-
Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.: Zentren für Digital Humanities in Deutschland (2015)
0.02
0.015408725 = product of:
0.09245235 = sum of:
0.020231893 = weight(_text_:und in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020231893 = score(doc=1834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.018018665 = product of:
0.03603733 = sum of:
0.03603733 = weight(_text_:29 in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03603733 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020231893 = weight(_text_:und in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020231893 = score(doc=1834,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.033969894 = product of:
0.06793979 = sum of:
0.06793979 = weight(_text_:deutschland in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06793979 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10609499 = queryWeight, product of:
4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.6403675 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Date
- 6.12.2015 17:38:29
- Footnote
- Beitrag im Rahmen eines Themenhefts zu: "Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften".
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.313-326
-
Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften (2015)
0.01
0.0113813905 = product of:
0.06828834 = sum of:
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=1838,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
0.012109677 = weight(_text_:der in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012109677 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=1838,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
0.01488048 = product of:
0.02976096 = sum of:
0.02976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 1838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02976096 = score(doc=1838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Abstract
- Das vorliegende Themenheft setzt sich mit dem Verhältnis von Informationsinfrastruktur, den Digital Humanities und der Informationswissenschaft auseinander.
- Date
- 6.12.2015 17:22:08
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.285-286
-
Burghardt, M.; Heckner, M.; Wolff, C.: Social Search (2011)
0.01
0.009774223 = product of:
0.058645334 = sum of:
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.014889815 = weight(_text_:des in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014889815 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.016779663 = weight(_text_:der in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016779663 = score(doc=342,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Abstract
- Social Search beschreibt die Einbeziehung des sozialen Kontexts in den Prozess der Informationssuche. Der folgende Beitrag zeigt die Entwicklung sozialer Suche auf und systematisiert den Bereich von Social Search Engines im WWW durch eine grundlegende Unterscheidung verschiedener Social-SearchKonzepte. Durch die Beschreibung typischer Merkmale bestehender Social-Search-Implementierungen werden diese überschau- und vergleichbar gemacht.
- Source
- Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
-
Burghardt, M.; Wolff, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Informationswissenschaft und Digital Humanities (2015)
0.01
0.007519369 = product of:
0.060154952 = sum of:
0.025233604 = weight(_text_:und in 2403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025233604 = score(doc=2403,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 2403, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2403)
0.009687742 = weight(_text_:der in 2403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009687742 = score(doc=2403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 2403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2403)
0.025233604 = weight(_text_:und in 2403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025233604 = score(doc=2403,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.51830536 = fieldWeight in 2403, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2403)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag beschreibt das Verhältnis zwischen Informationswissenschaft und Digital Humanities und zeigt dabei viele Anlnüpfungspunkte und Parallelen zwischen den beiden Disziplinen auf. Weiterhin wird am Beispiel ausgewählter Forschungsthemen und -methoden der Informationswissenschaft aufgezeigt, wo das Fach Angebote an die Geisteswissenschaft machen kann, um innovative Digital Humanities-Projekte zu befördern.
- Footnote
- Beitrag im Rahmen eines Themenhefts zu: "Informationsinfrastruktur und informationswissenschaftliche Methoden in den digitalen Geisteswissenschaften".
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 66(2015) H.5/6, S.287-294
-
Burghardt, M.: Annotationsergonomie : Design-Empfehlungen für linguistische Annotationswerkzeuge (2012)
0.01
0.005233209 = product of:
0.041865673 = sum of:
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=556,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 556, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=556)
0.014889815 = weight(_text_:des in 556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014889815 = score(doc=556,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 556, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=556)
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=556,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 556, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=556)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Dieser Beitrag skizziert die Kluft, die zwischen linguistischen Annotationswerkzeugen und etablierten Methoden des Usability Engineering besteht. Eine Evaluationsstudie dreier exemplarischer Annotationstools zeigt unterschiedliche Kategorien von Usability-Problemen auf, welche die Basis für eine Sammlung von 28 Design-Empfehlungen für benutzerfreundliche Annotationswerkzeuge bilden.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.5, S.300-304
-
Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015)
0.00
6.2002003E-4 = product of:
0.01488048 = sum of:
0.01488048 = product of:
0.02976096 = sum of:
0.02976096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02976096 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 6. 6.2016 18:42:22
