Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Endres-Niggemeyer, B."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Wissensbasierte Ansätze zur Formalerfassung (1988) 0.00
    0.0043114335 = product of:
      0.043114334 = sum of:
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=524,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.295-302
    Source
    Von der Information zum Wissen - vom Wissen zur Information: traditionelle und moderne Informationssysteme für Wissenschaft und Praxis, Deutscher Dokumentartag 1987, Bad Dürkheim, vom 23.-25.9.1987. Hrsg.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Sprachverarbeitung im Informationsbereich (1989) 0.00
    0.004196875 = product of:
      0.041968748 = sum of:
        0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018730707 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
        0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018730707 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.9-23
    Source
    Linguistische Datenverarbeitung und Neue Medien. Hrsg.: Winfried Lenders
  3. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: ¬Eine Repräsentation der Informationsstruktur von Fachzeitschriften (1987) 0.00
    0.0041764476 = product of:
      0.031323355 = sum of:
        0.011589034 = weight(_text_:und in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011589034 = score(doc=5278,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=5278,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
        0.011589034 = weight(_text_:und in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011589034 = score(doc=5278,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    AUTOCAT soll ein in der Routineproduktion gebrauchstüchtiges wissensbasiertes System zur Formalerfassung von Zeitschriftenaufsätzen nach INIS-Regeln werden. Der AUTOCAT-Prototyp übernimmt eine Zeitschrift vom optischen Leser und liefert Output in der Form eines ausgefüllten INIS-Datenblattes ab. Die Formalerfassung untergliedert sich in die schwierigere Erkennung von Informationselementen und deren leichtere Transformation nach INIS-Regeln. AUTOCAT erkennt die Informationselemente mit seiner Repräsentation des Erwartungswissens über Zeitschriftenstrukturen. Sie wurde anhand von rund 330 Kernzeitschriften des Faches Physik validiert. Ihr Schwerpunkt ist die Darstellung der Zusammensetzungsstruktur des komplexen Informationsobjetkt Zeitschrift. Konkrete Zeitschriften werden abgeleitet, indem man die Beschreibungen der Zeitschriftenkomponenten mit Typangaben spezifiziert. Die Repräsentation ist in PROLOG implementiert
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 38(1987) H.6, S.333-340
  4. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Referierregeln und Referate : Abstracting als regelgesteuerter Textverarbeitungsprozeß (1985) 0.00
    0.003861971 = product of:
      0.03861971 = sum of:
        0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 6602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323874 = score(doc=6602,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 6602, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6602)
        0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 6602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018323874 = score(doc=6602,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 6602, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6602)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 6602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=6602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6602)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Referierregeln steuern Referierprozesse. Inhaltsbezogene Vorschriften aus drei Referierregeln wurden mit zugehö-rigen Abstracts verglichen. Das Ergebnis war unbefriedi-gend: Referierregeln sind teilweise inkonsistent, ihre Angaben sind nicht immer sachgerecht und oft als Hand-lungsanleitung nicht geeignet. Referieren erscheint als unterbestimmter Denk- und Textverarbeitungsvorgang mit beachtlichem Klärungs- und Gestaltungsbedarf. Die Regeln enthalten zuwenig Wissen über die von ihnen geregelten Sachverhalte. Sie geben oft zu einfache und sachferne Inhaltsstrukturen vor. Ideen für differenziertere Referatstrukturen werden entwickelt. Sie berücksichtigen die Abhängigkeit der Referatstruktur von der Textstruktur des Originaldokuments stärker. Die Klärung des Referier-vorganges bis zu einer gemeinsamen Zieldefinition ist für die weitere Entwicklung des intellektuellen wie des automatischen Referierens wichtig.
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 36(1985), S.38-50
  5. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.00
    5.595652E-4 = product of:
      0.008393478 = sum of:
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
        0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003983958 = score(doc=3549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
    Pages
    S.103-112
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
  6. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Schmidt, B.: Knowledge based classification systems : basic issues, a toy system and further prospects (1989) 0.00
    3.854188E-4 = product of:
      0.0057812817 = sum of:
        0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003527615 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    This article propagates expert systems for classification by (1) explaining the conceptual affinity (especially) between faceted classification schemes and frame representations, using a simple example and a toy system for demonstration purposes, (2) reviewing some approaches to classificational knowledge processing, both from Artificial Intelligence and Classification Research or Information Science, in order to prepare the ground for the development of more comprehensive systems: expert systems for classification
    Source
    International classification. 16(1989), S.146-156