Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Jahn, N."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Hobert, A.; Jahn, N.; Mayr, P.; Schmidt, B.; Taubert, N.: Open access uptake in Germany 2010-2018 : adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021) 0.01
    0.011035873 = product of:
      0.05297219 = sum of:
        0.0041832835 = product of:
          0.01254985 = sum of:
            0.01254985 = weight(_text_:p in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01254985 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.009537406 = weight(_text_:und in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009537406 = score(doc=250,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.013700536 = weight(_text_:der in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013700536 = score(doc=250,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.009537406 = weight(_text_:und in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009537406 = score(doc=250,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
        0.01601356 = product of:
          0.03202712 = sum of:
            0.03202712 = weight(_text_:deutschland in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03202712 = score(doc=250,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10609499 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.30187213 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.829954 = idf(docFreq=959, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.20833333 = coord(5/24)
    
    Abstract
    Es handelt sich um eine bibliometrische Untersuchung der Entwicklung der Open-Access-Verfügbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenartikel in Deutschland, die im Zeitraum 2010-18 erschienen und im Web of Science indexiert sind. Ein besonderes Augenmerk der Analyse lag auf der Frage, ob und inwiefern sich die Open-Access-Profile der Universitäten und außeruniversitären Wissenschaftseinrichtungen in Deutschland voneinander unterscheiden.
    Footnote
    Den Aufsatz begleitet ein interaktives Datensupplement, mit dem sich die OA-Anteile auf Ebene der Einrichtung vergleichen lassen. https://subugoe.github.io/oauni/articles/supplement.html. Die Arbeit entstand in Zusammenarbeit der BMBF-Projekte OAUNI und OASE der Förderlinie "Quantitative Wissenschaftsforschung". https://www.wihoforschung.de/de/quantitative-wissenschaftsforschung-1573.php.
  2. Jahn, N.; Matthias, L.; Laakso, M.: Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata : an article-level study of Elsevier (2022) 0.00
    3.1282406E-4 = product of:
      0.0075077773 = sum of:
        0.0075077773 = product of:
          0.015015555 = sum of:
            0.015015555 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015015555 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Date
    16.12.2021 18:29:30
  3. Laakso, M.; Matthias, L.; Jahn, N.: Open is not forever : a study of vanished open access journals (2021) 0.00
    2.0182796E-4 = product of:
      0.004843871 = sum of:
        0.004843871 = weight(_text_:der in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004843871 = score(doc=333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. dazu den Letter to the editor: Shelomi, M.: Comment on "Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals". In. JASIST 72(2021) no.9, S.1113-1114 [https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24543]: "One reason these journals may have vanished is that they were predatory journals: a possibility the original paper did not consider." Dazu die Erwiderung der Autoren: Response to comment on "Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals". In: JASIST 72(2021) no.9, S.1115-1116 [https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24542].