-
Context: nature, impact, and role : 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, CoLIS 2005, Glasgow 2005; Proceedings (2005)
0.02
0.022251261 = product of:
0.089005046 = sum of:
0.024082858 = weight(_text_:und in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024082858 = score(doc=42,freq=76.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3773797 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
76.0 = termFreq=76.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.020620082 = weight(_text_:der in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020620082 = score(doc=42,freq=54.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3206009 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
54.0 = termFreq=54.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.024082858 = weight(_text_:und in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024082858 = score(doc=42,freq=76.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3773797 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
76.0 = termFreq=76.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.0136383 = weight(_text_:des in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0136383 = score(doc=42,freq=10.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1710414 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.006580944 = weight(_text_:in in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006580944 = score(doc=42,freq=40.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Classification
- SS 4800 [Informatik # Enzyklopädien und Handbücher. Kongreßberichte Schriftenreihe. Tafeln und Formelsammlungen # Schriftenreihen (indiv. Sign.) # Lecture notes in computer science]
- Content
- Das Buch ist in die Abschnitte Invited Papers (1 Beitrag, 1 Abstract), Representing Context (3 Beiträge), Context and Relevance in Information Seeking (3), Context and Information (3), Contextualised Information Seeking (3), Agendas for Context (3), Context and Documents (2) und Workshops (2 Ankündigungstexte) gegliedert und enthält ein simples Autoren-, jedoch kein Sachregister. Die Autoren der Beiträge stammen mit einigen Ausnahmen (Italien, Frankreich, Russland) aus den angelsächsischen und skandinavischen Ländern.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 59(2006) H.3, S.100-103 (O. Oberhauser): "Dieses als Band 3507 der bekannten, seit 1973 erscheinenden Springer-Serie Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) publizierte Buch versammelt die Vorträge der 5. Tagung "Conceptions of Library and Information Science". CoLIS hat sich in den letzten anderthalb Jahrzehnten als internationales Forum für die Präsentation und Rezeption von Forschung auf den Fachgebieten Informatik und Informationswissenschaft etabliert. Auf die 1992 in Tampere (Finnland) anlässlich des damals 20jährigen Bestehens des dortigen Instituts für Informationswissenschaft abgehaltene erste Tagung folgten weitere in Kopenhagen (1996), Dubrovnik (1999) und Seattle, WA (2002). Die zuletzt an der Strathclyde University in Glasgow (2005) veranstaltete Konferenz war dem Thema "Context" im Rahmen der informationsbezogenen Forschung gewidmet, einem komplexen, dynamischen und multidimensionalen Begriff von grosser Bedeutung für das Verhalten und die Interaktion von Mensch und Maschine. . . .
Am interessantesten und wichtigsten erschien mir der Grundsatzartikel von Peter Ingwersen und Kalervo Järvelin (Kopenhagen/Tampere), The sense of information: Understanding the cognitive conditional information concept in relation to information acquisition (S. 7-19). Hier versuchen die Autoren, den ursprünglich von Ingwersen1 vorgeschlagenen und damals ausschliesslich im Zusammenhang mit dem interaktiven Information Retrieval verwendeten Begriff "conditional cognitive information" anhand eines erweiterten Modells nicht nur auf das Gesamtgebiet von "information seeking and retrieval" (IS&R) auszuweiten, sondern auch auf den menschlichen Informationserwerb aus der Sinneswahrnehmung, wie z.B. im Alltag oder im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnistätigkeit. Dabei werden auch alternative Informationsbegriffe sowie die Beziehung von Information und Bedeutung diskutiert. Einen ebenfalls auf Ingwersen zurückgehenden Ansatz thematisiert der Beitrag von Birger Larsen (Kopenhagen), indem er sich mit dessen vor über 10 Jahren veröffentlichten2 Principle of Polyrepresentation befasst. Dieses beruht auf der Hypothese, wonach die Überlappung zwischen unterschiedlichen kognitiven Repräsentationen - nämlich jenen der Situation des Informationssuchenden und der Dokumente - zur Reduktion der einer Retrievalsituation anhaftenden Unsicherheit und damit zur Verbesserung der Performance des IR-Systems genutzt werden könne. Das Prinzip stellt die Dokumente, ihre Autoren und Indexierer, aber auch die sie zugänglich machende IT-Lösung in einen umfassenden und kohärenten theoretischen Bezugsrahmen, der die benutzerorientierte Forschungsrichtung "Information-Seeking" mit der systemorientierten IR-Forschung zu integrieren trachtet. Auf der Basis theoretischer Überlegungen sowie der (wenigen) dazu vorliegenden empirischen Studien hält Larsen das Model, das von Ingwersen sowohl für "exact match-IR" als auch für "best match-IR" intendiert war, allerdings schon in seinen Grundzügen für "Boolean" (d.h. "exact match"-orientiert) und schlägt ein "polyrepresentation continuum" als Verbesserungsmöglichkeit vor.
Mehrere Beiträge befassen sich mit dem Problem der Relevanz. Erica Cosijn und Theo Bothma (Pretoria) argumentieren, dass für das Benutzerverhalten neben der thematischen Relevanz auch verschiedene andere Relevanzdimensionen eine Rolle spielen und schlagen auf der Basis eines (abermals auf Ingwersen zurückgehenden) erweiterten Relevanzmodells vor, dass IR-Systeme die Möglichkeit zur Abgabe auch kognitiver, situativer und sozio-kognitiver Relevanzurteile bieten sollten. Elaine Toms et al. (Kanada) berichten von einer Studie, in der versucht wurde, die schon vor 30 Jahren von Tefko Saracevic3 erstellten fünf Relevanzdimensionen (kognitiv, motivational, situativ, thematisch und algorithmisch) zu operationalisieren und anhand von Recherchen mit einer Web-Suchmaschine zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass sich diese fünf Dimensionen in drei Typen vereinen lassen, die Benutzer, System und Aufgabe repräsentieren. Von einer völlig anderen Seite nähern sich Olof Sundin und Jenny Johannison (Boras, Schweden) der Relevanzthematik, indem sie einen kommunikationsorientierten, neo-pragmatistischen Ansatz (nach Richard Rorty) wählen, um Informationssuche und Relevanz zu analysieren, und dabei auch auf das Werk von Michel Foucault zurückgreifen. Weitere interessante Artikel befassen sich mit Bradford's Law of Scattering (Hjørland & Nicolaisen), Information Sharing and Timing (Widén-Wulff & Davenport), Annotations as Context for Searching Documents (Agosti & Ferro), sowie dem Nutzen von neuen Informationsquellen wie Web Links, Newsgroups und Blogs für die sozial- und informationswissenschaftliche Forschung (Thelwall & Wouters). In Summe liegt hier ein interessantes und anspruchsvolles Buch vor - inhaltlich natürlich nicht gerade einheitlich und geschlossen, doch dies darf man bei einem Konferenzband ohnedies nicht erwarten. Manche der abgedruckten Beiträge sind sicher nicht einfach zu lesen, lohnen aber die Mühe. Auch für Praktiker aus Bibliothek und Information ist einiges dabei, sofern sie sich für die wissenschaftliche Basis ihrer Tätigkeit interessieren. Fachlich einschlägige Spezial- und grössere Allgemeinbibliotheken sollten das Werk daher unbedingt führen.
Context: Nature, Impact and Role ist ein typischer LNCS-Softcover-Band in sauberem TeX-Design und mutet mit knapp 50 Euro zwar nicht als wohlfeil an, liegt aber angesichts heutiger Buchpreise im Rahmen. Die Zahl der Tippfehler hält sich in Grenzen, ist jedoch gelegentlich peinlich (z.B. wenn man auf S. 2, noch dazu im Fettdruck, "Tractaus" anstelle von "Tractatus" lesen muss). Als Kuriosum am Rande sei erwähnt, dass die einleitend abgedruckte Namensliste des CoLIS-Programmkomitees, immerhin rund 50 Personen, vom Computer fein säuberlich sortiert wurde - dies allerdings nach dem Alphabet der Vornamen der Komiteemitglieder, was offenbar weder den Herausgebern noch dem Verlag aufgefallen ist."
- RVK
- SS 4800 [Informatik # Enzyklopädien und Handbücher. Kongreßberichte Schriftenreihe. Tafeln und Formelsammlungen # Schriftenreihen (indiv. Sign.) # Lecture notes in computer science]
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; 3507
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Ingwersen, P.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The turn : integration of information seeking and retrieval in context (2005)
0.02
0.018946834 = product of:
0.075787336 = sum of:
0.01873614 = weight(_text_:und in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01873614 = score(doc=1323,freq=46.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29359633 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.018613148 = weight(_text_:der in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018613148 = score(doc=1323,freq=44.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.28939712 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.01873614 = weight(_text_:und in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01873614 = score(doc=1323,freq=46.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29359633 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
46.0 = termFreq=46.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.012198467 = weight(_text_:des in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012198467 = score(doc=1323,freq=8.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.0075034313 = weight(_text_:in in 1323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0075034313 = score(doc=1323,freq=52.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19158077 = fieldWeight in 1323, product of:
7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
52.0 = termFreq=52.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1323)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- The Turn analyzes the research of information seeking and retrieval (IS&R) and proposes a new direction of integrating research in these two areas: the fields should turn off their separate and narrow paths and construct a new avenue of research. An essential direction for this avenue is context as given in the subtitle Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Other essential themes in the book include: IS&R research models, frameworks and theories; search and works tasks and situations in context; interaction between humans and machines; information acquisition, relevance and information use; research design and methodology based on a structured set of explicit variables - all set into the holistic cognitive approach. The present monograph invites the reader into a construction project - there is much research to do for a contextual understanding of IS&R. The Turn represents a wide-ranging perspective of IS&R by providing a novel unique research framework, covering both individual and social aspects of information behavior, including the generation, searching, retrieval and use of information. Regarding traditional laboratory information retrieval research, the monograph proposes the extension of research toward actors, search and work tasks, IR interaction and utility of information. Regarding traditional information seeking research, it proposes the extension toward information access technology and work task contexts. The Turn is the first synthesis of research in the broad area of IS&R ranging from systems oriented laboratory IR research to social science oriented information seeking studies. TOC:Introduction.- The Cognitive Framework for Information.- The Development of Information Seeking Research.- Systems-Oriented Information Retrieval.- Cognitive and User-Oriented Information Retrieval.- The Integrated IS&R Research Framework.- Implications of the Cognitive Framework for IS&R.- Towards a Research Program.- Conclusion.- Definitions.- References.- Index.
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 59(2006) H.2, S.81-83 (O. Oberhauser): "Mit diesem Band haben zwei herausragende Vertreter der europäischen Informationswissenschaft, die Professoren Peter Ingwersen (Kopenhagen) und Kalervo Järvelin (Tampere) ein Werk vorgelegt, das man vielleicht dereinst als ihr opus magnum bezeichnen wird. Mich würde dies nicht überraschen, denn die Autoren unternehmen hier den ambitionierten Versuch, zwei informations wissenschaftliche Forschungstraditionen, die einander bisher in eher geringem Ausmass begegneten, unter einem gesamtheitlichen kognitiven Ansatz zu vereinen - das primär im sozialwissenschaftlichen Bereich verankerte Forschungsgebiet "Information Seeking and Retrieval" (IS&R) und das vorwiegend im Informatikbereich angesiedelte "Information Retrieval" (IR). Dabei geht es ihnen auch darum, den seit etlichen Jahren zwar dominierenden, aber auch als zu individualistisch kritisierten kognitiven Ansatz so zu erweitern, dass technologische, verhaltensbezogene und kooperative Aspekte in kohärenter Weise berücksichtigt werden. Dies geschieht auf folgende Weise in neun Kapiteln: - Zunächst werden die beiden "Lager" - die an Systemen und Laborexperimenten orientierte IR-Tradition und die an Benutzerfragen orientierte IS&R-Fraktion - einander gegenübergestellt und einige zentrale Begriffe geklärt. - Im zweiten Kapitel erfolgt eine ausführliche Darstellung der kognitiven Richtung der Informationswissenschaft, insbesondere hinsichtlich des Informationsbegriffes. - Daran schliesst sich ein Überblick über die bisherige Forschung zu "Information Seeking" (IS) - eine äusserst brauchbare Einführung in die Forschungsfragen und Modelle, die Forschungsmethodik sowie die in diesem Bereich offenen Fragen, z.B. die aufgrund der einseitigen Ausrichtung des Blickwinkels auf den Benutzer mangelnde Betrachtung der Benutzer-System-Interaktion. - In analoger Weise wird im vierten Kapitel die systemorientierte IRForschung in einem konzentrierten Überblick vorgestellt, in dem es sowohl um das "Labormodell" als auch Ansätze wie die Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache und Expertensysteme geht. Aspekte wie Relevanz, Anfragemodifikation und Performanzmessung werden ebenso angesprochen wie die Methodik - von den ersten Laborexperimenten bis zu TREC und darüber hinaus.
- Kapitel fünf enthält einen entsprechenden Überblick über die kognitive und benutzerorientierte IR-Tradition. Es zeigt, welche anderen (als nur die labororientierten) IR-Studien durchgeführt werden können, wobei sich die Betrachtung von frühen Modellen (z.B. Taylor) über Belkins ASK-Konzept bis zu Ingwersens Modell der Polyrepräsentation, und von Bates Berrypicking-Ansatz bis zu Vakkaris "taskbased" IR-Modell erstreckt. Auch Web-IR, OKAPI und Diskussionen zum Relevanzbegriff werden hier thematisiert. - Im folgenden Kapitel schlagen die Autoren ein integriertes IS&R Forschungsmodell vor, bei dem die vielfältigen Beziehungen zwischen Informationssuchenden, Systementwicklern, Oberflächen und anderen beteiligten Aspekten berücksichtigt werden. Ihr Ansatz vereint die traditionelle Laborforschung mit verschiedenen benutzerorientierten Traditionen aus IS&R, insbesondere mit den empirischen Ansätzen zu IS und zum interaktiven IR, in einem holistischen kognitiven Modell. - Kapitel sieben untersucht die Implikationen dieses Modells für IS&R, wobei besonders ins Auge fällt, wie komplex die Anfragen von Informationssuchenden im Vergleich mit der relativen Einfachheit der Algorithmen zum Auffinden relevanter Dokumente sind. Die Abbildung der vielfältig variierenden kognitiven Zustände der Anfragesteller im Rahmen der der Systementwicklung ist sicherlich keine triviale Aufgabe. Wie dabei das Problem der Einbeziehung des zentralen Aspektes der Bedeutung gelöst werden kann, sei dahingestellt. - Im achten Kapitel wird der Versuch unternommen, die zuvor diskutierten Punkte in ein IS&R-Forschungsprogramm (Prozesse - Verhalten - Systemfunktionalität - Performanz) umzusetzen, wobei auch einige kritische Anmerkungen zur bisherigen Forschungspraxis getroffen werden. - Das abschliessende neunte Kapitel fasst das Buch kurz zusammen und kann somit auch als Einstieg in dieThematik gelesen werden. Darauffolgen noch ein sehr nützliches Glossar zu allen wichtigen Begriffen, die in dem Buch Verwendung finden, eine Bibliographie und ein Sachregister. Ingwersen und Järvelin haben hier ein sehr anspruchsvolles und dennoch lesbares Buch vorgelegt. Die gebotenen Übersichtskapitel und Diskussionen sind zwar keine Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft, decken aber einen grossen Teil der heute in dieser Disziplin aktuellen und durch laufende Forschungsaktivitäten und Publikationen berührten Teilbereiche ab. Man könnte es auch - vielleicht ein wenig überspitzt - so formulieren: Was hier thematisiert wird, ist eigentlich die moderne Informationswissenschaft. Der Versuch, die beiden Forschungstraditionen zu vereinen, wird diesem Werk sicherlich einen Platz in der Geschichte der Disziplin sichern. Nicht ganz glücklich erscheint der Titel des Buches. "The Turn" soll eine Wende bedeuten, nämlich jene hin zu einer integrierten Sicht von IS und IR. Das geht vermutlich aus dem Untertitel besser hervor, doch dieser erschien den Autoren wohl zu trocken. Schade, denn "The Turn" gibt es z.B. in unserem Verbundkatalog bereits, allerdings mit dem Zusatz "from the Cold War to a new era; the United States and the Soviet Union 1983-1990". Der Verlag, der abgesehen davon ein gediegenes (wenn auch nicht gerade wohlfeiles) Produkt vorgelegt hat, hätte derlei unscharfe Duplizierend besser verhindert. Ungeachtet dessen empfehle ich dieses wichtige Buch ohne Vorbehalt zur Anschaffung; es sollte in keiner grösseren Bibliothek fehlen."
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002)
0.01
0.014768916 = product of:
0.07384458 = sum of:
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.018752426 = weight(_text_:und in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018752426 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.029276319 = weight(_text_:des in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029276319 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Michel, D.: Taxonomy of Subject Relationships (1997)
0.01
0.012307431 = product of:
0.061537154 = sum of:
0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015627023 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.015627023 = weight(_text_:und in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015627023 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396934 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996)
0.01
0.010236046 = product of:
0.05118023 = sum of:
0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012501617 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.012501617 = weight(_text_:und in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012501617 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517547 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006659447 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shapiro, C.D.; Yan, P.-F.: Generous tools : thesauri in digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.009439265 = product of:
0.047196325 = sum of:
0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010938915 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.010938915 = weight(_text_:und in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010938915 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=3132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 3132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=3132,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3132, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3132)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The Electronic Libraries and Information Highways MITRE Sponsored Research project aims to help searchers working in digital libraries increase their chance of matching the language of authors. Focuses on whether query formulation can be improved through the addition of semantic knowledge that is interactively gathered from a thesaurus that exists in a distributed, interoperating, cooperative environment. A prototype, ELVIS, was built that improves information retrieval through query expansion and is based on publicly available Z39.50 standard thesauri integrated with networked information discovery and retrieval tools
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998)
0.01
0.0085469205 = product of:
0.0427346 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.009344013 = weight(_text_:in in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009344013 = score(doc=5202,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Spiteri, L.F.: ¬The essential elements of faceted thesauri (1999)
0.01
0.008408292 = product of:
0.042041462 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=5362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.008650876 = weight(_text_:in in 5362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008650876 = score(doc=5362,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 5362, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5362)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The goal of this study is to evaluate, compare, and contrast how facet analysis is used to construct the systematic or faceted displays of a selection of information retrieval thesauri. More specifically, the study seeks to examine which principles of facet analysis are used in the thesauri, and the extent to which different thesauri apply these principles in the same way. A measuring instrument was designed for the purpose of evaluating the structure of faceted thesauri. This instrument was applied to fourteen faceted information retrieval thesauri. The study reveals that the thesauri do not share a common definition of what constitutes a facet. In some cases, the thesauri apply both enumerative-style classification and facet analysis to arrange their indexing terms. A number of the facets used in the thesauri are not homogeneous or mutually exclusive. The principle of synthesis is used in only 50% of the thesauri, and no one citation order is used consistently by the thesauri.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004)
0.01
0.008257545 = product of:
0.04128772 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007897133 = score(doc=2658,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Looking for information : a survey on research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2016)
0.01
0.008101069 = product of:
0.08101069 = sum of:
0.073224016 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073224016 = score(doc=3803,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
0.0077866786 = weight(_text_:in in 3803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0077866786 = score(doc=3803,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 3803, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3803)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Abstract
- The 4th edition of this popular and well-cited text is now co-authored, and includes significant changes from earlier texts. Presenting a comprehensive review of over a century of research on information behavior (IB), this book is intended for students in information studies and disciplines interested in research on information activities. The initial two chapters introduce IB as a multi-disciplinary topic, the 3rd provides a brief history of research on information seeking. Chapter four discusses what is meant by the terms "information" and "knowledge. "Chapter five discusses "information needs," and how they are addressed. The 6th chapter identifies many related concepts. Twelve models of information behavior (expanded from earlier editions) are illustrated in chapter seven. Chapter eight reviews various paradigms and theories informing IB research. Chapter nine examines research methods invoked in IB studies and a discussion of qualitative and mixed approaches. The 10th chapter gives examples of IB studies by context. The final chapter looks at strengths and weaknesses, recent trends, and future development.
- BK
- 06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
- Classification
- 06.30 (Bibliothekswesen / Dokumentationswesen: Allgemeines)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 68(2017) no.9, S.2284-2286 (Charles Cole)
- Series
- Studies in information
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-assisted search term selection and query expansion : a review of user-centred studies (2002)
0.01
0.0080908 = product of:
0.040453997 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=1330,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a review of the literature related to the application of domain-specific thesauri in the search and retrieval process. Focusing an studies that adopt a user-centred approach, the review presents a survey of the methodologies and results from empirical studies undertaken an the use of thesauri as sources of term selection for query formulation and expansion during the search process. It summarises the ways in which domain-specific thesauri from different disciplines have been used by various types of users and how these tools aid users in the selection of search terms. The review consists of two main sections: first, studies an thesaurus-aided search term selection; and second, studies dealing with query expansion using thesauri. Both sections are illustrated with case studies that have adopted a user-centred approach.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Sihvonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus (2004)
0.01
0.00722996 = product of:
0.0361498 = sum of:
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.012198467 = weight(_text_:des in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012198467 = score(doc=4417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 4417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=4417,freq=16.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4417, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4417)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- This study explores how experts and novices in pedagogics expanded queries supported by the ERIC thesaurus, and how this was connected to the search effectiveness in an easy and a difficult search task. The expert group consisted of 15 undergraduates in pedagogy and the novice group of 15 students with no previous studies in this field. Their search logs were recorded and a pre- and post-search interview was conducted. The results show that the number and type of terms selected from the thesaurus for expansion by experts improved search effectiveness, whereas there were no connections between the use of thesaurus and improvement of effectiveness among novices. The effectiveness of expansions varied between the facets of the queries. Thus, a vital condition for benefiting from a thesaurus in query expansion to improve search results is sufficient familiarity with the search topic. The results suggest also that it is not in the first place the number of terms used in expansion, but their type and quality that are crucial for search success.
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.01
0.00722996 = product of:
0.0361498 = sum of:
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.012198467 = weight(_text_:des in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012198467 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=1520,freq=16.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Shiri, A.: Topic familiarity and its effects on term selection and browsing in a thesaurus-enhanced search environment (2005)
0.01
0.006881287 = product of:
0.034406435 = sum of:
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.007813511 = weight(_text_:und in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007813511 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.012198467 = weight(_text_:des in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012198467 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.006580944 = weight(_text_:in in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006580944 = score(doc=613,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- Purpose - To evaluate the extent to which familiarity with search topics affects the ways in which users select and browse search terms in a thesaurus-enhanced search setting. Design/methodology/approach - An experimental methodology was adopted to study users' search behaviour in an operational information retrieval environment. Findings - Topic familiarity and subject knowledge influence some search and interaction behaviours. Searches involving moderately and very familiar topics were associated with browsing around twice as many thesaurus terms as was the case for unfamiliar topics. Research limitations/implications - Some search behaviours such as thesaurus browsing and term selection could be used as an indication of user levels of topic familiarity. Practical implications - The results of this study provide design implications as to how to develop personalized search interfaces where users with varying levels of familiarity with search topics can carry out searches. Originality/value - This paper establishes the importance of topic familiarity characteristics and the effects of those characteristics on users' interaction with search interfaces enhanced with semantic tools such as thesauri.
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997)
0.01
0.00532289 = product of:
0.02661445 = sum of:
0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054694577 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.0054694577 = weight(_text_:und in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054694577 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.008538926 = weight(_text_:des in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008538926 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.0071366085 = weight(_text_:in in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071366085 = score(doc=1800,freq=24.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
0.2 = coord(4/20)
- Abstract
- The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.
- Content
- Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Mayr, P.; Schaer, P.; Mutschke, P.: ¬A science model driven retrieval prototype (2011)
0.00
0.0038723755 = product of:
0.025815835 = sum of:
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.009376213 = weight(_text_:und in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009376213 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=649,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.15 = coord(3/20)
- Abstract
- This paper is about a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of science and the usage of these insights for compensating the typical problems that arises in metadata-driven Digital Libraries. Three science model driven retrieval services are presented: co-word analysis based query expansion, re-ranking via Bradfordizing and author centrality. The services are evaluated with relevance assessments from which two important implications emerge: (1) precision values of the retrieval services are the same or better than the tf-idf retrieval baseline and (2) each service retrieved a disjoint set of documents. The different services each favor quite other - but still relevant - documents than pure term-frequency based rankings. The proposed models and derived retrieval services therefore open up new viewpoints on the scientific knowledge space and provide an alternative framework to structure scholarly information systems.
- Series
- Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
- Source
- Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.00
0.0035908984 = product of:
0.035908982 = sum of:
0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008324308 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.027584674 = product of:
0.055169348 = sum of:
0.055169348 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055169348 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science; 2539
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983)
0.00
0.003554808 = product of:
0.03554808 = sum of:
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.027307434 = product of:
0.054614868 = sum of:
0.054614868 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054614868 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Date
- 30. 3.2001 13:32:22
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016)
0.00
0.0029700466 = product of:
0.029700466 = sum of:
0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010195156 = score(doc=2754,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.01950531 = product of:
0.03901062 = sum of:
0.03901062 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03901062 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
- Series
- Lecture notes in computer science ; 9398
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.00
0.0029700466 = product of:
0.029700466 = sum of:
0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010195156 = score(doc=3280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.01950531 = product of:
0.03901062 = sum of:
0.03901062 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03901062 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Series
- Communications in computer and information science; 672
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
