-
Erbarth, M.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen : Grundlagen mit einem Anwendungsbeispiel für das Multi-Channel-Publishing (2006)
1.05
1.0474286 = product of:
1.3092858 = sum of:
0.19451343 = weight(_text_:15860 in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19451343 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26774642 = queryWeight, product of:
9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.72648376 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.073224016 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073224016 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16427658 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.44573617 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.07878946 = weight(_text_:medien in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878946 = score(doc=714,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5813935 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02344053 = score(doc=714,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.03177357 = product of:
0.06354714 = sum of:
0.06354714 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06354714 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.19482185 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19482185 = score(doc=714,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8646243 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.08276299 = weight(_text_:formen in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08276299 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4738809 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.017746942 = weight(_text_:der in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017746942 = score(doc=714,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.27592933 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.059432298 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059432298 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14799947 = queryWeight, product of:
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.40157104 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.02344053 = weight(_text_:und in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02344053 = score(doc=714,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3673144 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.021128364 = weight(_text_:des in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021128364 = score(doc=714,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2649762 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.20299914 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesigns in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20299914 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.27352434 = queryWeight, product of:
9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.74216115 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
9.499662 = idf(docFreq=8, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.19482185 = weight(_text_:kommunikationsdesign in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19482185 = score(doc=714,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22532544 = queryWeight, product of:
7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.8646243 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.825686 = idf(docFreq=47, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.006580944 = weight(_text_:in in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006580944 = score(doc=714,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.06441521 = weight(_text_:elektronischen in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06441521 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15407887 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41806644 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.03939473 = product of:
0.07878946 = sum of:
0.07878946 = weight(_text_:medien in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878946 = score(doc=714,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5813935 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.8 = coord(16/20)
- Abstract
- "Wir ertrinken in Informationen, aber uns dürstet nach Wissen." Trendforscher John Naisbitt drückt hiermit aus, dass es dem Menschen heute nicht mehr möglich ist die Informationsflut, die sich über ihn ergießt, effizient zu verwerten. Er lebt in einer globalisierten Welt mit einem vielfältigen Angebot an Medien, wie Presse, Radio, Fernsehen und dem Internet. Die Problematik der mangelnden Auswertbarkeit von großen Informationsmengen ist dabei vor allem im Internet akut. Die Quantität, Verbreitung, Aktualität und Verfügbarkeit sind die großen Vorteile des World Wide Web (WWW). Die Probleme liegen in der Qualität und Dichte der Informationen. Das Information Retrieval muss effizienter gestaltet werden, um den wirtschaftlichen und kulturellen Nutzen einer vernetzten Welt zu erhalten.Matthias Erbarth beleuchtet zunächst genau diesen Themenkomplex, um im Anschluss ein Format für elektronische Dokumente, insbesondere kommerzielle Publikationen, zu entwickeln. Dieses Anwendungsbeispiel stellt eine semantische Inhaltsbeschreibung mit Metadaten mittels XML vor, wobei durch Nutzung von Verweisen und Auswertung von Zusammenhängen insbesondere eine netzförmige Darstellung berücksichtigt wird.
- Classification
- AP 15860 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Formen der Kommunikation und des Kommunikationsdesigns / Kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen Medien
- RVK
- AP 15860 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Formen der Kommunikation und des Kommunikationsdesigns / Kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen Medien
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.12
0.11764917 = product of:
0.33614048 = sum of:
0.030487342 = product of:
0.09146202 = sum of:
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.012698677 = weight(_text_:der in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012698677 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.009758773 = weight(_text_:des in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009758773 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.0088096205 = weight(_text_:in in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088096205 = score(doc=701,freq=28.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22493094 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
- Footnote
- Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Wirtschaftswissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) von der Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe genehmigte Dissertation.
- Imprint
- Karlsruhe : Fakultaet fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften der Universitaet Fridericiana zu Karlsruhe
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.12
0.115210444 = product of:
0.46084177 = sum of:
0.045731008 = product of:
0.13719302 = sum of:
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.13719302 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13719302 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003531705 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.11
0.106397815 = product of:
0.42559126 = sum of:
0.030487342 = product of:
0.09146202 = sum of:
0.09146202 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09146202 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.12934683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12934683 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24410787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=5820,freq=18.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Kreissig, B.: ¬Der neue Brockhaus : Einsatz von Sprachtechnologie und Wissensnetz (2006)
0.10
0.09753824 = product of:
0.2438456 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650189 = score(doc=6015,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.07022672 = weight(_text_:formen in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07022672 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.40210128 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.025198158 = weight(_text_:der in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025198158 = score(doc=6015,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3917808 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650189 = score(doc=6015,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.020701483 = weight(_text_:des in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020701483 = score(doc=6015,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.0049945856 = weight(_text_:in in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049945856 = score(doc=6015,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.021141429 = product of:
0.042282857 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(8/20)
- Abstract
- Menschliches Wissen und menschliche Sprache sind aufeinander bezogen und voneinander abhängig. Dies gilt auch und gerade bei den Bemühungen, Sprache und Wissen computergestützt so zu verarbeiten, dass für Menschen nutzbare maschinelle Wissensverarbeitung stattfindet. Jenseits von eher akademischen "Laborversuchen" hat wissenschaftliche Forschungsarbeit auf diesem Gebiet die Verfügbarkeit umfangreicher, gepflegter und sauber codierter Wissensbasen sowohl der verwendeten Sprache als auch des abgebildeten Gegenstands zur Voraussetzung. In einem Forschungsprojekt der Firma Brockhaus Duden Neue Medien GmbH gemeinsam mit namhaften wissenschaftlichen Partnern, u.a. dem Fraunhofer-IPSI, dem IICM der TU Graz, dem IAI der Universität Saarbrücken und dem KNOW-Center, Graz, wurde diese Herausforderung erfolgreich angegangen. Für eine neue digitale Brockhaus-Auflage wurden Informationsrepräsentations- und Retrievaltechniken entwickelt, die nicht auf domänenspezifischen Beschränkungen beruhend den gesamten enzyklopädischen Wissenskreis abdecken. Die entwickelten Formalismen erwiesen sich nicht nur zur Abfrage des enzyklopädischen Wissens in natürlicher Sprache als geeignet, sondern konnten auch darauf basierend neuartige Formen der Visualisierung von Wissenszusammenhängen implementiert werden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen zum einen Möglichkeiten erfolgreichen semantischen Retrievals ohne extensiven Einsatzformaler Metacodierungen, zum anderen weisen sie den Weg und die nächsten Schritte bei der Entwicklung noch leistungsfähigerer Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstellen.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.6/7, S.337-342
-
Held, C.; Cress, U.: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht (2008)
0.07
0.07056044 = product of:
0.20160125 = sum of:
0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.030939924 = weight(_text_:und in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030939924 = score(doc=2885,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.03333403 = weight(_text_:der in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03333403 = score(doc=2885,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5182773 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.030939924 = weight(_text_:und in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030939924 = score(doc=2885,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.024151731 = weight(_text_:des in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024151731 = score(doc=2885,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.302893 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=2885,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.024665 = product of:
0.04933 = sum of:
0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt Social-Tagging-Systeme aus theoretisch-kognitionspsychologischer Perspektive und zeigt einige Parallelen und Analogien zwischen Social Tagging und der individuellen kognitiven bedeutungsbezogenen Wissensrepräsentation auf. Zuerst werden wesentliche Aspekte von Social Tagging vorgestellt, die für eine psychologische Betrachtungsweise von Bedeutung sind. Danach werden Modelle und empirische Befunde der Kognitionswissenschaften bezüglich der Speicherung und des Abrufs von Inhalten des Langzeitgedächtnisses beschrieben. Als Drittes werden Parallelen und Unterschiede zwischen Social Tagging und der internen Wissensrepräsentation erläutert und die Möglichkeit von individuellen Lernprozessen durch Social-Tagging-Systeme aufgezeigt.
- Footnote
- Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Derntl, M.; Hampel, T.; Motschnig, R.; Pitner, T.: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access (2008)
0.06
0.06346525 = product of:
0.1813293 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=2864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=2864,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.026937963 = weight(_text_:der in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026937963 = score(doc=2864,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=2864,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.029276319 = weight(_text_:des in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029276319 = score(doc=2864,freq=8.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.008650876 = weight(_text_:in in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008650876 = score(doc=2864,freq=12.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.021141429 = product of:
0.042282857 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=2864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Der vorliegende Artikel beleuchtet und bewertet Social Tagging als aktuelles Phänomen des Web 2.0 im Kontext bekannter Techniken der semantischen Datenorganisation. Tagging wird in einen Raum verwandter Ordnungs- und Strukturierungsansätze eingeordnet, um die fundamentalen Grundlagen des Social Tagging zu identifizieren und zuzuweisen. Dabei wird Tagging anhand des Inclusive Universal Access Paradigmas bewertet, das technische als auch menschlich-soziale Kriterien für die inklusive und barrierefreie Bereitstellung und Nutzung von Diensten definiert. Anhand dieser Bewertung werden fundamentale Prinzipien des "Inclusive Social Tagging" hergeleitet, die der Charakterisierung und Bewertung gängiger Tagging-Funktionalitäten in verbreiteten Web-2.0-Diensten dienen. Aus der Bewertung werden insbesondere Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten von Social Tagging und unterstützenden Diensten erkennbar.
- Footnote
- Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Voß, J.: Vom Social Tagging zum Semantic Tagging (2008)
0.06
0.05924294 = product of:
0.16926555 = sum of:
0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=2884,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.02939785 = weight(_text_:der in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02939785 = score(doc=2884,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=2884,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.01090135 = weight(_text_:in in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01090135 = score(doc=2884,freq=14.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.024665 = product of:
0.04933 = sum of:
0.04933 = weight(_text_:medien in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933 = score(doc=2884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3640099 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Social Tagging als freie Verschlagwortung durch Nutzer im Web wird immer häufiger mit der Idee des Semantic Web in Zusammenhang gebracht. Wie beide Konzepte in der Praxis konkret zusammenkommen sollen, bleibt jedoch meist unklar. Dieser Artikel soll hier Aufklärung leisten, indem die Kombination von Social Tagging und Semantic Web in Form von Semantic Tagging mit dem Simple Knowledge Organisation System dargestellt und auf die konkreten Möglichkeiten, Vorteile und offenen Fragen der Semantischen Indexierung eingegangen wird.
- Footnote
- Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Braun, S.; Schmidt, A.; Walter, A.; Zacharias, V.: Von Tags zu semantischen Beziehungen : kollaborative Ontologiereifung (2008)
0.05
0.04961904 = product of:
0.1417687 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=2896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.016240077 = weight(_text_:und in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016240077 = score(doc=2896,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.02332896 = weight(_text_:der in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02332896 = score(doc=2896,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.016240077 = weight(_text_:und in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016240077 = score(doc=2896,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=2896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.007897133 = weight(_text_:in in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007897133 = score(doc=2896,freq=10.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.021141429 = product of:
0.042282857 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 2896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=2896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 2896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- Die Popularität von Tagging-Ansätzen hat gezeigt, dass dieses Ordnungsprinzip für Nutzer insbesondere auf kollaborativen Plattformen deutlich zugänglicher ist als strukturierte und kontrollierte Vokabulare. Allerdings stoßen Tagging-Ansätze oft an ihre Grenzen, wo sie keine ausreichende semantische Präzision ausbilden können. Umgekehrt können ontologiebasierte Ansätze zwar die semantische Präzision erreichen, werden jedoch (besonders aufgrund der schwerfälligen Pflegeprozesse) von den Nutzern kaum akzeptiert. Wir schlagen eine Verbindung beider Welten vor, die auf einer neuen Sichtweise auf die Entstehung von Ontologien fußt: die Ontologiereifung. Anhand zweier Werkzeuge aus dem Bereich des Social Semantic Bookmarking und der semantischen Bildsuche zeigen wir, wie Anwendungen aussehen können, die eine solche Ontologiereifung (in die jeweiligen Nutzungsprozesse integriert) ermöglichen und fördern.
- Footnote
- Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
-
Mazzocchi, F.; Plini, P.: Refining thesaurus relational structure : implications and opportunities (2008)
0.05
0.046529744 = product of:
0.13294213 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.013259968 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013259968 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.02129633 = weight(_text_:der in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02129633 = score(doc=5448,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.013259968 = weight(_text_:und in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013259968 = score(doc=5448,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20778441 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.014638159 = weight(_text_:des in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014638159 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=5448,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.021141429 = product of:
0.042282857 = sum of:
0.042282857 = weight(_text_:medien in 5448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042282857 = score(doc=5448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1355183 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.31200847 = fieldWeight in 5448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.35 = coord(7/20)
- Abstract
- In this paper the possibility to develop a richer relational structure for thesauri is explored and described. The development of a new environmental thesaurus - EARTh (Environmental Applications Reference Thesaurus) - is serving as a case study for exploring the refinement of thesaurus relational structure by specialising standard relationships into different subtypes. Together with benefits and opportunities, implications and possible challenges that an expanded set of thesaurus relations may cause are evaluated.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.10
- Source
- Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Beßler, S.: Wissensrepräsentation musealer Bestände mittels semantischer Netze : Analyse und Annotation eines Teilbestands des Haus der Geschichte der BRD in Bonn (2010)
0.04
0.04481563 = product of:
0.14938542 = sum of:
0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650189 = score(doc=4024,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.026960768 = product of:
0.053921536 = sum of:
0.053921536 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053921536 = score(doc=4024,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02332896 = weight(_text_:der in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02332896 = score(doc=4024,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.029650189 = weight(_text_:und in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029650189 = score(doc=4024,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46462005 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.032731917 = weight(_text_:des in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032731917 = score(doc=4024,freq=10.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41049933 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 4024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00706341 = score(doc=4024,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4024, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4024)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Semantische Netze unterstützen den Suchvorgang im Information Retrieval. Über ihre vielfältigen Relationen und Inferenzen unterstützen sie den Anwender und helfen Daten im Kontext zu präsentieren und zu erfassen. Die Relationen ermöglichen Suchanfragen die große Treffermengen produzieren zu verfeinern und so Treffermengen zu erreichen die möglichst genau das enthalten was gesucht wurde. Es wird, anhand eines Ausschnitts des Datenbestands des Haus der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in Bonn, aufgezeigt wie bestehende Datenbestände in semantische Netze überführt werden können und wie diese anschließend für das Retrieval eingesetzt werden können. Für die Modellierung des semantischen Netz wird die Open Source Software Protégé in den Versionen 3.4.4. und 4.1_beta eingesetzt, die Möglichkeiten des Retrieval werden anhand der Abfragesprachen DL Query und SPARQL sowie anhand der Software Ontology Browser und OntoGraf erläutert.
- Imprint
- Köln : Fachhochschule / Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
-
Borchers, D.: Missing Link : Wenn der Kasten denkt - Niklas Luhmann und die Folgen (2017)
0.04
0.04255978 = product of:
0.14186592 = sum of:
0.022099946 = weight(_text_:und in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022099946 = score(doc=2358,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.044934615 = product of:
0.08986923 = sum of:
0.08986923 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08986923 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.022448301 = weight(_text_:der in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022448301 = score(doc=2358,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.022099946 = weight(_text_:und in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022099946 = score(doc=2358,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.024396934 = weight(_text_:des in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396934 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30596817 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 2358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=2358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 2358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2358)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Gerade haben die Soziologen den 90. Geburstag des Systemtheoretikers Niklas Luhmann gefeiert. Die Informatiker stecken mitten in einem anspruchsvollen Digitalisierungsprojekt, seinen Gedankenkasten, sein "hölzernes Privat-Internet", zu verdaten.
- Field
- Kommunikationswissenschaften
- Source
- https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Missing-Link-Wenn-der-Kasten-denkt-Niklas-Luhmann-und-die-Folgen-3919843.html
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2008)
0.04
0.041268185 = product of:
0.1375606 = sum of:
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=1837,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.026960768 = product of:
0.053921536 = sum of:
0.053921536 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053921536 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.02129633 = weight(_text_:der in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02129633 = score(doc=1837,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3311152 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.026519936 = weight(_text_:und in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026519936 = score(doc=1837,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.032731917 = weight(_text_:des in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032731917 = score(doc=1837,freq=10.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41049933 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.003531705 = weight(_text_:in in 1837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003531705 = score(doc=1837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 1837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1837)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. Am Beispiel des Gegenstandsbereichs "Theater" der Schlagwortnormdatei wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, welche eine detaillierte und damit funktionale Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Die Relationierung des Gegenstandsbereichs wird als Ontologie im OWL-Format modelliert. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines vorgegebenen Gegenstandsbereichs heraus. Das entwickelte Inventar wird als eine hierarchisch strukturierte Taxonomie gestaltet, was einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität bringt.
- Footnote
- Überarb. Version der Diplomarbeit im Studiengang Bibliothekswesen
- Imprint
- Köln : Fachhochschule, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft
- Series
- Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd. 54
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.04
0.040338434 = product of:
0.13446145 = sum of:
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.02939785 = weight(_text_:der in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02939785 = score(doc=4792,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4570776 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=4792,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.029579712 = weight(_text_:des in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029579712 = score(doc=4792,freq=6.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.008240645 = weight(_text_:in in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008240645 = score(doc=4792,freq=8.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Kienreich, W.; Strohmaier, M.: Wissensmodellierung - Basis für die Anwendung semantischer Technologien (2006)
0.04
0.039269827 = product of:
0.15707931 = sum of:
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=5804,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
0.081931174 = weight(_text_:formen in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081931174 = score(doc=5804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.46911815 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
0.031427626 = weight(_text_:der in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031427626 = score(doc=5804,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.4886365 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
0.018946756 = weight(_text_:und in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018946756 = score(doc=5804,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2968967 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 5804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005827016 = score(doc=5804,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5804, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5804)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Abstract
- Der Transfer und die Nutzung von Wissen stellen ein zentrales Thema hei der Anwendung semantischer Technologien dar. In diesem Zusammenhang befasst sich das Gebiet der Wissensmodellierung mit der Explizierung von Wissen in formale, sowohl von Menschen als auch von Maschinen interpretierbare, Form. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es aufzuzeigen. wie Methoden der Wissensmodellierung die Grundlage für die Gestaltung von Anwendungen auf Basis semantischer Technologien bilden. Der Beitrag liefert eine Definition eines Wissensbegriffs, erklärt eine Reihe von Formen der abstrakten Wissensrepräsentation und führt ein Kategorisierungsschema für aktuelle Ansätze zur Modellierung ein. Anschließend wird ein Überblick über agenten- und prozessorientierte Modellierungsansätze gegeben. die sowohl auf die Abbildung der realen Welt als auch auf die Abbildung von Software eingehen.
-
Andelfinger, U.; Wyssusek, B.; Kremberg, B.; Totzke, R.: Ontologies in knowledge management : panacea or mirage?
0.04
0.037486978 = product of:
0.12495659 = sum of:
0.020300096 = weight(_text_:und in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020300096 = score(doc=4393,freq=54.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3181036 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
54.0 = termFreq=54.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.041381493 = weight(_text_:formen in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041381493 = score(doc=4393,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17464934 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.23694044 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0656753 = idf(docFreq=278, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.019841684 = weight(_text_:der in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019841684 = score(doc=4393,freq=50.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.30849838 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
7.071068 = tf(freq=50.0), with freq of:
50.0 = termFreq=50.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.020300096 = weight(_text_:und in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020300096 = score(doc=4393,freq=54.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.3181036 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
54.0 = termFreq=54.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.0149400085 = weight(_text_:des in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0149400085 = score(doc=4393,freq=12.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.18736646 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.008193209 = weight(_text_:in in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008193209 = score(doc=4393,freq=62.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.20919247 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
62.0 = termFreq=62.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Content
- Vgl. auch Mitgliederbrief Ernst-Schröder-Zentrum, Nr.41: "Die aktuelle Entwicklung insbesondere der Internettechnologien führte in den letzten Jahren zu einem Wieder-Erwachen des Interesses von Forschern und Anwendern an (technischen) Ontologien. Typische Visionen in diesem Zusammenhang sind das ,Semantic Web' und das ,Internet der Dinge' (Web 3.0). Technische Ontologien sind formale, zeichenvermittelte symbolische Repräsentationen von lebensweltlichen Zusammenhängen, die notwendigerweise zu einem großen Teil von ihrem Kontextbezug gelöst werden und über die ursprünglichen lebensweltlichen Zusammenhänge hinaus computerverarbeitbar verfügbar werden. Häufig werden dafür XML-basierte Beschreibungssprachen eingesetzt wie z.B. der OWL-Standard. Trotz des großen Interesses sind jedoch umfangreiche und erfolgreiche Beispiele von in größerem Umfang praktisch eingesetzten (technischen) Ontologien eher die Ausnahme. Die zentrale Fragestellung unseres Beitrags ist daher, ob es eventuell grundlegendere (möglicherweise auch außertechnische) Hürden gibt auf dem Weg zu einer Verwirklichung der oft visionären Vorstellungen, wie z.B. zukünftig E-Commerce und E-Business und ,Wissensmanagement' durch technische Ontologien unterstützt werden könnten: Oder ist alles vielleicht ,nur' eine Frage der Zeit, bis wir durch ausreichend leistungsfähige Technologien für solche technischen Ontologien die Versprechungen des ,Internet der Dinge' verwirklichen können?
Als theoretischen Ausgangspunkt wählen wir in unserem Beitrag eine medienphilosophische Perspektive, die von der Fragestellung ausgeht, inwieweit menschliches Wissen, das von Subjekten explizit oder implizit gewusst wird und Sinn und Bedeutungsbezüge hat, bereits dadurch prinzipiell verändert und möglicherweise um Wesentliches reduziert wird, wenn es in technischen Ontologien - notwendigerweise symbolhaft - repräsentiert wird. Zunächst wird dazu in unserem Beitrag historisch die jahrhundertelange Tradition insbesondere der abendländischen Kulturen seit dem Mittelalter nachgezeichnet, derzufolge zunehmend die epistemische Seite von ,Wissen' in den Vordergrund gestellt wurde, die sich besonders gut symbolisch, d.h. zeichenvermittelt darstellen lässt. Demgegenüber sind wissenschaftshistorisch andere Aspekte menschlichen Wissens wie z.B. die soziale Einbettung symbolvermittelten Wissens und Anteile ,impliziten Wissens' zunehmend in den Hintergrund getreten. Auch Fragen nach Sinn und Bedeutung bzw. reflektionsorientiertem Orientierungswissen sind teilweise davon betroffen.
Zweifelsohne hat die wissenschaftshistorisch begründete Bevorzugung epistemischen Wissens in Verbindung mit der symbolischen Repräsentation (z.B. in Büchern und zunehmend auch in digitaler, computerverarbeitbarer Form) wesentlich zur Herausbildung unseres aktuellen materiellen Wohlstands und technologischen Fortschritts in den Industrieländern beigetragen. Vielleicht hat jedoch gerade dieser Siegeszug der epistemischen, symbolhaft repräsentierten Seite menschlichen Wissens auch dazu beigetragen, dass die eher verdeckten Beiträge der begleitenden sozialen Prozesse und impliziten Anteile menschlichen Wissens erst in den allerletzten Jahren wieder zunehmend Aufmerksamkeit erhalten. Nur vor dieser wissenschaftshistorischen Kulisse kann schließlich auch erklärt werden, dass in vielen Organisationen das Schlagwort vom ,Wissens-management' oft verkürzend so verstanden wurde, von (technischen) Wissensrepräsentationssystemen zu erhoffen, dass sie als Technologie bereits unmittelbar zum gegenseitigen Wissensaustausch und Wissenstransfer für die Menschen beitragen würden, was in der Praxis dann jedoch oft nicht so wie erhofft eingetreten ist.
Zusätzlich zu diesen Überlegungen treten sprachphilosophische Grundsatzüberlegungen: Jeder semantische Definitionsversuch einer technischen Ontologie muss durch Verwendung von Metasprachen erfolgen - letztlich kommt man hier wahrscheinlich nicht ohne die Verwendung natürlicher Sprache aus. Sehr schnell wird man also in einen unendlichen Regress verwiesen, wenn man versucht, technische Ontologien 'vollständig' durch weitere technische Ontologien zu beschreiben. Im Fortgang der Argumentation wird dann aufgezeigt, dass eine wesentliche Herausforderung bei technischen Ontologien also darin liegt, angesichts der Vielschichtigkeit menschlichen Wissens die Möglichkeiten (aber auch notwendigen Begrenzungen) symbolvermittelter Wissensrepräsentationen zu verbinden mit Formen der situativen und intersubjektiven Interpretation dieser symbolhaften Repräsentationen in sozialen Prozessen und in natürlicher Sprache. Nur so kann man auch dem Problem des skizzierten 'infiniten Regresses' begegnen, wonach die Bedeutung einer (technischen) Ontologie nie vollständig wieder selbst durch (technische) Ontologien beschrieben werden kann.
In der Finanzwirtschaft mit ihren automatisierten Handelssystemen (auf Basis technischer Ontologien) wird beispielsweise inzwischen bei außergewöhnlichen Kursbewegungen der Börse der automatische Handel unterbrochen, so dass dann auf pragmatisch-natürlichsprachliche Weise nach den Gründen für die Ausschläge gesucht werden kann. Aus Sicht der technischen Ontologien wäre eine solche Unterbrechung des Computerhandels (zur Beruhigung der Märkte) nicht zwingend erforderlich, aber sie ist sehr sinnvoll aus einer außerhalb der technischen Ontologie stehenden Perspektive, die alleine nach Sinn und Bedeutung stabiler Kursverläufe zu fragen imstande ist. Der hier sich abzeichnende ,pragmatic turn' beim Einsatz technischer Ontologien ist auch in vielfältiger Weise in Trends wie z.B. Folksonomies, Sozialen Netzwerken und Open-SourceEntwicklergruppen zu erkennen. Diese Gemeinschaften zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass sie zwar (technische) Ontologien einsetzen, diese jedoch in intensive soziale Austauschprozesse einbinden, in denen die formalen Wissensrepräsentationen mit situativer Bedeutung und Sinn versehen und angereichert werden. Dieser Trend zu ,weicheren' Formen der Nutzung von (technischen) Ontologien scheint nach aktuellem Wissensstand auf jeden Fall in der Praxis erfolgversprechender als die anfänglichen Hoffnungen des Semantic Web oder vollständiger (technischer) Ontologien - ganz abgesehen vom laufenden Pflegeaufwand 'vollständiger' technischer Ontologien.
In diesem Sinne könnte auch Wissensaustausch und Wissensmanagement in Organisationen auf Basis (technischer) Ontologien eine neue Bedeutung erhalten im Sinne einer gezielten Ermöglichung sozialer Austauschprozesse unter Nutzung formaler Wissensrepräsentationen statt der technologiezentrierten Sichtweise, wonach bereits das Wissensrepräsentationssystem mit Wissensaustausch gleichzusetzen wäre. Letztlich haben die in (formalen) Wissensrepräsentationssystemen dargestellten technischen Ontologien alleine nämlich keine tiefere Bedeutung und auch keinen Sinn. Beides entsteht erst durch eine entsprechende Einbettung und Interpretation dieser Repräsentationen in konkreten lebensweltlichen Zusammenhängen. Und was die Menschen in diesem Interpretations-und Rekontextualisierungsprozess dann aus den zeichenvermittelten technischen Ontologien machen, ist glücklicherweise eine Frage, die sich einer vollständigen Behandlung und Abbildung in technischen Ontologien entzieht."
-
Brumm, A.: Modellierung eines Informationssystems zum Bühnentanz als semantisches Wiki (2010)
0.04
0.03681821 = product of:
0.122727364 = sum of:
0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02187783 = score(doc=4025,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.031454228 = product of:
0.062908456 = sum of:
0.062908456 = weight(_text_:kommunikationswissenschaften in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062908456 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15303716 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.019245412 = weight(_text_:der in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019245412 = score(doc=4025,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.02187783 = weight(_text_:und in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02187783 = score(doc=4025,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.024151731 = weight(_text_:des in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024151731 = score(doc=4025,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.302893 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.0041203224 = weight(_text_:in in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041203224 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Es wurde ein Informationssystem zum Bühnentanz modelliert, das der Informierung über konkrete Individuen des Gegenstandsbereichs (insbesondere choreographische Werke und Personen) dienen soll. Dabei wurde auch insbesondere das Ziel verfolgt, Beziehungen zwischen Werken, Personen, Organisationen etc. aufzuzeigen und abfragbar zu machen. Konzipiert wurde das Informationssystem als semantisches Wiki. Neben der Entwicklung eines Inventars an Kategorien und Attributen wurde anhand konkreter Beispiele gezeigt, wie Informationen in einem semantischen Wiki sowohl maschinenverständlich erfasst, als auch dem Benutzer anschaulich präsentiert werden können. Denkbar wäre ein Einsatzbereich des im Grunde eigenständigen Informationssystems auch im Bereich der Erschließung von Tanzsammlungen.
- Imprint
- Köln : Fachhochschule / Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften
-
Sandkühler, H.J.: Epistemologischer Realismus und die Wirklichkeit des Wissens : eine Verteidigung der Philosophie des Geistes gegen Naturalismus und Reduktionismus (1992)
0.03
0.034848355 = product of:
0.13939342 = sum of:
0.03827823 = weight(_text_:und in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03827823 = score(doc=1663,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5998219 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
0.022448301 = weight(_text_:der in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022448301 = score(doc=1663,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
0.03827823 = weight(_text_:und in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03827823 = score(doc=1663,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.5998219 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
0.034502473 = weight(_text_:des in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034502473 = score(doc=1663,freq=4.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.43270433 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
0.005886175 = weight(_text_:in in 1663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005886175 = score(doc=1663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1663)
0.25 = coord(5/20)
- Series
- Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18
- Source
- Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005)
0.03
0.03371124 = product of:
0.11237079 = sum of:
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=1852,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.022222685 = weight(_text_:der in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022222685 = score(doc=1852,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=1852,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005827016 = score(doc=1852,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:58
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.5/6, S.281-290
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005)
0.03
0.03371124 = product of:
0.11237079 = sum of:
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=4324,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.022222685 = weight(_text_:der in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022222685 = score(doc=4324,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.026794761 = weight(_text_:und in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026794761 = score(doc=4324,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.017077852 = weight(_text_:des in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017077852 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.005827016 = weight(_text_:in in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005827016 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.013653717 = product of:
0.027307434 = sum of:
0.027307434 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027307434 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10082839 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02879306 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
- Date
- 11. 2.2011 18:22:25
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
