Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Saarti, J.: Consistency of subject indexing of novels by public library professionals and patrons (2002) 0.00
    0.0026133577 = product of:
      0.0496538 = sum of:
        0.0496538 = weight(_text_:literatur in 4473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0496538 = score(doc=4473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11727622 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.42339188 = fieldWeight in 4473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7901325 = idf(docFreq=998, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4473)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Schöne Literatur
  2. Chen, X.: Indexing consistency between online catalogues (2008) 0.00
    8.565306E-4 = product of:
      0.016274082 = sum of:
        0.016274082 = weight(_text_:und in 2209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016274082 = score(doc=2209,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.29991096 = fieldWeight in 2209, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2209)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    In der globalen Online-Umgebung stellen viele bibliographische Dienstleistungen integrierten Zugang zu unterschiedlichen internetbasierten OPACs zur Verfügung. In solch einer Umgebung erwarten Benutzer mehr Übereinstimmungen innerhalb und zwischen den Systemen zu sehen. Zweck dieser Studie ist, die Indexierungskonsistenz zwischen Systemen zu untersuchen. Währenddessen werden einige Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen können, untersucht. Wichtigstes Ziel dieser Studie ist, die Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen herauszufinden, damit sinnvolle Vorschläge gemacht werden können, um die Indexierungskonsistenz zu verbessern. Eine Auswahl von 3307 Monographien wurde aus zwei chinesischen bibliographischen Katalogen gewählt. Nach Hooper's Formel war die durchschnittliche Indexierungskonsistenz für Indexterme 64,2% und für Klassennummern 61,6%. Nach Rolling's Formel war sie für Indexterme 70,7% und für Klassennummern 63,4%. Mehrere Faktoren, die die Indexierungskonsistenz beeinflussen, wurden untersucht: (1) Indexierungsbereite; (2) Indexierungsspezifizität; (3) Länge der Monographien; (4) Kategorie der Indexierungssprache; (5) Sachgebiet der Monographien; (6) Entwicklung von Disziplinen; (7) Struktur des Thesaurus oder der Klassifikation; (8) Erscheinungsjahr. Gründe für die Inkonsistenzen wurden ebenfalls analysiert. Die Analyse ergab: (1) den Indexieren mangelt es an Fachwissen, Vertrautheit mit den Indexierungssprachen und den Indexierungsregeln, so dass viele Inkonsistenzen verursacht wurden; (2) der Mangel an vereinheitlichten oder präzisen Regeln brachte ebenfalls Inkonsistenzen hervor; (3) verzögerte Überarbeitungen der Indexierungssprachen, Mangel an terminologischer Kontrolle, zu wenige Erläuterungen und "siehe auch" Referenzen, sowie die hohe semantische Freiheit bei der Auswahl von Deskriptoren oder Klassen, verursachten Inkonsistenzen.
    Imprint
    Berlin : Humboldt-Universität / Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
  3. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.00
    6.110432E-4 = product of:
      0.011609821 = sum of:
        0.011609821 = product of:
          0.023219641 = sum of:
            0.023219641 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023219641 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  4. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.00
    5.237513E-4 = product of:
      0.009951275 = sum of:
        0.009951275 = product of:
          0.01990255 = sum of:
            0.01990255 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01990255 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  5. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.00
    5.237513E-4 = product of:
      0.009951275 = sum of:
        0.009951275 = product of:
          0.01990255 = sum of:
            0.01990255 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01990255 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  6. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.00
    4.3645944E-4 = product of:
      0.008292729 = sum of:
        0.008292729 = product of:
          0.016585458 = sum of:
            0.016585458 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016585458 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003) 0.00
    4.1961254E-4 = product of:
      0.007972638 = sum of:
        0.007972638 = weight(_text_:und in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007972638 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05426304 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024482876 = queryNorm
            0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    1.7458377E-4 = product of:
      0.0033170916 = sum of:
        0.0033170916 = product of:
          0.006634183 = sum of:
            0.006634183 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006634183 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08573486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024482876 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05