Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Taniguchi, S."
  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997) 0.00
    7.747647E-4 = product of:
      0.01162147 = sum of:
        0.0076375115 = weight(_text_:in in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076375115 = score(doc=6343,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
        0.003983958 = weight(_text_:s in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003983958 = score(doc=6343,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues
    Footnote
    [In Japanisch]
    Source
    Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.129-139
  2. Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.00
    6.4605067E-4 = product of:
      0.00969076 = sum of:
        0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006901989 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
        0.0027887707 = weight(_text_:s in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027887707 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
    Footnote
    [In Japanisch]
    Source
    Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.1-18