Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Golub, K."
  1. Wartena, C.; Golub, K.: Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals (2021) 0.01
    0.0109173795 = product of:
      0.087339036 = sum of:
        0.024607675 = weight(_text_:und in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024607675 = score(doc=376,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.060597893 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027341092 = queryNorm
            0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.06273136 = weight(_text_:informationspraxis in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06273136 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17620279 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027341092 = queryNorm
            0.35601798 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag möchte einen Überblick über die in der Literatur diskutierten Möglichkeiten, Herausforderungen und Grenzen geben, Retrieval als eine extrinsische Evaluierungsmethode für die Ergebnisse verbaler Sacherschließung zu nutzen. Die inhaltliche Erschließung im Allgemeinen und die Verschlagwortung im Besonderen können intrinsisch oder extrinsisch evaluiert werden. Die intrinsische Evaluierung bezieht sich auf Eigenschaften der Erschließung, von denen vermutet wird, dass sie geeignete Indikatoren für die Qualität der Erschließung sind, wie formale Einheitlichkeit (im Hinblick auf die Anzahl zugewiesener Deskriptoren pro Dokument, auf die Granularität usw.), Konsistenz oder Übereinstimmung der Ergebnisse verschiedener Erschließer:innen. Bei einer extrinsischen Evaluierung geht es darum, die Qualität der gewählten Deskriptoren daran zu messen, wie gut sie sich tatsächlich bei der Suche bewähren. Obwohl die extrinsische Evaluierung direktere Auskunft darüber gibt, ob die Erschließung ihren Zweck erfüllt, und daher den Vorzug verdienen sollte, ist sie kompliziert und oft problematisch. In einem Retrievalsystem greifen verschiedene Algorithmen und Datenquellen in vielschichtiger Weise ineinander und interagieren bei der Evaluierung darüber hinaus noch mit Nutzer:innen und Rechercheaufgaben. Die Evaluierung einer Komponente im System kann nicht einfach dadurch vorgenommen werden, dass man sie austauscht und mit einer anderen Komponente vergleicht, da die gleiche Ressource oder der gleiche Algorithmus sich in unterschiedlichen Umgebungen unterschiedlich verhalten kann. Wir werden relevante Evaluierungsansätze vorstellen und diskutieren, und zum Abschluss einige Empfehlungen für die Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext von Retrieval geben.
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
  2. Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016) 0.01
    0.0063611446 = product of:
      0.050889157 = sum of:
        0.02843549 = product of:
          0.05687098 = sum of:
            0.05687098 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687098 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.33898067 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.022453668 = product of:
          0.044907335 = sum of:
            0.044907335 = weight(_text_:indexieren in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044907335 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.30122307 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Indexieren
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  3. Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual Web pages, based on a controlled vocabulary : challenges and recommendations (2006) 0.00
    0.0021326616 = product of:
      0.034122586 = sum of:
        0.034122586 = product of:
          0.06824517 = sum of:
            0.06824517 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 5897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06824517 = score(doc=5897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.4067768 = fieldWeight in 5897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  4. Golub, K.; Hamon, T.; Ardö, A.: Automated classification of textual documents based on a controlled vocabulary in engineering (2007) 0.00
    0.0021326616 = product of:
      0.034122586 = sum of:
        0.034122586 = product of:
          0.06824517 = sum of:
            0.06824517 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06824517 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.4067768 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  5. Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual documents in the context of Web-based hierarchical browsing (2011) 0.00
    0.0021326616 = product of:
      0.034122586 = sum of:
        0.034122586 = product of:
          0.06824517 = sum of:
            0.06824517 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 4558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06824517 = score(doc=4558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.4067768 = fieldWeight in 4558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4558)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  6. Golub, K.: Automated subject indexing : an overview (2021) 0.00
    0.001964696 = product of:
      0.031435136 = sum of:
        0.031435136 = product of:
          0.06287027 = sum of:
            0.06287027 = weight(_text_:indexieren in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06287027 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.4217123 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Indexieren
  7. Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual web documents (2006) 0.00
    0.0017772181 = product of:
      0.02843549 = sum of:
        0.02843549 = product of:
          0.05687098 = sum of:
            0.05687098 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687098 = score(doc=5600,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.33898067 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  8. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.: Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing (2009) 0.00
    0.0017772181 = product of:
      0.02843549 = sum of:
        0.02843549 = product of:
          0.05687098 = sum of:
            0.05687098 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687098 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.33898067 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  9. Golub, K.; Hansson, J.; Soergel, D.; Tudhope, D.: Managing classification in libraries : a methodological outline for evaluating automatic subject indexing and classification in Swedish library catalogues (2015) 0.00
    0.0017772181 = product of:
      0.02843549 = sum of:
        0.02843549 = product of:
          0.05687098 = sum of:
            0.05687098 = weight(_text_:klassifizieren in 2300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05687098 = score(doc=2300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16777056 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.33898067 = fieldWeight in 2300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1362057 = idf(docFreq=259, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Klassifizieren
  10. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.; Tudhope, D.: Enhancing social tagging with automated keywords from the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.00
    0.0014033542 = product of:
      0.022453668 = sum of:
        0.022453668 = product of:
          0.044907335 = sum of:
            0.044907335 = weight(_text_:indexieren in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044907335 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.30122307 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Indexieren
  11. Golub, K.: Automatic subject indexing of text (2019) 0.00
    0.0014033542 = product of:
      0.022453668 = sum of:
        0.022453668 = product of:
          0.044907335 = sum of:
            0.044907335 = weight(_text_:indexieren in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044907335 = score(doc=5268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908332 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.30122307 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.45272 = idf(docFreq=514, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Theme
    Automatisches Indexieren
  12. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.00
    6.945638E-4 = product of:
      0.011113021 = sum of:
        0.011113021 = product of:
          0.022226041 = sum of:
            0.022226041 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022226041 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09574384 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027341092 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54