-
Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987)
0.02
0.017543731 = product of:
0.105262384 = sum of:
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=4576,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.050333098 = weight(_text_:fragen in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050333098 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11184209 = queryWeight, product of:
5.0915895 = idf(docFreq=738, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.45003718 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.0915895 = idf(docFreq=738, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.016779663 = weight(_text_:der in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016779663 = score(doc=4576,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=4576,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Abstract
- In diesem Beitrag beabsichtigen wir, einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der bibliothekarischen Klassifikationstheorie zu geben. Die Darstellung ist angelehnt an die 1985 erschienene Norm DIN 32 705,Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen', stellt jedoch die Problematik bibliothekarischer Klassifikationssysteme in den Vordergrund. In einem zweiten Teil beschäftigen wir uns mit Problemen von Klassifikationssystemen in typischen bibliothekarischen Anwendungsbereichen. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf dem Online-Katalog; es wird ein Vorschlag zur Verwendung von Facettenklassifikationen diskutiert. Abschließend werden Fragen der kooperativen klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung gestreift.
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 11(1987) H.2, S.152-166
-
Buchanan, B.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationstheorie (1989)
0.01
0.010408919 = product of:
0.062453516 = sum of:
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.025789918 = weight(_text_:des in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025789918 = score(doc=3921,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42396194 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.009687742 = weight(_text_:der in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009687742 = score(doc=3921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.013487929 = weight(_text_:und in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013487929 = score(doc=3921,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Content
- Inhalt: Klassifikation: Definition und Einsatzmöglichkeiten - Die verschiedenen Arten von Klassenbeziehungen - Präkombinierte Klassifikationssysteme und Facettenklassifikationen - Methodische Überlegungen zur Lösung von Ordnungsproblemen - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 1. Teil - Konstruktion einer Facettenklassifikation, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 1. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 2. Teil - Gestaltung des Notationssystems, 3. Teil - Das alphabetische Sachregister - Universalklassifikationen - Kritische Anmerkungen zur systematischen Ordnung - Automatische Indexierung
- Footnote
- Das ultimative Buch zum Verständnis der Facettenklassifikation
-
Rescheleit, W.; Menner, L.: Vergleich der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL mit Dezimalklassifikation und Facettenklassifikation (1986)
0.01
0.01038568 = product of:
0.06231408 = sum of:
0.015994716 = weight(_text_:und in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015994716 = score(doc=1555,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.328536 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.015793033 = weight(_text_:des in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015793033 = score(doc=1555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.25962257 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.014531613 = weight(_text_:der in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014531613 = score(doc=1555,freq=8.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.015994716 = weight(_text_:und in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015994716 = score(doc=1555,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.328536 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Abstract
- Beim Vergleich von Klassifikationen mit Frame-Wissensbasen für Expertensysteme zeigen sich einige elementare Gemeinsamkeiten: Beide haben das Ziel einer geordneten Darstellung von Wissen. Beide bilden dazu Klassen und weisen hierarchische Beziehungen zwischen diesen Klassen auf. Anahnd der Wissensrepräsentationssprache FRL (Frame Representation Language) wird untersucht, inwieweit beide Systeme sich in das jeweils andere übertragen lassen. Die FRL speichert Wissen in einer speziellen Datenstruktur, den Frames, die aus einem Framenamen, der den jeweiligen Begriff bezeichnet, und Slots, die die Eigenschaften des Begriffs enthalten, bestehen. Eine effektive Speicherung des Wissens wird dadurch erreicht, daß die Frames in einer polyhierarchischen Struktur geordnet sind und in generischer Relation zueinander stehen müssen. Über die generische Relation lassen sich die Eigenschaften höherer Begriffe auf ihre Subklassen vererben. Es werden die Ergebnisse eines Versuchs dargestellt, Elemente bestehender Universalklassifikationen (DK, BC2) in die FRL zu übertragen
- Source
- Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens
-
Weinberger, O.: Begriffsstruktur und Klassifikation (1980)
0.01
0.009484499 = product of:
0.07587599 = sum of:
0.022079403 = weight(_text_:und in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022079403 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.031717185 = weight(_text_:der in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031717185 = score(doc=1440,freq=28.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.6464053 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.022079403 = weight(_text_:und in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022079403 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Klassifikation kann sich auf verschiedene Gegenstandsbereiche beziehen. Sie ist im Prinzip eine extensionale Vorgangsweise resp. ein extensionales Gebilde auch dann, wenn ihr Gegenstand begriffliche Gebilde bzw. Wissen (Wissensbestandteile) sind. Die Erstellung dieses extensionalen Gebildes, das wir 'Klassat' nennen, beruht auf begrifflichen Analysen. Die Probleme der Begriffstrukturen, der Definitionen und der verschiedenen Eigentümlichkeiten gewisser Begriffe der pragmatischen Sprachen stellen daher Grundlagenprobleme der Klassifikationstheorie dar. Hieraus ergibt sich die Aufgabenstellung: Skizzzierung der logischen Grundstruktur der Klassifikation, Hinweis auf die Relevanz methodologischer Momente der Problemsituation für das Klassieren und auf gewisse strukturelle und semantische Eigentümlichkeiten der Begriffsapparatur der modernen Wissenschaften und der Umgangssprache, die Probleme der Klassifizierungsaufgaben mit such bringen und die bewirken, daß die Klassifikationen oft als praktische Annäherungen anzusehen sind
- Source
- Wissensstrukturen und Ordnungsmuster. Proc. der 4. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Salzburg, 16.-19.4.1980. Red.: W. Dahlberg
-
Vickery, B.C.: Faceted classification : A guide to construction and use of special schemes (1986)
0.01
0.0067431135 = product of:
0.08091736 = sum of:
0.07365155 = weight(_text_:1960 in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07365155 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15622076 = queryWeight, product of:
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.47145814 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.11192 = idf(docFreq=97, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.0072658067 = weight(_text_:der in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072658067 = score(doc=2475,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.14807922 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Footnote
- Nicht leicht lesbar; es existiert auch eine (problematische) deutsche Übersetzung der Ausgabe von 1960: München: Verl. Dok. 1969
-
DIN 32705: Klassifikationssysteme: Erstellung und Weiterentwicklung von Klassifikationssystemen (1987)
0.00
0.004129818 = product of:
0.049557816 = sum of:
0.024778908 = weight(_text_:und in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024778908 = score(doc=1653,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.024778908 = weight(_text_:und in 1653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024778908 = score(doc=1653,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5089658 = fieldWeight in 1653, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1653)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Footnote
- Vgl. zur Einführung in die Norm auch die Beiträge von W. Gödert: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme ... in: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 11(1987) und I. Dahlberg: DIN 32705: ... in: International classification 19(1992)
-
DIN 2331: Begriffssysteme und ihre Darstellung (1980)
0.00
0.0039739194 = product of:
0.04768703 = sum of:
0.023843516 = weight(_text_:und in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023843516 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.023843516 = weight(_text_:und in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023843516 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.48975256 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.00
0.0018016316 = product of:
0.014413053 = sum of:
0.003660373 = product of:
0.010981118 = sum of:
0.010981118 = weight(_text_:p in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010981118 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.13903812 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0065142936 = weight(_text_:des in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065142936 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.004238387 = weight(_text_:der in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004238387 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.08637954 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985)
0.00
0.0012048138 = product of:
0.014457766 = sum of:
0.008874085 = product of:
0.026622253 = sum of:
0.026622253 = weight(_text_:p in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026622253 = score(doc=3651,freq=16.0), product of:
0.078979194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0055836807 = weight(_text_:des in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055836807 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.091790445 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Abstract
- This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
The fan of past documents may be seen across time as a philosophical "wake," translated documents as a sideways relationship and future documents as another fan spreading forward from a given document (p. 365). The "overlap of reading histories can be used to detect common interests among readers," (p. 365) and readers may be classified accordingly. Finally, Fairthorne rejects the notion of a "general" classification, which he regards as a mirage, to be replaced by a citation-type network to identify classes. An interesting feature of his work lies in his linkage between old and new documents via a bibliographic method-citations, authors' names, imprints, style, and vocabulary - rather than topical (subject) terms. This is an indirect method of creating classes. The subject (aboutness) is conceived as a finite, common sharing of knowledge over time (past, present, and future) as opposed to the more common hierarchy of topics in an infinite schema assumed to be universally useful. Fairthorne, a mathematician by training, is a prolific writer an the foundations of classification and information. His professional career includes work with the Royal Engineers Chemical Warfare Section and the Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE). He was the founder of the Computing Unit which became the RAE Mathematics Department.
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985)
0.00
0.001024065 = product of:
0.012288779 = sum of:
0.0074449074 = weight(_text_:des in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074449074 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.004843871 = weight(_text_:der in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004843871 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.09871948 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.083333336 = coord(2/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme
-
Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1985)
0.00
3.102045E-4 = product of:
0.0074449074 = sum of:
0.0074449074 = weight(_text_:des in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074449074 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Feibleman, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels (1985)
0.00
3.102045E-4 = product of:
0.0074449074 = sum of:
0.0074449074 = weight(_text_:des in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074449074 = score(doc=3637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.12238726 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels (1985)
0.00
2.714289E-4 = product of:
0.0065142936 = sum of:
0.0065142936 = weight(_text_:des in 3639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0065142936 = score(doc=3639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.10708885 = fieldWeight in 3639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3639)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
-
Classification Research Group: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (1985)
0.00
2.3265337E-4 = product of:
0.0055836807 = sum of:
0.0055836807 = weight(_text_:des in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055836807 = score(doc=3640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06083074 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.091790445 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
0.041666668 = coord(1/24)
- Footnote
- Nachdruck des Originalartikels mit Kommentierung durch die Herausgeber
