-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.37
0.3675766 = product of:
1.0024816 = sum of:
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018730707 = score(doc=2188,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.003527615 = weight(_text_:in in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003527615 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.018730707 = weight(_text_:und in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018730707 = score(doc=2188,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.13703413 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13703413 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18286887 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.36666667 = coord(11/30)
- Abstract
- Wissenschaftliche Karrieren und Publikationen benötigen Reputation und möglichst viel Beachtung. Literatur, die diese Aufmerksamkeit findet, wird - so die gängige Annahme - häufig zitiert. Ausgehend von dieser Überlegung wurden Verfahren der Zitationsmessung entwickelt, die Auskunft über die Relevanz oder (wie im- und explizit oft auch postuliert wird) gar die Qualität einer Publikation oder eines Wissenschaftlers geben sollen.
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
- Source
- Wissenschaftsmanagement. 2013, Juli / August, S.21-25
-
Böll, S.K.: Informations- und bibliothekswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in Literaturdatenbanken (2010)
0.05
0.053533103 = product of:
0.20074913 = sum of:
0.021681098 = weight(_text_:und in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021681098 = score(doc=3234,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.023439597 = product of:
0.046879195 = sum of:
0.046879195 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046879195 = score(doc=3234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4875579 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033851784 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033851784 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.348393 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.046879195 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046879195 = score(doc=3234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4875579 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.046879195 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046879195 = score(doc=3234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4875579 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004365201 = score(doc=3234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.021681098 = weight(_text_:und in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021681098 = score(doc=3234,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 3234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=3234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3234)
0.26666668 = coord(8/30)
- Abstract
- Fachzeitschriften spielen für Wissenschaftler und Praktiker bei der Verbreitung von Forschungsergebnissen und Erfahrungsberichten eine wichtige Rolle. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt eine kurze Einführung in das Feld der Informetrie, um auf dieser Grundlage eine Zeitschriftenliste auf dem Gebiet der lnformations- und Bibliothekswissenschaft (luB) einzuführen. Durch Kombination von zehn verschiedenen Zeitschriftenlisten aus Datenbanken, die relevante Literatur auf dem Gebiet der luB erfassen, wird eine umfassende Liste von 1205 relevanten Fachzeitschriften erstellt. Anhand ihrer Erscheinungshäufigkeit wird die Bedeutung einzelner Zeitschriften für das Gebiet der luB eingeordnet, wobei vier verschiedene Kategorien von Zeitschriften unterschieden werden: fünfzehn Kernzeitschriften, 88 zentrale Zeitschriften, 173 selektive Zeitschriften und 672 Randzeitschriften. Betrachtet werden darüber hinaus auch Publikationssprache und geografische Verteilung der Zeitschriften sowie die Überschneidung von verschiedenen Datenbanken untereinander.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 57(2010) H.1, S.26-36
-
Mayr, P.: Information Retrieval-Mehrwertdienste für Digitale Bibliotheken: : Crosskonkordanzen und Bradfordizing (2010)
0.04
0.035875753 = product of:
0.13453406 = sum of:
0.030909384 = weight(_text_:buch in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030909384 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10028592 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.3082126 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205253 = score(doc=4910,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005915991 = score(doc=4910,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205253 = score(doc=4910,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 4910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002390375 = score(doc=4910,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4910, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4910)
0.26666668 = coord(8/30)
- Abstract
- In dieser Arbeit werden zwei Mehrwertdienste für Suchsysteme vorgestellt, die typische Probleme bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Literatur behandeln können. Die beiden Mehrwertdienste semantische Heterogenitätsbehandlung am Beispiel Crosskonkordanzen und Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing, die in unterschiedlichen Phasen der Suche zum Einsatz kommen, werden in diesem Buch ausführlich beschrieben und evaluiert. Für die Tests wurden Fragestellungen und Daten aus zwei Evaluationsprojekten (CLEF und KoMoHe) verwendet. Die intellektuell bewerteten Dokumente stammen aus insgesamt sieben Fachdatenbanken der Fächer Sozialwissenschaften, Politikwissenschaft, Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Psychologie und Medizin. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit sind in das GESIS-Projekt IRM eingeflossen.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: iwp 62(2011) H.6/7, S. 323-324 (D. Lewandowski)
- Pages
- 270 S
-
Klein, A.: Von der Schneeflocke zur Lawine : Möglichkeiten der Nutzung freier Zitationsdaten in Bibliotheken (2017)
0.03
0.034612972 = product of:
0.14834131 = sum of:
0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008194685 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006901989 = score(doc=4002,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.008194685 = weight(_text_:und in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008194685 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041026 = score(doc=4002,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041026 = score(doc=4002,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.041026 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041026 = score(doc=4002,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.5047642 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- Zitationen spielen eine wichtige Rolle im wissenschaftlichen Diskurs, in der Recherchepraxis sowie im Bereich der Bibliometrie. In jüngster Zeit gibt es zunehmend Initiativen, die Zitationen als Open Data zur freien Nachnutzung verfügbar machen. Der Beitrag beschreibt den Stand der Entwicklung dieser Initiativen und zeigt, dass in nächster Zeit eine kritische Masse von Daten entstehen könnte, aus denen sich gerade für Bibliotheken neue Perspektiven ergeben. Als konkrete Möglichkeit zur Partizipation für Bibliotheken wird das DFG-Projekt Linked Open Citation Database (LOC-DB) vorgestellt.
- Footnote
- Vortrag anlässlich des Bibliothekartages 2017 in Frankfurt.
- Source
- o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.127-136
-
Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012)
0.03
0.032287907 = product of:
0.13837674 = sum of:
0.024584053 = weight(_text_:und in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024584053 = score(doc=154,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.016574297 = product of:
0.033148594 = sum of:
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.033148594 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033148594 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.004365201 = weight(_text_:in in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004365201 = score(doc=154,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.024584053 = weight(_text_:und in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024584053 = score(doc=154,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag werden am Beispiel von Onkologie- und Pharmaziezeitschriften Unterschiede zwischen und Gemeinsamkeiten von Downloads und Zitaten herausgearbeitet. Die Download-Daten wurden von Elsevier (ScienceDirect) bereitgestellt, die Zitationsdaten wurden den Journal Citation Reports entnommen bzw. aus dem Web of Science recherchiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen hohen Zusammenhang zwischen Download- und Zitationshäufigkeiten, der für die relativen Zeitschriftenindikatoren und auf Artikelebene etwas geringer ist. Deutliche Unterschiede bestehen hingegen zwischen den Altersstrukturen der herunter-geladenen und der zitierten Artikel. Elektronische Zeitschriften haben maßgeblich dazu beigetragen, dass aktuelle Literatur früher aufgegriffen und deutlich öfter zitiert wird, im Schnitt hat sich das Alter der zitierten Literatur in den letzten zehn Jahren aber kaum verändert.
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 59(2012) H.2, S.87-95
-
Sieben Fragen zu Bibliometrie : Antworten von Ilka Agricola, Friedrich Götze, Martin Grötschel, Klaus Hulek, Peter Michor, Gabriele Nebe, Hans Jürgen Prömel, Jens Vygen, Gerhard Woeginger (2017)
0.03
0.03101841 = product of:
0.15509205 = sum of:
0.016555762 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016555762 = score(doc=4216,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.0038187557 = weight(_text_:in in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0038187557 = score(doc=4216,freq=6.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.016555762 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016555762 = score(doc=4216,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.05837661 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05837661 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12695427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4598239 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.05837661 = weight(_text_:einzelne in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05837661 = score(doc=4216,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12695427 = queryWeight, product of:
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4598239 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- Wissenschaftliche Institutionen und einzelne WissenschaftlerInnen werden zunehmend nach bibliometrischen Daten beurteilt. Jeder Mathematiker hat Vorbehalte gegenüber dieser Praxis. Über diese beiden Dinge waren sich alle TeilnemerInnen und Wortmeldungen des Panels zur Bibliometrie auf der DMV-Jahrestagung in Salzburg einig. Für einzelne WissenschaftlerInnen hat die IMU bereits 2014 (tinyurl.com/ycd7wvh7) die Vorbehalte gegenüber rein bibliometrischen Beurteilungen klar formuliert. Universitätsleitungen, Politik und andere bis hin zur öffentlichen Diskussion verlassen sich aber teilweise aif diese Art der Bewertung. Konkret kann das so aussehen: Zur Beurteilung von Departements zählt eine Universität Publikationen und gewichtet sie nach ihrer Güte. Die Güte entnimmt man einer Einteilung von Fachzeitschriften etwa in A, B und C. Liegt eine solche Einteilung nicht vor, sind alle Journale des Faches mit 1 gewichtet, d.h. 'junk'. Die Diskrepanz zwischen unserer Einschätzung und der allgemeinen Wirkmächtigkeit von Biblimetrie wirft für die DMV als Fachgegsellschaft die Frage auf, wie sie Einfluss nehmen kann und soll. Die 'Mitteilungen' versuchen an dieser Stelle zunächst, ein möglichst breites Meinungsbild zu sammeln. Wir haben sieben Fragen an eine Reihe von Kolleginnen und Kollegen gestellt, die am Panel teilgenmmen haben oder aus anderen Gründen mit dem Thema besfasst sind.
Vgl. auch: Recommendation on the evaluation of individual researchers in the mathematical sciences endorsed by the IMU General Assembly on August 10, 2014. Unter: https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/IMU/Report/140810_Evaluation_of_Individuals_WEB.pdf [tinyurl.com/ycd7wvh7].
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2017, H.4, S.215-224
-
May, M.: Bibliometrie - ein Aufgabengebiet von Bibliotheken? (2014)
0.03
0.028718352 = product of:
0.14359176 = sum of:
0.01324461 = weight(_text_:und in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01324461 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.01324461 = weight(_text_:und in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01324461 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038282957 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038282957 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.038282957 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038282957 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.47101513 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- Bibliometrie zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Leistung gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Vor allem für Hochschulleitungen sind bibliometrische Indices zur Leistungsbeurteilung ihrer Wissenschaftler attraktiv. Die Wissenschaftler hingegen stehen den bibliometrischen Analysen skeptisch gegenüber und nehmen die Indices nur zögerlich an, wie die geringe Nutzung auf ihren Homepages im Internet zeigt. Für Bibliotheken ergibt sich eine neue Aufgabe. Sie sollten sich als Partner beider Gruppen positionieren und durch aktive Beratung ihre Kompetenz auf diesem Feld einbringen.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 48(2014) H.2, S.132-147
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: ¬The operationalization of "fields" as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics : the cases of "library and information science" and "science & technology studies" (2016)
0.03
0.027458396 = product of:
0.117678836 = sum of:
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029015815 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=2779,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.010648641 = product of:
0.03194592 = sum of:
0.03194592 = weight(_text_:l in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03194592 = score(doc=2779,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.37262368 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2779)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- Normalization of citation scores using reference sets based on Web of Science subject categories (WCs) has become an established ("best") practice in evaluative bibliometrics. For example, the Times Higher Education World University Rankings are, among other things, based on this operationalization. However, WCs were developed decades ago for the purpose of information retrieval and evolved incrementally with the database; the classification is machine-based and partially manually corrected. Using the WC "information science & library science" and the WCs attributed to journals in the field of "science and technology studies," we show that WCs do not provide sufficient analytical clarity to carry bibliometric normalization in evaluation practices because of "indexer effects." Can the compliance with "best practices" be replaced with an ambition to develop "best possible practices"? New research questions can then be envisaged.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.707-714
-
¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012)
0.03
0.02665493 = product of:
0.114235416 = sum of:
0.0121659525 = weight(_text_:und in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0121659525 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.04103456 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04103456 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003741601 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.0121659525 = weight(_text_:und in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0121659525 = score(doc=402,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.03188814 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03188814 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.3130544 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.004471982 = weight(_text_:s in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004471982 = score(doc=402,freq=14.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19069082 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.008767224 = product of:
0.017534448 = sum of:
0.017534448 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017534448 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:35:26
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
- Footnote
- Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.3, S.157-182
-
Mayr, P.: Bradfordizing mit Katalogdaten : Alternative Sicht auf Suchergebnisse und Publikationsquellen durch Re-Ranking (2010)
0.02
0.02401573 = product of:
0.102924556 = sum of:
0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205253 = score(doc=4301,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.005915991 = weight(_text_:in in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005915991 = score(doc=4301,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.017205253 = weight(_text_:und in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017205253 = score(doc=4301,freq=12.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.020302603 = weight(_text_:bibliotheken in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020302603 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08127756 = queryWeight, product of:
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24979347 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.768121 = idf(docFreq=2775, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- Nutzer erwarten für Literaturrecherchen in wissenschaftlichen Suchsystemen einen möglichst hohen Anteil an relevanten und qualitativen Dokumenten in den Trefferergebnissen. Insbesondere die Reihenfolge und Struktur der gelisteten Ergebnisse (Ranking) spielt, neben dem direkten Volltextzugriff auf die Dokumente, für viele Nutzer inzwischen eine entscheidende Rolle. Abgegrenzt wird Ranking oder Relevance Ranking von sogenannten Sortierungen zum Beispiel nach dem Erscheinungsjahr der Publikation, obwohl hier die Grenze zu »nach inhaltlicher Relevanz« gerankten Listen konzeptuell nicht sauber zu ziehen ist. Das Ranking von Dokumenten führt letztlich dazu, dass sich die Benutzer fokussiert mit den oberen Treffermengen eines Suchergebnisses beschäftigen. Der mittlere und untere Bereich eines Suchergebnisses wird häufig nicht mehr in Betracht gezogen. Aufgrund der Vielzahl an relevanten und verfügbaren Informationsquellen ist es daher notwendig, Kernbereiche in den Suchräumen zu identifizieren und diese anschließend dem Nutzer hervorgehoben zu präsentieren. Phillipp Mayr fasst hier die Ergebnisse seiner Dissertation zum Thema »Re-Ranking auf Basis von Bradfordizing für die verteilte Suche in Digitalen Bibliotheken« zusammen.
- Source
- BuB. 62(2010) H.1, S.61-63
-
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016)
0.02
0.023396436 = product of:
0.10027044 = sum of:
0.0118387835 = product of:
0.023677567 = sum of:
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024179846 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.006614278 = weight(_text_:in in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006614278 = score(doc=3231,freq=18.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.008873867 = product of:
0.0266216 = sum of:
0.0266216 = weight(_text_:l in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0266216 = score(doc=3231,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.31051973 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.3095-3100
-
Xu, L.: Research synthesis methods and library and information science : shared problems, limited diffusion (2016)
0.02
0.022701718 = product of:
0.09729308 = sum of:
0.0118387835 = product of:
0.023677567 = sum of:
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024179846 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.006236001 = weight(_text_:in in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006236001 = score(doc=3057,freq=16.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.006274772 = product of:
0.018824315 = sum of:
0.018824315 = weight(_text_:l in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018824315 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0857324 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 3057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=3057,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3057, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3057)
0.23333333 = coord(7/30)
- Abstract
- Interests of researchers who engage with research synthesis methods (RSM) intersect with library and information science (LIS) research and practice. This intersection is described by a summary of conceptualizations of research synthesis in a diverse set of research fields and in the context of Swanson's (1986) discussion of undiscovered public knowledge. Through a selective literature review, research topics that intersect with LIS and RSM are outlined. Topics identified include open access, information retrieval, bias and research information ethics, referencing practices, citation patterns, and data science. Subsequently, bibliometrics and topic modeling are used to present a systematic overview of the visibility of RSM in LIS. This analysis indicates that RSM became visible in LIS in the 1980s. Overall, LIS research has drawn substantially from general and internal medicine, the field's own literature, and business; and is drawn on by health and medical sciences, computing, and business. Through this analytical overview, it is confirmed that research synthesis is more visible in the health and medical literature in LIS; but suggests that, LIS, as a meta-science, has the potential to make substantive contributions to a broader variety of fields in the context of topics related to research synthesis methods.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.8, S.1990-2008
-
Zhao, R.; Wu, S.: ¬The network pattern of journal knowledge transfer in library and information science in China (2014)
0.02
0.021783909 = product of:
0.10891954 = sum of:
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029015815 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=1392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064806426 = score(doc=1392,freq=12.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.002390375 = weight(_text_:s in 1392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002390375 = score(doc=1392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1392)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- Using the library and information science journals 2003-2012 in Nanjing University's Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index as data sources, the paper reveals the citation structure implied in these journals by applying social network analysis. Results show that, first, journal knowledge transfer activity in library and information science is frequent, and both the level of knowledge and discipline integration as well as the knowledge gap influenced knowledge transfer activity. According to the out-degree and in-degree, journals can be divided into three kinds. Second, based on professional bias and citation frequency, the knowledge transfer network can be divided into four blocks. With the change of discipline capacity and knowledge gap among journals, the "core-periphery" structure of the knowledge transfer network is getting weaker. Finally, regions of the knowledge transfer network evolved from a "weak-weak" subgroup to a "strong-weak" subgroup or a "weak-strong" subgroup, and then move to a "strong-strong" subgroup.
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 41(2014) no.4, S.276-287
-
Chang, Y.-W.: Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research (2016)
0.02
0.02140604 = product of:
0.1070302 = sum of:
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029015815 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.0052914224 = weight(_text_:in in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052914224 = score(doc=2973,freq=8.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- General graph random walk has been successfully applied in multi-document summarization, but it has some limitations to process documents by this way. In this paper, we propose a novel hypergraph based vertex-reinforced random walk framework for multi-document summarization. The framework first exploits the Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP) topic model to learn a word-topic probability distribution in sentences. Then the hypergraph is used to capture both cluster relationship based on the word-topic probability distribution and pairwise similarity among sentences. Finally, a time-variant random walk algorithm for hypergraphs is developed to rank sentences which ensures sentence diversity by vertex-reinforcement in summaries. Experimental results on the public available dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.4, S.658-669
-
Ni, C.; Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.; Ding, Y.: Journal impact and proximity : an assessment using bibliographic features (2013)
0.02
0.021096075 = product of:
0.10548037 = sum of:
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029015815 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003741601 = score(doc=686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=686)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- Journals in the Information Science & Library Science category of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) were compared using both bibliometric and bibliographic features. Data collected covered journal impact factor (JIF), number of issues per year, number of authors per article, longevity, editorial board membership, frequency of publication, number of databases indexing the journal, number of aggregators providing full-text access, country of publication, JCR categories, Dewey decimal classification, and journal statement of scope. Three features significantly correlated with JIF: number of editorial board members and number of JCR categories in which a journal is listed correlated positively; journal longevity correlated negatively with JIF. Coword analysis of journal descriptions provided a proximity clustering of journals, which differed considerably from the clusters based on editorial board membership. Finally, a multiple linear regression model was built to predict the JIF based on all the collected bibliographic features.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.802-817
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.02
0.021096075 = product of:
0.10548037 = sum of:
0.014206541 = product of:
0.028413082 = sum of:
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029015815 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029015815 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.028413082 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028413082 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.003741601 = weight(_text_:in in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003741601 = score(doc=2495,freq=4.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- In theory, articles can attract readers on the social reference sharing site Mendeley before they can attract citations, so Mendeley altmetrics could provide early indications of article impact. This article investigates the influence of time on the number of Mendeley readers of an article through a theoretical discussion and an investigation into the relationship between counts of readers of, and citations to, 4 general library and information science (LIS) journals. For this discipline, it takes about 7 years for articles to attract as many Scopus citations as Mendeley readers, and after this the Spearman correlation between readers and citers is stable at about 0.6 for all years. This suggests that Mendeley readership counts may be useful impact indicators for both newer and older articles. The lack of dates for individual Mendeley article readers and an unknown bias toward more recent articles mean that readership data should be normalized individually by year, however, before making any comparisons between articles published in different years.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.1, S.191-199
-
Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013)
0.02
0.020724757 = product of:
0.10362378 = sum of:
0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323874 = score(doc=900,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.047873653 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047873653 = score(doc=900,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.4927021 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.006901989 = weight(_text_:in in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006901989 = score(doc=900,freq=10.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.018323874 = weight(_text_:und in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018323874 = score(doc=900,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019719584 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.010228428 = product of:
0.020456856 = sum of:
0.020456856 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020456856 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07553371 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag wird eine Publikationsanalyse von Beiträgen in von im Web of Science (WoS) indexierten bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften vorgestellt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Analyse bestätigen die anglo-amerikanische Dominanz in der facheinschlägigen Literatur, die bei den primär informationswissenschaftlichen Zeitschriften sogar noch deutlicher ausfällt. Die skandinavischen Länder und der Bereich der Szientometrie stellen gewisse Ausnahmen dar. Die internationale Sichtbarkeit Deutschlands und Österreichs ist hingegen "ausbaufähig".
- Content
- Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 14:04:09
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.02
0.018546335 = product of:
0.09273168 = sum of:
0.0118387835 = product of:
0.023677567 = sum of:
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024179846 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.007949374 = weight(_text_:in in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007949374 = score(doc=244,freq=26.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.27093613 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
Bibliothekswesen
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Li, D.; Russell, T.G.; Finlay, S.C.; Ding, Y.: ¬The shifting sands of disciplinary development : analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation (2011)
0.02
0.018483963 = product of:
0.09241981 = sum of:
0.0118387835 = product of:
0.023677567 = sum of:
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024179846 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.0076375115 = weight(_text_:in in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076375115 = score(doc=4143,freq=24.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.0014085418 = weight(_text_:s in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0014085418 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- This work identifies changes in dominant topics in library and information science (LIS) over time, by analyzing the 3,121 doctoral dissertations completed between 1930 and 2009 at North American Library and Information Science programs. The authors utilize latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to identify latent topics diachronically and to identify representative dissertations of those topics. The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930-1969) to the present (2000-2009). However, some themes occurred in multiple periods, representing core areas of the field: library history occurred in the first two periods; citation analysis in the second and third periods; and information-seeking behavior in the fourth and last period. Two topics occurred in three of the five periods: information retrieval and information use. One of the notable changes in the topics was the diminishing use of the word library (and related terms). This has implications for the provision of doctoral education in LIS. This work is compared to other earlier analyses and provides validation for the use of LDA in topic analysis of a discipline.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.185-204
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.02
0.018239798 = product of:
0.09119899 = sum of:
0.0118387835 = product of:
0.023677567 = sum of:
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024179846 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024179846 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09716552 = queryWeight, product of:
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.023677567 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023677567 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09615103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24625391 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.005833246 = weight(_text_:in in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005833246 = score(doc=4608,freq=14.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.001991979 = weight(_text_:s in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.001991979 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.2 = coord(6/30)
- Abstract
- This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
- Field
- Bibliothekswesen
Informationswissenschaft
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.10, S.1933-1953
