Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Schwendtke, A.: Wissenschaftssystematik und Scientometrologie (1979) 0.02
    0.01696586 = product of:
      0.11310574 = sum of:
        0.03750485 = weight(_text_:und in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03750485 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.58770305 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.038096033 = weight(_text_:der in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038096033 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.59231687 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.03750485 = weight(_text_:und in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03750485 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06381599 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.58770305 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.15 = coord(3/20)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  2. Solla Price, D. de: Little science, big science : Von der Studierstube zur Großforschung (1974) 0.00
    0.003747619 = product of:
      0.03747619 = sum of:
        0.017958641 = weight(_text_:der in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017958641 = score(doc=272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
        0.019517547 = weight(_text_:des in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019517547 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.079736836 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Abstract
    Big Science ist so neu, daß sich viele von uns ihrer Anfänge erinnern. Big Science ist so groß, daß sich viele von uns vor den Ausmaßen des Monsters, das wir geschaffen haben, zu fürchten beginnen. Big Science ist so anders als alles Frühere, daß eine Betrachtung der 'Little Science', die einst unsere Lebensart war, nur ein wehmütiger Rückblick ist
  3. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.00
    0.003077261 = product of:
      0.03077261 = sum of:
        0.022448301 = weight(_text_:der in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022448301 = score(doc=2015,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06431698 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
        0.008324308 = weight(_text_:in in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008324308 = score(doc=2015,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
      0.1 = coord(2/20)
    
    Footnote
    U.a. Wiedergabe der Beiträge von E. Garfield in der Rubrik 'Current comments' in den 'Current contents'
  4. Murphy, L.J.: Lotka's law in the humanities? (1973) 0.00
    4.70894E-4 = product of:
      0.00941788 = sum of:
        0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 5508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00941788 = score(doc=5508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5508)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  5. Mulkay, M.J.; Gilbert, G.N.; Woolgar, S.: Problem areas and research networks in science (1975) 0.00
    4.70894E-4 = product of:
      0.00941788 = sum of:
        0.00941788 = weight(_text_:in in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00941788 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
  6. Rao, I.K.: ¬The distribution of scientific productivity and social change (1978) 0.00
    4.0780622E-4 = product of:
      0.0081561245 = sum of:
        0.0081561245 = weight(_text_:in in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0081561245 = score(doc=8,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Results in the literature concerning the probability that an author publishes r articles in time t are reexamined, and it is found that a negative binomial distribution bits scientific productivity data (by the chi-squared goodness-of-fit-test) better than many other distribution such as geometric, logarithmic, zeta, cumulative advantage, etc. It is shown analytically that the nagative binomial distribution describes a pattern of scientific productivity under the 'success-breeds-success' condition in a wide variety of social circumstances
  7. Bookstein, A.: ¬The bibliometric distributions (1976) 0.00
    3.3297235E-4 = product of:
      0.006659447 = sum of:
        0.006659447 = weight(_text_:in in 5061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006659447 = score(doc=5061,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02879306 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5061, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5061)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most surprising findings in the information sciences is the recurrence of a small number of frequency distributions. In this paper, these distributions are described, and a point of view is adopted that allows us to understand them a being different versions of a single distribution. The empirical distributions are shown to be special cases of a single theoretic distribution. It is found that when random fluctuations are introduced, the distributions are not strongly influenced

Languages

Types