Search (330 results, page 17 of 17)

1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

OCLC newsletter. 1999, no.242, Nov/Dez., S.4-5

1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

OCLC newsletter. 1999, no.242, Nov/Dez., S.12-13

1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

Information research watch international. 2002, June, S.2-4

1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.3/4, S.317-323

1.12683345E-4 = product of:
  0.0033805002 = sum of:
    0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033805002 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.3/4, S.301-305

9.390279E-5 = product of:
  0.0028170836 = sum of:
    0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 3721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0028170836 = score(doc=3721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3721)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

Advanced technology libraries. 27(1998) no.11, S.2-3

9.295903E-5 = product of:
  0.0027887707 = sum of:
    0.0027887707 = weight(_text_:s in 4838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027887707 = score(doc=4838,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 4838, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4838)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

D-Lib magazine. 10(2004) no.6, x S

8.8190376E-5 = product of:
  0.0026457112 = sum of:
    0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026457112 = score(doc=5851,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Abstract

This paper discusses how the AustLit: Australian Literature Gateway's interpretation, enhancement and implementation of the International Federation of Library Association's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR Final Report 1998) model is meeting the needs of Australian literature scholars for accurate bibliographic representation of the histories of literary texts. It also explores how the AustLit Gateway's underpinning research principles, which are based on the tradition of scholarly enumerative and descriptive bibliography, with enhancements from analytical bibliography and literary biography, have impacted upon our implementation of the FRBR model. The major enhancement or alteration to the model is the use of enhanced manifestations, which allow the full representation of all agents' contributions to be shown in a highly granular format by enabling creation events to be incorporated at all levels of the Work, Expression and Manifestation nexus.

8.314669E-5 = product of:
  0.0024944006 = sum of:
    0.0024944006 = weight(_text_:in in 2812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024944006 = score(doc=2812,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.08501591 = fieldWeight in 2812, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2812)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Abstract

From a quantitative and qualitative point of view the ETH Library is offering its users an extensive choice of information services. In this respect all researchers, all scientists and also all students have access to nearly all relevant information. This is one side of the coin. On the other hand, this broad, but also heterogeneous bundle of information sources has disadvantages, which should not be underestimated: The more information services and information channels you have, the more complex is it to find what you want to get for your scientific work. A portal-like integration of all the different information resources is still missing. The vision, the main goal of the project "Knowledge Portal" is, to develop a central access system in terms of a "single-point-of-access" for all electronic information services. This means, that all these sources - from the library's catalogue and the fulltext inhouse applications to external, licensed sources - should be accessible via one central Web service. Although the primary target group for this vision is the science community of the ETH Zurich, the interested public should also be taken into account, for the library has also a nation-wide responsibility.The general idea to launch a complex project like that comes from a survey the library did one and a half years ago. We asked a defined sample of scientists what they expected to get from their library and one constant answer was, that they wanted to have one point of access to all the electronic library services and besides this, the search processes should be as simple as possible. We accepted this demand as an order to develop a "single-point-of-access" to all electronic services the library provides. The presentation gives an overview about the general idea of the project and describes the current status.

7.512224E-5 = product of:
  0.002253667 = sum of:
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
  0.033333335 = coord(1/30)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) nos.3/4, S.127-147