-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Zone analysis and mixed notation (1992)
0.00
0.0012611515 = product of:
0.018917272 = sum of:
0.018917272 = weight(_text_:des in 6708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018917272 = score(doc=6708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.027907511 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 6708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6708)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck des Beitrages; Original in: IASLIC bulletin 1(1956) no.2, S.44-47.
-
Cheti, A.; Crocetti, A.; Danesi, D.: Espansione o elencazione? : Ovvero l'equivoco ingombro (1995)
0.00
0.0011035076 = product of:
0.016552612 = sum of:
0.016552612 = weight(_text_:des in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016552612 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.077284485 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.027907511 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Expansion or enumeration? Or the doubtful error
-
Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996)
0.00
0.0010082887 = product of:
0.01512433 = sum of:
0.01512433 = product of:
0.03024866 = sum of:
0.03024866 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03024866 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027907511 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.00
7.562165E-4 = product of:
0.011343247 = sum of:
0.011343247 = product of:
0.022686495 = sum of:
0.022686495 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022686495 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09772735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.027907511 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Date
- 10. 8.2001 13:22:14