-
Scerri, E.R.: ¬The periodic table : its story and its significance (2007)
0.03
0.03371792 = product of:
0.13487168 = sum of:
0.0044370424 = product of:
0.013311126 = sum of:
0.013311126 = weight(_text_:p in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013311126 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.16853966 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.059254363 = weight(_text_:didaktik in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059254363 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16663471 = queryWeight, product of:
7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.35559437 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.5860133 = idf(docFreq=60, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.01338214 = weight(_text_:und in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01338214 = score(doc=2492,freq=28.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27487293 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.010898709 = weight(_text_:der in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010898709 = score(doc=2492,freq=18.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.22211882 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.033517282 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033517282 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12532558 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2674417 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.01338214 = weight(_text_:und in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01338214 = score(doc=2492,freq=28.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27487293 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.25 = coord(6/24)
- BK
- 35.01 / Geschichte der Chemie
- Classification
- VB 2400 Chemie und Pharmazie / Bibliographien und Nachschlagewerke, Geschichte und Didaktik der Chemie und Pharmazie, Betriebssicherheit / Geschichte der Chemie und Pharmazie / Geschichte einzelner Probleme und Teilgebiete der Chemie und Pharmazie / Allgemeines
35.01 / Geschichte der Chemie
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland): "The book is about the classification of chemical elements known as the periodical system. It is described as "one of the most potent icons in science [.] One sees periodic tables everywhere: in industrial labs, workshops, academic labs, and of course, lecture halls" (p. xiii). Among all taxonomies in all domains, there is probably none more respected and more useful than this one. As Scerri states (p. 25): The periodic table ranks as one of the most fruitful and unifying ideas in the whole of modern science, comparable perhaps with Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Unlike such theories as Newtonian mechanics, the periodic table has not been falsified by developments in modern physics but has evolved while remaining essentially unchanged. After evolving for nearly 150 years through the work of numerous individuals, the periodic table remains at the heart of chemistry. This is mainly because it is of immense practical benefit for making predictions about all manner of chemical and physical properties of the elements and possibilities for bond formation. The periodic system provides the basic criteria for organizing knowledge about all the material stuff in the entire universe. It is thus a model that anybody with interests in knowledge organization (KO) should know. Knowledge about the history, philosophy and status of the periodic system also provides important insight for knowledge organization in general. . . . Scerri's book demonstrates how one of the most important classification systems has evolved and what kinds of conceptualizations and classification criteria are at work in it. It is probably the best book about the best classification system ever constructed. It should belong to any library supporting teaching and research in knowledge organization."
- Object
- Periodensystem der Elemente
- RVK
- VB 2400 Chemie und Pharmazie / Bibliographien und Nachschlagewerke, Geschichte und Didaktik der Chemie und Pharmazie, Betriebssicherheit / Geschichte der Chemie und Pharmazie / Geschichte einzelner Probleme und Teilgebiete der Chemie und Pharmazie / Allgemeines
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.00
0.0033725756 = product of:
0.040470906 = sum of:
0.030688146 = weight(_text_:1960 in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030688146 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15622076 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19644089 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.009782758 = product of:
0.029348273 = sum of:
0.029348273 = weight(_text_:p in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029348273 = score(doc=3262,freq=28.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.371595 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.1, S.62-63 (K. La Barre): "This special issue of Axiomathes presents an ambitious dual agenda. It attempts to highlight aspects of facet analysis (as used in LIS) that are shared by cognate approaches in philosophy, psychology, linguistics and computer science. Secondarily, the issue aims to attract others to the study and use of facet analysis. The authors represent a blend of lifetime involvement with facet analysis, such as Vickery, Broughton, Beghtol, and Dahlberg; those with well developed research agendas such as Tudhope, and Priss; and relative newcomers such as Gnoli, Cheti and Paradisi, and Slavic. Omissions are inescapable, but a more balanced issue would have resulted from inclusion of at least one researcher from the Indian school of facet theory. Another valuable addition might have been a reaction to the issue by one of the chief critics of facet analysis. Potentially useful, but absent, is a comprehensive bibliography of resources for those wishing to engage in further study, that now lie scattered throughout the issue. Several of the papers assume relative familiarity with facet analytical concepts and definitions, some of which are contested even within LIS. Gnoli's introduction (p. 127-130) traces the trajectory, extensions and new developments of this analytico- synthetic approach to subject access, while providing a laundry list of cognate approaches that are similar to facet analysis. This brief essay and the article by Priss (p. 243-255) directly addresses this first part of Gnoli's agenda. Priss provides detailed discussion of facet-like structures in computer science (p. 245- 246), and outlines the similarity between Formal Concept Analysis and facets. This comparison is equally fruitful for researchers in computer science and library and information science. By bridging into a discussion of visualization challenges for facet display, further research is also invited. Many of the remaining papers comprehensively detail the intellectual heritage of facet analysis (Beghtol; Broughton, p. 195-198; Dahlberg; Tudhope and Binding, p. 213-215; Vickery). Beghtol's (p. 131-144) examination of the origins of facet theory through the lens of the textbooks written by Ranganathan's mentor W.C.B. Sayers (1881-1960), Manual of Classification (1926, 1944, 1955) and a textbook written by Mills A Modern Outline of Classification (1964), serves to reveal the deep intellectual heritage of the changes in classification theory over time, as well as Ranganathan's own influence on and debt to Sayers.
Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
Two of the papers revisit the interaction of facets with the theory of integrative levels, which posits that the organization of the natural world reflects increasingly interdependent complexity. This approach was tested as a basis for the creation of faceted classifications in the 1960s. These contemporary treatments of integrative levels are not discipline-driven as were the early approaches, but instead are ontological and phenomenological in focus. Dahlberg (p. 161-172) outlines the creation of the ICC (Information Coding System) and the application of the Systematifier in the generation of facets and the creation of a fully faceted classification. Gnoli (p. 177-192) proposes the use of fundamental categories as a way to redefine facets and fundamental categories in "more universal and level-independent ways" (p. 192). Given that Axiomathes has a stated focus on "contemporary issues in cognition and ontology" and the following thesis: "that real advances in contemporary science may depend upon a consideration of the origins and intellectual history of ideas at the forefront of current research," this venue seems well suited for the implementation of the stated agenda, to illustrate complementary approaches and to stimulate research. As situated, this special issue may well serve as a bridge to a more interdisciplinary dialogue about facet analysis than has previously been the case."
-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
0.001130218 = product of:
0.013562616 = sum of:
0.0060548387 = weight(_text_:der in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060548387 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.12339935 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.0075077773 = product of:
0.015015555 = sum of:
0.015015555 = weight(_text_:29 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015015555 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:17:11
- Footnote
- Ein Beitrag zur Problematik der Gestaltung geographischer Schlüssel zu Klassifikationssystemen
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.00
9.890207E-4 = product of:
0.011868248 = sum of:
0.005916056 = product of:
0.017748168 = sum of:
0.017748168 = weight(_text_:p in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017748168 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.22471954 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005952192 = product of:
0.011904384 = sum of:
0.011904384 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011904384 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Abstract
- The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000)
0.00
8.7590737E-4 = product of:
0.021021776 = sum of:
0.021021776 = product of:
0.04204355 = sum of:
0.04204355 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04204355 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 27. 1.2002 19:30:29
-
Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004)
0.00
6.954359E-4 = product of:
0.0083452305 = sum of:
0.0041726152 = weight(_text_:und in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041726152 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
0.0041726152 = weight(_text_:und in 3536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041726152 = score(doc=3536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 3536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3536)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.
-
McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: ¬A question of place (2004)
0.00
6.054839E-4 = product of:
0.014531613 = sum of:
0.014531613 = weight(_text_:der in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014531613 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Ein Beitrag zur Problematik der Gestaltung geographischer Schlüssel zu Klassifikationssystemen
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.00
5.005185E-4 = product of:
0.0120124435 = sum of:
0.0120124435 = product of:
0.024024887 = sum of:
0.024024887 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024024887 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 11. 9.2004 15:29:04
-
Integrative level classification: Research project (2004-)
0.00
4.9949874E-4 = product of:
0.011987969 = sum of:
0.011987969 = weight(_text_:der in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011987969 = score(doc=1151,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Mit einer Abbildung der Klassen der ILC als Liniendiagramm (von U. Priss)
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.00
4.96016E-4 = product of:
0.011904384 = sum of:
0.011904384 = product of:
0.023808768 = sum of:
0.023808768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023808768 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004)
0.00
4.3795368E-4 = product of:
0.010510888 = sum of:
0.010510888 = product of:
0.021021776 = sum of:
0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021021776 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 10:38:42
-
Zhonghong, W.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.: Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization (2006)
0.00
4.3795368E-4 = product of:
0.010510888 = sum of:
0.010510888 = product of:
0.021021776 = sum of:
0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021021776 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 11. 3.2007 14:20:29
-
Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006)
0.00
4.3795368E-4 = product of:
0.010510888 = sum of:
0.010510888 = product of:
0.021021776 = sum of:
0.021021776 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021021776 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 2.2008 19:19:30
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.00
4.3401401E-4 = product of:
0.010416336 = sum of:
0.010416336 = product of:
0.020832673 = sum of:
0.020832673 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020832673 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004)
0.00
4.0365593E-4 = product of:
0.009687742 = sum of:
0.009687742 = weight(_text_:der in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009687742 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:26:23
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:20:40
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 17:33:13
-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 30. 7.2006 16:38:29
-
Gnoli, C.: Phylogenetic classification (2006)
0.00
3.7538886E-4 = product of:
0.009009332 = sum of:
0.009009332 = product of:
0.018018665 = sum of:
0.018018665 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018018665 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07726968 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Date
- 11. 3.2007 14:19:29
