalen Zeitalter -- Kränkungen oder Revolutionen -- Transhumanismus und Posthumanismus -- Gibt es Empathie ohne Menschen? -- Wer ist autonom: Mensch oder Maschine? -- Humanismus der Verantwortung -- 8. Die Zukunft des Homo sapiens -- Vergöttlichung des Menschen -- Homo deus -- Gott und Mensch im digitalen Zeitalter -- Veränderung der Menschheit -- Literatur -- Personenregister.
    RVK
    MS 4850: Industrie (allgemeines) und Technik (Automatisierung), Technologie (Allgemeines)
  11. Santos Green, L.; Johnston, M.P.: ¬A contextualization of editorial misconduct in the library and information science academic information ecosystem (2022) 0.03 
    0.027597187 = product of:
  0.10348944 = sum of:
    0.01908586 = product of:
      0.03817172 = sum of:
        0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03817172 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038981467 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.03817172 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03817172 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.007250399 = product of:
      0.014500798 = sum of:
        0.014500798 = weight(_text_:information in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014500798 = score(doc=612,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    In the last decade, one of the most effective tools applied in combating the erosion of public trust in academic research has been an increased level of transparency in the peer review and editorial process. Publicly available publication ethics guidelines and policies are vital in creating a transparent process that prevents unethical research, publication misconduct, manipulation of the communication of research to practitioners, and the erosion of public trust. This study investigated how these unethical practices, specifically those coded as editorial misconduct, bring the authenticity and integrity of the library and information science academic research digital record into question. Employing a multi-layered approach, including key informant interviews, researchers determined the frequency and the content of ethical publishing policies and procedures in library and information science journals; exploring the ways the lack of, or nonadherence to these policies and procedures impacted library and information science researchers in instances of editorial misconduct.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.913-928
  12. Heisig, P.: Informationswissenschaft für Wissensmanager : Was Wissensmanager von der informationswissenschaftlichen Forschung lernen können (2021) 0.03 
    0.02759406 = product of:
  0.1379703 = sum of:
    0.025163881 = weight(_text_:und in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025163881 = score(doc=223,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
    0.073504165 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073504165 = score(doc=223,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5630881 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
    0.03930225 = sum of:
      0.0078932345 = weight(_text_:information in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0078932345 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
      0.031409014 = weight(_text_:22 in 223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031409014 = score(doc=223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=223)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaften und das Wissensmanagement weisen zahlreiche Gemeinsamkeiten auf und Anknüpfungspunkte für gemeinsamen Forschungen. Praktiker des Wissensmanagements sollten die Forschungsergebnisse der Schwesterdisziplin eingehender studieren, um für Ihre Organisationspraxis relevante Ergebnisse berücksichtigen zu können. Es ist zu wünschen, dass durch einen gemeinsamen Forschungsdialog potenzielle Synergien für Forschung und Praxis zukünftig erschlossen werden.
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:38:21
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.1, S.10-18
  13. Seemann, M.: ¬Die Macht der Plattformen : Politik in Zeiten der Internetgiganten (2021) 0.03 
    0.026748363 = product of:
  0.13374181 = sum of:
    0.08337579 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08337579 = score(doc=553,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16533206 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
    0.027683599 = weight(_text_:buch in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027683599 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13472971 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
    0.022682417 = weight(_text_:und in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022682417 = score(doc=553,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.3531656 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Plattformen sind mehr als Unternehmen, sie sind die Herrschaftszentren unserer Zeit. Facebook, Google und Amazon ersetzen Marktplätze und öffentlichen Räume, doch sie entscheiden darüber, wer sich dort aufhalten darf und welche Regeln gelten. Von Staaten sind sie kaum zu kontrollieren, sie agieren selbst wie welche. Mehr noch: Plattformen stellen gängige Konzepte von Kapitalismus, Eigentum und Demokratie in Frage. Michael Seemann zeigt, was Plattformen ausmacht, woher ihre Macht kommt, wie sich mit ihnen umgehen lässt und welche Zukunft sie haben
    BK
    05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    AP 14150: Kommunikation und Politik / Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign
    AP 15950: Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign
    05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Vgl.: Rez. unter: https://www.perlentaucher.de/buch/michael-seemann/die-macht-der-plattformen.html; https://www.rkm-journal.de/archives/23149 (H.-D. Kübler)).
    RVK
    AP 14150: Kommunikation und Politik / Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign
    AP 15950: Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign
  14. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 1: Das Dilemma mit der inkompetenten Informationskompetenz. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021). (2021) 0.03 
    0.026178187 = product of:
  0.13089094 = sum of:
    0.033027593 = weight(_text_:und in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033027593 = score(doc=345,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
    0.09095676 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09095676 = score(doc=345,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.696786 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
    0.00690658 = product of:
      0.01381316 = sum of:
        0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01381316 = score(doc=345,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 345, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Auf der im März 2021 abgehaltenen (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März -10.März 2021) wurde nochmals nachdrücklich auf die domänenspezifische, fast mit Alleinstellungsanspruch versehene "Informationskompetenz" (Information Literacy) der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft hingewiesen. Erneut wurden "Zukunftsdiskurse" zu "Informationskompetenz und Demokratie" angekündigt und "Positionspapiere" zur Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung präsentiert (D. Cetta, J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl, E. Montanari: Positionspapiere. Informationskompetenz und Informationskompetenzvermittlung: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Hildesheim 2019).
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  15. Jörs, B.: ¬Ein kleines Fach zwischen "Daten" und "Wissen" II : Anmerkungen zum (virtuellen) "16th International Symposium of Information Science" (ISI 2021", Regensburg) (2021) 0.03 
    0.025812719 = product of:
  0.12906359 = sum of:
    0.0136203505 = weight(_text_:und in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0136203505 = score(doc=330,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.21206908 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.08594606 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08594606 = score(doc=330,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.6584009 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
    0.029497176 = sum of:
      0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009866543 = score(doc=330,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Nur noch Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz und Information Assessment? Doch gerade die Abschottung von anderen Disziplinen verstärkt die Isolation des "kleinen Faches" Informationswissenschaft in der Scientific Community. So bleiben ihr als letzte "eigenständige" Forschungsrandgebiete nur die, die Wolf Rauch als Keynote Speaker bereits in seinem einführenden, historisch-genetischen Vortrag zur Lage der Informationswissenschaft auf der ISI 2021 benannt hat: "Wenn die universitäre Informationswissenschaft (zumindest in Europa) wohl kaum eine Chance hat, im Bereich der Entwicklung von Systemen und Anwendungen wieder an die Spitze der Entwicklung vorzustoßen, bleiben ihr doch Gebiete, in denen ihr Beitrag in der kommenden Entwicklungsphase dringend erforderlich sein wird: Informationsethik, Informationskompetenz, Information Assessment" (Wolf Rauch: Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist; in: Thomas Schmidt; Christian Wolff (Eds): Information between Data and Knowledge. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft 74, Regensburg, 2021, Seiten 20-22 - siehe auch die Rezeption des Beitrages von Rauch durch Johannes Elia Panskus, Was aus der Informationswissenschaft geworden ist. Sie ist in der Realität angekommen, in: Open Password, 17. März 2021). Das ist alles? Ernüchternd.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  16. Jörs, B.: Über den Grundbegriff der "Information" ist weiter zu reden und über die Existenzberechtigung der Disziplin auch : die Kapitulation der Informationswissenschaft vor dem eigenen Basisbegriff (2020) 0.03 
    0.025533566 = product of:
  0.12766783 = sum of:
    0.01906849 = weight(_text_:und in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01906849 = score(doc=326,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.10169275 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10169275 = score(doc=326,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.77903044 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.00690658 = product of:
      0.01381316 = sum of:
        0.01381316 = weight(_text_:information in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01381316 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Die Informationswissenschaft, eine Disziplin ohne Theorie, ohne Bezugsrahmen und ohne Klärung ihres Grundbegriffes. Zahlreiche FachvertreterInnen der Informationswissenschaft bereiten erst recht das Feld für Hate Speech und Fake News vor - mit ihrem ungeklärten (Un)begriff der "Information", - mit ihrer Forderung nach "Informationskompetenz", ein Terrain, das eigentlich der Bibliothekswissenschaft zusteht, - mit ihrer Theorielosigkeit, - mit ihrer unkritischen Ablehnung einer ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung sowie - mit ihrem ungeklärten Domänenverständnis.
    Content
    Fortsetzung als: Wie man mit Information umgehen sollte - Das Beispiel der Medienforschung. Unter: Open Password. 2020, Nr.777 vom 29. Juni 2020 [https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=Wzk0LCIxODU1NzhmZDQ2ZDAiLDAsMCw4NSwxXQ].
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Informationswissenschaft
    Theme
    Information
  17. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 4: "Informationskompetenz" messbar machen. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021) (2021) 0.03 
    0.025395835 = product of:
  0.12697917 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=428,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
    0.09095676 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09095676 = score(doc=428,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.696786 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
    0.0048836893 = product of:
      0.009767379 = sum of:
        0.009767379 = weight(_text_:information in 428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009767379 = score(doc=428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=428)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    Im abschließenden Teil 4 dieser Reihe zur Kritik des "Informationskompetenz"-Ansatzes der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft und dessen Eignung für die Aufdeckung und "Bekämpfung" von Desinformationen bzw. Fake News (Open Password - noch einzufügen) werden ausgewählte Forschungsergebnisse vorgestellt. Diese entstammen der Studie "Quelle: Internet? - Digitale Nachrichten- und Informationskompetenzen der deutschen Bevölkerung im Test". Träger der Studie ist die Berliner Stiftung "Neue Verantwortung", ein Forschungs-"Think Tank für die Gesellschaft im technologischen Wandel" (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation/quelle-internet-digitale-nachrichten-und-informationskompetenzen-der-deutschen).
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  18. Libraries, archives and museums as democratic spaces in a digital age (2020) 0.02 
    0.024936127 = product of:
  0.18702094 = sum of:
    0.18406098 = weight(_text_:bibliotheksbenutzung in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18406098 = score(doc=417,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23852277 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.77167046 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.231152 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
    0.002959963 = product of:
      0.005919926 = sum of:
        0.005919926 = weight(_text_:information in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005919926 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    BK
    06.60 (Bibliotheksbenutzung)
    Classification
    06.60 (Bibliotheksbenutzung)
    Series
    Current topics in library and information practice
  19. Jörs, B.: Informationskompetenz oder Information Literacy : Das große Missverständnis und Versäumnis der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Desinformation. Teil 3: Wie erst spezifisches Fachwissen zu Medien- und Informationskompetenz führen kann. Ergänzende Anmerkungen zum "16th International Symposium of Information Science" ("ISI 2021", Regensburg 8. März - 10. März 2021) (2021) 0.02 
    0.023491388 = product of:
  0.117456935 = sum of:
    0.03530798 = weight(_text_:und in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03530798 = score(doc=406,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.54974586 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
    0.077962935 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077962935 = score(doc=406,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.5972451 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
    0.0041860198 = product of:
      0.0083720395 = sum of:
        0.0083720395 = weight(_text_:information in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0083720395 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(3/15)
    Abstract
    In dieser Reihe wird die Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft und ihr Umgang mit der "Informationskompetenz" kritisiert und die Verwertbarkeit ihrer Beiträge für die Aufdeckung und "Bekämpfung" von Desinformationen und Fake News infrage gestellt (Open Password - nachzutragen). Alternativ dazu wurde in Teil 2 das Forschungsdesign zu einer ersten, nationalen empirischen Untersuchung zum Thema: "Digitale Nachrichten- und Informationskompetenzen der deutschen Bevölkerung im Test" der Stiftung "Neue Verantwortung", einem Berliner Forschungs-"Think Tank für die Gesellschaft im technologischen Wandel" (März 2021), vorgestellt (https://www.stiftung-nv.de/de/publikation/quelle-internet-digitale-nachrichten- und-informationskompetenzen-der-deutschen). In Teil 3 werden die Inhalte und Testverfahren der Berliner Studie interpretiert und bewertet. In Teil 4 werden ausgewählte Ergebnisse der Studie vorgestellt, die in eine Bestandsaufnahme zum Stand der operativen "Informationskompetenz"-Forschung allgemein und in den Nachbarwissenschaften münden sollte.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Series
    Zukunft der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  20. Vakkari, P.; Chang, Y.-W.; Järvelin, K.: Disciplinary contributions to research topics and methodology in Library and Information Science : leading to fragmentation? (2022) 0.02 
    0.022997657 = product of:
  0.08624121 = sum of:
    0.015904883 = product of:
      0.031809766 = sum of:
        0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031809766 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032484557 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.031809766 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031809766 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12917466 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.006041999 = product of:
      0.012083998 = sum of:
        0.012083998 = weight(_text_:information in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012083998 = score(doc=767,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    Abstract
    The study analyses contributions to Library and Information Science (LIS) by researchers representing various disciplines. How are such contributions associated with the choice of research topics and methodology? The study employs a quantitative content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 2015. Each article is seen as a contribution to LIS by the authors' disciplines, which are inferred from their affiliations. The unit of analysis is the article-discipline pair. Of the contribution instances, the share of LIS is one third. Computer Science contributes one fifth and Business and Economics one sixth. The latter disciplines dominate the contributions in information retrieval, information seeking, and scientific communication indicating strong influences in LIS. Correspondence analysis reveals three clusters of research, one focusing on traditional LIS with contributions from LIS and Humanities and survey-type research; another on information retrieval with contributions from Computer Science and experimental research; and the third on scientific communication with contributions from Natural Sciences and Medicine and citation analytic research. The strong differentiation of scholarly contributions in LIS hints to the fragmentation of LIS as a discipline.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.12, S.1706-1722

Authors

Languages

  • e 636
  • d 415
  • pt 4
  • m 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 924
  • el 232
  • m 63
  • s 10
  • p 7
  • x 3
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications