Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Pimenov, E.N.: O faktorah, vliyayushchikh na indeksirivanie : indeksirovanie i predmetnaya oblast' (2000) 0.05
    0.045470804 = product of:
      0.17051551 = sum of:
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
        0.028301695 = weight(_text_:des in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028301695 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.36716178 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=898)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Factors affecting indexing: indexing and subject areas
    Source
    Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya; Series 1. 2000, no.2, S.15-23
  2. Gregor, D.; Mandel, C.: Cataloging must change! (1991) 0.03
    0.02844276 = product of:
      0.1422138 = sum of:
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
        0.047404602 = weight(_text_:23 in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047404602 = score(doc=1999,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.47518367 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Erwiderung von T. Mann in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 23(1997) nos.3/4, S.3-45
  3. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.02
    0.024480741 = product of:
      0.091802776 = sum of:
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
        0.008844716 = product of:
          0.026534146 = sum of:
            0.026534146 = weight(_text_:internet in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026534146 = score(doc=6941,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08217419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.26666668 = coord(4/15)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1996) no.1, S.73-98
  4. Wilson, P.: ¬The end of specifity (1979) 0.02
    0.018961845 = product of:
      0.09480922 = sum of:
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=2274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 23(1979), S.116-122
  5. Haanen, E.: Specificiteit en consistentie : een kwantitatief oderzoek naar trefwoordtoekenning door UBA en UBN (1991) 0.02
    0.018961845 = product of:
      0.09480922 = sum of:
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
        0.03160307 = weight(_text_:23 in 4778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03160307 = score(doc=4778,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.31678912 = fieldWeight in 4778, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4778)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Source
    Open. 23(1991) no.2, S.45-49
  6. Tseng, Y.-H.: Keyword extraction techniques and relevance feedback (1997) 0.02
    0.016591612 = product of:
      0.08295806 = sum of:
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
        0.027652686 = weight(_text_:23 in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027652686 = score(doc=1830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Date
    13. 5.1996 21:43:23
  7. Mann, T.: 'Cataloging must change!' and indexer consistency studies : misreading the evidence at our peril (1997) 0.01
    0.01422138 = product of:
      0.0711069 = sum of:
        0.023702301 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023702301 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.023702301 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023702301 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.023702301 = weight(_text_:23 in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023702301 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09976059 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.2 = coord(3/15)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 23(1997) nos.3/4, S.3-45
  8. Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998) 0.01
    0.006118886 = product of:
      0.045891643 = sum of:
        0.027023846 = weight(_text_:und in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027023846 = score(doc=2526,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
        0.018867798 = weight(_text_:des in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018867798 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Für eine fiktive Dokumentmenge wird eine Dokument-Wort-Matrix erstellt und mittels zweier Suchanfragen, ebenfalls als Matrix dargestellt, die Retrievalergebnisse ermittelt. Den Wörtern der Dokumentmenge werden in einem zweiten Schritt Aspekte zugeordnet und die Untersuchung erneut durchgeführt. Ein Vergleich bestätigt die schon früher gefundenen Vorteile des aspektischen Indexierung gegenüber anderen Methoden der Retrievalverbesserung, wie Trunkierung und Controlled Terms
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.8, S.459-462
  9. Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008) 0.00
    0.004039245 = product of:
      0.030294336 = sum of:
        0.018501963 = weight(_text_:und in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018501963 = score(doc=2209,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.29991096 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
        0.011792374 = weight(_text_:des in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011792374 = score(doc=2209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.15298408 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  10. Bellamy, L.M.; Bickham, L.: Thesaurus development for subject cataloging (1989) 0.00
    0.003095323 = product of:
      0.023214921 = sum of:
        0.009064074 = weight(_text_:und in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009064074 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
        0.014150848 = weight(_text_:des in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014150848 = score(doc=2262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  11. Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.00
    0.003095323 = product of:
      0.023214921 = sum of:
        0.009064074 = weight(_text_:und in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009064074 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
        0.014150848 = weight(_text_:des in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014150848 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  12. Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003) 0.00
    0.003095323 = product of:
      0.023214921 = sum of:
        0.009064074 = weight(_text_:und in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009064074 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
        0.014150848 = weight(_text_:des in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014150848 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07708236 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Gretz, M.; Thomas, M.: Indexierungen in biomedizinischen Literaturdatenbanken : eine vergleichende Analyse (1991) 0.00
    0.0015763912 = product of:
      0.023645867 = sum of:
        0.023645867 = weight(_text_:und in 5104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023645867 = score(doc=5104,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5104, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5104)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Abstract
    Auf der Grundlage von vier Originaldokumenten, d.h. dokumentarischen Bezugseinheiten (DBEs), wird die Indexierung in vier biomedizinischen Online-Datenbanken (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS PREVIEWS, SCISEARCH) analysiert. Anhand von Beispielen werden inahltliche Erschließung, Indexierungstiefe, Indexierungsbreite, Indexierungskonsistenz, Präzision (durch syntaktisches Indexieren, Gewichtung, Proximity Operatoren) und Wiederauffindbarkeit (Recall) der in den Datenbanken gespeicherten Dokumentationseinheien (DBEs) untersucht. Die zeitaufwendigere intellektuelle Indexierung bei MEDLINE und EMBASE erweist sich als wesentlich präziser als die schneller verfügbare maschinelle Zuteilung von Deskriptoren in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH. In Teil 1 der Untersuchung werden die Indexierungen in MEDLINE und EMBASE, in Teil 2 die Deskriptorenzuteilungen in BIOSIS PREVIEWS und SCISEARCH verglichen
  14. Tinker, F.F.: Imprecision in meaning measured by inconsistency of indexing (1966-68) 0.00
    0.0010071194 = product of:
      0.01510679 = sum of:
        0.01510679 = weight(_text_:und in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01510679 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Content
    Ergebnisse: (1) Wenn SW frei gewählt, Recherche um so schwieriger, je mehr SW; (2) 'ältere' SW häufiger und weniger genau verwendet als 'jüngere'; (3) viele Wörter mit ungenauer Bedeutung
  15. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.00
    0.0010056518 = product of:
      0.015084775 = sum of:
        0.015084775 = product of:
          0.045254324 = sum of:
            0.045254324 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045254324 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  16. Chan, L.M.: Inter-indexer consistency in subject cataloging (1989) 0.00
    8.056955E-4 = product of:
      0.012085431 = sum of:
        0.012085431 = weight(_text_:und in 2276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012085431 = score(doc=2276,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06169152 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027834523 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2276, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2276)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Content
    Die Studie enthält Konsistenzzahlen bezogen auf die LCSH. Diese Zahlen sind kategorienbezogen und können teilweise auf die RSWK übertragen werden
  17. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.00
    6.704345E-4 = product of:
      0.010056517 = sum of:
        0.010056517 = product of:
          0.03016955 = sum of:
            0.03016955 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03016955 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  18. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.00
    5.866302E-4 = product of:
      0.008799452 = sum of:
        0.008799452 = product of:
          0.026398355 = sum of:
            0.026398355 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026398355 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  19. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00
    5.866302E-4 = product of:
      0.008799452 = sum of:
        0.008799452 = product of:
          0.026398355 = sum of:
            0.026398355 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026398355 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  20. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00
    5.028259E-4 = product of:
      0.0075423876 = sum of:
        0.0075423876 = product of:
          0.022627162 = sum of:
            0.022627162 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022627162 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09747176 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.027834523 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22