Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Henzler, R.G.: Informetrische Auswertungen bei der Online-Retrieval-Praxis (1982) 0.01
    0.0057194647 = product of:
      0.042895984 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
        0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0061733257 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=3054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Pages
    S.371-381
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1981, Mainz, 5.-8.10.1981: Kleincomputer in Information und Dokumentation. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  2. Eisenhardt, O.; Ohly, P.: Quantitative Analyse und Suchstrategien (1981) 0.00
    0.0043114335 = product of:
      0.043114334 = sum of:
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=36,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
        0.019866917 = weight(_text_:und in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019866917 = score(doc=36,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.305-332
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Zitatenanalyse und verwandte Verfahren : Vorträge einer öffentlichen Sitzung während der 32. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, Oktober 1979 (1980) 0.00
    0.004085332 = product of:
      0.03063999 = sum of:
        0.011706693 = weight(_text_:und in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011706693 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.004409519 = weight(_text_:in in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004409519 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.011706693 = weight(_text_:und in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011706693 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
        0.0028170836 = weight(_text_:s in 417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0028170836 = score(doc=417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=417)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: NACKE, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne; GERDEL, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse; EISENHARDT, O.-H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse; KRUG, G.: List-Analyse; LANGE, H.: Requestanalyse; HENZLER, R.G.: Bibliometrische Methoden der Termanalyse; NACKE, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse
    Type
    s
  4. Umstätter, W.: Informetrische Hilfe durch das 'intelligente Terminal' (1986) 0.00
    0.0036722657 = product of:
      0.036722656 = sum of:
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
        0.01638937 = weight(_text_:und in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01638937 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
        0.003943917 = weight(_text_:s in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003943917 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.556-56?
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1986, Freiburg, 8.-10.10.1986: Bedarfsorientierte Fachinformation: Methoden und Techniken am Arbeitsplatz. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Umstätter, W.; Rehm, M.; Dorogi, Z.: ¬Die Halbwertszeit in der naturwissenschaftlichen Literatur (1982) 0.00
    0.0034852899 = product of:
      0.026139673 = sum of:
        0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009933459 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
        0.0045825066 = weight(_text_:in in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045825066 = score(doc=5279,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
        0.009933459 = weight(_text_:und in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009933459 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=5279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Aus der Benutzung der Universitätsbibliothek Ulm wurde eine Halbwertszeit-Funktion in der naturwissenschaftlichen Literatur von t1/2=5 Jahren bestimmt. Eine interessante Abweichung von dieser Halbwertszeit-Funktion ist bei der Bestellung der neuesten Zeitschriften zu beobachten. Der Grund hierfür liegt vermutlich darin, daß Wissenschaftler das Vierfache an neuester Literatur lesen müssen, um wissenschaftliche Trends zu überschauen. Eine weitere Abweichung ist in der ältesten Literatur festzustellen, bei den sog. 'citation classics'. Übereinstimmung zeigt sich im Zitier- und Kopierverhalten bei Zeitschriftenliteratur, die älter als 2 Jahre ist. Etwa 27% der an die UB Ulm gerichteten Literaturanforderungen betreffen Zeitschriftenaufsätze mit einem Alter von über 10 Jahren, da diese Bestände für die Benutzer nur schwer zugänglich sind. Dies zeigt die große Bedeutung einer Freihand-Bibliothek
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Artus, H.M.: 'Halbwertzeit wissenschaftlicher Literatur' - Naturgesetz oder Forschungsartefakt? Zum Forschungsstand der Referenz- und Zitationsanalyse
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 33(1982) H.2, S.50-52
  6. Wersig, G.: Quantitative Methoden der Benutzerforschung (1981) 0.00
    0.003147656 = product of:
      0.03147656 = sum of:
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.297-304
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  7. Hunter, J.A.: Quantifizierbare Merkmale von Datenbanken (1981) 0.00
    0.003147656 = product of:
      0.03147656 = sum of:
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=416)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.371-388
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1980, Berlin, 29.9.-3.10.1980: IuD und Normung - Neue Kommunikationstechnologie - Berufspolitik - Datenbanken - Betriebsstatistik - Informetrie - Parlamentsdokumentation - Arbeitskreis Senioren - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  8. Vasiljev, A.: ¬The law of requisite variety as applied to subject indexing and retrieval (1989) 0.00
    0.003147656 = product of:
      0.03147656 = sum of:
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.014048031 = weight(_text_:und in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014048031 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 5069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=5069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 5069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5069)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Pages
    S.240-245
    Source
    Klassifikation und Ordnung. Tagungsband 12. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Darmstadt 17.-19.3.1988. Hrsg.: R. Wille
  9. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.00
    0.0018591067 = product of:
      0.0278866 = sum of:
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
        0.023379264 = product of:
          0.04675853 = sum of:
            0.04675853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04675853 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  10. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.00
    0.0018591067 = product of:
      0.0278866 = sum of:
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
        0.023379264 = product of:
          0.04675853 = sum of:
            0.04675853 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04675853 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  11. Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980) 0.00
    0.0012293302 = product of:
      0.018439952 = sum of:
        0.015059452 = product of:
          0.045178354 = sum of:
            0.045178354 = weight(_text_:l in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045178354 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021569785 = queryNorm
                0.52696943 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    S.101-105
    Source
    Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
  12. King, J.: ¬A review of bibliometric and other indicators and their role in research evaluation (1987) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 13(1987) no.5, S.261-276
  13. Peritz, B.C.: Citation characteristics in library science : some further results from a bibliometric survey (1981) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Library research. 3(1981), S.47-65
  14. Folly, G.; Hajtman, B.; Nagy, J.I.; Ruff, I.: Some methodological problems in ranking scientists by citation analysis (1981) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Scientometrics. 3(1981) no.2, S.135-147
  15. Kinnucan, M.T.: Statistical methods in information science research (1986) 0.00
    7.708376E-4 = product of:
      0.0115625635 = sum of:
        0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00705523 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
        0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004507334 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 21(1986), S.147-178
  16. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.00
    5.781282E-4 = product of:
      0.008671923 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
        0.0033805002 = weight(_text_:s in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033805002 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Pages
    S.95-102
  17. Rees-Potter, L.K.: Dynamic thesaural systems : a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems (1989) 0.00
    5.575784E-4 = product of:
      0.008363675 = sum of:
        0.006110009 = weight(_text_:in in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006110009 = score(doc=5059,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
        0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002253667 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 25(1989) no.6, S.677-691
  18. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.00
    4.8788113E-4 = product of:
      0.0073182164 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=13,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 32(1981) H.4/5, S.162-164
  19. Tsay, M.-Y.: ¬A bibliometric study of indexing and abstracting, 1876-1976 (1989) 0.00
    4.8788113E-4 = product of:
      0.0073182164 = sum of:
        0.0053462577 = weight(_text_:in in 5060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053462577 = score(doc=5060,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5060, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5060)
        0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019719584 = score(doc=5060,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5060, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5060)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    In a bibliometric study of references to indexing and abstracting from 1876 to 1976 a total of 2.381 references in Wellisch's Indexing and abstracting: an international bibliography were analysed by a PL/I program. Most of the articles (67%) appeared as journal papers. The Bradford-Zipf law was applied to investigate the journal literature. Thirteen core journals were identified, six of which emphasize the subject of indexing and abstracting. Lotka's law was used to measure the productivity of authors. The vast majority, 1.533 out of 1.966 authors, contributed only one article. The leading authors and their active life in this subject were also studied. English is the predominant language of articles on indexing and abstracting
    Source
    Indexer. 17(1989), S.234-238
  20. Davies, R.: Q-analysis : a methodology for librarianship and information science (1985) 0.00
    4.6544487E-4 = product of:
      0.0069816727 = sum of:
        0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052914224 = score(doc=589,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
        0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0016902501 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021569785 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Q-analysis is a methodology for investigating a wide range of structural phenomena. Strutures are defined in terms of relations between members of sets and their salient features are revealed using techniques of algebraic topology. However, the basic method can be mastered by non-mathematicians. Q-analysis has been applied to problems as diverse as discovering the rules for the diagnosis of a rare disease and the study of tactics in a football match. Other applications include some of interest to librarians and information scientists. In bibliometrics, Q-analysis has proved capable of emulating techniques such as bibliographic coupling, co-citation analysis and co-word analysis. It has also been used to produce a classification scheme for television programmes based on different principles from most bibliographic classifications. This paper introduces the basic ideas of Q-analysis. Applications relevant to librarianship and information science are reviewed and present limitations of the approach described. New theoretical advances including some in other fields such as planning and design theory and artificial intelligence may lead to a still more powerful method of investigating structure
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 41(1985) no.4, S.221-246