Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 1
-
Robertson, M.; Willett, P.: ¬An upperbound to the performance of ranked output searching : optimal weighting of query terms using a genetic algorithms (1996)
0.00
2.35447E-4 = product of: 0.00470894 = sum of: 0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 6977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.00470894 = score(doc=6977,freq=2.0), product of: 0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6977, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6977) 0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- Describes the development of a genetic algorithm (GA) for the assignment of weights to query terms in a ranked output document retrieval system. The GA involves a fitness function that is based on full relevance information, and the rankings resulting from the use of these weights are compared with the Robertson-Sparck Jones F4 retrospective relevance weight