Search (74 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971) 0.17
    0.1720511 = product of:
      0.5161533 = sum of:
        0.13176218 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13176218 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14780287 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.89147234 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.087499045 = weight(_text_:buch in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087499045 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1204451 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.7264641 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.024352528 = weight(_text_:und in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024352528 = score(doc=4593,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.040216226 = product of:
          0.08043245 = sum of:
            0.08043245 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08043245 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.69651127 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.11616164 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11616164 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.99540854 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.11616164 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11616164 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.99540854 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.33333334 = coord(6/18)
    
    Classification
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
    RVK
    AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Blair, D.C.: Language and representation in information retrieval (1991) 0.15
    0.14562494 = product of:
      0.3276561 = sum of:
        0.052704867 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052704867 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14780287 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.034999616 = weight(_text_:buch in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034999616 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1204451 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.29058564 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.022495901 = weight(_text_:und in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022495901 = score(doc=1545,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.01608649 = product of:
          0.03217298 = sum of:
            0.03217298 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03217298 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.2786045 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.046464656 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046464656 = score(doc=1545,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.046464656 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046464656 = score(doc=1545,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3981634 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.06724637 = weight(_text_:informationspraxis in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06724637 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16695212 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.40278837 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
        0.04119356 = weight(_text_:automatisches in 1545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04119356 = score(doc=1545,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13066888 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3152515 = fieldWeight in 1545, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1545)
      0.44444445 = coord(8/18)
    
    Classification
    ES 930 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Spezialbereiche der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft / Datenverarbeitung und Sprachwissenschaft. Computerlinguistik / Informationsbehandlung
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    ST 304 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Automatisches Programmieren, Deduction and theorem proving, Wissensrepräsentation
    RVK
    ES 930 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Spezialbereiche der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft / Datenverarbeitung und Sprachwissenschaft. Computerlinguistik / Informationsbehandlung
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    ST 270 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme
    ST 304 Informatik / Monographien / Künstliche Intelligenz / Automatisches Programmieren, Deduction and theorem proving, Wissensrepräsentation
  3. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.12
    0.11718824 = product of:
      0.30134118 = sum of:
        0.0790573 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0790573 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14780287 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.052499425 = weight(_text_:buch in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052499425 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1204451 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.011930253 = weight(_text_:und in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011930253 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.034124598 = product of:
          0.068249196 = sum of:
            0.068249196 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068249196 = score(doc=1659,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04928321 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04928321 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.04928321 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04928321 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.42231607 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.02516316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516316 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.3888889 = coord(7/18)
    
    Classification
    AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
    Issue
    Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing.
    RVK
    AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis
  4. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.11
    0.10764363 = product of:
      0.2767979 = sum of:
        0.07987657 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07987657 = score(doc=4360,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.14780287 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.5404264 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.043309815 = weight(_text_:buch in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043309815 = score(doc=4360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1204451 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.020877944 = weight(_text_:und in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020877944 = score(doc=4360,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.36362273 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.028151358 = product of:
          0.056302715 = sum of:
            0.056302715 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056302715 = score(doc=4360,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.4875579 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.040656574 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040656574 = score(doc=4360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.040656574 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040656574 = score(doc=4360,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11669745 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.348393 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
        0.023269042 = product of:
          0.034903564 = sum of:
            0.017530631 = weight(_text_:29 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017530631 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.19237353 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
            0.017372932 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017372932 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090717286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.3888889 = coord(7/18)
    
    Abstract
    Es werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für eine Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse der OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Im vergangenen Jahr wurden die Ergebnisse der Expertengruppe mit dem Schwerpunkt Formalerschließung vorgelegt, nun folgen die Aussagen zur Sacherschließung, welche die Expertengruppe - in veränderter personeller Zusammensetzung unter Leitung von Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann, Regensburg - erarbeitet hat. Die bibliothekarische Öffentlichkeit ist aufgefordert, sich dazu bis zum Jahresende zu äußern. Beide Berichte beziehen sich aufeinander und versuchen, den Zusammenhang zwischen Formal- und Sacherschließung herzustellen. Vom gegenwärtigen Stand der Sacherschließung in deutschen Bibliotheken ausgehend - wozu auch durch die Gruppe im Frühjahr 1993 eine Umfrage in wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken gemacht worden ist, werden die Grundprobleme der Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen dargestellt. Ein anschließendes Kapitel behandelt das Verhältnis von verbaler und klassifikatorischer Erschließung. Ein wichtiger Teil der Aussagen betrifft das Gebiet der verbalen Sacherschließung und damit das nationale Regelwerk: Es werden Vorschläge für ein Reform der RSWK im Hinblick auf die Erfordernisse des OPAC unterbreitet. Regelwerk und Normdatei (SWD) bilden dabei eine Einheit und werden zusammen betrachtet. Es geht um Kettenbildung und Permutationsregeln, Kompositumbildung oder Zerlegung von Begriffen, Pleonasmus, Funktion der SWD, Ansetzung von Schlagwörtern, die Einführung eines Zeit-Codes, Erschließung literarischer Formen und Gattungen, den verwendeten Zeichensatz, den Umgang mit Verweisungen
    Classification
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Editor
    Kommission des DBI für Erschließung und Katalogmanagement / Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    RVK
    AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines
    AN 50200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliographien, Sammelschriften / Schriftenreihen (Indiv.-Sign.)
  5. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.02
    0.017650275 = product of:
      0.10590164 = sum of:
        0.029223034 = weight(_text_:und in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029223034 = score(doc=753,freq=54.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                54.0 = termFreq=54.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.047550365 = weight(_text_:informationspraxis in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047550365 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16695212 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.2848144 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.029128244 = weight(_text_:automatisches in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029128244 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066888 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.22291647 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
    
    Abstract
    Der 70. Band der BIPRA-Reihe beschäftigt sich mit der Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung im Kontext etablierter Verfahren und technologischer Innovationen. Treffen heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Methoden und Systeme aufeinander, müssen minimale Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung festgelegt werden. Die Qualitätsfrage wird zurzeit in verschiedenen Zusammenhängen intensiv diskutiert und im vorliegenden Band aufgegriffen. In diesem Themenfeld aktive Autor:innen beschreiben aus ihrem jeweiligen Blickwinkel unterschiedliche Aspekte zu Metadaten, Normdaten, Formaten, Erschließungsverfahren und Erschließungspolitik. Der Band versteht sich als Handreichung und Anregung für die Diskussion um die Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung.
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691597/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691597. Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 73(2022) H.2-3, S.131-132 (B. Lorenz u. V. Steyer). Weitere Rezension in: o-bib 9(20229 Nr.3. (Martin Völkl) [https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5843/8714].
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Theme
    Automatisches Indexieren
  6. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.02
    0.017543359 = product of:
      0.078945115 = sum of:
        0.0070299692 = weight(_text_:und in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070299692 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.036410306 = weight(_text_:automatisches in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036410306 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13066888 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.27864558 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.044024 = idf(docFreq=774, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.029655067 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029655067 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.0058497707 = product of:
          0.017549312 = sum of:
            0.017549312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017549312 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090717286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.22222222 = coord(4/18)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
    Automatisches Indexieren
  7. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.01
    0.014396273 = product of:
      0.086377636 = sum of:
        0.021089906 = weight(_text_:und in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021089906 = score(doc=374,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.059437957 = weight(_text_:informationspraxis in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059437957 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16695212 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.35601798 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
        0.0058497707 = product of:
          0.017549312 = sum of:
            0.017549312 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017549312 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090717286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
    
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
  8. Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI): Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesenpapier (2021) 0.01
    0.012731417 = product of:
      0.114582755 = sum of:
        0.019482022 = weight(_text_:und in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019482022 = score(doc=364,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
        0.09510073 = weight(_text_:informationspraxis in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09510073 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16695212 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.5696288 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.444614 = idf(docFreq=190, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    In der Folge eines Arbeitsauftrags des Standardisierungsausschusses wurde im Herbst 2017 das Expertenteam RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) eingerichtet. Dieses ist der Fachgruppe Erschließung zugeordnet und beschäftigt sich seither mit der Weiterentwicklung der verbalen Inhaltserschließung.
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
  9. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.01
    0.011586718 = product of:
      0.06952031 = sum of:
        0.016871925 = weight(_text_:und in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016871925 = score(doc=1643,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
        0.017062299 = product of:
          0.034124598 = sum of:
            0.034124598 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034124598 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.2955047 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03558608 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03558608 = score(doc=1643,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3588626 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.16666667 = coord(3/18)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  10. Jüngling, H.: Bibliothekarische und dokumentarische Sachererschließung auf gemeinsamen Weg in die Zukunft? : Aus bibliothekarischer Sicht (1991) 0.01
    0.0064427895 = product of:
      0.057985105 = sum of:
        0.023860507 = weight(_text_:und in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023860507 = score(doc=144,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
        0.034124598 = product of:
          0.068249196 = sum of:
            0.068249196 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068249196 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.5910094 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.53
  11. Turquet, B.: Que faire de Rameau? : Ou comment faire avec Rameau? (1997) 0.01
    0.005531235 = product of:
      0.049781114 = sum of:
        0.041517094 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041517094 = score(doc=2249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.41867304 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
        0.008264019 = product of:
          0.024792057 = sum of:
            0.024792057 = weight(_text_:29 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024792057 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to the ongoing debate on the French subject headings list RAMEAU, which has been much criticised as time consuming and inflexible. Proposed technical solutions to recurring problems with complex syntax, strucutre of hierarchical and associative links, and rigity of language are discussed, in the context of computerised cataloguing and retrieval using OPACs. As a universal indexing language RAMEAU is more appropriate for medium sized specialised libraries and specialist researchers. However the 2 possible subject indexing techniques, linguistic treatment of whole text and thesaurus, are now beginning to be viewed as complementary approaches
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  12. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.01
    0.005531235 = product of:
      0.049781114 = sum of:
        0.041517094 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041517094 = score(doc=1395,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.41867304 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
        0.008264019 = product of:
          0.024792057 = sum of:
            0.024792057 = weight(_text_:29 in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024792057 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
  13. Geisselmann, F.; Zerbst, H.-J.: Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen : Stand der Diskussion (1996) 0.01
    0.0053689913 = product of:
      0.04832092 = sum of:
        0.019883756 = weight(_text_:und in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019883756 = score(doc=3416,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
        0.028437164 = product of:
          0.056874327 = sum of:
            0.056874327 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 3416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056874327 = score(doc=3416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11547904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.49250782 = fieldWeight in 3416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Series
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.63
    Source
    85. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Göttingen 1995: Die Herausforderung der Bibliotheken durch elektronische Medien und neue Organisationsformen. Hrsg.: S. Wefers
  14. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.00
    0.0047410587 = product of:
      0.042669527 = sum of:
        0.03558608 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03558608 = score(doc=5612,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.3588626 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
        0.007083445 = product of:
          0.021250334 = sum of:
            0.021250334 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021250334 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  15. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002) 0.00
    0.0044540963 = product of:
      0.040086865 = sum of:
        0.035954855 = weight(_text_:indexing in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035954855 = score(doc=97,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.36258146 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.0041320096 = product of:
          0.012396028 = sum of:
            0.012396028 = weight(_text_:29 in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012396028 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.61-77
  16. Hoerman, H.L.; Furniss, K.A.: Turning practice into principles : a comparison of the IFLA Principles underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000) 0.00
    0.003582956 = product of:
      0.032246605 = sum of:
        0.02516316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516316 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
        0.007083445 = product of:
          0.021250334 = sum of:
            0.021250334 = weight(_text_:29 in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021250334 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    The IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing's Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Headings Languages has identified a set of eleven principles for subject heading languages and excerpted the texts that match each principle from the instructions for each of eleven national subject indexing systems, including excerpts from the LC's Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. This study compares the IFLA principles with other texts that express the principles underlying LCSH, especially Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles of Structure and Policies for Application, prepared by Lois Mai Chan for the Library of Congress in 1990, Chan's later book on LCSH, and earlier documents by Haykin and Cutter. The principles are further elaborated for clarity and discussed
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  17. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.00
    0.003582956 = product of:
      0.032246605 = sum of:
        0.02516316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516316 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.007083445 = product of:
          0.021250334 = sum of:
            0.021250334 = weight(_text_:29 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021250334 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 20:57:41
  18. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.00
    0.0035758764 = product of:
      0.032182887 = sum of:
        0.02516316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02516316 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.0070197247 = product of:
          0.021059174 = sum of:
            0.021059174 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021059174 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090717286 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  19. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.00
    0.0034487573 = product of:
      0.031038815 = sum of:
        0.016871925 = weight(_text_:und in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016871925 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0574165 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.01416689 = product of:
          0.042500667 = sum of:
            0.042500667 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042500667 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09112809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025905682 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  20. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.00
    0.0032950074 = product of:
      0.059310135 = sum of:
        0.059310135 = weight(_text_:indexing in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059310135 = score(doc=873,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.099163525 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025905682 = queryNorm
            0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    
    Source
    Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 20
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 66
  • m 7
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications