Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.01 
    0.0051795486 = product of:
  0.04143639 = sum of:
    0.008366567 = product of:
      0.0250997 = sum of:
        0.0250997 = weight(_text_:p in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0250997 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.021057379 = weight(_text_:des in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021057379 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
    0.0120124435 = product of:
      0.024024887 = sum of:
        0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024024887 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(3/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: UNIMARC and UNIMARC: watch out for the differences
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.37
  2. SiBiL: Système intégré pour les bibliothèques universitaires de Lausanne : 9 années d'automatisation à la Bibliothèque cantonale et universitaire (1980) 0.00 
    0.003714881 = product of:
  0.029719047 = sum of:
    0.0083452305 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0083452305 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
    0.013028587 = weight(_text_:des in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013028587 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
    0.0083452305 = weight(_text_:und in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0083452305 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
  0.125 = coord(3/24)
    Abstract
    In Grenoble wurde um 1971 das Format MONOCLE als französische Adaption des USMARCII aufgestellt. Dieses wurde vom SiBiL-Verbund übernommen. MONOCLE wurde danach auch die Basis für das weiterentwickelte INTERMARC, das seinerseits ein Vorläufer von UNIMARC wurde. Die Ähnlichkeit mit USMARC ist recht stark, es gibt aber eine Reihe von abweichenden Feldern, vor allem sind die Indikatoren sehr unterschiedlich definiert. Immerhin hat die französische Orientierung auf USMARC dann um 1988 dazu geführt, daß die französischen Universitäten und die Bibliothèque Nationale sich zu einem Anschluß an OCLC entschließen konnten
  3. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0027564224 = product of:
  0.03307707 = sum of:
    0.022566179 = weight(_text_:des in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022566179 = score(doc=888,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.3709667 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Formats of exchanging local data: where are we now?
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.42-45
  4. Lahary, D.: Recommandations pour l'exchange de donnees d'exemplaires en format UNIMARC : un document de reference (1998) 0.00 
    0.0027558187 = product of:
  0.033069823 = sum of:
    0.021057379 = weight(_text_:des in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021057379 = score(doc=4620,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.34616345 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
    0.0120124435 = product of:
      0.024024887 = sum of:
        0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 4620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024024887 = score(doc=4620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4620)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Recommendations for exchange of single copy data in UNIMARC format: a reference document
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.180, S.132-133
  5. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0024113413 = product of:
  0.028936094 = sum of:
    0.018425206 = weight(_text_:des in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018425206 = score(doc=892,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Secondary information on primary documents: MARC or SGML format?
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.68-72
  6. Bourdon, F.: Qu'est-ce qu'un format d'autorité? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0024113413 = product of:
  0.028936094 = sum of:
    0.018425206 = weight(_text_:des in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018425206 = score(doc=902,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: What is an authority format?
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.46-52
  7. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.00 
    0.0024113413 = product of:
  0.028936094 = sum of:
    0.018425206 = weight(_text_:des in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018425206 = score(doc=917,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Nine months later (the future of cataloguing)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.155-157
  8. Witt, M.: Evolution du format UNIMARC (1997) 0.00 
    0.0024113413 = product of:
  0.028936094 = sum of:
    0.018425206 = weight(_text_:des in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018425206 = score(doc=920,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.302893 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Evolution of the UNIMARC format
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.30-36
  9. Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997) 0.00 
    0.001961623 = product of:
  0.023539476 = sum of:
    0.013028587 = weight(_text_:des in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013028587 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
    0.010510888 = product of:
      0.021021776 = sum of:
        0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021021776 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.021966046 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.174, S.38-40
  10. Garden, A.: ¬L'avenir des formats de données (2001) 0.00 
    0.0018805149 = product of:
  0.045132358 = sum of:
    0.045132358 = weight(_text_:des in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045132358 = score(doc=4202,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.7419334 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: The future of data formats
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 46(2001) no.5, S.114-116
  11. Manuel Unimarc : format bibliographique (1999) 0.00 
    0.00161187 = product of:
  0.03868488 = sum of:
    0.03868488 = weight(_text_:des in 4083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03868488 = score(doc=4083,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.63594294 = fieldWeight in 4083, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4083)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Editor
    Federation Internationale des Associations des Bibliothécaires et des Bibliothèques, IFLA universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Programme, Deutsche Bibliothek, Frankfurt am Main
  12. Jolibois, S.: ¬La gestion informatisée de corpus bibliographiques : adaption des normes et formats documentaires (2000) 0.00 
    0.0013432249 = product of:
  0.032237396 = sum of:
    0.032237396 = weight(_text_:des in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032237396 = score(doc=941,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.5299524 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Adaptation of standards and formats to the computerized management of bibliographic records
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 45(2000) no.1, S.98-101
  13. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.00 
    6.580431E-4 = product of:
  0.015793033 = sum of:
    0.015793033 = weight(_text_:des in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015793033 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Cataloguing formats and standards
    Source
    Bulletin des bibliothèques de France. 43(1998) no.3, S.56-65
  14. Recommandation 995 (1995) 0.00 
    6.20409E-4 = product of:
  0.014889815 = sum of:
    0.014889815 = weight(_text_:des in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014889815 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.24477452 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothécaires Français. 1995, no.169, S.120-126
  15. Beaudiquez, M.: ¬L'¬avenir des formats de communication (1996) 0.00 
    4.6530674E-4 = product of:
  0.011167361 = sum of:
    0.011167361 = weight(_text_:des in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011167361 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021966046 = queryNorm
        0.18358089 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
  0.041666668 = coord(1/24)

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 13
  • m 2

Themes