-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Mingers, J.: Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the Leiden rankings (2019)
0.00
0.0030473555 = product of:
0.04723401 = sum of:
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
0.04478951 = product of:
0.08957902 = sum of:
0.08957902 = weight(_text_:eco in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08957902 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18636073 = queryWeight, product of:
8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Abstract
- The Leiden Rankings can be used for grouping research universities by considering universities which are not statistically significantly different as homogeneous sets. The groups and intergroup relations can be analyzed and visualized using tools from network analysis. Using the so-called "excellence indicator" PPtop-10%-the proportion of the top-10% most-highly-cited papers assigned to a university-we pursue a classification using (a) overlapping stability intervals, (b) statistical-significance tests, and (c) effect sizes of differences among 902 universities in 54 countries; we focus on the UK, Germany, Brazil, and the USA as national examples. Although the groupings remain largely the same using different statistical significance levels or overlapping stability intervals, these classifications are uncorrelated with those based on effect sizes. Effect sizes for the differences between universities are small (w < .2). The more detailed analysis of universities at the country level suggests that distinctions beyond three or perhaps four groups of universities (high, middle, low) may not be meaningful. Given similar institutional incentives, isomorphism within each eco-system of universities should not be underestimated. Our results suggest that networks based on overlapping stability intervals can provide a first impression of the relevant groupings among universities. However, the clusters are not well-defined divisions between groups of universities.
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.: Scientific peer review (2011)
0.00
0.002056584 = product of:
0.031877052 = sum of:
0.025032459 = weight(_text_:20 in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025032459 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.42518654 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.0068445937 = weight(_text_:e in 1600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068445937 = score(doc=1600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1600)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:53:20
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.: ¬The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science (2014)
0.00
0.0017627863 = product of:
0.027323188 = sum of:
0.021456394 = weight(_text_:20 in 1509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021456394 = score(doc=1509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.36444563 = fieldWeight in 1509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1509)
0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 1509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058667944 = score(doc=1509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1509)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 27. 9.2014 20:04:10
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
0.00
0.0015587485 = product of:
0.024160603 = sum of:
0.0120803015 = weight(_text_:und in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0120803015 = score(doc=928,freq=6.0), product of:
0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.0120803015 = weight(_text_:und in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0120803015 = score(doc=928,freq=6.0), product of:
0.047469996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.2544829 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Abstract
- Grundsätzlich können wir bei Bewertungen in der Wissenschaft zwischen einer 'qualitative' Form, der Bewertung einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit (z. B. eines Manuskripts oder Forschungsantrags) durch kompetente Peers, und einer 'quantitative' Form, der Bewertung von wissenschaftlicher Arbeit anhand bibliometrischer Indikatoren unterscheiden. Beide Formen der Bewertung sind nicht unumstritten. Die Kritiker des Peer Review sehen vor allem zwei Schwächen des Verfahrens: (1) Verschiedene Gutachter würden kaum in der Bewertung ein und derselben wissenschaftlichen Arbeit übereinstimmen. (2) Gutachterliche Empfehlungen würden systematische Urteilsverzerrungen aufweisen. Gegen die Verwendung von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für die Qualität einer wissenschaftlichen Arbeit wird seit Jahren eine Vielzahl von Bedenken geäußert. Zitierhäufigkeiten seien keine 'objektiven' Messungen von wissenschaftlicher Qualität, sondern ein kritisierbares Messkonstrukt. So wird unter anderem kritisiert, dass wissenschaftliche Qualität ein komplexes Phänomen darstelle, das nicht auf einer eindimensionalen Skala (d. h. anhand von Zitierhäufigkeiten) gemessen werden könne. Es werden empirische Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Fairness des Peer Review Verfahrens sowie Forschungsergebnisse zur Güte von Zitierhäufigkeiten als Indikator für wissenschaftliche Qualität vorgestellt.
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
0.00
0.0015119897 = product of:
0.023435842 = sum of:
0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058667944 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.017569048 = product of:
0.035138097 = sum of:
0.035138097 = weight(_text_:29 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035138097 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:55:03
- Language
- e
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.00
0.0015017934 = product of:
0.023277799 = sum of:
0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058667944 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.017411005 = product of:
0.03482201 = sum of:
0.03482201 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03482201 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
0.00
0.001028292 = product of:
0.015938526 = sum of:
0.012516229 = weight(_text_:20 in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012516229 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034222968 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 4. 8.2007 21:20:02
- Language
- e
-
Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013)
0.00
0.001028292 = product of:
0.015938526 = sum of:
0.012516229 = weight(_text_:20 in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012516229 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.21259327 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034222968 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 10. 3.1997 20:31:13
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.00
0.0010011956 = product of:
0.015518532 = sum of:
0.0039111963 = weight(_text_:e in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039111963 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.011607336 = product of:
0.023214672 = sum of:
0.023214672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023214672 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
0.00
8.819941E-4 = product of:
0.013670908 = sum of:
0.0034222968 = weight(_text_:e in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034222968 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.010248612 = product of:
0.020497223 = sum of:
0.020497223 = weight(_text_:29 in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020497223 = score(doc=1190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 15:58:21
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
0.00
8.8139315E-4 = product of:
0.013661594 = sum of:
0.010728197 = weight(_text_:20 in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010728197 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.18222281 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029333972 = score(doc=1109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 29.10.2013 20:26:34
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.00
7.508967E-4 = product of:
0.011638899 = sum of:
0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029333972 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.008705502 = product of:
0.017411005 = sum of:
0.017411005 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017411005 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
- Language
- e
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.00
7.508967E-4 = product of:
0.011638899 = sum of:
0.0029333972 = weight(_text_:e in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0029333972 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.008705502 = product of:
0.017411005 = sum of:
0.017411005 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017411005 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008)
0.00
7.344943E-4 = product of:
0.011384662 = sum of:
0.008940164 = weight(_text_:20 in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008940164 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 10. 3.1997 20:31:13
- Language
- e
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.; Bornmann, L.: How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? : An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2013)
0.00
7.344943E-4 = product of:
0.011384662 = sum of:
0.008940164 = weight(_text_:20 in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008940164 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 27.12.2012 20:44:36
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Ye, A.; Ye, F.: Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data (2018)
0.00
7.344943E-4 = product of:
0.011384662 = sum of:
0.008940164 = weight(_text_:20 in 4196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008940164 = score(doc=4196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05887406 = queryWeight, product of:
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.15185234 = fieldWeight in 4196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.748821 = idf(docFreq=7692, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4196)
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 4196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=4196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4196)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 10. 3.1997 20:31:13
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
0.00
6.299958E-4 = product of:
0.009764935 = sum of:
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.007320437 = product of:
0.014640874 = sum of:
0.014640874 = weight(_text_:29 in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014640874 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07534158 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 8. 1.2011 18:29:40
- Language
- e
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
6.2574726E-4 = product of:
0.009699083 = sum of:
0.0024444978 = weight(_text_:e in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024444978 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.007254585 = product of:
0.01450917 = sum of:
0.01450917 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01450917 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07500195 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.06451613 = coord(2/31)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
- Language
- e
-
Collins, H.; Bornmann, L.: On scientific misconduct (2014)
0.00
2.2079334E-4 = product of:
0.0068445937 = sum of:
0.0068445937 = weight(_text_:e in 1247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068445937 = score(doc=1247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 1247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1247)
0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
- Language
- e
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Statistical tests and research assessments : a comment on Schneider (2012) (2013)
0.00
1.8925143E-4 = product of:
0.0058667944 = sum of:
0.0058667944 = weight(_text_:e in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058667944 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.03078549 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.02141793 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.032258064 = coord(1/31)
- Language
- e
