Search (21234 results, page 1 of 1062)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Abbott, R.: ¬The world as information : overload and personal design (1999) 0.41 
    0.40832663 = product of:
  0.74241203 = sum of:
    0.08786882 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08786882 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5348834 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.084565714 = weight(_text_:medien in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084565714 = score(doc=5939,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.62401694 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029650189 = score(doc=5939,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.038128283 = product of:
      0.076256566 = sum of:
        0.076256566 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076256566 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.16531183 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16531183 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7336581 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.02332896 = weight(_text_:der in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02332896 = score(doc=5939,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.07131875 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07131875 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.48188522 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029650189 = score(doc=5939,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.16531183 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16531183 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7336581 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.0049945856 = weight(_text_:in in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049945856 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
    0.042282857 = product of:
      0.084565714 = sum of:
        0.084565714 = weight(_text_:medien in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084565714 = score(doc=5939,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.62401694 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.55 = coord(11/20)
    Abstract
    This book takes the broadest view of information, considering it as a phenomenon in its own roght, rather than exploring the technology for handling it. It is very much concerned with the meaning of information - and what we as individuals do with it
    BK
    02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    AP 16100 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Aussagefunktion und Aussagegestaltung / Unterrichtung (Information)
    MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
    02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 26(1999) no.2, S.104-105 (M. Dowding)
    RVK
    AP 16100 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Aussagefunktion und Aussagegestaltung / Unterrichtung (Information)
    MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
  2. Hill, M.W.: ¬The impact of information on society : an examination of its nature, value and usage (1999) 0.38 
    0.38422507 = product of:
  0.76845014 = sum of:
    0.102513626 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102513626 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.069763154 = weight(_text_:medien in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069763154 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.51478773 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02187783 = score(doc=5934,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.044483 = product of:
      0.088966 = sum of:
        0.088966 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088966 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.19286379 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19286379 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.8559344 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.083205216 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083205216 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.5621994 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02187783 = score(doc=5934,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.19286379 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19286379 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.8559344 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041203224 = score(doc=5934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
    0.034881577 = product of:
      0.069763154 = sum of:
        0.069763154 = weight(_text_:medien in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069763154 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.51478773 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(10/20)
    Classification
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 51(2000) no.5, S.487-488 (S.R. Tompson)
    RVK
    AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
  3. Human perspectives in the Internet society : culture, psychology and gender; International Conference on Human Perspectives in the Internet Society <1, 2004, Cádiz> (2004) 0.31 
    0.30594102 = product of:
  0.4370586 = sum of:
    0.04142176 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04142176 = score(doc=91,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.25214645 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028188571 = score(doc=91,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.009883396 = weight(_text_:und in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009883396 = score(doc=91,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.15487336 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.012709428 = product of:
      0.025418855 = sum of:
        0.025418855 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025418855 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.16609597 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05510394 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05510394 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24455269 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.046817813 = weight(_text_:formen in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046817813 = score(doc=91,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2680675 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.010039186 = weight(_text_:der in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010039186 = score(doc=91,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.1560892 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.03361998 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03361998 = score(doc=91,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22716287 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.009883396 = weight(_text_:und in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009883396 = score(doc=91,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.15487336 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.0069004945 = weight(_text_:des in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0069004945 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.08654086 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.08119965 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesigns in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08119965 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27352434 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.29686445 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.05510394 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05510394 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24455269 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.0069646165 = weight(_text_:in in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0069646165 = score(doc=91,freq=70.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17782353 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          8.3666 = tf(freq=70.0), with freq of:
            70.0 = termFreq=70.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
    0.03922244 = sum of:
      0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028188571 = score(doc=91,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02879306 = queryNorm
          0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.011033869 = weight(_text_:22 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.011033869 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02879306 = queryNorm
          0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
  0.7 = coord(14/20)
    BK
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    303.48/33 22 (LoC)
    AP 15840 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Formen der Kommunikation und des Kommunikationsdesigns / Elektronisch unterstützte Formen
    MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
    SR 850 Informatik / Nachschlagewerke. Didaktik / Allgemeines, Nachschlagewerke, Ausbildung / Gesellschaftliche Folgen der Datenverarbeitung
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    DDC
    303.48/33 22 (LoC)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.1, S.150-151 (L. Westbrook): "The purpose of this volume is to bring together various analyses by international scholars of the social and cultural impact of information technology on individuals and societies (preface, n.p.). It grew from the First International Conference on Human Perspectives in the Internet Society held in Cadiz, Spain, in 2004. The editors and contributors have addressed an impressive array of significant issues with rigorous research and insightful analysis although the resulting volume does suffer from the usual unevenness in depth and content that affects books based on conference proceedings. Although the $256 price is prohibitive for many individual scholars, the effort to obtain a library edition for perusal regarding particular areas of interest is likely to prove worthwhile. Unlike many international conferences that are able to attract scholars from only a handful of nations, this genuinely diverse conference included research conducted in Australia, Beijing, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, England, Fiji, Germany, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Malaysia, Norway, Russia, Scotland, South Africa, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States. The expense of a conference format and governmental travel restrictions may have precluded greater inclusion of the work being done to develop information technology for use in nonindustrialized nations in support of economic, social justice, and political movements. Although the cultural variants among these nations preclude direct cross-cultural comparisons, many papers carefully provide sufficient background information to make basic conceptual transfers possible. A great strength of the work is the unusual combination of academic disciplines that contributes substantially to the depth of many individual papers, particularly when they are read within the larger context of the entire volume. Although complete professional affiliations are not universally available, the authors who did name their affiliation come from widely divergent disciplines including accounting, business administration, architecture, business computing, communication, computing, economics, educational technology, environmental management, experimental psychology, gender research in computer science, geography, human work sciences, humanistic informatics, industrial engineering, information management, informatics in transport and telecommunications, information science, information technology, management, mathematics, organizational behavior, pedagogy, psychology, telemedicine, and women's education. This is all to the good, but the lack of representation from departments of women's studies, gender studies, and library studies certainly limits the breadth and depth of the perspectives provided.
    The editorial and peer review processes appear to be slightly spotty in application. All of the 55 papers are in English but a few of them are in such need of basic editing that they are almost incomprehensible in sections. Consider, for example, the following: "So, the meaning of region where we are studying on, should be discovered and then affect on the final plan" (p. 346). The collection shows a strong array of methodological approaches including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies; however, a few of the research efforts exhibit fundamental design flaws. Consider, for example, the study that "set[s] out to show that nurses as care-givers find it difficult to transfer any previously acquired technological skills into their work based on technology needs (p. 187). After studying 39 female and 6 male nurses, this study finds, not surprisingly, exactly what it "set out" to find. Rather than noting the limitations of sample size and data gathering techniques, the paper firmly concludes that nurses can be technologists "only in areas of technology that support their primary role as carers" (p. 188). Finally, some of the papers do not report on original research but are competent, if brief, summaries of theories or concepts that are covered in equal depth elsewhere. For example, a three-page summary of "the major personality and learning theories" (p. 3) is useful but lacks the intellectual depth or insight needed to contribute substantially to the field. These problems with composition, methodological rigor, and theoretical depth are not uncommon in papers designed for a broadly defined conference theme. The authors may have been writing for an in-person audience and anticipating thoughtful postpresentation discussions; they probably had no idea of the heavy price tag put on their work. The editors, however, might have kept that $256 in mind and exercised a heavier editorial hand. Perhaps the publisher could have paid for a careful subject indexing of the work as a substantive addition to the author index provided. The complexity of the subject domains included in the volume certainly merits careful indexing.
    The volume is organized into 13 sections, each of which contains between two and eight conference papers. As with most conferences, the papers do not cover the issues in each section with equal weight or depth but the editors have grouped papers into reasonable patterns. Section 1 covers "understanding online behavior" with eight papers on problems such as e-learning attitudes, the neuropsychology of HCI, Japanese blogger motivation, and the dividing line between computer addiction and high engagement. Sections 2 (personality and computer attitudes), 3 (cyber interactions), and 4 (new interaction methods) each contain only two papers on topics such as helmet-mounted displays, online energy audits, and the use of ICT in family life. Sections 6, 7, and 8 focus on gender issues with papers on career development, the computer literacy of Malaysian women, mentoring, gaming, and faculty job satisfaction. Sections 9 and 10 move to a broader examination of cyber society and its diversity concerns with papers on cultural identity, virtual architecture, economic growth's impact on culture, and Iranian development impediments. Section 11's two articles on advertising might well have been merged with those of section 13's ebusiness. Section 12 addressed education with papers on topics such as computer-assisted homework, assessment, and Web-based learning. It would have been useful to introduce each section with a brief definition of the theme, summaries of the major contributions of the authors, and analyses of the gaps that might be addressed in future conferences. Despite the aforementioned concerns, this volume does provide a uniquely rich array of technological analyses embedded in social context. An examination of recent works in related areas finds nothing that is this complex culturally or that has such diversity of disciplines. Cultural Production in a Digital Age (Klinenberg, 2005), Perspectives and Policies on ICT in Society (Berleur & Avgerou, 2005), and Social, Ethical, and Policy Implications of Information Technology (Brennan & Johnson, 2004) address various aspects of the society/Internet intersection but this volume is unique in its coverage of psychology, gender, and culture issues in cyberspace. The lip service often given to global concerns and the value of interdisciplinary analysis of intransigent social problems seldom develop into a genuine willingness to listen to unfamiliar research paradigms. Academic silos and cultural islands need conferences like this one-willing to take on the risk of examining the large questions in an intellectually open space. Editorial and methodological concerns notwithstanding, this volume merits review and, where appropriate, careful consideration across disciplines."
    RVK
    AP 15840 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Formen der Kommunikation und des Kommunikationsdesigns / Elektronisch unterstützte Formen
    MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
    SR 850 Informatik / Nachschlagewerke. Didaktik / Allgemeines, Nachschlagewerke, Ausbildung / Gesellschaftliche Folgen der Datenverarbeitung
    Series
    Advances in information and communication technologies ; 4
  4. ¬Die Macht der Suchmaschinen (2007) 0.26 
    0.25623295 = product of:
  0.42705488 = sum of:
    0.04393441 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04393441 = score(doc=1813,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2674417 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042282857 = score(doc=1813,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.025677817 = weight(_text_:und in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025677817 = score(doc=1813,freq=60.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.40237278 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
            60.0 = termFreq=60.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.019064141 = product of:
      0.038128283 = sum of:
        0.038128283 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038128283 = score(doc=1813,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24914396 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.082655914 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082655914 = score(doc=1813,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.36682904 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.026082572 = weight(_text_:der in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026082572 = score(doc=1813,freq=60.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.40553164 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
            60.0 = termFreq=60.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.035659377 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035659377 = score(doc=1813,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24094261 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.025677817 = weight(_text_:und in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025677817 = score(doc=1813,freq=60.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.40237278 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
            60.0 = termFreq=60.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.016365958 = weight(_text_:des in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016365958 = score(doc=1813,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20524967 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.082655914 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082655914 = score(doc=1813,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.36682904 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.0058566704 = weight(_text_:in in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0058566704 = score(doc=1813,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14953499 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
    0.021141429 = product of:
      0.042282857 = sum of:
        0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042282857 = score(doc=1813,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(12/20)
    Abstract
    Suchmaschinen sind der wichtigste Zugangsweg zum Auffinden neuer Netzinhalte. Insgesamt verwendeten nach einer repräsentativen Studie im dritten Quartal 2005 fast 85 Prozent der deutschen Internetnutzer Suchmaschinen. Diese sind inzwischen auch ein Big Business: Gemessen am Börsenwert ist die Suchmaschine Google mit einem Gesamtwert von 80 Mrd. Dollar das wertvollste Medienunternehmen der Welt. Der Konzerngewinn stieg von 2004 auf 2005 um 367 Prozent auf 1,5 Mrd. Dollar. Als Gatekeeper im Internet stellen die Suchmaschinen eine zentrale Herausforderung für Wissenschaft und Forschung dar - letztlich geht es um die Frage der "digitalen Informationsmacht". Mit diesem Band liegt erstmals eine Publikation vor, die die Rolle von Suchmaschinen in der Informationsgesellschaft in den wichtigsten Dimensionen aus verschiedenen Perspektiven wissenschaftlich beleuchtet und dabei hilft, die künftige Suchmaschinenforschung zu systematisieren.
    BK
    05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
    05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Content
    Der Band geht auf die internationale Tagung Die wachsende Macht von Suchmaschinen im Internet: Auswirkungen auf User, Medienpolitik und Medienbusiness bestehend aus einem interdisziplinären wissenschaftlichen Workshop am 26. Juni 2006 und einer Publikumskonferenz am 27. Juni 2006 in Berlin zurück, die vom Lehrstuhl für Journalistik II der Universität Leitung und dem Lehrstuhl für Internationalen Journalismus der UniversitSt Dortmund in Kooperation mit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bereich Medien und Politik, veranstaltet worden ist. In drei Kapiteln werden die zentralen Forschungsfelder aufgegriffen: Das erste Kapitel behandelt die wichtigsten Aspekte im Bereich der Suchmaschinenregulierung und -ökonomie. Es werden Herausforderungen transparent gemacht, die sich gegenwärtig in der Entwicklung befindlichen Regulierungsstrukturen analysiert und Lösungswege erarbeitet. Das zweite Kapitel beschäftigt sich, zum ersten Mal in Form einer Publikation, mit dem Verhältnis von Suchmaschinen und Journalismus. Dabei ist die Frage, inwieweit Suchmaschinen einerseits journalistische Funktionen übernehmen und andererseits Journalisten als Rechercheinstrument dienen und wie sich hierdurch das Gefüge des bisherigen Massenkommunikationssystems verändert, von entscheidender Bedeutung.
    Im dritten Kapitel werden die Qualität von Suchmaschinen und das Nutzerverhalten näher beleuchtet. Erkenntnisse über die Güte von Suchmaschinen sind von großer Relevanz, um deren Rolle bei der Informationsvermittlung in einer Gesellschaft angemessen beurteilen zu können. Der Band liefert hier neue Ansätze und Vorschläge, da die Frage nach der Qualität von Suchmaschinen noch nicht ausreichend beantwortet worden ist. Zum anderen ist die Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens grundlegend, um Schlussfolgerungen für die Medienkompetenz als zentrale Schlüsselqualifikation im Informationszeitalter ziehen zu können. Unter den Autoren sind viele der international führende Experten auf dem Gebiet Suchmaschinen, darunter Wissenschaftler der Universitäten Harvard, Yale und Columbia sowie der London School of Economics und der Pariser Sorbonne. Darüber hinaus wurden auch Beiträge von Praktikern, allesamt leitende Redakteure oder Verantwortliche in Medienunternehmen aufgenommen, um deren Erkenntnisse für die Thematik fruchtbar zu machen. Der Band richtet sich neben der Wissenschaft auch an die Praxis, vor allem die Medienaufsicht und -ökonomie sowie an den Journalismus. Er bietet aber auch der allgemein interessierten Öffentlichkeit einen fundierten Einblick in die bisher wenig erforschte Welt der Suchmaschinen.
    MARCEL MACHILL / MARKUS BEILER / MARTIN ZENKER: Suchmaschinenforschung. Überblick und Systematisierung eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes TEIL 1: SUCHMASCHINENREGULIERUNG UND -ÖKONOMIE URS GASSER / JAMES THURMAN: Themen und Herausforderungen der Regulierung von Suchmaschinen NORBERT SCHNEIDER: Die Notwendigkeit der Suchmaschinenregulierung aus Sicht eines Regulierers WOLFGANG SCHULZ / THORSTEN HELD: Der Index auf dem Index? Selbstzensur und Zensur bei Suchmaschinen BORIS ROTENBERG: Towards Personalised Search: EU Data Protection Law and its Implications for Media Pluralism ELIZABETH VAN COUVERING: The Economy of Navigation: Search Engines, Search Optimisation and Search Results THEO RÖHLE: Machtkonzepte in der Suchmaschinenforschung TEIL 2: SUCHMASCHINEN UND JOURNALISMUS VINZENZ WYSS / GUIDO KEEL: Google als Trojanisches Pferd? Konsequenzen der Internet-Recherche von Journalisten für die journalistische Qualität NIC NEWMAN: Search Strategies and Activities of BBC News Interactive JÖRG SADROZINSKI: Suchmaschinen und öffentlich-rechtlicher Onlinejournalismus am Beispiel tagesschau.de HELMUT MARTIN-JUNG: Suchmaschinen und Qualitätsjournalismus PHILIP GRAF DÖNHOFF / CHRISTIAN BARTELS: Online-Recherche bei NETZEITUNG.DE SUSAN KEITH: Searching for News Headlines: Connections between Unresolved Hyperlinking Issues and a New Battle over Copyright Online AXEL BUNDENTHAL: Suchmaschinen als Herausforderung für Archive und Dokumentationsbereiche am Beispiel des ZDF BENJAMIN PETERS: The Search Engine Democracy: Metaphors and Muhammad
    TEIL 3: QUALITÄT VON SUCHMASCHINEN UND NUTZERVERHALTEN] DIRK LEWANDOWSKI: Mit welchen Kennzahlen lässt sich die Qualität von Suchmaschinen messen? BENJAMIN EDELMAN: Assessing and Improving the Safety of Internet Search Engines HENDRIK SPECK / FREDERIC PHILIPP THIELE: Playing the Search Engines or Hacking the Box: Möglichkeiten und Gefahren von Suchmaschinen-Hacking am Beispiel von Google NATALIE KINK / THOMAS HESS: Suchmaschinen als Substitut traditioneller Medien? Erste Ergebnisse einer Studie zum Wandel der Informationsbeschaffung durch Suchmaschinen DIVINA FRAU-MEIGS: Minding the Gatekeepers: Search Engines for Young People, and the Regulatory Riddle of Harmful Content an Environmental Cognition Perspective MARCEL MACHILL / MARKUS BEILER / ULRIKE NEUMANN: Leistungsfähigkeit von wissenschaftlichen Suchmaschinen. Ein Experiment am Beispiel von Google Scholar
    RVK
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
  5. Virtuelle Welten im Internet : Tagungsband ; [Vorträge und Diskussionen der Fachkonferenz des Münchner Kreises am 21. November 2007] / [Münchner Kreis] (2008) 0.25 
    0.25432232 = product of:
  0.4624042 = sum of:
    0.05857921 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05857921 = score(doc=2926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.35658893 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.056377143 = weight(_text_:medien in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056377143 = score(doc=2926,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.4160113 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.013977233 = weight(_text_:und in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013977233 = score(doc=2926,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.219024 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.025418855 = product of:
      0.05083771 = sum of:
        0.05083771 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05083771 = score(doc=2926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.33219194 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.11020788 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11020788 = score(doc=2926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.48910537 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.020078372 = weight(_text_:der in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020078372 = score(doc=2926,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3121784 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.013977233 = weight(_text_:und in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013977233 = score(doc=2926,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.219024 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.016902693 = weight(_text_:des in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016902693 = score(doc=2926,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.21198097 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.11020788 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11020788 = score(doc=2926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.48910537 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.008489163 = weight(_text_:in in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008489163 = score(doc=2926,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
    0.028188571 = product of:
      0.056377143 = sum of:
        0.056377143 = weight(_text_:medien in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056377143 = score(doc=2926,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4160113 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.55 = coord(11/20)
    Abstract
    - Wachstumsfeld 3D-Internet - wertvolle Informationen hochkarätiger Fachleute Virtuelle Welten entwickeln sich in der industrialisierten Welt zu einem Massenphänomen. Millionen Menschen schaffen sich eine zweite Identität in Second Life, agieren als künstliche "Wesen", den Avataren in virtuellen Umgebungen oder spielen Online-Rollenspiele. Der Reiz der virtuellen Welten liegt in der Überwindung der Grenzen, die in einem realen Leben gesetzt sind. Ganz neue Geschäftsmöglichkeiten können hier entstehen. Ein Unternehmen nach dem anderen baut daher seine Insel in den virtuellen Welten. In zahlreichen Beiträgen erhalten Sie in diesem Band wertvolle Informationen, um selbst in den virtuellen Welten operieren zu können: - Boas Betzler von IBM Research, Wappingers Falls, NY erläutert Anforderungen an die technologische Infrastruktur, - Claus Nehmzow von der PA Consulting Group, London nimmt sie mit auf eine Geschäftsreise in Second Life, - Daniel Michelis von der Universität der Künste, Berlin zeigt, wie Sie Ihren Avatar studieren lassen können, - Dr. Wolfram Proksch von Proksch & Fritsche Rechtsanwälte, Wien klärt auf über Cyberspace Regulation, - Robert Gehorsam von Forterra Systems, NY berichtet über Erfahrungen mit Mitarbeiterschulung in den virtuellen Welten und - Jean Miller von Linden Lab, San Francisco beleuchtet Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten, die sie für Second Life sieht. Ungezählte weitere Aspekte der faszinierenden virtuellen Welten werden behandelt und geben Ihnen Antwort zu vielfältigen Fragestellungen, die sich in diesem Zusammenhang stellen (sollten).
    Classification
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
    QR 760 Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Gewerbepolitik. Einzelne Wirtschaftszweige / Industrie, Bergbau, Handel, Dienstleistungen, Handwerk / Öffentliche Versorgungseinrichtungen. Elektrizität. Gas. Wasser / Informationsgewerbe (Massenmedien). Post / Neue Medien. Online-Dienste (Internet u. a.)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 62(2009) H.1, S.91-92 (M. Buzinkay)
    RVK
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
    QR 760 Wirtschaftswissenschaften / Gewerbepolitik. Einzelne Wirtschaftszweige / Industrie, Bergbau, Handel, Dienstleistungen, Handwerk / Öffentliche Versorgungseinrichtungen. Elektrizität. Gas. Wasser / Informationsgewerbe (Massenmedien). Post / Neue Medien. Online-Dienste (Internet u. a.)
  6. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.19 
    0.19262695 = product of:
  0.7705078 = sum of:
    0.07621835 = product of:
      0.22865506 = sum of:
        0.22865506 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22865506 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22865506 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22865506 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.22865506 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22865506 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.22865506 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22865506 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008324308 = score(doc=1826,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  7. Willinsky, J.: ¬The access principle : the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006) 0.17 
    0.16745815 = product of:
  0.30446935 = sum of:
    0.073224016 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073224016 = score(doc=298,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.024915414 = weight(_text_:medien in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024915414 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.18385276 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.011049973 = weight(_text_:und in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011049973 = score(doc=298,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.015886785 = product of:
      0.03177357 = sum of:
        0.03177357 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03177357 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20761997 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.068879925 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068879925 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.30569085 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.0056120753 = weight(_text_:der in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0056120753 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.08725651 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.011049973 = weight(_text_:und in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011049973 = score(doc=298,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17315367 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.0060992334 = weight(_text_:des in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0060992334 = score(doc=298,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.07649204 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.068879925 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068879925 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.30569085 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.0064143105 = weight(_text_:in in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0064143105 = score(doc=298,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.16377288 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.012457707 = product of:
      0.024915414 = sum of:
        0.024915414 = weight(_text_:medien in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024915414 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18385276 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.55 = coord(11/20)
    Abstract
    An argument for extending the circulation of knowledge with new publishing technologies considers scholarly, economic, philosophical, and practical issues. Questions about access to scholarship go back farther than recent debates over subscription prices, rights, and electronic archives suggest. The great libraries of the past - from the fabled collection at Alexandria to the early public libraries of nineteenth-century America - stood as arguments for increasing access. In The Access Principle, John Willinsky describes the latest chapter in this ongoing story - online open access publishing by scholarly journals - and makes a case for open access as a public good. A commitment to scholarly work, writes Willinsky, carries with it a responsibility to circulate that work as widely as possible: this is the access principle. In the digital age, that responsibility includes exploring new publishing technologies and economic models to improve access to scholarly work. Wide circulation adds value to published work; it is a significant aspect of its claim to be knowledge. The right to know and the right to be known are inextricably mixed. Open access, argues Willinsky, can benefit both a researcher-author working the best-equipped lab at a leading research university and a teacher struggling to find resources in an impoverished high school. Willinsky describes different types of access - the New England Journal of Medicine, for example, grants open access to issues six months after initial publication, and First Monday forgoes a print edition and makes its contents immediately accessible at no cost. He discusses the contradictions of copyright law, the reading of research, and the economic viability of open access. He also considers broader themes of public access to knowledge, human rights issues, lessons from publishing history, and "epistemological vanities." The debate over open access, writes Willinsky, raises crucial questions about the place of scholarly work in a larger world - and about the future of knowledge.
    Classification
    AP 25280 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Zeitungswissenschaft / Zeitschriftentypologie / Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften
    AK 39620 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Editionstechnik
    AN 96300 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationsvermittlung, Informationsplanung / Wissensverbreitung, Informationsfluß
    AK 28400 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Wissenschaftspraxis / Informationen, Kontakte, Austausch, Technologietransfer
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.9, S.1386 (L.A. Ennis): "Written by John Willinsky. Pacific Press Professor of Literacy and Technology at the University of British Columbia and Open Journals Systems Software des eloper. the eighth hook in the Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing series (edited by William Y. Arms) provides a compelling and convincing argument in favor of open access. At the core of this work is Willinsky's "access principle." a commitment that "research carries with it a responsibility to extend circulation of such work as far as possible and ideally to all who are interested in it and all who might profit from it" (p.xii). One by one Willinsky tackles the obstacles. both real and perceived, to open access. succeeding in his goal to "inform and inspire a larger debate over the political and moral economy of knowledge" (p.xiv). The author does note the irony of publishing a hook while advocating for open access, but points out that he does so to reach a larger audience. Willinsky also points out that most of the chapters' earlier versions can be found in open-access journals and on his Web site (http://www.11ed.educubc.ca/faculty/willinsky.html). The Access Principle is organized topically into thirteen chapters covering a broad range of practical and theoretical issues. Taken together. these chapters provide the reader with an excellent introduction to the open-access debate as well as all the potential benefits and possible impacts of the open-access movement. The author also includes six appendices. with information on metadata and indexing. os er twenty pages of references, and an index. ... All of Willinsky's arguments arc convincing and heartfelt. It is apparent throughout the hook that the author deeply believes in the principles behind open access. and his passion and conviction come through in the work. making the hook a thought-provoking and very interesting read. While he offers numerous examples to illustrate his points throughout the work. he does not. however. offer solutions or state that he has all the answers. In that, he succeeds in his goal to craft a hook that "informs and inspires. As a result, The Access Principle is an important read for information professionals, researchers, and academics of all kinds, whether or not the reader agrees with Willinsky."
    LCSH
    Communication in learning and scholarship
    Communication in science
    RVK
    AP 25280 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Zeitungswissenschaft / Zeitschriftentypologie / Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften
    AK 39620 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Technik der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit / Editionstechnik
    AN 96300 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationsvermittlung, Informationsplanung / Wissensverbreitung, Informationsfluß
    AK 28400 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Wissenschaftspraxis / Informationen, Kontakte, Austausch, Technologietransfer
    Subject
    Communication in learning and scholarship
    Communication in science
  8. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.16 
    0.15819658 = product of:
  0.63278633 = sum of:
    0.045731008 = product of:
      0.13719302 = sum of:
        0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719302 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.19402024 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19402024 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.19402024 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19402024 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.19402024 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19402024 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.0049945856 = weight(_text_:in in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049945856 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  9. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.15 
    0.15361394 = product of:
  0.61445576 = sum of:
    0.060974684 = product of:
      0.18292405 = sum of:
        0.18292405 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18292405 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18292405 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18292405 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.18292405 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18292405 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.18292405 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18292405 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
    0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00470894 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  10. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14 
    0.1417635 = product of:
  0.47254497 = sum of:
    0.045731008 = product of:
      0.13719302 = sum of:
        0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719302 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003531705 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.011703186 = product of:
      0.023406371 = sum of:
        0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023406371 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  11. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.14 
    0.13568546 = product of:
  0.54274184 = sum of:
    0.053352848 = product of:
      0.16005854 = sum of:
        0.16005854 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16005854 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16005854 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16005854 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.16005854 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16005854 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.16005854 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16005854 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
    0.009213322 = weight(_text_:in in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009213322 = score(doc=306,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  12. Cognition, education and multimedia : exploring ideas in high technology (1990) 0.13 
    0.12781525 = product of:
  0.31953812 = sum of:
    0.12426527 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12426527 = score(doc=1536,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.7564393 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.059796993 = weight(_text_:medien in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059796993 = score(doc=1536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.44124663 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029650189 = score(doc=1536,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.013468982 = weight(_text_:der in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013468982 = score(doc=1536,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20941564 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029650189 = score(doc=1536,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.029276319 = weight(_text_:des in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029276319 = score(doc=1536,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003531705 = score(doc=1536,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
    0.029898496 = product of:
      0.059796993 = sum of:
        0.059796993 = weight(_text_:medien in 1536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059796993 = score(doc=1536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.44124663 = fieldWeight in 1536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1536)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(8/20)
    BK
    18.00 / Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein
    Classification
    DP 1960 Pädagogik / Didaktik und Methodik des Unterrichts / Spezielle Fragen der Methodik / Unterrichtsformen (allgemein) / Computerunterstützter Unterricht / Allgemeines und Deutschland
    DP 2600 Pädagogik / Didaktik und Methodik des Unterrichts / Medien im Unterricht / Computer / Allgemeines und Deutschland (SWB)
    18.00 / Einzelne Sprachen und Literaturen allgemein
    RVK
    DP 1960 Pädagogik / Didaktik und Methodik des Unterrichts / Spezielle Fragen der Methodik / Unterrichtsformen (allgemein) / Computerunterstützter Unterricht / Allgemeines und Deutschland
    DP 2600 Pädagogik / Didaktik und Methodik des Unterrichts / Medien im Unterricht / Computer / Allgemeines und Deutschland (SWB)
  13. Fuller, M.: Media ecologies : materialist energies in art and technoculture (2005) 0.13 
    0.1277514 = product of:
  0.283892 = sum of:
    0.04142176 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04142176 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.25214645 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028188571 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.008839978 = weight(_text_:und in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008839978 = score(doc=469,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.02009537 = product of:
      0.04019074 = sum of:
        0.04019074 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04019074 = score(doc=469,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2626208 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.07792874 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07792874 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34584972 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.008839978 = weight(_text_:und in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008839978 = score(doc=469,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.13852294 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.07792874 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07792874 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.34584972 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.006554567 = weight(_text_:in in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006554567 = score(doc=469,freq=62.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.16735397 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
          7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
            62.0 = termFreq=62.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
    0.014094286 = product of:
      0.028188571 = sum of:
        0.028188571 = weight(_text_:medien in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028188571 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20800565 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.45 = coord(9/20)
    Abstract
    In Media Ecologies, Matthew Fuller asks what happens when media systems interact. Complex objects such as media systems - understood here as processes, or elements in a composition as much as "things" - have become informational as much as physical, but without losing any of their fundamental materiality. Fuller looks at this multiplicitous materiality - how it can be sensed, made use of, and how it makes other possibilities tangible. He investigates the ways the different qualities in media systems can be said to mix and interrelate, and, as he writes, "to produce patterns, dangers, and potentials." Fuller draws on texts by Felix Guattari (and his "serial collaborator" Gilles Deleuze) as well as writings by Friedrich Nietzsche, Marshall McLuhan, Donna Haraway, Friedrich Kittler, and others, to define and extend the idea of "media ecology." Arguing that the only way to find out about what happens when media systems interact is to carry out such interactions, Fuller traces a series of media ecologies - "taking every path in a labyrinth simultaneously," as he describes one chapter. He looks at contemporary London-based pirate radio and its interweaving of high- and low-tech media systems; the "medial will to power" illustrated by "the camera that ate itself"; how, as seen in a range of compelling interpretations of new media works, the capacities and behaviors of media objects are affected when they are in "abnormal" relationships with other objects; and each step in a sequence of Web pages, "Cctv - world wide watch," that encourages viewers to report crimes seen via webcams. Contributing to debates around standardisation, cultural evolution, cybernetic culture, and surveillance, and inventing a politically challenging aesthetic that links them, Media Ecologies, with its various narrative speeds, scales, frames of references, and voices, does not offer the academically traditional unifying framework; rather, Fuller says, it proposes to capture "an explosion of activity and ideas to which it hopes to add an echo."
    Classification
    AP 13550 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Theorie und Methodik / Grundlagen, Methodik, Theorie
    AP 13550 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Theorie und Methodik / Grundlagen, Methodik, Theorie
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.8, S.1222 (P.K. Nayar): "Media ecology is the intersection of information and communications technology (ICTs), organizational behavior, and human interaction. Technology, especially ICT, is the environment of human culture today-from individuals to organizations, in metropolises across the world. Fuller defines media ecology as "the allocation of informational roles in organizations and in computer-supported collaborative work" (p. 3), a fairly comprehensive definition. Fuller opens with a study of a pirate radio in London. Adapting thinkers on media and culture-Stuart Hall, J. F. Gibson's ecological psychology, Deleuze and Guattari figure prominently here. Exploring the attempted regulation of radio, the dissemination into multiple "forms," and the structures that facilitate this, Fuller presents the environment in which "subversive" radio broadcasts take place. Marketing and voices, microphones, and language codes all begin to interact with each other to form a higher order of a material or "machinic" universe (Fuller here adapts Deleuze and Guattari's concept of a "machinic phylum" defined as "materiality, natural or artificial, and both simultaneously; it is matter in movement, in flux, in variation, matter as a conveyer of singularities and traits of expression," p. 17). Using hip-hop as a case study, Fuller argues that digitized sound transforms the voice from indexical to the "rhythmatic." Music becomes fundamentally synthetic here (p. 31), and acquires the potential to access a greater space of embodiment. Other factors, often ignored in media studies, include the role of the DJs (disk jockies), are worked into a holistic account. The DJ, notes Fuller is a switch for the pirate station, but is also a creator of hype. Storing, transposing, organizing time, the DJ is a crucial element in the informational ecology of the radio station. Fuller argues that "things" like the mobile phone must be treated as media assemblages. Pirate radio is an example of the minoritarian use of media systems, according to Fuller.
    Exploring John Hilliard's 1971 series of photographs, A Camera Recording it Own Condition (7 apertures, 10 speeds, 2 mirrors), Fuller argues that the camera's media ecology consists of the interplay between mathematical, material, and social powers, while demonstrating a medial will to power. Fuller shows how every apparatus is an ensemble of other apparatuses. Thresholds of visibility and disappearance are built into the camera's structure, of its material capacity. When the camera focuses on itself, it is engaged in a cybernetic circuit that brings together forces of form, programs, material structures: in short, a media ecology. Fuller marks out two sets of interconnected and antagonistic relations of force that "make" the camera in this act of recording itself. One, the problematic of the camera working on the condition of being a camera (a machine reflexivity). Second, it mobilizes the constraints and freedoms generated by the correlation of the intensive and extensive qualities embedded within the camera. Fuller expands his exploration of media ecologies by working with multiple "objects": the introduction of an on/off switch in a residential street, BITRadio, "phreaking" of radio broadcasts and others. Perhaps the most argumentative chapter of the book-certainly one of the most lucid ones!-this demonstrates how technology and the dynamics of media systems are appropriated for other, nonofficial purposes. Fuller shows how the "standard object"-a serial element such as an ISO standard shipping container whose "potential" has been stabilized, circumscribes knowledge itself, limiting all other forms of understanding. Standard objects, even as they work with other "forms" define the technicity and organizational frames of systems.
    Moving on to Web pages-Heath Bunting's cctv-world wide watch, where users watching four Webcams are encouraged to report crimes on an HTML form, which is then sent to the nearest police station-Fuller shows how cultural and technological components mesh uneasily in the project. Fuller argues that the "meme" (a kind of replicator that mutates as it passes from person to person or media to media, and works in combination with its immediate environment) or "bit" of identity constitutes a problem for surveillance. Packets of information-often the most common "meme" in Web technology-is, for Fuller, the standard object around which an ecology gets built. Networks check packets as they pass isolating passwords, URLS, credit data, and items of interest. The packet is the threshold of operations. The meme's "monitorability" enables not only dissemination through the network, but also its control. Memes, or what Fuller calls "flecks of identity" are referents in the flows of information-they "locate" and "situate" a user. Fuller's work is full of rich insights, especially into the ways in which forces of power operate within media ecologies. Even when the material/technological object, such as the camera or the Webcam turns in on itself, it is situated within a series of interrelated forces, some of which are antagonistic to the object. This insight-that contemporary media technology works within a field of antagonistic forces too-is Fuller's major contribution. Fuller is alert also to the potential within such force fields for subversion. Pirate radio and phreaking, therefore, emblematize how media ecologies create the context, possibility, and even modalities of political and social protest. Unfortunately, Fuller's style is a shade too digressive and aleatory for us to discover these insights. In his eagerness to incorporate as many theorists and philosophers of media/technology-he moves from Nietzsche to Susan Blackmore, sometimes within the space of a single paragraph-Fuller often takes a long time to get to his contribution to the debate or analysis. The problem, therefore, is mainly with style rather than content, and the arguments would have been perfectly fine if they had been couched in easier forms."
    RVK
    AP 13550 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Theorie und Methodik / Grundlagen, Methodik, Theorie
    AP 13550 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Theorie und Methodik / Grundlagen, Methodik, Theorie
  14. Rogers, R.: Information politics on the Web (2004) 0.13 
    0.12733038 = product of:
  0.23150977 = sum of:
    0.029289605 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029289605 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.17829446 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.019932332 = weight(_text_:medien in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019932332 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.14708221 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062508085 = score(doc=442,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.012709428 = product of:
      0.025418855 = sum of:
        0.025418855 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025418855 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.16609597 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.05510394 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05510394 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24455269 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.023772918 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023772918 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.16062841 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062508085 = score(doc=442,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.0069004945 = weight(_text_:des in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0069004945 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.08654086 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.05510394 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05510394 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.24455269 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.006229343 = weight(_text_:in in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006229343 = score(doc=442,freq=56.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
          7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
            56.0 = termFreq=56.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
    0.009966166 = product of:
      0.019932332 = sum of:
        0.019932332 = weight(_text_:medien in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019932332 = score(doc=442,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14708221 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.55 = coord(11/20)
    Abstract
    Rogers presents a profoundly different way of thinking about information in cyberspace, one that supports the political efforts of democratic activists and NGOs and takes seriously the epistemological issues at the heart of networked communications.
    BK
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
    MF 1000 Politologie / Politische Systeme: einzelne Elemente / Öffentliche Meinung (politische Kommunikation)
    54.08 Informatik in Beziehung zu Mensch und Gesellschaft
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.4, S.608-609 (K.D. Desouza): "Richard Rogers explores the distinctiveness of the World Wide Web as a politically contested space where information searchers may encounter multiple explanations of reality. Sources of information on the Web are in constant competition with each other for attention. The attention a source receives will determine its prominence, the ability to be a provider of leading information, and its inclusion in authoritative spaces. Rogers explores the politics behind evaluating sources that are collected and housed on authoritative spaces. Information politics on the Web can be looked at in terms of frontend or back-end politics. Front-end politics is concerned with whether sources on the Web pay attention to principles of inclusivity, fairness, and scope of representation in how information is presented, while back-end politics examines the logic behind how search engines or portals select and index information. Concerning front-end politics, Rogers questions the various versions of reality one can derive from examining information on the Web, especially when issues of information inclusivity and scope of representation are toiled with. In addition, Rogers is concerned with how back-end politics are being controlled by dominant forces of the market (i.e., the more an organization is willing to pay, the greater will be the site's visibility and prominence in authoritative spaces), regardless of whether the information presented on the site justifies such a placement. In the book, Rogers illustrates the issues involved in back-end and front-end politics (though heavily slanted on front-end politics) using vivid cases, all of which are derived from his own research. The main thrust is the exploration of how various "information instruments," defined as "a digital and analytical means of recording (capturing) and subsequently reading indications of states of defined information streams (p. 19)," help capture the politics of the Web. Rogers employs four specific instruments (Lay Decision Support System, Issue Barometer, Web Issue Index of Civil Society, and Election Issue Tracker), which are covered in detail in core chapters of the book (Chapter 2-Chapter 5). The book is comprised of six chapters, with Chapter 1 being the traditional introduction and Chapter 6 being a summary of the major concepts discussed.
    Chapter 2 examines the politics of information retrieval in the context of collaborative filtering techniques. Rogers begins by discussing the underpinnings of modern search engine design by examining medieval practices of knowledge seeking, following up with a critique of the collaborative filtering techniques. Rogers's major contention is that collaborative filtering rids us of user idiosyncrasies as search query strings, preferences, and recommendations are shared among users and without much care for the differences among them, both in terms of their innate characteristics and also their search goals. To illustrate Rogers' critiques of collaborative filtering, he describes an information searching experiment that he conducted with students at University of Vienna and University of Amsterdam. Students were asked to search for information on Viagra. As one can imagine, depending on a number of issues, not the least of which is what sources did one extract information from, a student would find different accounts of reality about Viagra, everything from a medical drug to a black-market drug ideal for underground trade. Rogers described how information on the Web differed from official accounts for certain events. The information on the Web served as an alternative reality. Chapter 3 describes the Web as a dynamic debate-mapping tool, a political instrument. Rogers introduces the "Issue Barometer," an information instrument that measures the social pressure on a topic being debated by analyzing data available from the Web. Measures used by the Issue Barometer include temperature of the issue (cold to hot), activity level of the debate (mild to intense), and territorialization (one country to many countries). The Issues Barometer is applied to an illustrative case of the public debate surrounding food safety in the Netherlands in 2001. Chapter 4 introduces "The Web Issue Index," which provides an indication of leading societal issues discussed on the Web. The empirical research on the Web Issues Index was conducted on the Genoa G8 Summit in 1999 and the anti-globalization movement. Rogers focus here was to examine the changing nature of prominent issues over time, i.e., how issues gained and lost attention and traction over time.
    In Chapter 5, the "Election Issue Tracker" is introduced. The Election Issue Tracker calculates currency that is defined as "frequency of mentions of the issue terms per newspaper and across newspapers" in the three major national newspapers. The Election Issue Tracker is used to study which issues resonate with the press and which do not. As one would expect, Rogers found that not all issues that are considered important or central to a political party resonate with the press. This book contains a wealth of information that can be accessed by both researcher and practitioner. Even more interesting is the fact that researchers from a wide assortment of disciplines, from political science to information science and even communication studies, will appreciate the research and insights put forth by Rogers. Concepts presented in each chapter are thoroughly described using a wide variety of cases. Albeit all the cases are of a European flavor, mainly Dutch, they are interesting and thought-provoking. I found the descriptions of Rogers various information instruments to be very interesting. Researchers can gain from an examination of these instruments as it points to an interesting method for studying activities and behaviors on the Internet. In addition, each chapter has adequate illustrations and the bibliography is comprehensive. This book will make for an ideal supplementary text for graduate courses in information science, communication and media studies, and even political science. Like all books, however, this book had its share of shortcomings. While I was able to appreciate the content of the book, and certainly commend Rogers for studying an issue of immense significance, I found the book to be very difficult to read and parse through. The book is laden with jargon, political statements, and even has several instances of deficient writing. The book also lacked a sense of structure, and this affected the presentation of Rogers' material. I would have also hoped to see some recommendations by Rogers in terms of how should researchers further the ideas he has put forth. Areas of future research, methods for studying future problems, and even insights on what the future might hold for information politics were not given enough attention in the book; in my opinion, this was a major shortcoming. Overall, I commend Rogers for putting forth a very informative book on the issues of information politics on the Web. Information politics, especially when delivered on the communication technologies such as the Web, is going to play a vital role in our societies for a long time to come. Debates will range from the politics of how information is searched for and displayed on the Web to how the Web is used to manipulate or politicize information to meet the agendas of various entities. Richard Rogers' book will be of the seminal and foundational readings on the topic for any curious minds that want to explore these issues."
    RVK
    AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
    MF 1000 Politologie / Politische Systeme: einzelne Elemente / Öffentliche Meinung (politische Kommunikation)
  15. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12 
    0.11847439 = product of:
  0.3949146 = sum of:
    0.038109176 = product of:
      0.11432753 = sum of:
        0.11432753 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.007936673 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007936673 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.11432753 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11432753 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005886175 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  16. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.12 
    0.11764917 = product of:
  0.33614048 = sum of:
    0.030487342 = product of:
      0.09146202 = sum of:
        0.09146202 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.012698677 = weight(_text_:der in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012698677 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.009758773 = weight(_text_:des in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009758773 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.0088096205 = weight(_text_:in in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088096205 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.22493094 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.35 = coord(7/20)
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Footnote
    Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe genehmigte Dissertation.
    Imprint
    Karlsruhe : Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe
  17. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.12 
    0.1158568 = product of:
  0.4634272 = sum of:
    0.045731008 = product of:
      0.13719302 = sum of:
        0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719302 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.006117093 = weight(_text_:in in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006117093 = score(doc=862,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  18. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.12 
    0.115210444 = product of:
  0.46084177 = sum of:
    0.045731008 = product of:
      0.13719302 = sum of:
        0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719302 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003531705 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  19. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.12 
    0.115210444 = product of:
  0.46084177 = sum of:
    0.045731008 = product of:
      0.13719302 = sum of:
        0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003531705 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  20. Memmel, T.: User interface specification for interactive software systems : process-, method- and tool-support for interdisciplinary and collaborative requirements modelling and prototyping-driven user interface specification (2009) 0.11 
    0.11044716 = product of:
  0.36815718 = sum of:
    0.23341611 = weight(_text_:15860 in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23341611 = score(doc=4093,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26774642 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.8717805 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
    0.02096585 = weight(_text_:und in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02096585 = score(doc=4093,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.328536 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
    0.016496068 = weight(_text_:der in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016496068 = score(doc=4093,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
    0.07131875 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07131875 = score(doc=4093,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.48188522 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
    0.02096585 = weight(_text_:und in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02096585 = score(doc=4093,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.328536 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
    0.0049945856 = weight(_text_:in in 4093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049945856 = score(doc=4093,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 4093, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4093)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    User-Interface-Spezifikationsprozesse involvieren unterschiedliche Akteure mit jeweils eigenen Ausdrucksmitteln. Dadurch ergeben sich Herausforderungen bei der Umsetzung von Anforderungen in gutes UI-Design. Durch einen Mangel an interdisziplinären und kollaborativen Methoden und Werkzeugen dominieren dabei vor allem textbasierte Spezifikationsdokumente. Diese reichen jedoch mangels Interaktivität nicht aus, um innovative und kreative Prozesse zu unterstützen. In diesem Buch wird eine Spezifikationstechnik vorgestellt, mit der Benutzer-, Aufgaben- und Interaktionsmodelle mit unterschiedlich detailliertem UI-Design verbunden werden. Dadurch entsteht eine erlebbare UI-Simulation, die im Vergleich zu interaktiven UI-Prototypen zusätzlich den visuellen Drill-Down zu Artefakten der Anforderungsermittlung erlaubt. Das Resultat sind interaktive UI-Spezifikationen, mit denen eine höhere Transparenz und Nachvollziehbarkeit im Spezifikationsprozess möglich sind.
    Classification
    AP 15860
    RSWK
    Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Benutzeroberfläche / Benutzermodell / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Spezifikationstechnik / Prototyping
    RVK
    AP 15860
    Subject
    Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Benutzeroberfläche / Benutzermodell / Benutzerfreundlichkeit / Spezifikationstechnik / Prototyping

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 34
  • m 4
  • es 2
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications