Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.05271349 = product of:
  0.21085396 = sum of:
    0.049101032 = weight(_text_:1960 in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049101032 = score(doc=2866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15622076 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.31430542 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.020231893 = weight(_text_:und in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020231893 = score(doc=2866,freq=36.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
            36.0 = termFreq=36.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.010528689 = weight(_text_:des in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010528689 = score(doc=2866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.17308173 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.010831225 = weight(_text_:der in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010831225 = score(doc=2866,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.22074346 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.099929236 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.099929236 = score(doc=2866,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.12532558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.7973571 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
    0.020231893 = weight(_text_:und in 2866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020231893 = score(doc=2866,freq=36.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 2866, product of:
          6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
            36.0 = termFreq=36.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2866)
  0.25 = coord(6/24)

Abstract

Ob wir spazieren gehen, einkaufen oder uns unterhalten - ständig teilen wir die Lebewesen und Dinge, die uns umgeben, ein in verschiedene Kategorien: Bäume und Blumen, Milchprodukte und Gemüse, sympathische Menschen und unsympathische. So schaffen wir Ordnung und finden uns in der Welt zurecht wie in einer Bibliothek - alles hat seinen Platz. Diese Ordnung kommt ins Wanken, sagt David Weinberger. Unser Denken in festen Kategorien führt uns auf Dauer nicht weiter, wir müssen lernen, mit Chaos, Unordnung und Unschärfe umzugehen. Nur so lässt sich verstehen, warum Projekte wie Wikipedia funktionieren, warum YouTube, Flickr und iTunes so populär und erfolgreich sind. Das ist nicht weniger als eine Revolution: Denn auf einmal verlieren Experten ihre Macht, soziale Netzwerke werden immer einflussreicher, Kunden und Bürger entscheiden selbst, weil sie am besten wissen, was sie wollen. Jeder besorgt sich genau die Informationen, die er braucht, und bringt sie in die Ordnung, die ihm am besten nützt. Ein faszinierendes Panorama der digitalen Welt von einem der profiliertesten Internet-Vordenker.

BK

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

AK 28000 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Wissenschaftspraxis / Allgemeines
AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
AP 18000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Allgemeines
05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

RVK

AK 28000 Allgemeines / Wissenschaftskunde und Wissenschaftsorganisation / Wissenschaftspraxis / Allgemeines
AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
AP 18000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Allgemeines

Signature

99 OKH 1960

0.009215964 = product of:
  0.044236626 = sum of:
    0.0026145522 = product of:
      0.007843656 = sum of:
        0.007843656 = weight(_text_:p in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007843656 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.099312946 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.004214978 = weight(_text_:und in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004214978 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.086576834 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.027931072 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027931072 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12532558 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.22286808 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.004214978 = weight(_text_:und in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004214978 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.086576834 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.005261044 = product of:
      0.010522088 = sum of:
        0.010522088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010522088 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.20833333 = coord(5/24)

BK

06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines

Classification

323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines

DDC

323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.2, S.302 (L.A. Ennis):"This is an important and timely anthology of articles "on the normative issues surrounding information control" (p. 11). Using an interdisciplinary approach, Moore's work takes a broad look at the relatively new field of information ethics. Covering a variety of disciplines including applied ethics, intellectual property, privacy, free speech, and more, the book provides information professionals of all kinds with a valuable and thought-provoking resource. Information Ethics is divided into five parts and twenty chapters or articles. At the end of each of the five parts, the editor has included a few "discussion cases," which allows the users to apply what they just read to potential real life examples. Part I, "An Ethical Framework for Analysis," provides readers with an introduction to reasoning and ethics. This complex and philosophical section of the book contains five articles and four discussion cases. All five of the articles are really thought provoking and challenging writings on morality. For instance, in the first article, "Introduction to Moral Reasoning," Tom Regan examines how not to answer a moral question. For example, he thinks using what the majority believes as a means of determining what is and is not moral is flawed. "The Metaphysics of Morals" by Immanuel Kant looks at the reasons behind actions. According to Kant, to be moral one has to do the right thing for the right reasons. By including materials that force the reader to think more broadly and deeply about what is right and wrong, Moore has provided an important foundation and backdrop for the rest of the book. Part II, "Intellectual Property: Moral and Legal Concerns," contains five articles and three discussion cases for tackling issues like ownership, patents, copyright, and biopiracy. This section takes a probing look at intellectual and intangible property from a variety of viewpoints. For instance, in "Intellectual Property is Still Property," Judge Frank Easterbrook argues that intellectual property is no different than physical property and should not be treated any differently by law. Tom Palmer's article, "Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified," however, uses historical examples to show how intellectual and physical properties differ.