Talja, S.; Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: "Isms" in information science : constructivism, collectivism and constructionism (2005)
0.02
0.02497166 = product of:
0.1248583 = sum of:
0.016574297 = product of:
0.033148594 = sum of:
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=4412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033851784 = score(doc=4412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.348393 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=4412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=4412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0053462577 = score(doc=4412,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.0027887707 = weight(_text_:s in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027887707 = score(doc=4412,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach - Presents a literature-based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings - Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value - Outlines each metatheory's specific fields of application.
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.79-101
