Search (49 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Chan, L.M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Chan, L.M.; Mitchell, J.S.; Alex, H. (Übers.); Heiner-Freiling, M. (Übers.); Preuss, M. (Übers.): Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation : Theorie und Praxis (2006) 0.02
    0.019685257 = product of:
      0.11811154 = sum of:
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=3068,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=3068,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
        0.023178069 = weight(_text_:und in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023178069 = score(doc=3068,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
        0.06443719 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06443719 = score(doc=3068,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.6325972 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=3068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3068)
      0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    
    Editor
    Die Deutsche Bibliothek
    Footnote
    Die zunehmende Nutzung der DDC im deutschsprachigen Raum wird in den kommenden Jahren in der bibliothekarischen Ausbildung und Praxis zu einer stärkeren Nachfrage nach Informations- und Unterrichtsmaterialien zu dieser Klassifikation führen. Die deutsche Übersetzung des DDC-Lehrbuchs Dewey Decimal Classification: Principles and Application bietet für Studierende und praktisch mit dem DDC-Klassifizieren und -Recherchieren Arbeitende eine umfassende Einführung in die theoretischen Grundlagen der Klassifikation, ergänzt durch fachliche Aspekte und viele Einzelbeispiele. Der Gebrauch der Hilfstafeln und die Notationssynthesezwei wesentliche Elemente der DDC - werden detailliert erläutert und mit praktischen Übungen vertieft.
    Issue
    Deutsche Übersetzung.
    Pages
    260 S
  2. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.01
    0.00568881 = product of:
      0.04266607 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
        0.015059452 = product of:
          0.045178354 = sum of:
            0.045178354 = weight(_text_:l in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045178354 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=3985,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
        0.017534448 = product of:
          0.035068896 = sum of:
            0.035068896 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035068896 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1996) no.1, S.127-130 (L. Kuyper-Rushing)
    Pages
    550 S
  3. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.: FAST - a new approach to controlled subject access (2008) 0.00
    0.003949438 = product of:
      0.03949438 = sum of:
        0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005915991 = score(doc=2181,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.03188814 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03188814 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.3130544 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=2181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2181)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid proliferation of digital resources, are forcing changes in bibliographic control to make it easier to use, understand, and apply subject data. Subject headings are no exception. The enormous volume and rapid growth of digital libraries and repositories and the emergence of numerous metadata schemes have spurred a reexamination of the way subject data are to be provided for such resources efficiently and effectively. To address this need, OCLC in cooperation with the Library of Congress, has taken a new approach, called FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology). FAST headings are based on the existing vocabulary in Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), but are applied with a simpler syntax than required by Library of Congress application policies. Adapting the LCSH vocabulary in a simplified faceted syntax retains the rich vocabulary of LCSH while making it easier to understand, control, apply, and use.
    Imprint
    Leipzig : Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
    Pages
    S.173-177
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  4. Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989) 0.00
    0.0036125847 = product of:
      0.027094383 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=2276,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of the current study has been twofold: (1) to develop a valid methodology for studying indexing consistency in MARC records and, (2) to study such consistency in subject cataloging practice between non-LC libraries and the Library of Congress
    Content
    Die Studie enthält Konsistenzzahlen bezogen auf die LCSH. Diese Zahlen sind kategorienbezogen und können teilweise auf die RSWK übertragen werden
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 8(1989), S.349-358
  5. Chan, L.M.: Dewey Decimal Classification : a practical guide (1996) 0.00
    0.0025131626 = product of:
      0.025131624 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
        0.015059452 = product of:
          0.045178354 = sum of:
            0.045178354 = weight(_text_:l in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045178354 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=2612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library review 46(1997) nos.3/4, S.285-286 (L. Grove)
    Pages
    246 S
  6. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.00
    0.0017940676 = product of:
      0.017940676 = sum of:
        0.007483202 = weight(_text_:in in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007483202 = score(doc=5920,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.008767224 = product of:
          0.017534448 = sum of:
            0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017534448 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Pages
    S.224-234
  7. Chan, L.M.; O'Neill, E.: FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) : a simplified LCSH-based vocabulary (2003) 0.00
    0.0017715634 = product of:
      0.0531469 = sum of:
        0.0531469 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0531469 = score(doc=1653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.52175736 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Content
    Deutsche Fassung unter: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/010g trans-ONeill_Mai-Chan.pdf
  8. Chan, L.M.; Mitchell, J.S.: Dewey Decimal Classification : principles and applications (2003) 0.00
    0.0016267182 = product of:
      0.024400773 = sum of:
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
        0.020456856 = product of:
          0.040913712 = sum of:
            0.040913712 = weight(_text_:22 in 3247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040913712 = score(doc=3247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
    Pages
    xxx S
  9. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.00
    0.0015748896 = product of:
      0.015748896 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=2205,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
        0.008767224 = product of:
          0.017534448 = sum of:
            0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017534448 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Form subdivisions have always been an important part of the Library of Congress Subject Headings. However, when the MARC format was developed, no separate subfield code to identify form subdivisions was defined. Form and topical subdivisions were both included within a general subdivision category. In 1995, the USMARC Advisory Group approved a proposal defining subfield v for form subdivisions, and in 1999 the Library of Congress (LC) began identifying form subdivisions with the new code. However, there are millions of older bibliographic records lacking the explicit form subdivision coding. Identifying form subdivisions retrospectively is not a simple task. An algorithmic method was developed to identify form subdivisions coded as general subdivisions. The algorithm was used to identify 2,563 unique form subdivisions or combinations of form subdivisions in OCLC's WorldCat. The algorithm proved to be highly accurate with an error rate estimated to be less than 0.1%. The observed usage of the form subdivisions was highly skewed with the 100 most used form subdivisions or combinations of subdivisions accounting for 90% of the assignments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 45(2001) no.4, S.187-197
  10. Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (1999) 0.00
    0.0012487139 = product of:
      0.018730707 = sum of:
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009365354 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Zu den großen Herausforderungen einer sinnvollen Suche im WWW gehören die riesige Menge des Verfügbaren und die Sparchbarrieren. Verfahren, die die Web-Ressourcen im Hinblick auf ein effizienteres Retrieval inhaltlich strukturieren, werden daher ebenso dringend benötigt wie Programme, die mit der Sprachvielfalt umgehen können. Im folgenden Vortrag werden wir einige Ansätze diskutieren, die zur Bewältigung der beiden Probleme derzeit unternommen werden
  11. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.00
    0.001150207 = product of:
      0.011502069 = sum of:
        0.0038187557 = weight(_text_:in in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0038187557 = score(doc=3816,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
        0.006274772 = product of:
          0.018824315 = sum of:
            0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824315 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0014085418 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
    Pages
    S.140-147
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  12. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.L.: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) (2009) 0.00
    0.0010165245 = product of:
      0.0152478665 = sum of:
        0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064806426 = score(doc=3842,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
        0.008767224 = product of:
          0.017534448 = sum of:
            0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017534448 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Classification (LCC), originally designed for classifying the Library's own collection, is now used in a wide range of libraries, both in the United States and abroad. This entry recounts its history and development from its genesis to the present time, leading up to an explanation of LCC structure, tables, and notation. It then considers the system's potential for wider application in the online age, through speculation on using LCC as a tool for (a) partitioning large files; (b) generating domain-specific taxonomies; and (c) integrating classification and controlled subject terms for improved retrieval in the online public access catalog (OPAC) and the Internet. Finally, analyzing both its strong and relatively weak features, it addresses the question of whether in its current state LCC is in all respects ready for playing such roles
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:42
  13. Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983) 0.00
    7.7245734E-4 = product of:
      0.01158686 = sum of:
        0.009333193 = weight(_text_:in in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009333193 = score(doc=309,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.31810042 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 3(1983) no.4, S.19-35
  14. Chan, L.M.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1975 (1976) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 20(1976) S.213-235
  15. Chan, L.M.: Dewey 18: another step in an evolutionary step (1972) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 1780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=1780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1780)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 1780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=1780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1780)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 16(1972), S.293-
  16. Chan, L.M.: ¬The period subdivision in subject headings (1972) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 16(1972), S.454-457
  17. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress class numbers in online catalog searching (1989) 0.00
    7.2630163E-4 = product of:
      0.010894524 = sum of:
        0.008640857 = weight(_text_:in in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008640857 = score(doc=1146,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29450375 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=1146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    In addition to using title keywords and subject headings for searching in the online catalog, the searcher may also use class numbers as access points. Library of Congress class or call numbers are particular effective in certain kinds of specific-item subject searching and serve as supplements to keywords and descriptors, improving precision and recall. Class number searching in the database can produce unique results because these numbers collect citations in ways that differ from those of keywords and descriptors
    Source
    RQ. 28(1989), S.530-536
  18. Chan, L.M.: Instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification (1987) 0.00
    6.7611027E-4 = product of:
      0.010141654 = sum of:
        0.007887987 = weight(_text_:in in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007887987 = score(doc=393,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    An informal survey was conducted for the purpose of identifying instructional materials used in teaching cataloging and classification in library and information science programs in the United States and Canada. Based on responses from instructors in these areas, three groups of instructional materials were identified: cataloging and classification tools, textbooks, and background and supplementary reading materials.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.4, S.131-144
  19. Chan, L.M.: ¬A guide to the Library of Congress Classification (1999) 0.00
    6.7147816E-4 = product of:
      0.010072172 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=2118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
        0.00478075 = weight(_text_:s in 2118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00478075 = score(doc=2118,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 2118, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2118)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 26(1999) no.3, S.169-170 (J.E. Leide)
    Pages
    XVIII, 551 S
  20. Chan, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Errors and obsolete elements in assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for subject cataloging and subject authority control (1997) 0.00
    6.355139E-4 = product of:
      0.009532709 = sum of:
        0.00756075 = weight(_text_:in in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00756075 = score(doc=492,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    An analysis of a sample of 9.442 headings assigned by the LoC to bibliographic records disclosed 2 types of invalid headings: those that were erroneous and those that were obsolete. Each type revealed recurring patterns. Errors and obsolete elements occuring in assigned heading involve MARC coding, terminology in main headings and subdivisions, application of subdivisions, and in mechanical elements such as punctuation and capitalization. Different headings (e.g. personal name, corporate name, topical, etc.) display different patterns as well as predominance of errors and obsoleteness. Although the overall error rate is low, an awareness and understanding of patterns of errors and obsolescnce in subject heading strings should contribute to improvement in subject heading assignment and subject authority control
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 41(1997) no.4, S.295-322