Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  • × theme_ss:"Computer Based Training"
  1. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.08
    0.07813098 = product of:
      0.22323139 = sum of:
        0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04933 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.02721712 = weight(_text_:der in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02721712 = score(doc=2889,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.4231716 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02187783 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017077852 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.009213322 = weight(_text_:in in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009213322 = score(doc=2889,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
        0.07663743 = sum of:
          0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04933 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02879306 = queryNorm
              0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027307434 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02879306 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.35 = coord(7/20)
    
    Abstract
    Als dynamische und einfache Form der Auszeichnung von Ressourcen kann sich Tagging im E-Learning positiv auf Partizipation, soziale Navigation und das Verständnis der Lernenden auswirken. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet verschiedene Möglichkeiten des Einsatzes von Social Tagging in Lehrportalen und E-LearningKursen. Hierzu werden zunächst drei konkrete Anwendungsfälle dargestellt. Anschließend werden aus den Anwendungsfällen gewonnene Erkenntnisse für Lehr-/Lernszenarien zusammengefasst.
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
    Footnote
    Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
    Series
    Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a