Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Neufang, R."
  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0016565587 = product of:
      0.016565587 = sum of:
        0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004365201 = score(doc=2343,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
        0.010228428 = product of:
          0.020456856 = sum of:
            0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020456856 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Report of a survey 96 (out of 119) US and Canadian member libraries of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) to determine their use of on-line and CD-ROM data bases, including OPACs. 4 catalogues were identified: on-line mediated searching (97%); CD-ROMs (96%); end-user on-line searching (45%); and locally mounted magnetic tapes (37,5%). The latter option is expected to be the most widely used option in the new future. Although CD-ROM caused some migration from on-line, most migration was from printed sources to CD-ROM. Tables show: on-line hosts most used for intermediary on-line searching; on-line data bases most after searched by intermediaries; end user on-line systems offered by most libraries; the 20 most popular CD-ROM data bases; and the 8 magnetic tape data bases accessible on OPACs
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  2. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: ¬The impact of electronic reference on reference librarians (1992) 0.00
    1.5024448E-4 = product of:
      0.004507334 = sum of:
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 6371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=6371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 6371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6371)
      0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.3, S.54-56,58,60