-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.09
0.09145281 = product of:
0.18290561 = sum of:
0.18290561 = sum of:
0.14229754 = weight(_text_:400 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14229754 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.43455404 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.02
0.01692003 = product of:
0.03384006 = sum of:
0.03384006 = product of:
0.06768012 = sum of:
0.06768012 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06768012 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.01
0.013536024 = product of:
0.027072048 = sum of:
0.027072048 = product of:
0.054144096 = sum of:
0.054144096 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054144096 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006)
0.01
0.010152018 = product of:
0.020304035 = sum of:
0.020304035 = product of:
0.04060807 = sum of:
0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060807 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.008460015 = product of:
0.01692003 = sum of:
0.01692003 = product of:
0.03384006 = sum of:
0.03384006 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03384006 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049953517 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
