Search (116 results, page 2 of 6)

  • × author_ss:"Gödert, W."
  1. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.02 
    0.022221636 = product of:
  0.09523558 = sum of:
    0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009933459 = score(doc=5138,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.014206541 = product of:
      0.028413082 = sum of:
        0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413082 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028413082 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028413082 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026457112 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009933459 = score(doc=5138,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
    0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0016902501 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
  0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 34(1987) H.3, S.185-195
  2. Gödert, W.: Materialien zur Inhaltserschließung : begleitend zu den Veranstaltungen Inhaltserschließung, Dokumentation I-III (1988) 0.02 
    0.018942056 = product of:
  0.18942055 = sum of:
    0.03788411 = product of:
      0.07576822 = sum of:
        0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07576822 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576822 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
    0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576822 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Imprint
    Hamburg : Fachhochschule, FB Bibliothekswesen
  3. Gödert, W.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK) : Materialien begleitend zur Veranstaltung (1989) 0.02 
    0.018942056 = product of:
  0.18942055 = sum of:
    0.03788411 = product of:
      0.07576822 = sum of:
        0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07576822 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576822 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.07576822 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576822 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.7880125 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Imprint
    Hamburg : Fachhochschule, FB Bibliothekswesen
  4. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.02 
    0.01721482 = product of:
  0.0860741 = sum of:
    0.018509908 = weight(_text_:und in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018509908 = score(doc=5801,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.3871834 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.034195468 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034195468 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.35193008 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.0031180005 = weight(_text_:in in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031180005 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.018509908 = weight(_text_:und in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018509908 = score(doc=5801,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.3871834 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0014085418 = score(doc=5801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.010332272 = product of:
      0.020664545 = sum of:
        0.020664545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020664545 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(6/30)
    Abstract
    Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele: durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen; diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden hier in verkürzter Form vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
    Pages
    S.276-294
    Series
    Tagungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis; 4
    Source
    Information Research & Content Management: Orientierung, Ordnung und Organisation im Wissensmarkt; 23. DGI-Online-Tagung der DGI und 53. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis e.V. DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 8.-10.5.2001. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  5. Gödert, W.: Materialien zur Inhaltserschließung : begleitend zu den Veranstaltungen Inhaltserschließung, Dokumentation I-III (1989) 0.02 
    0.016574297 = product of:
  0.16574296 = sum of:
    0.033148594 = product of:
      0.06629719 = sum of:
        0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06629719 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06629719 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
    0.06629719 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06629719 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.68951094 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
  0.1 = coord(3/30)
    Imprint
    Hamburg : Fachhochschule, FB Bibliothekswesen
  6. Gödert, W.: Informationswissenschaftliche Besinnungen : eine Nestbeschmutzung mit Vorschlägen zur Neuausrichtung (2016) 0.02 
    0.015112756 = product of:
  0.11334566 = sum of:
    0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 4249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01622127 = score(doc=4249,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4249, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4249)
    0.07737551 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07737551 = score(doc=4249,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.7963268 = fieldWeight in 4249, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4249)
    0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 4249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003527615 = score(doc=4249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4249)
    0.01622127 = weight(_text_:und in 4249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01622127 = score(doc=4249,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4249, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4249)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Die gegenwärtige Informationswissenschaft ist gekennzeichnet durch den Verlust der Problemlösungs-kompetenz für Zukunftsfragen und eines konstituierenden wissenschaftlichen Methodenkerns. Die Vertreter der Informationswissenschaft und -praxis haben gemessen an ihrem artikulierten Anspruch ein unterentwickeltes Verständnis der von ihnen zu beachtenden Qualitätsstandards. Anders, als in aktuellen Diskussionsverläufen gerne argumentiert wird, liegen wesentliche Ursachen für Rückbau nicht außerhalb, sondern innerhalb der Informationsprofession. Die Informationspraxis und die Information Professionals haben einen maßgeblichen Anteil an diesem Zustand. Es werden Vorschläge zu einer Neuorientierung der Informationswissenschaft gemacht.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  7. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.01 
    0.014868107 = product of:
  0.08920864 = sum of:
    0.016574297 = product of:
      0.033148594 = sum of:
        0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033148594 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033148594 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
    0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033148594 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
    0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004365201 = score(doc=1174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 31(1997) H.1, S.59-68
  8. Gödert, W.: Multilingualität und Lokalisierung zur Wissenserkundung : oder vom Nutzen semantischer Netze für das Information Retrieval (2007) 0.01 
    0.013573855 = product of:
  0.08144313 = sum of:
    0.018583799 = weight(_text_:und in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583799 = score(doc=557,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
    0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026457112 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
    0.03993957 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03993957 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.35035387 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
    0.018583799 = weight(_text_:und in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583799 = score(doc=557,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
    0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0016902501 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    Das CrissCross-Projekt verfolgt die Zielsetzung, ein erweitertes multilinguales und thesaurusbasiertes Registervokabular zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC Deutsch) zu erstellen, das als Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten verwendet werden kann und soll damit die Ausgangsbedingungen für die Gestaltung von OPAC-Retrievalumgebungen verbessern helfen. Im einzelnen soll jedes Sachschlagwort der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) eine DDC-Notation erhalten und es sollen die im Projekt MACS begonnen Arbeiten fortgesetzt werden, Links zwischen den Schlagwörtern der SWD, den Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und dem Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifé (Rameau) herzustellen. In diesem Beitrag wird der Vorschlag gemacht, die Zielsetzung des Projektes darin zu sehen, eine Kern-Ontologie mit universalen Relationen als Klassifikation zu benutzen und die beteiligten Normdateien als zugeordnete semantische Netze zu entwickeln, indem nicht-generische Relationen die Aufgabe der durch die Lokalisierung gestellten Anforderungen übernehmen. Generische Relationen im bekannten Thesaurussinn sind für derartige semantische Netze nicht mehr erforderlich, da sie sich aus den generischen Beziehungen der Kern-Ontologie vererben.
    Pages
    S.233-242
    Series
    Schriften der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare (VÖB); Bd. 2
  9. Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.01 
    0.012230662 = product of:
  0.09172996 = sum of:
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=1881,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
    0.048359692 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048359692 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.49770427 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=1881,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Evit@ stellt ein Bewertungsinstrument bereit, mit dessen Hilfe qualitative Aussagen über elektronische Informationsmittel möglich werden. Eine Stärke des Verfahrens liegt auf der vergleichenden Produktanalyse und auf einem weitgehend entindividualisierten Ansatz
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    94 S
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.23
  10. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.: Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) : Projektbericht (2001) 0.01 
    0.011935878 = product of:
  0.071615264 = sum of:
    0.018583799 = weight(_text_:und in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583799 = score(doc=1476,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029015815 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003741601 = score(doc=1476,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.018583799 = weight(_text_:und in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018583799 = score(doc=1476,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.38872904 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0016902501 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    Der Umfang und die Heterogenität des Informationsangebotes erfordert immer differenzierte Methoden und Hilfsmittel für das gezielte und möglichst ballastfreie Auffinden von Informationsquellen im Kontext eines bestimmten Fachgebietes oder einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin. Um dieses Ziel zu errei-chen, wurden in der letzten Zeit eine Reihe sog. Subject Gateways entwickelt. Bislang liegen weder viele Untersuchungen zur Qualität derartiger Hilfsmittel vor noch ist eine differenzierte Methodik für solche Bewertungen entwickelt worden. Das Projekt Evaluation von Subject Gateways des Internet (EJECT) verfolgte daher die Ziele:· Durch Analyse bereits realisierter Subject Gateways die Verwendungsvielfalt des Begriffes aufzuzeigen und zu einer Präzisierung der Begriffsbildung beizutragen; Einen methodischen Weg zur qualitativen Bewertung von Subject Gateways aufzuzeigen;· Diesen Weg anhand einer Evaluation des Subject Gateways EULER zu testen, das im Rahmen eines EU-Projektes für das Fachgebiet Mathematik entwickelt wurde. Die Resultate der Evaluation werden in dieser Studie ausführlich vorgestellt und es wird aufgezeigt, inwieweit eine Übertragung auf die Bewertung anderer Gateways möglich ist.
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    64 S
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.30
  11. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Rezeption externalisierten Wissens : ein konstruktivistisches Modell auf der Basis von Poppers Drei Welten und Searles Kollektiver Intentionalität (2018) 0.01 
    0.011429361 = product of:
  0.068576165 = sum of:
    0.01419361 = weight(_text_:und in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01419361 = score(doc=5852,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
    0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033851784 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.348393 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
    0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004365201 = score(doc=5852,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
    0.01419361 = weight(_text_:und in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01419361 = score(doc=5852,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=5852,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5852, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5852)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    Wir stellen ein Modell für die Wissensrezeption aus externalisierten Informationsquellen vor. Das Modell beruht auf einem kognitiven Verständnis von Informationsverarbeitung und greift auf Vorstellungen eines Austausches von Information in Kommunikationsvorgängen zurück. Poppers Drei-Welten-Theorie mit ihrer Orientierung an falsifizierbarem wissenschaftlichen Wissen wird erweitert um Searles Konzept der Kollektiven Intentionalität. Dies erlaubt eine konsistente Beschreibung der Externalisierung und Rezeption von Wissen unter Einschluss von Alltagswissen.
    Content
    Auch unter: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21248.07688. Auch in: International Forum on Information. 44(2019) H.4, S.25-35 (http://lamb.viniti.ru/sid2/sid2free?sid2=J18357463. Zunächst auch: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41860839 bzw. http://www.viniti.ru/products/publications/pub-134048#issues [http://catalog.viniti.ru/srch_result.aspx?IRL=FETCH+QUERY%3d2603664+OBJ%3d01bsmm7z+STYLE%3dFull1&TYP=FULL1]).
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
  12. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Informationserschließung und Automatisches Indexieren : ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch (2011) 0.01 
    0.010845773 = product of:
  0.06507464 = sum of:
    0.02575782 = weight(_text_:buch in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02575782 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.017560039 = weight(_text_:und in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017560039 = score(doc=2550,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.0022047595 = weight(_text_:in in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0022047595 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.017560039 = weight(_text_:und in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017560039 = score(doc=2550,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
    0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.001991979 = score(doc=2550,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    Das Buch vermittelt Kenntnisse über die Modellierung dokumentbezogener Metadaten durch praktische Aufgabenstellungen, begleitende theoretische Erläuterungen sowie ergänzende Übungen. Als Beispiele dienen Bilddokumente und bibliografische Daten. Es wird vermittelt, wie entsprechende Datenbanken aufgebaut und mit geeigneten Suchumgebungen ausgestattet werden. Es wird dargestellt und praktisch geübt, wie Kenntnisse über die Struktur der Daten zum Import von Fremddaten genutzt werden können. Zielvorstellung ist der Aufbau von Datenbanken zur formalen und inhaltlichen Erschließung und die Gestaltung von Retrievalumgebungen, für bibliografische Daten auch die Erstellung von Bibliografien. Als Methoden zur inhaltlichen Erschließung werden besonders die semantische Strukturierung von Themenfeldern am Beispiel des aspektorientierten Thesaurus-Konzepts und das Automatische Indexieren bibliografischer Daten behandelt. Abgerundet wird die Darstellung durch die Diskussion von Bezügen zum Aufbau relationaler Datenbanken für bibliografische Daten sowie Hintergründe der Zeichencodierung und Ordnungsfragen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ABI Technik 32(2012) H.2, S.113-114 (F. Förster)
    Pages
    XIV, 434 S
  13. Gödert, W.: Formale und inhaltliche Medienerschließung in der theoretischen Ausbildung der wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekare (1991) 0.01 
    0.01070305 = product of:
  0.0642183 = sum of:
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=175,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
    0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006236001 = score(doc=175,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=175,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
    0.0146120405 = product of:
      0.029224081 = sum of:
        0.029224081 = weight(_text_:22 in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029224081 = score(doc=175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Pages
    S.101-115
    Source
    Die theoretische Ausbildung der Bibliotheksreferendare. Die Umsetzung der Empfehlungen für die Ausbildung des Höheren Bibliotheksdienstes an den Ausbildungseinrichtungen. Referate und Diskussionsergebnisse ... 22. und 23.11.1990 in Frankfurt/M. Hrsg.: J. Tehnzen
  14. Schöneberg, U.; Gödert, W.: Erschließung mathematischer Publikationen mittels linguistischer Verfahren (2012) 0.01 
    0.010412225 = product of:
  0.07809168 = sum of:
    0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017205253 = score(doc=1055,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
    0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003741601 = score(doc=1055,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
    0.03993957 = weight(_text_:einzelnen in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03993957 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1139978 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.35035387 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
    0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017205253 = score(doc=1055,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Die Zahl der mathematik-relevanten Publikationn steigt von Jahr zu Jahr an. Referatedienste wie da Zentralblatt MATH und Mathematical Reviews erfassen die bibliographischen Daten, erschließen die Arbeiten inhaltlich und machen sie - heute über Datenbanken, früher in gedruckter Form - für den Nutzer suchbar. Keywords sind ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Publikationen. Keywords sind meist keine einzelnen Wörter, sondern Mehrwortphrasen. Das legt die Anwendung linguistischer Methoden und Verfahren nahe. Die an der FH Köln entwickelte Software 'Lingo' wurde für die speziellen Anforderungen mathematischer Texte angepasst und sowohl zum Aufbau eines kontrollierten Vokabulars als auch zur Extraction von Keywords aus mathematischen Publikationen genutzt. Es ist geplant, über eine Verknüpfung von kontrolliertem Vokabular und der Mathematical Subject Classification Methoden für die automatische Klassifikation für den Referatedienst Zentralblatt MATH zu entwickeln und zu erproben.
    Footnote
    Vortrag anlässlich der DMV-Tagung in Saarbrücken, 17.-20.09.2012.
  15. Gödert, W.: Wissensdarstellung in Informationssystemen, Fragetypen und Anforderungen an Retrievalkomponenten (2000) 0.01 
    0.010398637 = product of:
  0.062391818 = sum of:
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=4194,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
    0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004409519 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
    0.020276587 = weight(_text_:und in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020276587 = score(doc=4194,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
    0.0146120405 = product of:
      0.029224081 = sum of:
        0.029224081 = weight(_text_:22 in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029224081 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Content
    Vortrag, gehalten anläßlich der Tagung 'Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung - Methoden und Anwendungen' im Ernst Schröder Zentrum für Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung an der TH Darmstadt, 22.-25.2.1995
    Pages
    S.223-238
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen, mit Beiträgen zahlreicher Fachwissenschaftler. Hrsg.: G. Stumme u. R. Wille
  16. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1996) 0.01 
    0.01019302 = product of:
  0.07644764 = sum of:
    0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03244254 = score(doc=4220,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
    0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705523 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
    0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03244254 = score(doc=4220,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
    0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 4220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004507334 = score(doc=4220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4220)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    164 S
  17. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1997) 0.01 
    0.01019302 = product of:
  0.07644764 = sum of:
    0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03244254 = score(doc=391,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
    0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00705523 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
    0.03244254 = weight(_text_:und in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03244254 = score(doc=391,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.67862105 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
    0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004507334 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    204 S
  18. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2003) 0.01 
    0.00920788 = product of:
  0.05524728 = sum of:
    0.021072047 = weight(_text_:und in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021072047 = score(doc=1506,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.4407773 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026457112 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.021072047 = weight(_text_:und in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021072047 = score(doc=1506,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.4407773 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0016902501 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
    0.008767224 = product of:
      0.017534448 = sum of:
        0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017534448 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(5/30)
    Abstract
    Die Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft ist in aller Munde, das Verständnis derselben ist gleichwohl unklar. Unscharf ist auch das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden Begriffe Information und Wissen sowie des Erwerbs von Information aus den verschiedenen medialen Repräsentationsformen. Allenfalls lässt sich eine gewisse Einseitigkeit bemerken, die durch den informationstechnischen Primat und an der Nachrichtentechnik orientierten Übertragungsformen geprägt ist. Ausgangspunkt der Erörterung ist die Beobachtung, dass Menschen Informationsbedürfnisse besitzen, die sie durch Inanspruchnahme verschiedenster externer Quellen und Hilfsmittel befriedigen wollen. Die neuartigen Speicher- und Findeformen führen zu übersteigerten Erwartungen, wenn man an all die Formulierungen mit virtuell, cyber, Hyper, Multimedia, Information Superhighway etc. denkt. Häufig wird dabei suggeriert, die veränderte mediale Präsentation habe neuartige und bessere Qualitäten für die Rezeption von Information, ohne dass die dabei beteiligten Prozesse völlig verstanden sind. Innerhalb eines konstruktivistischen Modells der kognitiven Informationsverarbeitung und der Rezeption medial gespeicherter Information werden Fragen der Darstellung und Rezeption von Information untersucht.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:29
    Pages
    S.139-152
    Source
    Medien-Informationsmanagement: Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte. Hrsg.: Marianne Englert u.a
  19. Sachse, E.; Liebig, M.; Gödert, W.: Automatische Indexierung unter Einbeziehung semantischer Relationen : Ergebnisse des Retrievaltests zum MILOS II-Projekt (1998) 0.01 
    0.009146999 = product of:
  0.06860249 = sum of:
    0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01638937 = score(doc=3577,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033851784 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.348393 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01638937 = score(doc=3577,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019719584 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen von MILOS II wurde das erste MILOS-Projekt zur automatischen Indexierung von Titeldaten um eine semantischer Komponente erweitert, indem Thesaurusrelationen der Schlagwortnormdatei eingebunden wurden. Der abschließend zur Evaluierung durchgeführte Retrievaltest und seine Ergebnisse stehen im Mittelpunkt dieses Texts. Zusätzlich wird ein Überblick über bereits durchgeführte Retrievaltests (vorwiegend des anglo-amerikanischen Raums) gegeben und es wird erläutert, welche grundlegenden Fragestellungen bei der praktischen Durchführung eines Retrievaltests zu beachten sind
    Imprint
    Köln : FH Köln, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    66 S
    Series
    Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.14
  20. Gödert, W.: Einführung in Probleme und Methoden der inhaltlichen Dokumenterschließung : eine Text- und Materialsammlung (1998) 0.01 
    0.008918892 = product of:
  0.066891685 = sum of:
    0.02838722 = weight(_text_:und in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02838722 = score(doc=7503,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
    0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061733257 = score(doc=7503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
    0.02838722 = weight(_text_:und in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02838722 = score(doc=7503,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
    0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 7503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003943917 = score(doc=7503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7503)
  0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    Imprint
    Köln : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen
    Pages
    248 S

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 99
  • e 17

Types

  • a 88
  • el 15
  • u 11
  • m 5
  • r 4
  • p 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications