Search (454 results, page 1 of 23)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Matthews, J.R.; Lawrence, G.S.; Ferguson, D.K.: Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey, a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.04
    0.038748596 = product of:
      0.15499438 = sum of:
        0.102513626 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102513626 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.62403065 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.015713813 = weight(_text_:der in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015713813 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
        0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005827016 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Classification
    AN 73400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Datenverarbeitung / Einsatz in der Katalogisierung
    RVK
    AN 73400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Datenverarbeitung / Einsatz in der Katalogisierung
  2. Höchstötter, N.: Suchverhalten im Web : Erhebung, Analyse und Möglichkeiten (2007) 0.02
    0.01956857 = product of:
      0.07827428 = sum of:
        0.02096585 = weight(_text_:und in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02096585 = score(doc=281,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
        0.009524008 = weight(_text_:der in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009524008 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
        0.02096585 = weight(_text_:und in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02096585 = score(doc=281,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.328536 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
        0.020701483 = weight(_text_:des in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020701483 = score(doc=281,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
        0.006117093 = weight(_text_:in in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006117093 = score(doc=281,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Suchmaschinen stellen eine wichtige Möglichkeit dar, um neue Informationen oder Webseiten im Internet zu finden. Das Online-Marketing wurde dadurch verstärkt auf das Suchmaschinen-Marketing ausgerichtet, bei dem vor allem darauf geachtet wird, dass man in Suchmaschinen gut sichtbar ist. Bei der effizienten Planung von Marketing-Aktionen ist es deshalb wichtig, nicht nur profunde Kenntnisse über die Funktionsweise von Suchmaschinen zu haben, sondern auch das Suchverhalten von Suchmaschinennutzern zu untersuchen und die Ergebnisse geeignet umzusetzen. In diesem Beitrag wird auf die Erforschung des Suchverhaltens im Web und auf die Interaktion von Menschen mit Suchmaschinen ab 1997 eingegangen. In erster Linie werden verschiedene Erhebungsmethoden erklärt und Analysen vorgestellt. Es wird auch diskutiert, wie die Ergebnisse umgesetzt werden können, um die Auffindbarkeit von Webseiten zu verbessern.
    Footnote
    Diss. Karlsruhe, 2007: Untersuchung des Suchverhaltens im Web - Interaktion von Intemetnutzem mit Suchmaschinen, ISBN 3-8300-2725-7
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.3, S.135-140
  3. Harms, I.; Schweibenz, W.: Usability engineering methods for the Web (2000) 0.02
    0.017877879 = product of:
      0.071511514 = sum of:
        0.016240077 = weight(_text_:und in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016240077 = score(doc=5482,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.016496068 = weight(_text_:der in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016496068 = score(doc=5482,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.25648075 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.016240077 = weight(_text_:und in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016240077 = score(doc=5482,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014638159 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
        0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007897133 = score(doc=5482,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents the results of a study on usability methods for evaluating Web sites. It summarizes the "Heuristics for Web Communications," and reports the practical experiences with these heuristics, contrasting them with the "Keevil Index" and combining them with user testing with thinking aloud. It concludes that working with the "Heuristics for Web Communications" takes more time and effort than working with the "Keevil Index," but produces more consistent results. The heuristics proved to be applicable both in heuristic evaluation and in combination with user testing.
    Content
    Der Beitrag präsentiert eine Studie über Evaluationsmethoden zur WebUsability. Er beschreibt die "Heuristics for Web Communications" und berichtet von den praktischen Erfahrungen mit den Heuristiken, die mit dem "Keevil Index" verglichen und mit Benutzertests mit lautem Denken kombiniert werden. Das Ergebnis zeigt, dass eine Evaluation mit den beschriebenen Heuristiken gegenüber dem "Keevil Index" mehr Zeit und Aufwand erfordert, aber konsistentere Ergebnisse bringt. Die Heuristiken haben sich sowohl in der experten-zentrierten Evaluation als auch in Kombination mit dem Benutzertest insgesamt als geeignete Evaluationsmethode erwiesen
    Source
    Informationskompetenz - Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft: Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000), Hrsg.: G. Knorz u. R. Kuhlen
  4. Huvila, I.: Mining qualitative data on human information behaviour from the Web (2010) 0.01
    0.01042762 = product of:
      0.0521381 = sum of:
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=4676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.015469962 = weight(_text_:und in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015469962 = score(doc=4676,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
        0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 4676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041203224 = score(doc=4676,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4676, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4676)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses an approach of collecting qualitative data on human information behaviour that is based on mining web data using search engines. The approach is technically the same that has been used for some time in webometric research to make statistical inferences on web data, but the present paper shows how the same tools and data collecting methods can be used to gather data for qualitative data analysis on human information behaviour.
    Source
    Information und Wissen: global, sozial und frei? Proceedings des 12. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2011) ; Hildesheim, 9. - 11. März 2011. Hrsg.: J. Griesbaum, T. Mandl u. C. Womser-Hacker
  5. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.01
    0.008257545 = product of:
      0.04128772 = sum of:
        0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009376213 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
        0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009376213 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
        0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014638159 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
        0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007897133 = score(doc=2658,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Shiri, A.; Chambers, T.: Information retrieval from digital libraries : assessing the potential utility of thesauri in supporting users' search behaviour in an interdisciplinary domain (2008) 0.01
    0.008257545 = product of:
      0.04128772 = sum of:
        0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009376213 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
        0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009376213 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
        0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014638159 = score(doc=2263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
        0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 2263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007897133 = score(doc=2263,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2263, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2263)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Content
    The objective of this research was to investigate the extent to which thesauri have the potential to support the search behaviour of nanoscience and technology researchers while interacting with an electronic book digital library. Transaction log data was obtained from a nanoscience and technology digital library to investigate the nature, type and characteristics of users' queries and search terms. The specific objectives was to assess the extent to which users' search terms matched with those found in two well-established thesauri attached o the INSPEC and Compendex databases.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  7. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.0075555057 = product of:
      0.050370038 = sum of:
        0.029579712 = weight(_text_:des in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029579712 = score(doc=7914,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
        0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071366085 = score(doc=7914,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
        0.013653717 = product of:
          0.027307434 = sum of:
            0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027307434 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    The library of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie attracts 4.000 visitors daily of whom 25% consult the GEAC system OPAC. Describes a 1992 survey consisting of online questions followed by an interview. The questionnaires were adapted from ones used in the UK and utilised OLIVE (Online Interactive Validation and Evaluation). While difficulties arose from users' inconsistency in their replies and failures to answer questions, it has become clear that subject access is unsatisfactory, sometimes because of mistyping by the searcher but also because of the vocabulary problems and lack of guidance in search strategies
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch den Text des Vortrages IFLA Tagung Barcelona 1993
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  8. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhurry, G.: Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures : a quantitative analysis framework (2003) 0.01
    0.005941176 = product of:
      0.029705878 = sum of:
        0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062508085 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.0062508085 = weight(_text_:und in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062508085 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.09795051 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.009758773 = weight(_text_:des in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009758773 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.0074454886 = weight(_text_:in in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0074454886 = score(doc=2766,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.19010136 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been important information and knowledge organisation tools for more than three decades. The recent emergence and phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have yet been carried out to evaluate how end-users, for whom all these efforts are ostensibly made, interact with and make use of thesauri for query building and expansion. The present paper reports a pilot study carried out to determine the extent to which a thesaurus-enhanced search interface to a web-based database aided end-users in their selection of search terms. The study also investigated the ways in which users interacted with the thesaurus structure, terms, and interface. Thesaurusbased searching and browsing behaviours adopted by users while interacting with the thesaurus-enhanced search interface were also examined. 1. Introduction The last decade has witnessed the emergence of a broad range of applications for knowledge structures in general and thesauri in particular. A number of researchers have predicted that thesauri will increasingly be used in retrieval rather than for indexing (Milstead, 1998; Aitchison et al., 1997) and that their application in information retrieval systems will become more diverse due to the growth of fulltext databases accessed over the Internet (Williamson, 2000). Some researchers have emphasised the need for tailoring the structure and content of thesauri as tools for end-user searching (Bates, 1986; Strong and Drott, 1986; Anderson and Rowley, 1991; Lopez-Huertas, 1997) while others have suggested thesaurus-enhanced user interfaces to support query formulation and expansion (Pollitt et.al., 1994; Jones et.al., 1995; Beaulieu, 1997). The recent phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have been carried out to evaluate the ways in which end-users interact with and make use of online thesauri for query building and expansion. The work reported here expands an a pilot study (Shiri and Revie, 2001) carried out to investigate user - thesaurus interaction in the domains of biology and veterinary medicine.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  9. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.00
    0.0045888117 = product of:
      0.030592076 = sum of:
        0.011111342 = weight(_text_:der in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011111342 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005827016 = score(doc=6966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
        0.013653717 = product of:
          0.027307434 = sum of:
            0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027307434 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the technique used to study hypertext systems from a very general point of view, focus on monitoring searchers' behaviour, predict the estimation of the ultimate goals of the searchers, and estimate the searchers' determination to find these goals. The components are combined via a Markov chain approach so as to study information retrieval in general and hypertext (hypermedia) in particular. Demonstrates how these estimations can be used to assist searchers during their searching process and presents the derivation of a relevance function for documents, based on these estimations
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  10. Kaba, B.; Touré, B.: Understanding information and communication technology behavioral intention to use : applying the UTAUT model to social networking site adoption by young people in a least developed country (2014) 0.00
    0.00348579 = product of:
      0.0348579 = sum of:
        0.026960768 = product of:
          0.053921536 = sum of:
            0.053921536 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 1336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053921536 = score(doc=1336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 1336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007897133 = score(doc=1336,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 1336, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1336)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    According to many studies, social network sites (SNS) have become some of the most popular online destinations. It has been pointed out that very little is known about the psychosocial variables that predict people's use of these websites. In this article, our general objective is to understand behavioral intentions to use SNS employing the well-known unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), which has been validated in a number of studies. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey from a final sample of 1,039 social networking website users in Africa. We have shown that there are contexts, such as the African context, in which the UTAUT does not hold up. Explanations are provided to support the findings.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
  11. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.00
    0.003402418 = product of:
      0.03402418 = sum of:
        0.026960768 = product of:
          0.053921536 = sum of:
            0.053921536 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053921536 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00706341 = score(doc=3113,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
  12. Rieh, S.Y.: On the Web at home : information seeking and Web searching in the home environment (2004) 0.00
    0.0033077863 = product of:
      0.033077862 = sum of:
        0.026960768 = product of:
          0.053921536 = sum of:
            0.053921536 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053921536 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006117093 = weight(_text_:in in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006117093 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    As more people gain at-home access to the Internet, information seeking an the Web has become embedded in everyday life. The objective of this study was to characterize the home as an information use environment and to identify a range of information seeking and Websearch behaviors at home. Twelve Northern California residents were recruited, and the data were collected through semi-structured at-home interviews based an a self-reported Search Activities Diary that subjects kept over a 3-5 day period. The data were analyzed an four levels: home environment, information seeking goals, information retrieval interaction, and search query. Eindings indicated that the home, indeed, provided a distinct information use environment beyond physical setting alone in which the subjects used the Web for diverse purposes and interests. Based an the findings, the relationships among home environment, Web context, and interaction situation were identified with respect to user goals and information-seeking behaviors.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
  13. Fabritius, H.: Triangulation as a multiperspective strategy in a qualitative study of information seeking behaviour of journalists (1999) 0.00
    0.0032662463 = product of:
      0.032662462 = sum of:
        0.022467308 = product of:
          0.044934615 = sum of:
            0.044934615 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044934615 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010195156 = score(doc=279,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, the importance of application of multiple, qualitative methods has been emphasised in the field of information seeking and retrieval research. (See Fidel 1993; Vakkari 1997). One of the earliest and most ambitious attempts to apply multiple methods was the research project on information needs and information services in local authority social services departments. (Wilson & Streatfield 1977; Wilson, et al., 1979; Wilson 1981). In studies on information needs and seeking qualitative methods have gained a leading position in the 1990's (Vakkari 1997: 451). Indisputably, this is the case when looking at recent information needs, seeking and use research carried out by Algon (1997), Ellen (1998), Barry (1995), Byström (1997), Iivonen (1996), Kirk (1997), Kuhlthau (1993), Solomon (1997) and Sonnenwald and Lievrouw (1996). Furthermore, though the approach of the study is qualitative the application of quantitative techniques is not necessarily excluded. In methodological literature attention is paid to integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques. These methods are not opposite but they complement to each other. In a qualitative study various methods can be combined. Triangulation can be seen in two ways: firstly, to ascertain the validity of research; secondly, to employ the methods that are appropriate to the subject investigated. Application of triangulation in the former way aims at the full, 'objective' picture of the subject studied, while the picture obtained in the latter way is like a kaleidoscope. Thus the ultimate reason for triangulating is to gain deeper understanding of the phenomenon studied.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  14. Wallace, P.M.: How do patrons search the online catalog when no one's looking? : transaction log analysis and implications for bibliographic instruction and system design (1993) 0.00
    0.0031086903 = product of:
      0.0207246 = sum of:
        0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007813511 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
        0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007813511 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
        0.005097578 = weight(_text_:in in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005097578 = score(doc=6974,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1301535 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project which monitored electronically 11 public access terminals, at the Colorado University Librarys, to produce transaction logs that were used to gather statistics and analyze the behaviour of users when searching the library online catalogues. The study recorded user behaviour unobtrusively and focused exclusively on what actually occured during the search process. Among other findings it was revealed that the use of system supplied search aids varied, from low use of quick search and express search features, to more extensive use of search history and searching databases other than the home catalogue. Analysis of search results revealed that 66% of subject (keyword) and name searches produce 10 or fewer results, and 82% produce 25 or fewer titles, a manageable number for searchers to scan postings and spot relevant materials. User persistence in scanning titles was found to be high with the full list being requested for nearly 40% of searches netting up to 100 results. Overall, results show that emphasis on improved system design must be stressed if the needs of the majority of searchers are to be met more effectively
    Footnote
    Die hier angegebenen Zahlen stehen in Widerspruch zur Micco Studie; allerdings ist wohl auch die Ausgangslage eine andere, wenn hier Autoren- und Stichwortsuche mit in die Statistik einbezogen wurden
  15. Lian, T.; Chen, Z.; Lin, Y.; Ma, J.: Temporal patterns of the online video viewing behavior of smart TV viewers (2018) 0.00
    0.0029048254 = product of:
      0.029048253 = sum of:
        0.022467308 = product of:
          0.044934615 = sum of:
            0.044934615 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044934615 = score(doc=4219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006580944 = weight(_text_:in in 4219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006580944 = score(doc=4219,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 4219, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4219)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, millions of households have shifted from traditional TVs to smart TVs for viewing online videos on TV screens. In this article, we perform extensive analyses on a large-scale online video viewing log on smart TVs. Because time influences almost every aspect of our lives, our aim is to understand temporal patterns of the online video viewing behavior of smart TV viewers at the crowd level. First, we measure the amount of time per hour spent in watching online videos on smart TV by each household on each day. By applying clustering techniques, we identify eight daily patterns whose peak hours occur in different segments of the day. The differences among households can be characterized by three types of temporal habits. We also uncover five periodic weekly patterns. There seems to be a circadian rhythm at the crow level. Further analysis confirms that there exists a holiday effect in the online video viewing behavior on smart TVs. Finally, we investigate the popularity variations of different video categories over the day. The obtained insights shed light on how we can partition a day to improve the performance of time-aware video recommendations for smart TV viewers.
    Field
    Kommunikationswissenschaften
  16. Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.00
    0.002903719 = product of:
      0.029037189 = sum of:
        0.019048017 = weight(_text_:der in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019048017 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
        0.009989171 = weight(_text_:in in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009989171 = score(doc=347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Footnote
    Eine interessante Studie, die auf die Anwendung der RSWK übertragen werden könnte.
    Source
    Subject control in online catalogs. Ed.: R.P. Holley
  17. Wilson, T.D.: Exploring models of information behaviour : the 'uncertainty' project (1999) 0.00
    0.0024214461 = product of:
      0.024214461 = sum of:
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=6785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
        0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 6785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071366085 = score(doc=6785,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 6785, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6785)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    My original intention in this Keynote Paper was to talk about models of information behaviour, and I shall do that to some extent. However, both Carol Kuhlthau and Amanda Spink address this general conceptual level of research into information-seeking behaviour and I thought it would more appropriate to present my current research.
    Content
    Enthält Grafik des Schalen-Modells: Information searching behaviour < Information seeking behaviour < Information behaviour
    Source
    Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, Sheffield, UK, 1998. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
  18. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.00
    0.0022263695 = product of:
      0.022263695 = sum of:
        0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006659447 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.015604248 = product of:
          0.031208497 = sum of:
            0.031208497 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031208497 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  19. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.00
    0.0022263695 = product of:
      0.022263695 = sum of:
        0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006659447 = score(doc=3687,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
        0.015604248 = product of:
          0.031208497 = sum of:
            0.031208497 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031208497 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  20. Fidel, R.: ¬The user-centered approach (2000) 0.00
    0.0021047199 = product of:
      0.0210472 = sum of:
        0.009344013 = weight(_text_:in in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009344013 = score(doc=917,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.011703186 = product of:
          0.023406371 = sum of:
            0.023406371 = weight(_text_:22 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023406371 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02879306 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    I started my professional career in library and information science because of my great interest in knowledge organization. The more experience I gained in the profession, the more I realized how crucial it is to understand which organization would be best for each group of users. This in turn requires an understanding of how users seek information. And so now my focus is an studying information seeking and searching behavior. Throughout the relatively long course of changing my focus, I followed Pauline Cochrane's writings. Now I can say that she has been among the first to have a "user-centered approach" to knowledge organization, and she has used the term three years before it became a mainstream phrase. The following is a short discussion about the usercentered approach which was presented in a workshop in 1997.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler

Types

  • a 436
  • el 7
  • r 7
  • m 5
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…