Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dobratz, S."
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Dobratz, S.: Open-Source-Software zur Realisierung von Institutionellen Repositorien : Überblick (2007) 0.02
    0.016721394 = product of:
      0.08026269 = sum of:
        0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016519273 = score(doc=267,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.014889815 = weight(_text_:des in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014889815 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.009687742 = weight(_text_:der in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009687742 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016519273 = score(doc=267,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
        0.022646595 = product of:
          0.04529319 = sum of:
            0.04529319 = weight(_text_:deutschland in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04529319 = score(doc=267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10609499 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.42691165 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.20833333 = coord(5/24)
    
    Abstract
    Institutionelle Repositorien sind ein wesentliches Instrument, um Open Access sowohl auf dem grünen als auch auf dem goldenen Weg in die Praxis umzusetzen. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Überblick über die derzeit in Deutschland eingesetzten Softwaresysteme, mit denen Institutionelle Repositorien technisch umgesetzt werden können und beleuchtet diese Lösungen unter den Anforderungen des DINI-Zertifikats für Dokumenten- und Publikationsservices 2007. Speziell werden erläutert: Opus, DSpace, EPrints, MyCoRe, Fedora.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 54(2007) H.4/5, S.199-206
  2. Kamke, H.-U.; Dippold, S.; Groß, S.; Bahne, T.; Zimmermann, K.; Schulz, M.; Dobratz, S.; Becker, H.; Diepold, P.: ¬Das DFG-Projekt Dissertationen Online stellt sich vor (1999) 0.01
    0.014892766 = product of:
      0.07148528 = sum of:
        0.003660373 = product of:
          0.010981118 = sum of:
            0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010981118 = score(doc=5016,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018660503 = score(doc=5016,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
        0.013028587 = weight(_text_:des in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013028587 = score(doc=5016,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
        0.017475316 = weight(_text_:der in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017475316 = score(doc=5016,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.35615197 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
        0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 5016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018660503 = score(doc=5016,freq=40.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 5016, product of:
              6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
                40.0 = termFreq=40.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5016)
      0.20833333 = coord(5/24)
    
    Abstract
    Das Projekt "Dissertationen Online" finanziert von der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschoft (DFG) und ins Leben gerufen durch Betreiben der IUK Kommission der Fachgesellschaften existiert seit Frühjahr 1998. Dabei arbeiten sieben Gruppen an sechs verschiedenen Standorten in einem interdisziplinären Forschungsverbund zusammen: die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (DgfE), die Deutsche Mathematiker-Vereinigung (DMV), die Deutsche Physikalische Gellschaft (DPG) die Gesellschaft deutscher Chemiker (GDCH), die Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek, die Deutsche Bibliothek (DDB) sowie das Rechenzentrum der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Das Projekt wird von Prof. Peter Diepold von der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin geleitet. Ziel des Projektes ist es, Vorschläge für die UmstelluT der Publikation von Dissertotionen vom Papier in das digitale Netz auszuarbeiten. Zu dem bisherigen Angebot von "Dissertationen Online" gehören Vorschläge zur organisatorischen Umsetzung, Informationen zu rechtlichen Grundlagen und zur Änderung der Promotionsordnung, Empfehlungen zu Textformaten, Unterstützung für die Erhebung der Metadaten, und die Bereitstellung von Schulungsmaterialien. In 4 Fortsetzungsartikeln soll auf die einzelnen Teilprojekte und deren inhaltliche Aspekte eingegangen werden. In diesem Heft wird zunächst eine Einführung in die Problematik und Konzeption des Projektes gegeben und dann das Teilprojekt Beratung und Unterstützung vorgestellt
    Content
    I. Teilbericht 1: A. Überblick über das Projekt von Hans-Ulrich Kamke; Humboldt Universität zu Berlin. - 1. Einleitung - 2. Vorgeschichte - 3. Das Projekt Dissertationen online im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes... - 4. Das DFG-Projekt - 4.1 Aufgaben und Ziele - 4.2 Die Teilprojekte - 4.3 Ergebnisse und Weiterarbeit - B. Teilprojekt Beratung und Unterstützung von Steffi Dippold und Stefan Groß; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. - 1. Informationsvermittlung, nicht Informationsüberlastung - 2. Schulung der Doktoranden - 3. Dissinfo - ein Informationsangebot im Internet - 4. Explosion des Wissens - 5. Weg aus der Einbahnstrasse - 6. Kontakt nach außen. II. Teilbericht 2: C. Teilprojekt Metadaten von Thorsten Bahne; Gerhard Mercator; Universität Duisburg. - 1. Hintergrundinformationen zu Metadaten - 2. Metadaten in Dissonline - 2.1 Datensatzentwicklung - 2.2 Tools - 2.3 Installation - 2.4 Nutzung - 3. Suche mit Metadaten. - D. Teilprojekt Retrieval und rechtliche Aspekte von Kerstin Zimmermann; Carl von Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg: 1. Weltweites Retrieval nach und in Dissertationen - 1.1 Harvest: Funktionsweise - 1.2 Aufbau eines Harvest-Netzwerkes - 1.3 Kooperationen mit anderen Sy stemen - 2. Rechtliche Aspekte bei elektronischen Dissertationen - 2.1 Promotionsverfahren - 2.2 Online Publikation - 2.3 Nationale Datenbanken. - III. Teilbericht 3: E. Teilprojekt Formate von Matthias Schulz und Susanne Dobratz; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: 1. Dokumentformate - 1.3 Was ist ein Dokument? - 1.2 Dokumentformate für die Archivierung und das Retrieval - 1.3 Dokumentformate für die Präsentation und den Druck - 2. Die DiML-Dokumenttypdefinition - 2.1 Beschreibung der DiML-DTD - 2.2 Vergleich / Kooperation mit anderen Dissertations-DTD's - 3. Wissensmanagement mit SGML/XML-Dokumenten - F. Teilprojekt Multimedia von N.N.; Computer Chemie Centrum Universität Erlangen:1. Multimediadaten in der Chemie - 1.1 Voraussetzungen für die Nutzung von Strukturdaten (Aufbereitung der Rohdaten) - 1.2 Suche in Chemischen Strukturen - 2. Multimediadaten in anderen Wissen schaften - 2.1 Datenformate - 2.2 Zur Akzeptanz und Nutzung von Multimediadaten in den Wissenschaften -IV. Teilbericht 4. - G. Teilprojekte Bibliotheken und Die Deutsche Bibliothek von Hans Becker; SUB Göttingen: 1. Bibliothekarische Aspekte bei der Publikation elektronischer Dissertationen - 2. Integration in den Workflow der Universitätsbibliotheken - 3. Zusammenarbeit mit Der Deutschen Bibliothek. - H. Dissertationen Online: Ergebnisse und Ausblick von Peter Diepold; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: 1. Ergebnisse der 2 Projektjahre - 2. Dissertationen Online im internationalen Kontext - 3. Wie geht es weiter mit Dissertationen Online?
  3. Dobratz, S.; Schulz, M.: Dissertationen in SGML/XML : Erprobung eines Publikationskonzeptes (2000) 0.01
    0.005969426 = product of:
      0.04775541 = sum of:
        0.012389454 = weight(_text_:und in 6649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012389454 = score(doc=6649,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 6649, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6649)
        0.022976499 = weight(_text_:der in 6649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022976499 = score(doc=6649,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.46826762 = fieldWeight in 6649, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6649)
        0.012389454 = weight(_text_:und in 6649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012389454 = score(doc=6649,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 6649, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6649)
      0.125 = coord(3/24)
    
    Abstract
    Auf der Grundlage einer eigens entworfenen Dokumenttypdefinition für Dissertationen (DiML) wurden an der Humboldt-Universität Technologien und Konzepte entwickelt, um SGML/XML als Archivformat für elektronische Dissertationen innerhalb der Universitätsbibliothek zu integrieren. Ein Austausch mit Universitäten, die gleichartige Konzepte entwickeln, zeigt, daß die Probleme bei der Durchsetzung vor allem im Aufwand der Strukturierung bzw. Nachbearbeitung durch die Autoren bzw. die Bibliothek zu sehen sind. Daher wird versucht, durch die an die Bedürfnisse der Autoren angepaßte Benutzerschnittstellen die Arbeit für diese zu vereinfachen, um das in den Dissertationen enthaltene Wissen durch die Universitätsbibliotheken für ihre Leser nutzbar zu machen
    Series
    Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.6
    Source
    Globalisierung und Wissensorganisation: Neue Aspekte für Wissen, Wissenschaft und Informationssysteme: Proceedings der 6. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Hamburg, 23.-25.9.1999. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly, G. Rahmstorf u. A. Sigel
  4. Dobratz, S.: Elektronisches Publizieren an Universitäten - aktuelle Trends und zwei Tagungen aus bibliothekarischer Sicht : II. XML-basierte elektronische Publikationen in Universitätsbibliotheken - eine Frage von Dokumenttypdefinitionen? Projekte, Ansätze und Ergebnisse eines NDLTD-Workshops zu Dokumenttypdefinitionen für Hochschulschriften (2000) 0.00
    0.0028099853 = product of:
      0.033719823 = sum of:
        0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016859911 = score(doc=4984,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
        0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016859911 = score(doc=4984,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
  5. Dobratz, S.; Schulz, M.: Elektronisches Publizieren an Universitäten - aktuelle Trends und zwei Tagungen aus bibliothekarischer Sicht : I. Online-Dissertationen: Bericht vom Dritten Internationalen Symposium für elektronische Dissertationen (2000) 0.00
    0.0023843516 = product of:
      0.028612217 = sum of:
        0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 4983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0143061085 = score(doc=4983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4983)
        0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 4983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0143061085 = score(doc=4983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 4983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4983)
      0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    
  6. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.00
    0.001457215 = product of:
      0.01165772 = sum of:
        0.0035765271 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035765271 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.004504666 = product of:
          0.009009332 = sum of:
            0.009009332 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009009332 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0035765271 = weight(_text_:und in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035765271 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.07346288 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.125 = coord(3/24)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.

Languages

Types