Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Bawden, D."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Robinson, L.; Priego, E.; Bawden, D.: Library and information science and digital humanities : two disciplines, joint future? (2015) 0.05
    0.048196148 = product of:
      0.20655492 = sum of:
        0.023677567 = product of:
          0.047355134 = sum of:
            0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047355134 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.068390936 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068390936 = score(doc=2982,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.70386016 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.047355134 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047355134 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.012549544 = product of:
          0.03764863 = sum of:
            0.03764863 = weight(_text_:l in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764863 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Pages
    S.44-54
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.66
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  2. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Distance learning and LIS professional development (2002) 0.04
    0.03564086 = product of:
      0.15274654 = sum of:
        0.018942054 = product of:
          0.03788411 = sum of:
            0.03788411 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03788411 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.038687754 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038687754 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.03788411 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03788411 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.03788411 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03788411 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39400625 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=691,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    The nature of distance learning in general, and for the specific case of LIS professional development, is reviewed in the context of wider changes in the learning environment. This leads to an analysis of the kind of materials and activities which may be required to support this form of education, and to proposals for categories of activities, which are to be tested in a part distance learning multinational LIS summer school.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 54(2002) no.1, S.48-55
  3. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: Curating the infosphere : Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information as the foundation for library and information science (2018) 0.03
    0.026113316 = product of:
      0.11191421 = sum of:
        0.014206541 = product of:
          0.028413082 = sum of:
            0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028413082 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029015815 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
        0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413082 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
        0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413082 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
        0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0026457112 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
      0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the proposal that Luciano Floridi's philosphy of information (PI) may be an appropriate conceptual foundation for the discipline of library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach A selective literature review and analysis are carried out. Findings It is concluded that LIS is in need of a new conceptual framework, and that PI is appropriate for this purpose. Originality/value Floridi proposed a close relationship between PI and LIS more than a decade ago. Although various authors have addressed the aspects of this relationship since then, this is the first proposal from an LIS perspective that PI be adopted as a basis for LIS.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 74(2018) no.1, S.2-17
  4. Haider, J.; Bawden, D.: Conceptions of "information poverty" in LIS : a discourse analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.018279316 = product of:
      0.09139658 = sum of:
        0.0118387835 = product of:
          0.023677567 = sum of:
            0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023677567 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024179846 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023677567 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023677567 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.006614278 = weight(_text_:in in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006614278 = score(doc=607,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
      0.2 = coord(6/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide an analysis of the notion of "information poverty" in library and information science (LIS) by investigating concepts, interests and strategies leading to its construction and thus to examine its role as a constitutive element of the professional discourse. Design/methodology/approach - Starting from a Foucauldian notion of discourse, "information poverty" is examined as a statement in its relation to other statements in order to highlight assumptions and factors contributing to its construction. The analysis is based on repeated and close reading of 35 English language articles published in LIS journals between 1995 and 2005. Findings - Four especially productive discursive procedures are identified: economic determinism, technological determinism and the "information society", historicising the "information poor", and the library profession's moral obligation and responsibility. Research limitations/implications - The material selection is linguistically and geographically biased. Most of the included articles originate in English-speaking countries. Therefore, results and findings are fully applicable only in an English language context. Originality/value - The focus on overlapping and at times conflicting discursive procedures, i.e. the results of alliances and connections between statements, highlights how the "information poor" emerge as a category in LIS as the product of institutionally contingent, professional discourse. By challenging often unquestioned underlying assumptions, this article is intended to contribute to a critical examination of LIS discourse, as well as to the analysis of the discourses of information, which dominate contemporary society. It is furthermore seen to add to the development of discourse analytical approaches in LIS research.
    Field
    Bibliothekswesen
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.4, S.534-557
  5. Bawden, D.: Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants : the developing foundations of information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0041170004 = product of:
      0.04117 = sum of:
        0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033851784 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=3645,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=3645,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Some developments in the information science discipline over a period of 30 years are discussed, by selecting topics covered in the early issues of Journal of Information Science, and tracing their influence on subsequent developments, largely though by no means exclusively through JIS papers. Five main themes are covered: the information discipline per se; the foundations of that discipline; the nature of information; relations between discipline and profession; and education for information science. The continuing resonance of the writings of Farradane and Brookes is noted.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Pages
    S.23-43
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  6. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: Information and the gaining of understanding (2015) 0.00
    0.001948704 = product of:
      0.01948704 = sum of:
        0.008730402 = weight(_text_:in in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008730402 = score(doc=893,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
        0.008784681 = product of:
          0.026354041 = sum of:
            0.026354041 = weight(_text_:l in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026354041 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    It is suggested that, in addition to data, information and knowledge, the information sciences should focus on understanding, understood as a higher-order knowledge, with coherent and explanatory potential. The limited ways in which understanding has been addressed in the design of information systems, in studies of information behaviour, in formulations of information literacy and in impact studies are briefly reviewed, and future prospects considered. The paper is an extended version of a keynote presentation given at the i3 conference in June 2015.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue - i3 Conference - Aberdeen - June 2015. Vgl.: http://jis.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/12/14/0165551515621691.
    Source
    Journal of information science. 41(2015) no.x, S.1-6
  7. Gorichanaz, T.; Furner, J.; Ma, L.; Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Dixon, D.; Herold, K.; Obelitz Søe, S.; Martens, B. Van der Veer; Floridi, L.: Information and design : book symposium on Luciano Floridi's The Logic of Information (2020) 0.00
    0.0019471515 = product of:
      0.019471515 = sum of:
        0.004929992 = weight(_text_:in in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004929992 = score(doc=5710,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
        0.012549544 = product of:
          0.03764863 = sum of:
            0.03764863 = weight(_text_:l in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764863 = score(doc=5710,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.001991979 = score(doc=5710,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss Luciano Floridi's 2019 book The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design, the latest instalment in his philosophy of information (PI) tetralogy, particularly with respect to its implications for library and information studies (LIS). Design/methodology/approach Nine scholars with research interests in philosophy and LIS read and responded to the book, raising critical and heuristic questions in the spirit of scholarly dialogue. Floridi responded to these questions. Findings Floridi's PI, including this latest publication, is of interest to LIS scholars, and much insight can be gained by exploring this connection. It seems also that LIS has the potential to contribute to PI's further development in some respects. Research limitations/implications Floridi's PI work is technical philosophy for which many LIS scholars do not have the training or patience to engage with, yet doing so is rewarding. This suggests a role for translational work between philosophy and LIS. Originality/value The book symposium format, not yet seen in LIS, provides forum for sustained, multifaceted and generative dialogue around ideas.
    Biographed
    Floridi, L.: The Logic of Information
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 76(2020) no.2, S.586-616
  8. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Global knowledge organization, "super-facets" and music : universal music classification in the digital age (2018) 0.00
    0.0019348533 = product of:
      0.019348532 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=4746,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=4746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=4746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.248-255
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  9. Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011) 0.00
    0.0019102376 = product of:
      0.019102376 = sum of:
        0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006901989 = score(doc=3361,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter considers the continuing relevance of the ideas of browsing, serendipity, information encountering and literature discovery in the context of the information retrieval (IR) environment of 2010, though its scope extends to the ideas in the broader contexts of information seeking and information-related behaviour. It is based around a selective review of the literature since 1990 and reflection and speculation on the results. The central focus is on questions of how the concept of browsing, serendipity and related ideas have changed in the new IR environment of the web and whether, indeed, they are still meaningfull concepts.
    Pages
    S.1-22
    Source
    Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
  10. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: No such thing as society? : On the individuality of information behavior (2013) 0.00
    0.001840331 = product of:
      0.01840331 = sum of:
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=1139,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This opinion piece considers the relative importance of individual and social factors in determining information behavior. It concludes that individual factors are more central and fundamental, although they may certainly be qualified by social and cultural factors and even though there are good reasons for studying and analyzing information behavior in terms of social groups. More studies of interesting emergent factors and behaviors in social settings would be valuable.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.12, S.2587-2590
  11. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.00
    0.0017546645 = product of:
      0.017546644 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=730,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library is a socio-technical concept of great significance. It redefines the relationships between information providers and intermediaries and, potentially, transforms the way that services are delivered to users. This article, based on a British Library Research & Innovation Centre funded study, reviews current themes and directions in digital library research and scholarship. It locates the digital library in a simple work-oriented framework emphasising its social as well as its systems and informational dimensions. The article highlights differences in understanding of the digital library construct between the library and computer science communities and identifies some critical areas for further research.
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 51(1999) no.8, S.275-282
  12. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Libraries and open society : Popper, Soros and digital information (2001) 0.00
    0.0017282102 = product of:
      0.017282102 = sum of:
        0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004988801 = score(doc=702,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
        0.010039635 = product of:
          0.030118903 = sum of:
            0.030118903 = weight(_text_:l in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030118903 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines the role of libraries and information services, in promoting the 'open society' espoused by Karl Popper and George Soros. After a brief discussion of the nature of an 'open society ', the paper covers the role played by provision of knowledge and information, of new technology, particularly the Internet, and of critical thinking and digital literacy in the development of this form of society. Conclusions are drawn for the role of libraries and librarians, with seven general principles suggested.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 53(2001) no.5, S.167-178
  13. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Siddiqui, T.: "Potentialities or possibilities" : towards quantum information science? (2015) 0.00
    0.001715711 = product of:
      0.01715711 = sum of:
        0.007937134 = weight(_text_:in in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007937134 = score(doc=1659,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.27051896 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The use of quantum concepts and formalisms in the information sciences is assessed through an analysis of published literature. Five categories are identified: use of loose analogies and metaphors between concepts in quantum physics and library/information science; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in information retrieval; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in studying meaning and concepts; quantum social science, in areas adjacent to information science; and the qualitative application of quantum concepts in the information disciplines. Quantum issues have led to demonstrable progress in information retrieval and semantic modelling, with less clear-cut progress elsewhere. Whether there may be a future "quantum turn" in the information sciences is debated, the implications of such a turn are considered, and a research agenda outlined.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.3, S.437-449
  14. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.00
    0.0016565587 = product of:
      0.016565587 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=683,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the types of information that are generally involved in information policy, from data, through information with varying degrees of structure, to knowledge and perhaps to wisdom. Information with lower levels of structure and raw data may be managed by systems, technical and administrative, and by procedures. Knowledge can only be managed by policies. There is, therefore, a close link between information policy formulation and evaluation and the emerging discipline of knowledge management. Concludes that information policy is: inevitably complex, not concerned with technical solutions; and dependent upon an appreciation of the meaning and significance of knowledge in its proper context
    Pages
    S.74-79
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  15. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬"The dearest of our possessions" : applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy (2020) 0.00
    0.0014511398 = product of:
      0.014511398 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=5939,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This conceptual article argues for the value of an approach to privacy in the digital information environment informed by Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information and information ethics. This approach involves achieving informational privacy, through the features of anonymity and obscurity, through an optimal balance of ontological frictions. This approach may be used to modify models for information behavior and for information literacy, giving them a fuller and more effective coverage of privacy issues in the infosphere. For information behavior, the Information Seeking and Communication Model and the Information Grounds conception are most appropriate for this purpose. For information literacy, the metaliteracy model, using a modification a privacy literacy framework, is most suitable.
    Series
    Special issue: Information privacy in the digital age
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.9, S.1030-1043
  16. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Internet subject gateways (1999) 0.00
    0.0014342186 = product of:
      0.021513278 = sum of:
        0.017569361 = product of:
          0.052708082 = sum of:
            0.052708082 = weight(_text_:l in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052708082 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    International journal of information management. 19(1999) no.6, S.311-322
  17. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: "Waiting for Carnot" : Information and complexity (2015) 0.00
    0.0013843302 = product of:
      0.013843302 = sum of:
        0.0030866629 = weight(_text_:in in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030866629 = score(doc=2254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
        0.008784681 = product of:
          0.026354041 = sum of:
            0.026354041 = weight(_text_:l in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026354041 = score(doc=2254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2177-2186
  18. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Orthogonality, dependency, and music : an exploration of the relationships between music facets (2021) 0.00
    0.0013083849 = product of:
      0.013083849 = sum of:
        0.0054005357 = weight(_text_:in in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054005357 = score(doc=212,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
        0.006274772 = product of:
          0.018824315 = sum of:
            0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824315 = score(doc=212,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=212,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The classification of Western art music is a complex area of knowledge organization, yet the reasons for those complexities have not been fully studied. This research dissects the concept of orthogonality, in particular regard to music classification. Orthogonality (antonym: dependency) means that one facet acts independently from another facet. Although orthogonality is an assumed quality of facets, it has attracted relatively little attention in knowledge organization discourse. This research utilizes bibliographic classification schemes, musicological writings, and musical works to analyze orthogonality in music classification. The relationships between the medium, form/genre, and function facets are unpicked and a strong dependency is found between these facets. Whether this orthogonality exists as a construct of faceted classification or stems from the domain knowledge is explored. Furthermore, the analysis initiates new thinking about the general concept of orthogonality. The idea of a spectrum of dependency is proposed. In addition, novel, orthogonality-derived phenomena are discussed-"dynamic facets" and "meta-dependency"-where the boundary between what is and is not a facet is blurred. The concluding model visualizes the chain of dependencies between music facets, ultimately showing how the lack of orthogonality plays a key role in the complexity and issues found in music classification.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.5, S.570-582
  19. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬"A few exciting words" : information and entropy revisited (2015) 0.00
    0.0012961577 = product of:
      0.012961577 = sum of:
        0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 2211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003741601 = score(doc=2211,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2211, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2211)
        0.007529726 = product of:
          0.022589177 = sum of:
            0.022589177 = weight(_text_:l in 2211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022589177 = score(doc=2211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 2211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2211)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=2211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2211)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    A review is presented of the relation between information and entropy, focusing on two main issues: the similarity of the formal definitions of physical entropy, according to statistical mechanics, and of information, according to information theory; and the possible subjectivity of entropy considered as missing information. The paper updates the 1983 analysis of Shaw and Davis. The difference in the interpretations of information given respectively by Shannon and by Wiener, significant for the information sciences, receives particular consideration. Analysis of a range of material, from literary theory to thermodynamics, is used to draw out the issues. Emphasis is placed on recourse to the original sources, and on direct quotation, to attempt to overcome some of the misunderstandings and oversimplifications that have occurred with these topics. Although it is strongly related to entropy, information is neither identical with it, nor its opposite. Information is related to order and pattern, but also to disorder and randomness. The relations between information and the "interesting complexity," which embodies both patterns and randomness, are worthy of attention.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.1965-1987
  20. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Mind the gap : transitions between concepts of information in varied domains (2014) 0.00
    0.0012523696 = product of:
      0.018785544 = sum of:
        0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006236001 = score(doc=1315,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
        0.012549544 = product of:
          0.03764863 = sum of:
            0.03764863 = weight(_text_:l in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03764863 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.4391412 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Series
    Studies in history and philosophy of science ; 34