Search (2224 results, page 1 of 112)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Boman, D.D.: Thesaurus construction for law literature (1991) 0.12 
    0.11605789 = product of:
  0.23211578 = sum of:
    0.23211578 = sum of:
      0.18504633 = weight(_text_:1000 in 897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18504633 = score(doc=897,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.5369932 = fieldWeight in 897, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=897)
      0.04706944 = weight(_text_:22 in 897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04706944 = score(doc=897,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17379647 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 897, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=897)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports on a research project aimed at constructing a thesaurus to be used for indexing materials in the area of law. it was observed that despite the importance of specialized controlled vocabularies, none has been made for law. In the project, terms used by practitioners and those in literature were compared to produce a balanced thesaurus. 1000 terms were selected from the literature of law and sent to 60 law experts for their comments and suggestions. Analysis was then carried out using the student t-test statistic. It was observed that there was no significant difference between the terms used by the lawyers and those in law literature
    Source
    Library focus. 9(1991) nos.1/2, S.12-22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09899852 = sum of:
  0.0788259 = product of:
    0.23647769 = sum of:
      0.23647769 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23647769 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4207653 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020172616 = product of:
    0.040345233 = sum of:
      0.040345233 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040345233 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17379647 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Universal Decimal Classification : Supplement no.3. cumulating supplements nos.1 and 2 (1997) 0.09 
    0.092523165 = product of:
  0.18504633 = sum of:
    0.18504633 = product of:
      0.37009266 = sum of:
        0.37009266 = weight(_text_:1000 in 6042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37009266 = score(doc=6042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            1.0739864 = fieldWeight in 6042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    BS 1000: Supplement.3:1997
  4. Wellisch, H.H.: Incunabula indexes (1994) 0.08 
    0.07930557 = product of:
  0.15861113 = sum of:
    0.15861113 = product of:
      0.31722227 = sum of:
        0.31722227 = weight(_text_:1000 in 7637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31722227 = score(doc=7637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.92055976 = fieldWeight in 7637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Examination of nearly a 1000 books printed before 1500 has revealed indexes, some printed, some manuscript. 83 of them permitted conclusions about late medieval indexing policy and practice
  5. Universal Decimal Classification : Pocket edition (1999) 0.08 
    0.07930557 = product of:
  0.15861113 = sum of:
    0.15861113 = product of:
      0.31722227 = sum of:
        0.31722227 = weight(_text_:1000 in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31722227 = score(doc=38,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.92055976 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    DISC PD 1000:1999
  6. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.06568825 = product of:
  0.1313765 = sum of:
    0.1313765 = product of:
      0.3941295 = sum of:
        0.3941295 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3941295 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4207653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  7. Mühlbacher, S.: Information literacy in enterprises (2009) 0.06 
    0.05607751 = product of:
  0.11215502 = sum of:
    0.11215502 = product of:
      0.22431004 = sum of:
        0.22431004 = weight(_text_:1000 in 2402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22431004 = score(doc=2402,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6509341 = fieldWeight in 2402, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    DP 1000
    RVK
    DP 1000
  8. Costandi, M.: Neuroplasticity (2016) 0.06 
    0.05607751 = product of:
  0.11215502 = sum of:
    0.11215502 = product of:
      0.22431004 = sum of:
        0.22431004 = weight(_text_:1000 in 456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22431004 = score(doc=456,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6509341 = fieldWeight in 456, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=456)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    CZ 1000
    RVK
    CZ 1000
  9. Meeting the needs of journalists (1993) 0.05 
    0.05287038 = product of:
  0.10574076 = sum of:
    0.10574076 = product of:
      0.21148153 = sum of:
        0.21148153 = weight(_text_:1000 in 6288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21148153 = score(doc=6288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6137065 = fieldWeight in 6288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6288)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The news International reference library at Wapping serves the 1000 journalists who work on the 5 Murdoch titles, the Times, the Sunday Times, Today, the Sun and the News of the World. Describes the range of work of the online specialists. 45% of all enquiries received are for cuttings. 4% of enquiries are fulfilled by online searches, either of News International's own internal database or third party hosts. The library is working on its own internal image database
  10. Anagnostelis, B.: Inside information needs better presentation (1996) 0.05 
    0.05287038 = product of:
  0.10574076 = sum of:
    0.10574076 = product of:
      0.21148153 = sum of:
        0.21148153 = weight(_text_:1000 in 777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21148153 = score(doc=777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6137065 = fieldWeight in 777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reviews the British Library's Inside Science Plus CD-ROM (ISCD) which gives details of 13.000 scientific journals held by the British Library Document Supply Centre. ISCD provides standard bibliographic information, table of contents information for the 6 most recent months, and abstracts for the most popular 1000 journals. The Plau features allow ordering and delivery of articles from BLDSC
  11. Wilson, C.: ¬A classification scheme for textbooks and curriculum materials (1983) 0.05 
    0.05287038 = product of:
  0.10574076 = sum of:
    0.10574076 = product of:
      0.21148153 = sum of:
        0.21148153 = weight(_text_:1000 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21148153 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6137065 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Many curriculum centers use locally developed classification schemes, as no standardized one has ever been accepted. A simple and logical scheme for classifying elementary and secondary textbooks, curriculum materials and teacher resources is described. The system develops the LT 1000-9000 portion of the Library of Congress "L" schedule for education. The classification system allows for specific arrangement within the broad curricular areas of language arts, mathematics, social studies, etc, and permits formatting of unique call numbers using double Cutter numbers and workmarks so that the material may be circulated manually or through an automated system.
  12. Braun, E.: ¬The Internet directory : [the guide with the most complete listings for: 1500+ Internet and Bitnet mailing lists, 2700+ Usenet newsgroups, 1000+ On-line library catalogs (OPACs) ...] (1994) 0.05 
    0.05287038 = product of:
  0.10574076 = sum of:
    0.10574076 = product of:
      0.21148153 = sum of:
        0.21148153 = weight(_text_:1000 in 1549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21148153 = score(doc=1549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.6137065 = fieldWeight in 1549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.0525506 = product of:
  0.1051012 = sum of:
    0.1051012 = product of:
      0.3153036 = sum of:
        0.3153036 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3153036 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4207653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  14. Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation : DDC 22 (2005) 0.05 
    0.049854502 = product of:
  0.099709004 = sum of:
    0.099709004 = sum of:
      0.066087976 = weight(_text_:1000 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.066087976 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.1917833 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.033621028 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033621028 = score(doc=302,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.17379647 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04963019 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Zum ersten Mal liegt die Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) auf Deutsch vor. Die Deutsche Bibliothek und die Fachhochschule Köln haben im Rahmen eines von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft finanzierten Projekts die 2003 erschienene Standard Edition der DDC 22 übersetzt und damit die Grundlage für die Nutzung der DDC im deutschsprachigen Raum geschaffen. In vier Bänden verzeichnet die DDC in etwa 60.000 Hauptklassen das gesamte Weltwissen in einer hierarchisch gegliederten Form, ergänzt durch umfangreiche Hilfstafeln für alle geografischen, ethnografischen und sprachlichen Einheiten und ein alphabetisches Register mit etwa 80.000 Einträgen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Informationsmittel für Bibliotheken (Online-Ausgabe) 06-2-176 (H. Wiesenmüller): "Die erste Version der Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) erschien 1876 - bis zur ersten deutschen Ausgabe hat es mithin fast 130 Jahre gedauert, obwohl die DDC schon in mehr als 30 Sprachen vorliegt. Dies zeigt deutlich, wie gering das Interesse an dieser Klassifikation im deutschsprachigen Raum noch bis vor kurzem gewesen ist. Kein Wunder, wurde doch der DDC - häufig sehr pauschal - eine rein amerikanische Weltsicht und ein antiquiertes Wissenschaftsbild unterstellt. Nichtsdestoweniger war der Einsatz einer deutschen DDC bereits 1998 von der Expertengruppe Klassifikation empfohlen worden. Eine Machbarkeitsstudie aus dem Jahr 2000 unterstützte diese Beurteilung und machte konkrete Vorgaben für die praktische Umsetzung. Zu den Vorteilen der DDC gehört ihre weltweite Verbreitung (wobei einschränkend zu sagen ist, daß die meisten 'academic libraries' in den USA nicht die DDC, sondern die Library of Congress Classification anwenden) sowie ihre kontinuierliche Pflege und dadurch verhältnismäßig hohe Aktualität, die sich freilich i.d.R. erst auf den tieferen Ebenen zeigt. In jüngerer Zeit hat sie außerdem große Bedeutung bei der sachlichen Erschließung von Online-Ressourcen gewonnen und wird von vielen Dokumentenservern und Fachportalen zumindest für ein grobes Klassifizieren eingesetzt. Die seit Oktober 2005 vorliegende deutsche Übersetzung der 22. Standard Edition von 2003 ist das Ergebnis eines an der Fachhochschule Köln und der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) angesiedelten und von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) finanzierten Projekts (Laufzeit: 2002-2005). Das Projekt wurde von einer vom Standardisierungsausschuß eingesetzten Expertengruppe begleitet; über das Konsortium DDC Deutsch waren außerdem mehrere deutsche Bibliotheksverbünde sowie der Österreichische Bibliothekenverbund und die Schweizerische Landesbibliothek eingebunden.
    Die hier anzuzeigende Druckausgabe wurde mit Hilfe eines speziell dafür entwickelten, datenbankgestützten Editionssystems erstellt. Parallel wurde ein Online-Dienst ('Melvil') aufgebaut, der im Vergleich zur Printversion mancherlei Vorteile besitzt. So wird Melvil halbjährlich aktualisiert und erweitert: Dabei werden nicht nur die amerikanischen Ergänzungslieferungen eingespielt, sondern auch synthetische, d.h. 'zusammengebaute' Notationen aus der praktischen Anwendung der DNB. Auch die Suchfunktionalitäten gehen deutlich über die Möglichkeiten der Druckausgabe hinaus - nicht zuletzt auf Grund einer sukzessiven Anreicherung mit Suchbegriffen aus der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) im Rahmen eines weiteren DFG-Projekts ('CrissCross'). So könnte man sich durchaus fragen, warum überhaupt eine Druckausgabe produziert wurde. Diese hat jedoch den unschätzbaren Vorteil, mit einer einmaligen Zahlung (wenn auch eines stattlichen Preises!) abgegolten zu sein, während für die Nutzung von Melvil jährliche Lizenzgebühren anfallen. Trotz ihres Umfangs von zusammen über 4000 Seiten sind die vier Bände vom Gewicht her erfreulich leicht ausgefallen. Das sehr dünne Papier hat allerdings den Nachteil, daß der Text der Rückseite deutlich durchschlägt. Als ausgesprochen gelungen empfand die Rezensentin die Umschlaggestaltung, bei der das klassische Dunkelgrün der DDC-Ausgaben mit dem bekannten (um nicht zu sagen: berüchtigten) Orange des Saur-Verlags kombiniert wurde. Der erste Band enthält - neben verschiedenen Vorworten und Begleittexten - eine kurz gefaßte Einführung in die DDC (im Original: Introduction to Dewey Decimal Classification; im Deutschen etwas unglücklich wiedergegeben als Einleitung in die Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation), die Praxishilfe und die Hilfstafeln. In der Praxishilfe (im Original: Manual) werden schwierige Fälle erläutert, z.B. die Abgrenzung inhaltlich eng verwandter Klassen. Obwohl die Praxishilfe für die 22. Auflage komplett überarbeitet wurde, ist der Text noch immer recht schwer zu lesen. In der deutschen Fassung ergeben sich dabei z.T. komplizierte Schachtelsätze, die sich über fünf oder gar sechs Zeilen erstrecken.3 Die Haupttafeln finden sich im zweiten und dritten Band, das Register im abschließenden vierten Band.
    Wer die deutsche DDC das erste Mal in die Hand nimmt, wird vielleicht überrascht sein vom hohen Grad der Übereinstimmung mit dem amerikanischen Vorbild. Dies zeigt sich nicht nur im identischen Aufbau, sondern auch im bis ins kleinste Detail kopierten Layout. Dazu muß man wissen, daß OCLC als Copyright-Inhaber für Übersetzungen der DDC äußerst strenge Vorgaben macht und deren Einhaltung genauestens kontrolliert. Das Projektteam arbeitete daher in einem sehr engen 'Korsett' und besaß nur wenig Spielraum für Anpassungen an deutsche Gepflogenheiten und das Setzen eigener Akzente. Die gewaltige Übersetzungsleistung, die im Laufe des Projekts erbracht wurde, zerfällt in zwei Bereiche: Zum einen mußten die Klassenbenennungen und Registerbegriffe übertragen werden, zum anderen die Erläuterungen und Anweisungen (sozusagen die 'Metatexte'). Beim ersten Teil der Aufgabe wurde das Team von ca. 70 Fachreferenten unterstützt, wobei man sich bemüht hat, jedes Fach doppelt zu besetzen. Durch dieses Verfahren ist eine ausgesprochen gute Qualität gewährleistet. Wieviel Arbeit in diesem Bereich geleistet wurde, läßt sich schon erahnen, wenn man nur die obersten 1000 Klassen der DDC (d.h. die ersten drei Ebenen) betrachtet: Diese wurden 2003 erstmals in deutscher Fassung herausgegeben. In der zweiten Auflage der kleinen Broschüre, die zum Ende des Übersetzungsprojekts erschien, waren in mehr als der Hälfte der Fälle die Klassenbenennungen geändert worden!
  15. Sweller, J.; Ayres, P.; Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive load theory (2011) 0.05 
    0.046731256 = product of:
  0.09346251 = sum of:
    0.09346251 = product of:
      0.18692502 = sum of:
        0.18692502 = weight(_text_:1000 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18692502 = score(doc=3784,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.54244506 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    CX 1000
    RVK
    CX 1000
  16. O'Connor, C.; Weatherall, J.O.: ¬The misinformation age : how false ideas spread (2019) 0.05 
    0.046731256 = product of:
  0.09346251 = sum of:
    0.09346251 = product of:
      0.18692502 = sum of:
        0.18692502 = weight(_text_:1000 in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18692502 = score(doc=5818,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.54244506 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    MF 1000
    RVK
    MF 1000
  17. Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006) 0.05 
    0.046261583 = product of:
  0.092523165 = sum of:
    0.092523165 = product of:
      0.18504633 = sum of:
        0.18504633 = weight(_text_:1000 in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18504633 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.5369932 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Assignability of authors to Web pages using either normal browsing procedures or browsing assisted by simple automatic extraction was investigated. Candidate strings for 1000 pages were extracted automatically from title elements, meta-tags, and address-like and copyright-like passages; 539 of the pages produced at least one candidate: 310 candidates from titles, 66 from meta-tags, 91 from address-like passages, and 259 from copyright-like passages. An assistant attempted to identify personal authors for 943 pages by examining the pages themselves and related pages; this added 90 pages with authors to the pages from which no candidate strings were extracted. Specific problems are noted and some refinements to the extraction methods are suggested.
  18. Blanco, E.; Cankaya, H.C.; Moldovan, D.: Composition of semantic relations : model and applications (2010) 0.05 
    0.046261583 = product of:
  0.092523165 = sum of:
    0.092523165 = product of:
      0.18504633 = sum of:
        0.18504633 = weight(_text_:1000 in 4761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18504633 = score(doc=4761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.5369932 = fieldWeight in 4761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: http://www.hlt.utdallas.edu/~eduardo/papers/csr_model_and_applications.pdf. Vgl. für den Proceedingsband: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C/C10/C10-1000.pdf.
  19. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.045981776 = product of:
  0.09196355 = sum of:
    0.09196355 = product of:
      0.27589065 = sum of:
        0.27589065 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27589065 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4207653 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  20. Ross, N.C.M.; Wolfram, D.: End user searching on the Internet : an analysis of term pair topics submitted to the Excite search engine (2000) 0.04 
    0.039652783 = product of:
  0.07930557 = sum of:
    0.07930557 = product of:
      0.15861113 = sum of:
        0.15861113 = weight(_text_:1000 in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15861113 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34459716 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04963019 = queryNorm
            0.46027988 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Queries submitted to the Excite search engine were analyzed for subject content based on the cooccurrence of terms within multiterm queries. More than 1000 of the most frequently cooccurring term pairs were categorized into one or more of 30 developed subject areas. Subject area frequencies and their cooccurrences with one another were tallied and analyzed using hierarchical cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling. The cluster analyses revealed several anticipated and a few unanticipated groupings of subjects, resulting in several well-defined high-level clusters of broad subject areas. Multidimensional scaling of subject cooccurrences revealed similar relationships among the different subject categories. Applications that arise from a better understanding of the topics users search and their relationships are discussed

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 1944
  • m 162
  • s 97
  • el 72
  • b 31
  • r 10
  • x 8
  • i 4
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications