Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997) 0.00
    3.5683042E-4 = product of:
      0.0071366085 = sum of:
        0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071366085 = score(doc=623,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of research to examine users conducting their initial online search on a particular information problem. Findings from 3 separate studies of relevance judgements by 44 initial search users were examined, including 2 studies of 13 end users and a study of 18 user engaged in mediated online searches. Number of items was judged on the scale 'relevant', 'patially relevant' and 'not rlevant'. Results suggest that: a relationship exists between partially rlevant items retrieved anch changes in the users' information problem or question during an information seeking process; partial relevance judgements play an important role for users in the early stages of seeking information on a particular information problem; and 'highly' relevant items may or may not be the only items useful at the early stages of users' information seeking processes
  2. Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.; Robins, D.: Search intermediary elicitations during mediated online searching (1995) 0.00
    2.9135082E-4 = product of:
      0.005827016 = sum of:
        0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 3872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005827016 = score(doc=3872,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 3872, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3872)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates search intermediary elicitations during mediated online searching. A study of 40 online reference interviews involving 1.557 search intermediary elicitation, found 15 different types of search intermediary elicitation to users. The elicitation purpose included search terms and strategies, database selection, relevance of retrieved items, users' knowledge and previous information seeking. Analysis of the patterns in the types and sequencing of elicitation showed significant strings of multiple elicitation regarding search terms and strategies, and relevance judgements. Discusses the implications of the findings for training search intermediaries and the design of interfaces eliciting information from end users
    Source
    Forging new partnerships in information: converging technologies. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'95, Chicago, IL, 9-12 October 1995. Ed.: T. Kinney
  3. Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.: ¬A study of search intermediary working notes : implications for IR system design (1996) 0.00
    2.0601612E-4 = product of:
      0.0041203224 = sum of:
        0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 6981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041203224 = score(doc=6981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 6981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6981)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Reports findings from an explanatory study investigating working notes created during encoding and external storage (EES) processes, by human search intermediaries using a Boolean information retrieval systems. Analysis of 221 sets of working notes created by human search intermediaries revealed extensive use of EES processes and the creation of working notes of textual, numerical and graphical entities. Nearly 70% of recorded working noted were textual/numerical entities, nearly 30 were graphical entities and 0,73% were indiscernible. Segmentation devices were also used in 48% of the working notes. The creation of working notes during the EES processes was a fundamental element within the mediated, interactive information retrieval process. Discusses implications for the design of interfaces to support users' EES processes and further research
  4. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Interaction in information retrieval : selection and effectiveness of search terms (1997) 0.00
    1.7658525E-4 = product of:
      0.003531705 = sum of:
        0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003531705 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)