Search (44 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Muddamalle, M.R.: Natural language versus controlled vocabulary in information retrieval : a case study in soil mechanics (1998) 0.00
    2.6145522E-4 = product of:
      0.006274925 = sum of:
        0.006274925 = product of:
          0.018824775 = sum of:
            0.018824775 = weight(_text_:p in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018824775 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
    Abstract
    The effectiveness ot two information retrieval tools, namely, thesaurus and natural language, in an information retrieval system has been studies. A database SOILSC was created using a HP3000/58 series minicomputer and MINISIS software. Records of articles totalling 17.918 published in various journals, received in the Central Water and Power Research Station (CWPRS) library (Pune, India) since 1988, have been stored. The information needs of a soil mechanics group have been formulated using thesaurus and natural language into 81 search strategies. In consultation with the user, relevance of the retrieved documents was assessed and, recall (R) and precision (P) values were calculated. Since both thesaurus and natural language have shown identical performance in information retrieval, a combination of these two have been suggested for making searches and providing relevant information
  2. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00
    2.1787935E-4 = product of:
      0.0052291043 = sum of:
        0.0052291043 = product of:
          0.015687313 = sum of:
            0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015687313 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
  3. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.00
    2.1787935E-4 = product of:
      0.0052291043 = sum of:
        0.0052291043 = product of:
          0.015687313 = sum of:
            0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015687313 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
    
  4. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.00
    2.1787935E-4 = product of:
      0.0052291043 = sum of:
        0.0052291043 = product of:
          0.015687313 = sum of:
            0.015687313 = weight(_text_:p in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015687313 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.021966046 = queryNorm
                0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.041666668 = coord(1/24)